Publish Every Squidoo Lens Without TEXT Module Within 5 hrs

by mahol
26 replies
I want to share few tips for publishing squidoo lenses within 10 minutes.
with this strategy my lenses published within 5 hours of posting even if i don't include "TEXT" module and only "100 WORDS DESCRIPTION".
Hope you guys will love it.
To follow my method use this sequence of MODULES ON SQUIDOO.
(1)DESCRIPTION MODULE(Write 100 words at least).
(2) AMAZON MODULE MODULE (3 items)
(3) GOOGLE NEWS MODULE (3 items)
(4) EBAY MODULE (3 items)
(5) YOUTUBE MODULE (3 items)
(6) DUAL DEBATE MODULE
(7) AMAZON VOTING (PLEXO) MODULE
(8) GUESTBOOK COMMENTS MODULE
(9) LENS LOVE WIDGET MODULE

Thats it.
you can set your lens within 10 minuits and it will get published for sure within 5 hours of posting. If you want to rank your squidoo lens higher try to add "TEXT" module with unique content.

Thanks
#hrs #lens #module #publish #squidoo #text
  • Profile picture of the author TiffanyLambert
    ...but why would you do this?

    Just curious. I don't understand the purpose. Speed isn't going to help you create a lens that performs well

    Or are you using it for a backlink or something?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7746897].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      I was wondering whether anyone actually "reads" and buys from lenses without any text? :confused:

      But I suppose if it's for a backlink, that doesn't matter (but if it's for a backlink, why would you need all those modules)?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7746922].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mahol
      Yes you are right...I am using it for backlinks not for traffic and conversions.
      Originally Posted by TiffanyDow View Post

      ...but why would you do this?

      Just curious. I don't understand the purpose. Speed isn't going to help you create a lens that performs well

      Or are you using it for a backlink or something?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7746993].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Sandra Martinez
        Originally Posted by mahol View Post

        Yes you are right...I am using it for backlinks not for traffic and conversions.
        you better have a backup plan, because they will be slapped sooner than later.

        I try but don´t get it, people generously open their "houses" to others... and instead of being thankful and playing by the intended rules - what are very clear - others come and drop their s$%&... errr links, on the backyard.

        I am not jumping on you specifically, it IS widespread. Some even do it under the umbrella of taking this as a business...

        My question is: why is ok to be unethical when you are serious as a business?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747182].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author mahol
          Originally Posted by Sandra Martinez View Post

          you better have a backup plan, because they will be slapped sooner than later.

          I try but don´t get it, people generously open their "houses" to others... and instead of being thankful and playing by the intended rules - what are very clear - others come and drop their s$%&... errr links, on the backyard.

          I am not jumping on you specifically, it IS widespread. Some even do it under the umbrella of taking this as a business...

          My question is: why is ok to be unethical when you are serious as a business?
          I am not big fan of squidoo at all, but I just found this fast working trick to get good backlinks. Even i used this method only twice and i have total 6 lenses published from last 2 years.

          This is just method, so only for needy people who want good backlinks fast.

          I know sooner these type of lenses will be in trouble thats why I already told you my first post that try to add "TEXT" module too with unique content.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747234].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
            Banned
            Originally Posted by mahol View Post

            I am not big fan of squidoo at all, but I just found this fast working trick to get good backlinks.
            I don't believe that they're good backlinks.

            Whether a backlink is good is determined primarily by site-relevance.

            You can make site-relevant backlinks (if you really want to) by putting up little one-page WordPress blogs on free hosting, which contain one or two articles about your niche and your backlink. I don't seriously suggest that you should spend your time doing this, but it's just as quick and the backlinks are better.

            Don't imagine that backlinks from Squidoo are "good" just because Squidoo's own home page has a high page rank. Your backlink isn't on Squidoo's own home page, is it? Remember that websites don't "have page ranks": only pages have page ranks.

            Originally Posted by mahol View Post

            only for needy people who want good backlinks fast.
            I think "bad backlinks fast". And temporary backlinks, too.

