Is it better to come from urgency or abundance?

I've always wondered about this, so I thought what the heck, I'll ask.

Essentially my question is whether or not it's better to go into IM or try to succeed in it from a situation of necessity or abundance. Most people coming here are somewhere in the middle, but a lot of the threads end up being by people on one end of the spectrum or another.

By this I mean needing to get something set up within 3 months with a low budget in order to survive, or to have a well paying job and plenty of time.

It's easy to come up with answers both ways, but I'm not sure which (or if either) is correct.

# For example, you could say that if someone has a lot of existing abundance, they don't feel the pressure to succeed more, and are more likely to just buy a thousand WSOs without taking much action because they don't need to, in contrast with the person that needs to stretch every dollar and will work extremely hard to make it work.

# On the other hand, you could say that someone with urgency probably won't succeed because they could waste all of their time on one idea, or won't have the foresight to succeed in the same timeframe as someone with abundance, and that they'll similarly slack if they're coming to IM as a last attempt.

So which is it (if either)?