Open question : brand trust / riding on the shoulders of giants

8 replies
I'd like to ask an open question regarding customer trust in a brand. If you could spend just a moment and possibly post your opinion on the following matter It would be greatly appreciated.

I commonly see internet 'marketing' sites which feature a ribbon of 'as seen' logos, be it as seen on BBC or as seen in the Telegraph or many other iterations along that theme.

The idea being to instil trust into the visitor by appeal to an authoritative and recognised brand / name (Riding on the shoulder of giants)

now to the nub of this question:

Would there be any benefit to use this method, but instead refer to internet recognised brands. for example

As seen on -- Google, Bing, Facebook, Linkedin
(there are other possibilities but these are the big 4 really)

Would this self acclimation be a worthwhile thing to include on a site?

My personal view is... "so what"? Everyone can be found via bing / google and it's few and far between where a business does not have a social media element (even if that just means having a Facebook page)

but I need to know if this would be a valid tactic to earn trust of visitors to a site. I eagerly await your feedback.
#brand #conversion #giants #open #question #riding #shoulders #trust
  • Profile picture of the author ilee
    I don't think that's a good idea using google facebook etc because they're not "authorities" in your niche, and frankly, I think it'll look a bit silly. Also, their branding is thrown around everywhere.

    It'll be much more impressive if you actually got recognition from authorities in your niche. Visitors are susceptible to subliminal marketing, but they're not stupid.
    Signature
    --~***~--


    --~***~--
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7762864].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author andyjbenson
      Originally Posted by ichl13 View Post

      I don't think that's a good idea using google facebook etc because they're not "authorities" in your niche, and frankly, I think it'll look a bit silly. Also, their branding is thrown around everywhere.

      It'll be much more impressive if you actually got recognition from authorities in your niche. Visitors are susceptible to subliminal marketing, but they're not stupid.
      I tend to agree....yes it will take more time but the best results will come when people recognize YOU as the authority and brand.

      Brand yourself and if you choose to, your company. Once they both become a trusted authority, you wont need anything else and you will also find that others in time will only reinforce your brand and standing within your niche.

      Yahoo, Facebook, Google and whoever else you see in those image banners wont be bothered to do that for you!

      Kind Regards,

      And Benson
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7788215].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    Claiming "as seen on" when you aren't actually seen on or endorsed by brands can get you in a heap of trouble.

    As for as seen on Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc. that's a laugh. Everybody is seen on Google, Facebook, and Twitter. Big deal. It doesn't mean that Google, Facebook and Twitter endorse you. It would just look pretty lame.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7763035].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JamesColin
    Banned
    Well if some people do AS SEEN ON TV, or as seen on bbc, I don't see why that would be more ridiculous to do the same with google and facebook.
    Someone said that customers are not stupid, well speak for yourself, most people are very stupid indeed, myself included. And although I can say "so what" when I see as seen on tv, nevertheless I'm sure there's a part of my brain which doesn't think the same!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7763300].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ilee
      Originally Posted by JamesColin View Post

      Well if some people do AS SEEN ON TV, or as seen on bbc, I don't see why that would be more ridiculous to do the same with google and facebook.
      It doesn't have the same effect because:

      1.) Chances are the customer has already seen the advert if it's been on T.V, and is probably the reason why they're o the website in the first place.

      2.) Companies pay thousands, hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions (superbowl) on getting a t.v advertising slot, so saying you've been on t.v gives you credibility as a company. Google and facebook are free.
      Signature
      --~***~--


      --~***~--
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7763634].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author BudaBrit
        Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

        Claiming "as seen on" when you aren't actually seen on or endorsed by brands can get you in a heap of trouble.

        As for as seen on Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc. that's a laugh. Everybody is seen on Google, Facebook, and Twitter. Big deal. It doesn't mean that Google, Facebook and Twitter endorse you. It would just look pretty lame.
        Originally Posted by ichl13 View Post

        It doesn't have the same effect because:

        1.) Chances are the customer has already seen the advert if it's been on T.V, and is probably the reason why they're o the website in the first place.

        2.) Companies pay thousands, hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions (superbowl) on getting a t.v advertising slot, so saying you've been on t.v gives you credibility as a company. Google and facebook are free.
        Sure, if you're marketing a product to the internet savvy. But what if your target market isn't? The only way to know, though, is to test it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7787970].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TiffanyLambert
    I know some people put those "as seen on" when they paid for advertising on the website for those major news outlets. Kinda ridiculous.

    But yeah as seen on web entities looks lame.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7763330].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Forbes Burton
    Thank you guys for your feedback, It wont be well received but you have all but confirmed my initial suspicion. Anyone else with a view on this please feel free to comment.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7787962].message }}

Trending Topics