Advice Regarding Cease & Desist for Selling Automation App

12 years ago

Seriously, get a lawyer. Don't base it on what you think is "absurd" or on what others are doing (or what you perceive them to be doing).

Suzanne

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773430].message }}

force5

12 years ago

By selling the software I am not violating the TOS of this website, the users of the software would be.

But its easier for the site to come after you..

It is one of those things that if you get too big then they will come after you. There are still programs that abuse Twitter, but they went after the best known ones..

The choice is yours, I don't think anyone can really tell you the best way, no one knows if you will get a c&D letter or not. You may get one on day one you may never get it..

Tough choice in these times

Paul

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

=====================================
My Latest WSO >>Viral Word Search
=====================================
All My Plugins and tools

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773433].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by force5

But its easier for the site to come after you..

It is one of those things that if you get too big then they will come after you. There are still programs that abuse Twitter, but they went after the best known ones..

The choice is yours, I don't think anyone can really tell you the best way, no one knows if you will get a c&D letter or not. You may get one on day one you may never get it..

Tough choice in these times

Paul

Thanks Paul,

I am worried about getting too big since I would be the only person selling an application that would automate things for this site.

I am worried about all the time and money investment's I'm going to be making and then possibly having to shut down without ROI.

If what I would be selling couldn't cause civil litigation against me then it would def be worth it.

Anyone know how the facebook bots are able to operate?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773452].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by SuzanneH

Seriously, get a lawyer. Don't base it on what you think is "absurd" or on what others are doing (or what you perceive them to be doing).

Suzanne

I'm not in the financial position to be able to afford advice from a lawyer at the moment. I was hoping for advice from anyone who is knowledgeable on the subject or has had experience with it.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773437].message }}

Chris Worner

12 years ago

What part of social networking don't you understand? You don't build relationships with people by spamming them.

Not to mention, most folk here don't take too kindly to folk like you.

-Chris

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773438].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Chris Worner

What part of social networking don't you understand? You don't build relationships with people by spamming them.

Not to mention, most folk here don't take too kindly to folk like you.

-Chris

I clearly said it's not spamming, the bot will have limits on how fast messages can be sent, and how many can be sent, the limits will be even lower to what the site has implemented so that it can not be abused.

It is not even a site that could be spammed for any commercial benefit. The purpose of the application is to save time in communication, that's about all the info I can give away without releasing what the idea and site are.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773467].message }}

Mark Alan

12 years ago

Sure go to the biggest law firm you can find, plunk down a couple of million dollars in retainer fees and have them file for a declaratory judgment saying you can sell your application. In 5- 10 years it will get sorted out. If you win you get to sell your application, but your attorneys also get to keep all your legal fees. … It sounds like I am being a smart ass, but the truth is that is how it really works.

You can't win against a big well funded corporation like that.

Thanks

Signature

Crazy Cheap Hosting Get Hosting for less than $2 per month + Free Domain Name Registration. Get Free SEO, Blogging and Internet Marketing Tips from the Solo Blogger.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773481].message }}

Taniwha

12 years ago

Just don't do it. Scrap the whole idea.

[ 1 ] Thanks
3 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773501].message }}

BusinessPartner 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Taniwha

Just don't do it. Scrap the whole idea.

Do you have any basis for this statement?
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773573].message }}
tj 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Taniwha

Just don't do it. Scrap the whole idea.

There is an scraping app for that

Timo
- Thanks
Signature
BIG BRAND Copywriting - Sales Letters + Bonuses for Warriors. $97 - Guaranteed! | OFFER NOT CONVERTING ? Need People to take action NOW?
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773600].message }}
Paul Myers 12 years ago

I clearly said it's not spamming

Spamfighters' Rule #1: Spammers lie.

Spamfighters' Rule #2: When in doubt, see rule #1.

Spammer lie #1: "Spamming is [something other than what I do]."

