10 replies
Do you use the new Aweber 'Compose Message' interface or do you revert back to the previous broadcast editor?

I have to say that I find the new way confusing so hopefully they will keep the old way of editing.
#aweber #layout
  • Profile picture of the author WillR
    I also found the new way of editing a pain in the backside but I just dealt with it and after a few emails I am now getting used to it.

    It's like when Facebook change their layout and everyone complains and then a few weeks later everyone is used to it.

    It's obviously the direction they are heading so you may as well get used to it now.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6854588].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Terry Kyle
    Originally Posted by bwjstreet View Post

    Do you use the new Aweber 'Compose Message' interface or do you revert back to the previous broadcast editor?

    I have to say that I find the new way confusing so hopefully they will keep the old way of editing.
    Yes Ben, I revert back to the old 'Classic' every time.

    So often 'progress' means annoying the user base my moving most functions and users have to waste time finding them again e.g. Word 2003 > Word 2007.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6854656].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bwjstreet
      Originally Posted by Terry Kyle View Post

      Yes Ben, I revert back to the old 'Classic' every time.

      So often 'progress' means annoying the user base my moving most functions and users have to waste time finding them again e.g. Word 2003 > Word 2007.
      Great to hear it's not just me. I won't mind for as long as they keep the classic editor. I'm really not keen on spending hours re-training to use what is essentially an unnecessary complication however.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6854686].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author WillR
        Originally Posted by bwjstreet View Post

        Great to hear it's not just me. I won't mind for as long as they keep the classic editor. I'm really not keen on spending hours re-training to use what is essentially an unnecessary complication however.
        Sure, I preferred the old way as well. But I can tell you it isn't going to take you hours to get the hang of this new one.

        It took me all of 20 minutes. It's actually quite simple when you play around with it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6854724].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author retsced
    Personally I see no problem with the old way. It gets exactly what you need to get done so I always revert back to it.
    Signature
    Strong Men and Women put themselves in harms way
    for the freedoms weak people give away for safety
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6854684].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bwjstreet
      Originally Posted by retsced View Post

      Personally I see no problem with the old way. It gets exactly what you need to get done so I always revert back to it.
      Quite right. It does exactly what you want it to do. Also, if I wanted to add extras to the message I'd compose it in an HTML editor anyway.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6854707].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WinsonYeung
    I use the old way. The new user interface seem very user-unfriendly to me but definitely it has much nicer design.
    Signature
    [WSO of The Day] Discount How To Generate 172.56% Positive Return OR build your List for FREE!

    "Case Study: Discover You Can Make $1371.66 With A Simple Blog Post by Clicking Here"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6856723].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author InfiniteInc
    Not only is the new layout a little less intuitive but I found it's just SLOWER. It takes much longer to load everything than the pervious set up.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6856960].message }}

Trending Topics