Regulators say Google is Evil, must make Immmediate changes...

13 replies
EU: Google must address antitrust objections in 'weeks' - May. 21, 2012

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- In a scolding letter sent to Google on Monday, European regulators outlined their "concerns" about Google's business practices, giving the search giant "a matter of weeks" to shape up or pay up.

The European Commission said it had reached preliminary conclusions based on its 18-month antitrust investigation of Google. It found four ways in which Google potentially violates anti-monopoly laws in the region.

Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) displays links to its own "vertical search services" differently than it does for links to competitors, the letter said.

The commission said it is concerned that Google may be giving its own services preferential treatment over rivals'.

Though the letter did not outline specifics, such Google services include local reviews, shopping listings and flight schedules among others, which sometimes compete with companies like Yelp (YELP), Amazon (AMZN, Fortune 500), Priceline (PCLN) and Expedia (EXPE).

The commission also said it is concerned with how Google scrapes content from the Internet to post within some of its own search verticals, including reviews from across the Web. Though it's a common practice among search engines, the commission is worried that it may harm innovation by "appropriating the benefits of the investments of competitors."

The third and fourth issues focus on Google's advertising business.

The commission found that Google enters into quasi-exclusivity agreements with partner sites that display Google advertising, which could hinder competition.

The letter also said that Google makes it difficult for AdWords customers to port their ad campaigns to rival services, such as those from chief competitors Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500), AOL (AOL) and Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500).

A Google spokesman said the company has only just started looking through the commission's letter.

"We disagree with the conclusions but we're happy to discuss any concerns they might have," the company said. "Competition on the Web has increased dramatically in the last two years since the commission started looking at this, and the competitive pressures Google faces are tremendous."

Google may be just a little evil

Since the European Commission first began its probe in November 2010, several companies have filed complaints against Google, most notably Microsoft and Expedia. Microsoft operates the second-place Bing search engine, which trails Google by a long shot in the United States and by even more in Europe.

The letter was sent ahead of any official complaint or ruling because Google had urged the commission to discuss the results with it ahead of time. Google said it is interested in potentially reaching a settlement.

"This is why I am today giving Google an opportunity to offer remedies to address the concerns we have already identified," wrote Joaquín Almunia, head of the European Commission's competition committee. He said he is eager to reach a swift conclusion to the matter.

"If Google comes up with an outline of remedies which are capable of addressing our concerns, I will instruct my staff to initiate the discussions in order to finalize a remedies package," he continued. "I hope that Google seizes this opportunity to swiftly resolve our concerns, for the benefit of competition and innovation in the sector."

Almunia sent the letter to Google Chairman Eric Schmidt and gave the company "a matter of weeks" to address each of the commission's concerns with "first proposals of remedies."

Google faces a similar antitrust probe in the United States from the Federal Trade Commission.
#evil #google #immmediate #make #regulators
  • Profile picture of the author BIG Mike
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286284].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author RichBeck
      Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

      The price of being the best at what you do...
      Mike,

      Microsoft knows this all too well....

      God Bless,

      Rich
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286291].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joseph Robinson
      Banned
      Originally Posted by rambo9600 View Post

      IMHO, if I were Google I would tell everyone including IMers to **** Off!

      They built the product (search engine), it's their profit loss if they fail, and I don't have to cater to anyone, so **** You!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286532].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rambo9600
      Originally Posted by JaRyCu View Post

      In other words, release updates and name them Panda and then Penguin and...oh wait, they did do this.

      -- j
      Screw the gov't and politicians telling everyone what to do.

      Google will flourish or fail as a business because of what they do, not what some politician wants them to do.

      Let the Free Markets dictates what happens.

      If people no longer like Google they can find another search engine or start their own.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286609].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author rambo9600
        Originally Posted by Chris Kent View Post

        There's a big difference between a free market and a dominant corporation abusing its position. I'm all for capitalism and free market economics if its fair.
        It is fair. People can stop using Google and go somewhere else.