I am not a lawyer. If I were, I'd consider the fact that you're selling a tool designed specifically to help people violate a contract, and which will reduce the value of the service involved for both the owners and the members of that service. Then I would ask myself...

Wuddyatink dey'll didabouddit?

(That's Lawyer-speak for "Duh!")

Let's pretend for a moment that we live in an alternate universe, where the above rules don't apply. In that fictional realm, you've created an interesting dilemma for yourself. If your software actually has the limitations you've stated, people using it will be able to do less than they otherwise could, but faster. In return, they run the risk of being banned for using the tool.

Ain't gonna sell a bunch with that copy.

So, if you want to make any worthwhile cash, you're going to have to raise those limits. That raises your profile, and eliminates the psychological band-aid you've sloppily placed over your self-esteem. You would no longer be able to even pretend you weren't selling spamware.

And either way, you run the very real risk of legal action against you for selling the tool.

Good choices, eh?

Paul
- [ 8 ] Thanks
Signature

.
Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773628].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

The website doesn't' allow html in the text, nor domains, it's actually designed around the basis of finding other members in the US and messaging them.

However it's a tedious task to-do and this application would automate it. If I found out someone was abusing it in away I'd put restrictions on that abuse. I know there is demand for a service like this based on the keyword research i've done and questionnaires to members of the site.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773652].message }}

davezan 12 years ago

Twitter Spam Filing

http://www.pcworld.com/article/25334...providers.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference
- Thanks
Signature

David
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773920].message }}

travlinguy

12 years ago

Originally Posted by BusinessPartner

The website does state in their terms of service that applications such as this should not be used and doing so violates their TOS. To me this is absurd since the application will allow the user to save an abundance of time, and in my opinion will make his experience using the sight more enjoyable.

So you thinking this absurd is relevant? I'm not a lawyer but I'd guess that if you went into this knowing you're exposing people who use your app to liability (regardless of your ridiculous disclaimer) then you're exposing yourself to even more liability.

When people start getting banned along with other possible consequences, they're going to come back to you. And when they do your disclaimer is going to be worth spit because it will be pretty simple do prove, in my opinion, that you have demonstrated massive bad faith right from the start. Good luck, you're going to need it.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773907].message }}

Dragonfire Wealth

12 years ago

You just got advice from Paul Myers. /thread

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773917].message }}

cjreynolds

12 years ago

Originally Posted by BusinessPartner

The website does state in their terms of service that applications such as this should not be used and doing so violates their TOS. To me this is absurd since the application will allow the user to save an abundance of time, and in my opinion will make his experience using the sight more enjoyable.

You may think this absurd, and your app will make the user experience of their site better in your opinion (your words),but that's not in question here.

You might take one look inside my apartment and think that my decorating, furniture, room flow are all absurd, and you might think you know a much better way to lay out my apartment so that my visitors will have what you consider to be a better 'visitor experience' when they visit. Tuff S**t! It's my apartment, and regardless of your opinion of it, I will not allow you to come into my apartment and re-arrange it, no matter how absurd you think my resistance to your ideas is - it's my apartment!!!

Facebook, Twitter, et al, are not public property!! I don't know why people don't understand that! They are somebody's else's sites, just like our sites belong to us! If there was something that you didn't want people to do on your site, would you say "I gotta let them do this, because they think it's absurd not to."?

RIGHT!!!!

[ 2 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

I just added this sig so I can refer to it in my posts...

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774044].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by cjreynolds

You may think this absurd, and your app will make the user experience of their site better in your opinion (your words),but that's not in question here.

You might take one look inside my apartment and think that my decorating, furniture, room flow are all absurd, and you might think you know a much better way to lay out my apartment so that my visitors will have what you consider to be a better 'visitor experience' when they visit. Tuff S**t! It's my apartment, and regardless of your opinion of it, I will not allow you to come into my apartment and re-arrange it, no matter how absurd you think my resistance to your ideas is - it's my apartment!!!

