1000+ Subscribers a day...

I'll tell you a secret, Some of the most successful IM know Psychology to some degree, weather they know that they know it or not. For example, I use to sell my items really cheap and hardly made any sales, then I read this book called "Influence Psychology Persuasion By Robert B Cialdini" and you would be surprised at how much we unconsciously do things, so anyway I was hardly making any sales, then I doubled my prices of my items and sold more than I ever sold in an entire year. In the book he talks about a lady he knew (if I remember correctly, need to read it again :rolleyes who was selling jewelry and had quite a few jade pieces she could not sell. So to make a long story short her assistant made a mistake and tripled the prices of the jade jewelry and she sold out with a week or so (mind you when she had the prices cheap no one was willing to buy it).

This goes back to people subconsciously associating high prices items with quality.

So my point is yes its possible but you need to have the knowledge of how people minds work if you want to realistically achieve the number of subscribers you want within a reasonable time frame .

Ah, you're not a bad judge, then.
Undeniably they're more palatable, that way.

Yes, I think I agree, really.

There's a huge difference between "getting 1,000 in a day" (which I've done myself) and "getting 30,000 in a month" (which I haven't); but I always kind of assume that when people say "getting 1,000 a day" they're referring to a set-up which does that regularly and reliably. Which is, of course, a whole different mug of cappuccino.

I admit my own instinctive reaction to this thread's subject-line, whenever it's caught my eye so far, has been "I wouldn't want to". Of course, that's not quite true - I'd love to in some ways, provided they were still adequately targeted. But in reality that's a huge proviso and it would be naive to pretend otherwise.

Realistically, many (most?) people who are adding 1,000 subscribers per day to a niche are doing so with poor quality, not-very-well targeted traffic, and their subsequent response rates, open-rates, click-through-rates and conversion-rates are not quite going to be out of the top drawer. Yes, I know it doesn't necessarily, always, have to be like that, just as you know that in the real world, it usually is.

And that is the concealed issue, here.

As with so many other issues in internet marketing, a quantitative approach to list-building is going to bite you on the elegantly high-heeled ankle, sooner or later, at least in opportunity-cost terms.

It rests on the assumption that "building the biggest list is necessarily going to lead to the biggest income in the long run".

That isn't so.

There are actually many instances where not only isn't it so, but sometimes the correlation between the two will be both a reliable one and an inverse one.

It can be one of those "be careful what you wish for ..." issues.

It's not necessarily such a great blessing to build a really huge list which is a mixture of a tiny proportion of "quality subscribers" and a great majority of "not those at all", with no way to distinguish between the two groups.

I'm "just saying".

I don’t believe this! Higher opt-in rate, fewer sales

1 Page Squeeze Site for List Building

What gets peopole to sign up?

Squeeze Page on Landing Page a Turn Off?

Ad swaps ARE free.

You send out someone else's squeeze page to your list and as a result, they send your squeeze page out to their list. That's as free as it gets in internet marketing.

So if you're trying to get there without any funds, that's a good place to start.

Fixed that for you.