Is EZA interfering with freedom of expression now?

by DavidO
19 replies
I've seen increasing complaints about EZA here recently. Much of this is about linking. EZA has been getting more and more restrictive about how you link, but some of this is about quality control and I've actually welcomed the tightening up.

But now it appears they may be starting to interfere with freedom of expression itself and this is a whole different ball of wax.

I'm a Platinum writer with scores of articles over the years with never a single problem... until now. My latest article was rejected because "we are not able to accept any articles that advocate against a business or product".

The supposed business or product I "advocated against" is a so-called "polypill". This is a new pharmaceutical development whereby several different drugs are combined in a single pill. It is controversial and as a promoter of natural health I criticized it.

Now, the polypill is a class or type of drug, not a specific drug, product or brand. Many manufacturers are making them for various purposes. I did not mention anything to identify my target with any specific business or product.

To make an analogy, my article was comparable to criticizing a new trend in cars but without mentioning Ford, Chevrolet or BMW, all of whom are making them. What's more, I've written dozens of articles very similar to this. In one of them I wrote pretty strongly about statins, a class of cholesterol drugs. That one was much more critical than my polypill article.

So what's changed? Is EZA suddenly afraid of the drugs industry coming down on them? If so, somebody should warn the American Medical Association, which sometimes publishes some pretty harsh condemnations of drug companies in their journals (while promoting them on the following page!)

Maybe an EZA editor just misunderstood. Maybe they think "polypill" is a brand name like Anacin or Bufferin. Doesn't look like any brand name to me! But I'll give them the benefit of the doubt until I get a reply to my clarification.

If it's rejected I'm going to be pretty frustrated. There's really no other comparable article directory on the web... but maybe the time is ripe for one to come along.

By the way, I cannot find "we are not able to accept any articles that advocate against a business or product" in the official EZA guidelines. The closest I can find is must not "advocate against any individual or group" in the hate and violence clause. This is a totally different thing.
#expression #eza #freedom #interfering
  • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
    EZA is protecting their business...

    They are not happy to publish content that could be deemed detrimental to anyone... this particular article COULD be deemed detrimental to Dr. Salim Yusuf .. who first spoke about this 6 in 1 "polypill" type thing...

    ON the other hand, they may accept this type of generic article and this time an editor just confused the word polypill, and assumed it was a brand name?...

    Either way...

    If you don't like it, you could always publish the content on your own domain where you make the rules?

    Peace

    Jay
    Signature

    Bare Murkage.........

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[703901].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      If it's rejected I'm going to be pretty frustrated. There's really no other comparable article directory on the web... but maybe the time is ripe for one to come along.
      You may have to be frustrated then. If this is the first article you've had a problem with, your reaction is over the top.

      Might be different result if you base an article on points to ponder and questions about this new drug. As a "promoter of natural health" you are not apparently a doctor or scientist - and not qualified to give specific advice on a new drug treatment. Could be the article crossed that line in the opinion of EZA.

      Your freedom of expression is not an issue when you want to place your "expression" on someone else's site. They decide whether to publish or not. You are free to put the article on your own site.

      kay
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      It actually doesn't take much to be considered a 'difficult woman' -
      that's why there are so many of us.
      ...jane goodall
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[703942].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Gene Pimentel
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        Your freedom of expression is not an issue when you want to place your "expression" on someone else's site. They decide whether to publish or not. You are free to put the article on your own site.
        Words of wisdom. That is the bottom line.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[703960].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author dotslash
          I've pretty much stopped using EZA for similar reasons, it's the inconsistent approach I had a problem with. They suddenly decided they didn't like one of my links and I had to go back and change about 60 articles submitted over the last 18 months.

          But as posted the bottom line is that they can publish what they wan't - not much point complaining. I cancelled my premium membership and now put all my best content on my sites - with just a little more effort I can usually match my rankings on EZA and I can control exactly what I put up there.

          Also if I want to swamp the pages with Adsense - it's linked to my adsense account not theirs !

          It was kind of an eye opener for me but I get way more success using my own content myself.

          Neil
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[703984].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
            EZA can do what they want...end of story.

            Having said that, yes, I think they are really tightening up on what kinds of
            articles they are now allowing. I am not a lawyer, nor am I on the inside of
            EZA so I'm not going to speculate on their reasoning.

            Point is, they are. So you have 2 choices.

            1. Write what they will publish.
            2. Write for another directory.

            See, isn't life simple when you look at things logically?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704020].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
              David, at this point, EZA did not reject your article. One editor at EZA rejected your article. Big difference. And you said yourself that you are still waiting for the results from your clarifications.

              I can see why they might adopt the policy of "we are not able to accept any articles that advocate against a business or product"...

              Suppose you and I offer two similar products and we compete head to head. I get the brilliant idea of hiring a small army of article writers to submit articles trashing your product. You catch me and retaliate.

              Suddenly, that section of EZA is our personal war zone. From EZA's perspective, the user experience is severely degraded. So they toss out both sets of submissions, and decide they'll nip it in the bud by not allowing that kind of article.

              Is my example over the top? Maybe.

              Try substituting the word affiliate for the army of hired writers. If you read this forum, you'll find many affiliate marketers that will jump all over any tactic that they think will work. If it got around that trashing Product A was a good way to sell Product B, the editors would be buried by articles, from well-written to the garbage shat out of an article spinner, all trashing Product A.

              Has nothing to do with "freedom of expression" and everything to do with running their business. At least, that's how I see it...
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704068].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author FortressDewey
              Originally Posted by Steven Wagenheim View Post

              EZA can do what they want...end of story.

              ...Point is, they are. So you have 2 choices.