Facebook, Twitter, et al, are not public property!! I don't know why people don't understand that! They are somebody's else's sites, just like our sites belong to us! If there was something that you didn't want people to do on your site, would you say "I gotta let them do this, because they think it's absurd not to."?

RIGHT!!!!

We can drop the absurd thing already, I didn't know that word would have such an emotional impact on people lol. What I meant by it being absurd is the fact that this website doesn't allow someone to develop an automated application to make their users experience easier, less time consuming, and thus better. If I owned a website I would not limit 3rd parties selling applications or services that improved my website.

And like I said, i've had questionnaire of users of the sight, and 95% of about 500 members that of the site have said on my blog that they would love an application that provided what mine would offer. The other % said they are indifferent, no one person said it would hurt their experience.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774073].message }}

Kay King

12 years ago

It does have an impact in your post because....

The website does state in their terms of service that applications such as this should not be used and doing so violates their TOS. To me this is absurd

...it says the site does not permit such applications and indicates you think it's ok to ignore the rules of the site owners because YOU don't agree.

However, the real sticking point in your case is this

I'm not in the financial position to be able to afford advice from a lawyer at the moment. I was hoping for advice from anyone who is knowledgeable on the subject or has had experience with it.

If you can't afford a couple hours of a lawyer's time to check on the legal status of what you plan to do....you won't be able to afford the consequences you could face. That alone makes this a bad business plan.

You've had advice in this thread from some extremely knowledgeable people.

kay

Thanks

Signature

Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog

***

Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.

January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.

So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774112].message }}

cjreynolds

12 years ago

Originally Posted by BusinessPartner

We can drop the absurd thing already, I didn't know that word would have such an emotional impact on people lol. What I meant by it being absurd is the fact that this website doesn't allow someone to develop an automated application to make their users experience easier, less time consuming, and thus better. If I owned a website I would not limit 3rd parties selling applications or services that improved my website.

And like I said, i've had questionnaire of users of the sight, and 95% of about 500 members that of the site have said on my blog that they would love an application that provided what mine would offer. The other % said they are indifferent, no one person said it would hurt their experience.

I'm sorry - I don't care if you love it, if 100% of the 500 people on your blog love it, I don't even care if the Pope loves it! The people who own the site in question don't love it!!! THAT'S ALL THAT COUNTS!!!!! THEY OWN THE SITE!!!!

Doesn't that matter at all to you???!!!!

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

I just added this sig so I can refer to it in my posts...

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774200].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by cjreynolds

I'm sorry - I don't care if you love it, if 100% of the 500 people on your blog love it, I don't even care if the Pope loves it! The people who own the site in question don't love it!!! THAT'S ALL THAT COUNTS!!!!! THEY OWN THE SITE!!!!

Doesn't that matter at all to you???!!!!

Thanks for your contributions to the thread bro, but the bold, caps, and the explanation points are not necessary. I will understand what you're saying without their use.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774210].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Thanks Davezan,

From those links and further research i've done, it turns out that a company will sue you for selling software that violates its terms of service.

It's interesting to see where it will go when a developer refuses to get bullied and fights back, if you read this article

(edit: great, can't post link, just google for the article)

Skottle's argument is similar to mine, the application is designed with spam prevention in mind, and it's features will be there just to help legitimate users save time.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774046].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Skootle, the company that sells tweetadder is actually getting some good victories in court against twitter. They apparently have enough/are making enough money to continue the litigation, I guess the outcome of their case will really solve my question.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774100].message }}

TheEye

12 years ago

If you don't have enough money to afford a lawyer. You don't have enough money to fight a court case.

From what I have read about court cases look at at least $100,000 to defend yourself in court. The company who is suing you will be willing to spend a lot more than this.

Also, all your time will be tied up in defending yourself.

If you are passionate enough about this to go into bankruptcy if you lose, then head to the courts to prove you are right.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774165].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by TheEye

If you don't have enough money to afford a lawyer. You don't have enough money to fight a court case.