            Originally Posted by mahol View Post

            I know sooner these type of lenses will be in trouble
            Then we all agree.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747381].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author mahol
              yeh ALEXA you are right....

              but I think pointing some DOFOLLOW backlinks to our money site will be good....

              My two of the lenses made with this method having rank between 350311 to 399,911.

              we should have to add 200 words TEXT MODULE to make it better this will hardly take 10-15 min more than my method, but they will live for longer time and no fear of squidoo suspension too...
              Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

              I don't believe that they're good backlinks.

              Whether a backlink is good is determined primarily by site-relevance.

              You can make site-relevant backlinks (if you really want to) by putting up little one-page WordPress blogs on free hosting, which contain one or two articles about your niche and your backlink. I don't seriously suggest that you should spend your time doing this, but it's just as quick and the backlinks are better.

              Don't imagine that backlinks from Squidoo are "good" just because Squidoo's own home page has a high page rank. Your backlink isn't on Squidoo's own home page, is it? Remember that websites don't "have page ranks": only pages have page ranks.



              I think "bad backlinks fast". And temporary backlinks, too.



              Then we all agree.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749167].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
                Banned
                Originally Posted by mahol View Post

                yeh ALEXA you are right....

                but I think pointing some DOFOLLOW backlinks to our money site will be good....
                Respectfully, Mahol, you're still missing my point.

                If you follow my suggestion above, you get to determine, yourself, whether or not the backlinks are "do-follow" anyway, because you own and control the page on which they appear.

                There's actually no such thing as a "do-follow" backlink anyway: this is all nonsense-talk from people selling backlinks and stuff. There's a "no-follow" attribute and when people talk about "do-follow" backlinks all they actually mean (though many of them don't know it) is "links without the no-follow attribute". There's nothing particularly clever about Squidoo's backlinks being "do-follow". Most backlinks are so-called "do-follow". :rolleyes: :p

                Page ranks are NOT the primary determinant of linkjuice.

                Site-relevance is the primary determinant of linkjuice.

                The pages you describe in your OP above are not going to gather any page ranks anyway. They're typically not even going to be "featured lenses".

                Sorry, but even if the rest of what you're saying were correct (which it isn't), a PR-0 link from a site-relevant little blog you own and control yourself is in any case a far better backlink than the PR-1/2 backlink from a page on Squidoo's site (not that a lens as you describe it above would ever be even PR-1/2, anyway!).

                I correct this information for the sake of anyone else reading the thread, so that they'll know not to use up any time/effort doing this, because it's based on entirely mistaken assumptions. Sorry!
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749829].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author mahol
                  Thanks ALEXA for helping me again..
                  actually till today there was misconception about dofollow and nofollow which you cleared today. LOL

                  So In future I am going to create few small blogs related to my niche and will try to add unique and informative content to them for backlinking.

                  :p:p:p:p:p:p

                  Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

                  Respectfully, Mahol, you're still missing my point.

                  If you follow my suggestion above, you get to determine, yourself, whether or not the backlinks are "do-follow" anyway, because you own and control the page on which they appear.

                  There's actually no such thing as a "do-follow" backlink anyway: this is all nonsense-talk from people selling backlinks and stuff. There's a "no-follow" attribute and when people talk about "do-follow" backlinks all they actually mean (though many of them don't know it) is "links without the no-follow attribute". There's nothing particularly clever about Squidoo's backlinks being "do-follow". Most backlinks are so-called "do-follow". :rolleyes: :p

                  Page ranks are NOT the primary determinant of linkjuice.

                  Site-relevance is the primary determinant of linkjuice.

                  The pages you describe in your OP above are not going to gather any page ranks anyway. They're typically not even going to "featured lenses" anyway.

                  Sorry, but even if the rest of what you're saying were correct (which it isn't), a PR-0 link from a site-relevant little blog you own and control yourself is in any case a far better backlink than the PR-1/2 backlink from a page on Squidoo's site (not that a lens as you describe it above would ever be even PR-1/2, anyway!).