              1. Write what they will publish.
              2. Write for another directory.

              See, isn't life simple when you look at things logically?
              Gotta agree, sorta like hosts deciding if they will accept certain types of traffic or not...ie warez, torrents, adult, etc etc
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704220].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DavidO
    Jay, I get your drift... but since when has criticism, as long as it is factual and not libelous, etc, ever been prohibited? The same article was accepted immediately by American Chronicle and several other directories. We're not talking Satanic Verses here.

    I don't buy this "it's their business" argument. This is often applied to criticism of Google too. Businesses are bound by all sorts of federal and other fairness statutes. In the publishing business there are also broadly held principles of journalism.

    Sure, it's their business and they can do it if they like... but is it right?

    Beyond that, it's totally inconsistent with their previous treatment of my articles.

    And of course I published the article on my own site. I always do that first thing!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[703952].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
    Simple.

    Just like this forum, EZA is NOT a democracy. There is no freedom of anything. You have the privilege of submitting articles to them, that's all.

    Not saying that'll make you happy, but that's the bottom line.

    All the best,
    Michael
    Signature

    "Ich bin en fuego!"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[703978].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Joe Stewart
    It's best to remain vague about things like that within your article. That way you won't run the risk of being rejected. Put something really controversial with a question mark afterward in your resource box that encourages your readers to visit your website to get the rest of the story.

    Controversy is VERY effective. :-)
    Signature

    My New "Share All" Blog Is Coming Soon! Online & Offline Marketing, More!

    http://www.UnCENTSored.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[703981].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matt Barrington
    John and Steven raise good points. At the same time I can see Davido's points. A good portion of Ezinearticles success has come on the backs of Internet Marketers, and if they do limit our expression too far, I'm afraid they'll start to feel it. Now, I've seen some tightening of the rules, but I'm pretty sure this was the result of an isolated editor.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704167].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Long
      Originally Posted by Matt Barrington View Post

      A good portion of Ezinearticles success has come on the backs of Internet Marketers...
      I'm honestly not trying to be a pot stirrer here, but what proof do we have of the above?

      I realize that we as internet marketers like to believe that we alone are the big movers and shakers of the industry, but it's a big, big world out there.

      Chris Knight has made it crystal clear that his vision for the site (and it's his companies site, and ultimately his rules, so I agree with several others who have made similar points) is for it to be full of people who are knowledgeable and authoritative on a single topic. It was never designed to be cluttered up with scattershot, drive-by articles popularlized by Bum Marketing.

      I fought this for a long time, until I really understood the "long view" reality of it. Once I finally got it into my head, I decided that maybe my business would be better off in the long run if, like Google, I tried to give Chris what he wants.

      In the process, I realized that I could possibly bring a few others along with me.

      ~Mike
      Signature
      Future Proof Your Business in Just 7 Days
      Control Your Traffic (and Your Destiny) By Building a List of Raving Customers for Life
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[705146].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author horning
    hmmm interesting
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704170].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author elle56
    If you still want to publish with EZA, it leaves you with no choice but to comply with their requirements. It's their rules that matter.

    Some of my submissions were also rejected in the past and it was quite frustrating having to tweak the article then get rejected again.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704349].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author alertinvestor
      If you disagree with a reviewers decision, email them with your reasoning. I had this happen with an article recently.

      I received a reply with an apology and my article was approved.

      May not always happen, but it is worth a try. After all, the reviewers are only human.

      Just my two cents...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704463].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joe Stewart
        Originally Posted by alertinvestor View Post

        If you disagree with a reviewers decision, email them with your reasoning. I had this happen with an article recently.

        I received a reply with an apology and my article was approved.

        May not always happen, but it is worth a try. After all, the reviewers are only human.

        Just my two cents...

        I've done this a few times too. If they don't approve it right away, they usually will let me know exactly what the problem is so I can get it fixed.

        What I hate is when they send a disapproval and say it's not compliant with (example) "section 4, article 2b", blah, blah, blah. Then I go read that rule and it doesn't make sense.

        What I won't do is waste a lot of time there. If I can't get it fixed/approved after 1-2 contacts with admin, I'll put it on my site or submit it elswhere.
        Signature

        My New "Share All" Blog Is Coming Soon! Online & Offline Marketing, More!

        http://www.UnCENTSored.com

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704654].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Guitarnut
          I understand your frustration to a point but like many others have said, they can pretty much accept or reject whatever they want. However, it doesn't mean you've wasted your time writing the article as you still have many options.

          I've only had 2 articles rejected but rather than waste time worrying about it and trying to get it rectified I simply posted it somewhere else and wrote more articles to submit to EZA. It's not that big of a deal when you think about it.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704698].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Alan Petersen
            People seem to be confused about "freedom of expression/speech" EZA is a business and private company not a government. They put any regulations they want in their business even we don't agree. It's their business.
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704747].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author BigRedNotebook
              Is the original poster willing to allow me to post anything I'd like on his sites/blogs without exercising editorial discretion?

              If not, it seems a bit odd for him to expect EZA to extend that courtesy to him.

              I know it's all beginning to sound like a broken record, but...

              Their site. Their rules.

              If you want to publish the article, you can. Just not on their site.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[705027].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author writergirlk
    It DOES sound frustrating. Inconsistency is always maddening. I remember I had something rejected once on Associated Content. It was about how to make money on hubpages. The reasons for the rejection were ridiculous. It was on the grounds that I was promoting an affiliate program when there wasn't an affiliate link in the article or in the resources section of the article. I really think that people who are in charge of things are often not even paying attention.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[704500].message }}

Trending Topics