From what I have read about court cases look at at least $100,000 to defend yourself in court. The company who is suing you will be willing to spend a lot more than this.

Also, all your time will be tied up in defending yourself.

If you are passionate enough about this to go into bankruptcy if you loose, then head to the courts to prove you are right.

Yeah, you make a very good point, to determine if the person getting sued can actually be held accountable by the courts for selling software that violates TOS is a conclusion that in most cases wouldn't suffice, because the defendant would default first from not having means to mount a defense.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774202].message }}

Entrecon

12 years ago

If your app leaves any tell tale sign at all, the site n question may just be able to find a way to block it. Even worse, they might ban/block the people using it and all of a sudden you have a bunch of upset customers.

Thanks

Signature

Visit My website http://kipferguson.com

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774132].message }}

Black Hat Cat

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by BusinessPartner

Would this be enough to cover me, or could the website still sue me on any grounds?

Thanks!

Of course they can. Doesn't mean they will win, but they can certainly make the effort. Bogus lawsuits happen every day in this country. Can you afford to defend yourself if one is filed against you?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774151].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Thanks for the advice guys. The more research I've done the more I find that companies really don't like anyone selling applications to automate tasks on their websites. MySpace, Facebook, Google/Youtube have all sent C&Ds and sued automation apps.

Craigslist has sued a few companies, and recently a service called padmapper that really helped improved the experience of craiglsit for users.

As far as I know skootle is the only company to hold its ground and fight the lawsuit, that's why i'm saying this will be very interesting to see how it concludes.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774181].message }}

Rob Whisonant

12 years ago

So according to YOUR line of thinking.... It would be OK for me to sell a tool that is designed to break into houses. But... This specific tool is only designed to break into YOUR house.

Sound OK to you? I just made the tool and sell it. I don't actually use the tool. The buyers do.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

FREE Email Marketing Quick Start Course! Start Building a Profitable Email List Today!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774226].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Rob Whisonant

So according to YOUR line of thinking.... It would be OK for me to sell a tool that is designed to break into houses. But... This specific tool is only designed to break into YOUR house.

Sound OK to you? I just made the tool and sell it. I don't actually use the tool. The buyers do.

I'm not going to be baited with this type of argument. Associating a criminal act with an online application for a website are too separate to be compared.

Good Sir.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774249].message }}

Rob Whisonant

12 years ago

Originally Posted by BusinessPartner

I'm not going to be baited with this type of argument. Associating a criminal act with an online application for a website are too separate to be compared.

Good Sir.

Forget it. Not worth my time. You are ignoring everyone and trying your best to make it a ok in your mind to do this.

[ 1 ] Thanks
2 replies

Signature

FREE Email Marketing Quick Start Course! Start Building a Profitable Email List Today!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774311].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Rob Whisonant

I get you now. In your mind breaking civil law is a ok with you. Your thinking is what gives marketers and software developers a bad name.

This is clearly not the business for you to be in.

A huge percentage of websites state in their TOS that use of automation software is against their TOS. An abundance of internet marketers use automation software to decease the amount of time it takes to complete tasks on websites. Almost all IM software does this, SENuke is just one example. Is it breaking TOS, yes, is it spamming, NO, is it making one service easier for a user, yes. Can you say you've never used an automation tool?

I like the way you come to conclusions about things, an thanks for blaming me for giving marketers and software developers a bad name.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774386].message }}

Rob Whisonant

12 years ago

Originally Posted by BusinessPartner

A huge percentage of websites state in their TOS that use of automation software is against their TOS. An abundance of internet marketers use automation software to decease the amount of time it takes to complete tasks on websites. Almost all IM software does this, SENuke is just one example. Is it breaking TOS, yes, is it spamming, NO, is it making one service easier for a user, yes. Can you say you've never used an automation tool?

I like the way you come to conclusions about things, an thanks for blaming me for giving marketers and software developers a bad name.

You are welcome.

