A problem with Article Marketing robot

Then you suggest to add each article by hand? Or there are some alternatives?

I figured this out shortly after purchasing AMR.

:rolleyes:

Yes. The links in this post might help.

This is incorrect.

Real article marketing has been helped greatly by both the series of Panda Updates of 2011/12 and the Penguin Update of early 2012.

The attempt to use articles for backlinks (that isn't really "article marketing" at all, you know?) has been greatly hindered. One thing is for sure, at this stage: you're very unlikely indeed to benefit - and are taking great risks of penalties - by using automated article submission software!

You can, but I advise you against it.

For an article directory to "have a section which is relevant to you" doesn't usually make the site itself relevant to you in the sense that Google looks at "relevance" for backlinking purposes. And you won't gain from it. Your potential publishers will (normally) look in Ezine Articles first and foremost. There'll be some who look in the other directories you're referring to, I imagine, but typically they'll have looked in Ezine Articles first (because that's the best-known article directory and the natural "first port of call" of content-seekers. And what you don't want to happen is for your potential customers to find your articles there. You want the one on your site to outrank all the others and always to be the one that attracts the customers (usually fairly easily done). There's also the added risk, in these post-Penguin times, that Google won't like your article being in 20 article directories (they have said so, openly), whereas they obviously do like it being on 20 relevant sites.

Greatly preferable, I think.

It just doesn't.

Even before the Panda updates of 2011, as the authors of standard SEO textbooks were pointing out in 2010 and early 2011, you'd typically need something between 50,000 and 100,000 of those "backlinks" to give you the same linkjuice as that arising from one backlink on a relevant site. Last year, I would have said to you "Try it and see for yourself", but this year I won't even say that because you may run into a Penguin penalty if you try it. It's too risky, and to gain nothing.

You have misunderstood what they said, as many people do.

It means they need content which is unique to them. Not content "which hasn't previously been published". These are two different things.

They say "We only allow one copy of each article" and they're right. It they published two copies of one article, that would be duplicate content, not syndicated content. Duplicate content means "more than one copy on the same website". Syndicated content means "copies on different websites". (One is good; the other is bad).

They're telling you they won't accept your article because it's too similar to another article which already exists in their database, so it isn't unique to them. They don't care if it's been published elsewhere.

Don't imagine that they're rejecting it because you already published it on your own site: that isn't what happened, here.

This little article explains very clearly the difference between "duplicate content" and "syndicated content": Article Marketers – Lay the Duplicate Content Myth To Rest Once and For All - Internet Marketing and Publishing Blog <--- highly recommended!

Well - thanks for this: I'm embarrassed to say I've never noticed it before. It isn't enforced. Like countless other article marketers, I have hundreds of articles in there, all of which had already been published on my own site before being submitted there.

Anyway, you don't need to use that one, if you don't want to: Ezine Articles is far better.

If you have a read through this longer thread, you'll see a large number of professional, successful article marketers explaining at great length and in great detail why they don't submit to article directories anything that hasn't already been published and indexed (in the same form) on their own websites first: http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...eza-first.html

Above all, don't imagine that multiple article directory backlinks will have any linkjuice value to you. That wasn't even true before the Panda updates decimated the SEO-potential of article directories. They're worthless. As the saying goes: "100,000 of those backlinks and $3.50 will buy you a cappuccino at Starbucks!" (But don't test that out, or the Penguin update might eat your website for breakfast!! ).

There may be, depending on your niche.

It isn't generally necessary to pay. The benefits tend to come from the fact that it's content people that want to syndicate without payment, just because they want to share your content with their own visitors, subscribers and readers. The ones you have to "pay to display" are - usually - unlikely to bring so much targeted traffic anyway.

This post will help you, I think: http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...ml#post6575732

If you'll excuse the observation, what will help you even more is to try to stop thinking of article marketing in terms of SEO/backlinks. That's not what it's all about. The reason for trying to do off-page SEO is just to attract search engine traffic through rankings. Article marketing, correctly done, can bring you far more traffic than that, and far more highly targeted and better quality, too.