                  I correct this information for the sake of anyone else reading the thread, so that they'll know not to use up any time/effort doing this, because it's based on entirely mistaken assumptions. Sorry!
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749873].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Sandra Martinez
                    Originally Posted by mahol View Post

                    Thanks ALEXA for helping me again..
                    actually till today there was misconception about dofollow and nofollow which you cleared today. LOL

                    So In future I am going to create few small blogs related to my niche and will try to add unique and informative content to them for backlinking.

                    :p:p:p:p:p:p
                    Some blog platforms allow you to populate via rss, so you do the work one time and then spread it around; you follow the intended rules doing it this way, so everyone is happy.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749938].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author mahol
                      can you expose those platforms. I am little bit new to it. It would be great if you share here.
                      Originally Posted by Sandra Martinez View Post

                      Some blog platforms allow you to populate via rss, so you do the work one time and then spread it around; you follow the intended rules doing it this way, so everyone is happy.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749989].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Sandra Martinez
            Originally Posted by mahol View Post

            I am not big fan of squidoo at all, but I just found this fast working trick to get good backlinks. Even i used this method only twice and i have total 6 lenses published from last 2 years.

            This is just method, so only for needy people who want good backlinks fast.

            I know sooner these type of lenses will be in trouble thats why I already told you my first post that try to add "TEXT" module too with unique content.
            btw... you are missing the best back linking features of squidoo... you can add the rss of your blog, you can add the twitter feed as well.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747453].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author wolfmmiii
            Originally Posted by mahol View Post

            I am not big fan of squidoo at all, but I just found this fast working trick to get good backlinks.
            But they aren't "good" backlinks. They are PR n/a.
            Signature
            Want a REAL Online Business That's Fun to Run?
            CLICK HERE FOR INFO
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747625].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author seobuzz
              Originally Posted by wolfmmiii View Post

              But they aren't "good" backlinks. They are PR n/a.
              No its not. Most Squidoo lenses have PR.
              And the backlink from Squidoo is very valuable with respect to ranking as it Dofollow contextual backlink that you are getting.
              Signature
              SecondIncomeBlog.com
              Ideas and Techniques to Make Money Online
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747736].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author kaposzta
                Originally Posted by seobuzz View Post

                No its not. Most Squidoo lenses have PR.
                And the backlink from Squidoo is very valuable with respect to ranking as it Dofollow contextual backlink that you are getting.
                Most Squidoo lenses that have a lensrank below 400,000 got PR. If the lensrank is over 400k, your lens becomes work-in-progress, and won't be shown by Google. Bad lenses don't have PR, but if some do have, these lenses also lose PR after they got de-indexed. Create at least decent lenses for backlink purposes.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7748194].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author wolfmmiii
                Originally Posted by seobuzz View Post

                No its not. Most Squidoo lenses have PR.
                And the backlink from Squidoo is very valuable with respect to ranking as it Dofollow contextual backlink that you are getting.
                New lenses do not have PR.
                Signature
                Want a REAL Online Business That's Fun to Run?
                CLICK HERE FOR INFO
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7748291].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kaposzta
    I'm sure you won't get long term effects if you use this method. Your lenses will have a lensrank over 400,000, and they will be de-indexed. If you have too much lenses without any real content, you'll account will be suspended.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747328].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TiffanyLambert
    ...alrighty then. No wonder I didn't get it.

    I don't game systems. I get out there and create value for people everywhere I go (including Squidoo).

    Much better long-term solution and personal satisfaction.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747428].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ymest
    That's a strange system but if it works for you, good! I never bother with backlinking and such strategies; a mix a laziness and I also think it isn't worth the effort but thanks for sharing!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747672].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chri5123
    Squidoo works really well to backup my content sites, however I add about 4-5 text modules and try and focus on 100% unique content - that way I have found that either the lens ranks well or my site gets a big boost.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747709].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Lena Williams
    Though squidoo lenses does get PR very soon and easily but the kind of lens you are talking about, I do not that they will ever get any PR. They are full of this and that module and the content is almost empty (I do not think 100 words are enough for a good lens).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7748875].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author PotPieGirl
      Even after reading this whole thread, I'm still stuck on WHY one would do this (the 'strategy' outlined in the original post).