        IMers are ticked because it effects "their" business ON Google search engine.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286661].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Chris Kent View Post

        There's a big difference between a free market and a dominant corporation abusing its position. I'm all for capitalism and free market economics if its fair.
        And therein lies the problem....you really don't believe in free markets at all.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286872].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JSProjects
      Originally Posted by rambo9600 View Post

      IMHO, if I were Google I would tell everyone including IMers to **** Off!

      They built the product (search engine), it's their profit loss if they fail, and I don't have to cater to anyone, so **** You!
      I kind of look at it the same, even though I really don't like the direction they're going in. (You're either an authority site who naturally ranks well, or you're a small site that Google doesn't really care about. See the recent negative SEO threads / case studies.)

      Google seems to be trying to push most small / mid size sites & businesses towards PPC.

      Obviously I don't want Google to totally abandon the little guy(s), but at the same time I'm not a fan of intense regulation. Really, all we need is some REAL COMPETITION.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286705].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author andreasup
      Originally Posted by JaRyCu View Post

      In other words, release updates and name them Panda and then Penguin and...oh wait, they did do this.

      -- j
      Good one JaRyCu.

      Business is like everything else in life. Everything that goes up eventually comes down, what goes around comes around. What you reap you shall sow.

      Microsoft got spanked pretty bad in the past for unfair competition, so did IBM (remember those guys?) and a host of other big companies. I think getting the FTC and the EU on your tail is just part of the dance huge corporations have to do.

      IMHO You just know Google with be next. Or maybe Amazon. Only a matter of time.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6287861].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jwmann2
      Google makes no guarantees. It can do what it wants. They constantly provide updates and changes in the algorithm to keep things fair while also making it harder for webmasters to manipulate the system.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6288380].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author E. Brian Rose
    Originally Posted by rambo9600 View Post

    "a matter of weeks" to shape up or pay up.
    They will choose the option that is of the least resistance and is more profitable. I expect that option will be "pay up".
    Signature

    Founder of JVZoo. All around good guy :)

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286304].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kindsvater
    Is it a "free market" if it is controlled by a monopoly? That's why even "free market" countries have laws against monopolies.

    Google bought this problem by shifting billions of dollars through the EU to avoid US taxes. Even my Adsense checks come from a European bank.

    .
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286946].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rambo9600
      Originally Posted by kindsvater View Post

      Is it a "free market" if it is controlled by a monopoly? That's why even "free market" countries have laws against monopolies.

      Google bought this problem by shifting billions of dollars through the EU to avoid US taxes. Even my Adsense checks come from a European bank.

      .
      You are a Lawyer, correct? Everything Google did was LEGAL.

      Google Double Irish: Double Irish arrangement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Google does the same as Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, etc.... they all have corporate offices in Ireland, the lowest corporate rate of any Westernized country.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6287611].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Colin Palfrey
        Originally Posted by rambo9600 View Post

        You are a Lawyer, correct? Everything Google did was LEGAL.

        Google Double Irish: Double Irish arrangement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        Google does the same as Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, etc.... they all have corporate offices in Ireland, the lowest corporate rate of any Westernized country.
        Ireland has been preparing a case against both Google and Facebook. I saw it on the news last week, and it is because of the same EU laws that both organizations are breaking, including various violations of EU privacy laws.

        Also the pay up argument doesn't excuse them from what they are doing. If you are fined for breaking the law you are also expected to stop breaking the law. I think that is expected by most legal systems.
        Signature

        I write articles and eBooks - PM me for details!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6288446].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Blimeyoreilly
    This has made my day the Googly tyrants being told how they have to do something for a change.
    The Googly lot are power mad & they are abusing the market...
    I would use another search engine if something competent comes along.
    Googly think they are an untouchable self made government but Just like any business in this world though, if they cannot communicate they will fall flat on their faces.
    Signature
    Be HaPpY, LuCkY & Successful in life!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6287622].message }}

Trending Topics