And I can happily say I don't use any automation tools that violate a sites TOS. I actually respect other peoples business. I don't try to justify doing things they don't want done to their sites to make a buck.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

FREE Email Marketing Quick Start Course! Start Building a Profitable Email List Today!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774399].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Rob Whisonant

You are welcome.

And I can happily say I don't use any automation tools that violate a sites TOS. I actually respect other peoples business. I don't try to justify doing things they don't want done to their sites to make a buck.

You are one outstanding citizen. I commend you

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774409].message }}

BusinessPartner 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Rob Whisonant

Forget it. Not worth my time. You are ignoring everyone and trying your best to make it a ok in your mind to do this.

I have not ignored anyone, I've actually taken the advice that it would not be a good idea to continue with this business model based on that fact that if I were to get sued, it wouldn't matter if I won the court battle, I can't afford the court battle and would lose that way.

You should def read through entire threads before you make statements like that.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774400].message }}

peteJ

12 years ago

Keep one thing in mind. No matter how likely you are to win the case, they have a lot more money and more lawyers. Even if your clearly in the right that type of power against you can easily turn the tables.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774328].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by peteJ

Keep one thing in mind. No matter how likely you are to win the case, they have a lot more money and more lawyers. Even if your clearly in the right that type of power against you can easily turn the tables.

Thanks,

That is actually the exact conclusion I have come up with as well.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774390].message }}

shane_k

12 years ago

Advice for all you warriors responding to this guy, don't waste your time

He obviously has already made his decision and was hoping to come on here and have everyone back him up and say he is in the right.

He asks for advice but for every person who has offered advice he didn't say yea maybe you are right, he just continues to argue his point.

Let him move forward with this and get hit with a lawsuit.

Even then that probably won't wake him up

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774408].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by shane_k

Advice for all you warriors responding to this guy, don't waste your time

He obviously has already made his decision and was hoping to come on here and have everyone back him up and say he is in the right.

He asks for advice but for every person who has offered advice he didn't say yea maybe you are right, he just continues to argue his point.

Let him move forward with this and get hit with a lawsuit.

Even then that probably won't wake him up

That's actually the opposite of what I did, I actually have deiced it's not a good idea and have mentioned that more than once.

I hope anyone else doing a search for similar advice can find this thread and become informed as well.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774418].message }}

shane_k

12 years ago

ok I take my post back it looks like 2 minutes before I posted you changed your mind.

If that is true, then good for you.

You seem to have software development skills, so my recommendation is for you to think of a different type of software to develop where you can make a lot of money but dont' have this worry.

How about you setup a poll asking people on this forum what kind of software would they like, what would make their businesses easier.

This will give you an idea of a software that you can develop where you could possibly make a lot of money

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774424].message }}

BusinessPartner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by shane_k

ok I take my post back it looks like 2 minutes before I posted you changed your mind.

If that is true, then good for you.

You seem to have software development skills, so my recommendation is for you to think of a different type of software to develop where you can make a lot of money but dont' have this worry.

How about you setup a poll asking people on this forum what kind of software would they like, what would make their businesses easier.

This will give you an idea of a software that you can develop where you could possibly make a lot of money

Nooo problem, thanks for the advice. The only problem with asking people what type of software they want, and depending on the hype one piece of potential software generates, leaves room for competitors to swoop in and take the idea.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774435].message }}

Rob Whisonant

12 years ago

Yes you did say you are going to not follow up on your project. But you did so for the wrong reason.

You decided you don't have the money to fight a lawsuit.

What you should have decided is it's just not right to deliberately violate a sites TOS you do not own.

That's the problem. Big difference.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

FREE Email Marketing Quick Start Course! Start Building a Profitable Email List Today!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6774436].message }}

Advice Regarding Cease & Desist for Selling Automation App

Trending Topics

Google Ads, landing pages, and Clickbank links

Carry out better target audience research

A Very Strange Internet Problem

YouTube gets shopping display tools and affiliate partnership updates

Membership area with multiple income streams