      Sure, Squidoo might let the lens publish...and sure, Google might even index that lens. But what in the world would KEEP that lens in Google? Once that lens falls to a lensrank of 400,000 or higher (which it will), Squidoo blocks it so Google can't see it (ie, slaps a no-index tag on it).

      So much for that back link, huh?

      But on the other hand, if you put even a little more effort into it - say perhaps a whole 30 minutes instead of 10 minutes - you might just end up with a well-ranking web page on Squidoo AND a valuable back link resource.

      Yes, Squidoo lenses DO develop Page Rank and they can do it quickly if you know how to work the internal juice Squidoo offers. Off the top of my head, I can think of one lens I have that was made just about a month ago that is now a PR4.

      But that does not just magically happen just because you made a lens/page on Squidoo. You have to know how to funnel that PR power to your lens.

      It's not rocket science to make a lens/page on Squidoo and Squidoo is totally a great place to start making money online and/or diversify as well. I've been using my large portfolio of Squidoo pages for many things for many years.

      But as with all things, you really get out of it what you put into it - and based on that, I'm not thinking the original 'strategy' is a great idea.

      Squidoo is very competitive these days - just slapping something up there ain't gonna cut it. But if you know what you're doing, it's a beautiful thing.

      Just my 2 cents tho

      Jennifer
      ~PotPieGirl
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7748911].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author mahol
        great tips and thanks for your thoughts about my strategy.
        Originally Posted by kaposzta View Post

        Most Squidoo lenses that have a lensrank below 400,000 got PR. If the lensrank is over 400k, your lens becomes work-in-progress, and won't be shown by Google. Bad lenses don't have PR, but if some do have, these lenses also lose PR after they got de-indexed. Create at least decent lenses for backlink purposes.
        I havent noticed any page rank change to my two lenses made with this method but their rank is improved little bit without text module....

        By adding one text module of 200 words can make it better and it will help to improve that lens rank too
        Originally Posted by PotPieGirl View Post

        Even after reading this whole thread, I'm still stuck on WHY one would do this (the 'strategy' outlined in the original post).

        Sure, Squidoo might let the lens publish...and sure, Google might even index that lens. But what in the world would KEEP that lens in Google? Once that lens falls to a lensrank of 400,000 or higher (which it will), Squidoo blocks it so Google can't see it (ie, slaps a no-index tag on it).
        My two of the lenses made with this method having rank between 350311 to 399,911 without any further efforts.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749183].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nicheminer
    I'm with Jennifer here. Really don't see any point in throwing up a lens in 10 mins that is going to do nothing for you in the long term.

    I have Squidoo lenses and it takes me anything between 1.5 - 3hrs to find the niche, do the KW research and then write unique content that I want peeps to read. All my lenses are marketing one or more products. Mostly Amazon, but some are CPA.

    Personally, I think it's a waste of time to have lenses ranked that are close to 400K because Squidoo will put them as WIP (work in progress) once they hit 400k. All my lenses are ranked less than 80k and most less than 50k. It's not difficult to keep them there with a small amount of updating once in a while.

    Squidoo is a fantastic resource, so use it for it's intended purpose - making income.
    Signature
    Amazon Discounted Products - Search tool that earns you Amazon commissions on auto pilot.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749707].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Danny Shaw
    I have built up a long list of squidoo lenses over the years in different niches and a lot have good PR. I use them for backlinking to new sites which works great and also make a few $100 a month from amazon and the adsense share. Win Win!
    Signature
    **5 DAY FREE TRIAL** - The ultimate social media bot (FB, Instagram, Pinterest & G+).........
    Grab it >> HERE
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749722].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Stevie C
    Agree with pretty much everybody else here, why not make a decent lens and get a decent page rank, it doesn't take long to get to a pr2 with a lens that you might have to work on for a couple of hours.

    To give the op some slack maybe he is just talking about getting ranked fast and then going back to the site and updating it to give it a bit of love??
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7749748].message }}

Trending Topics