article rewriter software

[mel ramsay]

Hi Guys
Hope everyone is fit and well. Does anyone know of a free or cheap article rewiting software
Best regards to all
Mel(squaddie)

[terrapin719]

Personally I've found all the free or cheap rewriters to be junk I've had much better luck hiring someone to manually rewrite the articles. Usually with the rewrites you can get them done for a $1 - 2 per article. I've seen some offer for as low as 50 cents per rewrite on some of the freelancer sites, but to me that just seems way too cheap.

[bedmo]

I think that there's no such good software.

All the software out there have the same principe, they just do replace some WORDS. And the result is really bad....

This is just my opinion

[bedmo]

Originally Posted by dannyhw

That's not what mine or that power one do

So, how did your software works

Anyway, I whould suggest everyone to read this article. It's really the best one I have read about articles rewriting.

theindianblogger.com/blogging/the-best-article-rewriting-software-on-earth-and-it%E2%80%99s-free/

[32paul52]

Haven't seen a free version - I have used PowerArticlerewriter.com - which is really easy and fast to use. Plenty of free versions out there which take a lot of time and work to put the formatting in..........

[Glenn Leader]

Originally Posted by bedmo

I think that there's no such good software.

All the software out there have the same principe, they just do replace some WORDS. And the result is really bad....

This is just my opinion

You are miles off track here.... Not all article rewrite software works
like this. My product requires YOU to enter the data, not a robot.

HTH

Glenn

[ExRat]

Hi,

Jetspinner.com is the free version.

Power article rewriter produces the same output, but makes it a lot easier to do so.

For anyone confusing spinners and synonym replacement tools, please read the multitudinous threads here on this subject.

EG -

bedmo said -

I think that there's no such good software.

All the software out there have the same principe, they just do replace some WORDS. And the result is really bad....

With respect, you obviously don't know what you are talking about. Why comment on 'all of the software out there' when it is crystal clear that you haven't even come close to researching this and don't know the basic differences between the products?

I don't sell any spinner or anything like this, but I use a spinner every day that I'm working. It's actually one of the most important automation tools in my SEO armoury, but I don't just use it as advised - I combine it with other tools and also spend a lot of time refining my process.

It works like this - 'garbage in, garbage out'.

No reason to avoid them - just don't put garbage in and expect a different output.

[Terry Kyle]

Power Article Rewriter is excellent.

[stoica]

Hello Mel,
You can use my latest software ( E-marketing Helper ) to create articles. It's free for all warriors for 2 months , you can try it , in the following days it will be updated with another 50.000 articles(it's still beta version ). EMarketing Helper

[bedmo]

Hi ExRat,

Thank you for your respect but I know what I'm talking about.

Yes, there aren't only these kinds of software (I mean the software that just replace some words - automatically or those that require you to do it as Glenn Leader said). I know that there are other software like the one you are talking about here (powerarticlerewriter.com) or like jetspinner.com.

I think that these articles are more useful for articles submission and not for websites or blogs. And the more important as you said

I combine it with other tools and also spend a lot of time refining my process

.

I prefer to spent this times writing unique articles OR at least rewriting them myself especially for using them on blogs/websites.

With all my respect to all of you.

Originally Posted by ExRat

Hi,
EG -

bedmo said -

With respect, you obviously don't know what you are talking about. Why comment on 'all of the software out there' when it is crystal clear that you haven't even come close to researching this and don't know the basic differences between the products?

I don't sell any spinner or anything like this, but I use a spinner every day that I'm working. It's actually one of the most important automation tools in my SEO armoury, but I don't just use it as advised - I combine it with other tools and also spend a lot of time refining my process.

It works like this - 'garbage in, garbage out'.

No reason to avoid them - just don't put garbage in and expect a different output.

[unitminer]

Hi

Does anybody know algorithm, which is used in Power Article Rewriter or similar tool with good quality ?

Maybe it would be interesting to develop free web service, which will allow you to upload text and result will be 10, 50 or 1000 variations of article

[unitminer]

You can save results you have already from thesaurus.com in data base, so you will save few requests and day by day your database will grow and number of requests will be lower.

[Allen Graves]

If you are smart about it (like ExRat) and use a good piece of software (like Glenn's), then you'll be OK.

Software like Glenn's was created for those who are not looking for a short cut to get a million backlinks, but for those who want to increase their production by getting good content out of it.

If you use a cheap software and get articles that a human thinks sucks, then what's the point? You'll never get a single click-through to your site and any respectable article irectory is going to catch it and decline the article.

There is a place for everything, but crappy spinners don't belong in the article marketing industry of today. Best to either use your brain with Dragon Naturally Speaking or to spend some time, USE YOUR BRAIN and increase your productivity using software like Glenn's.

I think ExRat said it above, you get out of it what you put into it.

AL

p.s. Am I changing the way I feel about spinners? Absolutely not, I hate them and I wish they were never created, BUT I don't consider Glenn's software a spinner, I consider it a tool that a smart person can use to maximize their productivity if they stay ethical about it and don't fall into the "Link Trap.".

[Vijay M]

Using good Article Rewriting tools takes as much time as rewriting a 250 word article.

I just bought a tool being sold as a wso by warrior Milan. This tool researches and shows non commercial results for a keyword. I think using this tool and writing down quality articles and then getting backlinks to these articles might be a better idea than spitting out junk rewrites.

[Yudha Andika]

If you ask for software, power article rewriter is the best, but I am really suggest u, to rewrite manually, its better.

[dndoseller]

It is cheaper to hire someone from India at 3.50 an hour on elance to do rewrites than it is to buy and use article rewriting software.

You have no idea how much time you will spend rewriting the rewrites to have them make any sense at all.

[AmyKay]

I just signed up for article spinner. Anxious to see how it works.

[WillDee]

Originally Posted by unitminer

Hi

Does anybody know algorithm, which is used in Power Article Rewriter or similar tool with good quality ?

Maybe it would be interesting to develop free web service, which will allow you to upload text and result will be 10, 50 or 1000 variations of article

Yes, I do know the algorithm. It's been put into the spinner I wrote, initially to see how easy it was and for my own use. Have a look in my sig for a link, download the full version and use one of these serials, which will unlock the software:

It's got a full thesaurus included, and works like the PAR types.

Free for all, enjoy yourselves.

[ExRat]

Hi Bedmo,

Thank you for your respect but I know what I'm talking about.

Fair enough, I stand corrected - you just didn't express that in your first post.

Hi dndoseller,

It is cheaper to hire someone from India at 3.50 an hour on elance to do rewrites than it is to buy and use article rewriting software.

It's mathematically and logically impossible for that to be true - especially if you concentrate on maximising the use of the spun results. I can't believe that people are suggesting that spinning phrases (wisely with the right tool) is going to produce worse output/be less efficient than a non native English speaker doing it one at a time.

You have no idea how much time you will spend rewriting the rewrites to have them make any sense at all.

It's a pain-in-the-arse process, but as for time - if one is articulate, and uses DNS programmed to work hands free with PAR, then one can spin one article quicker than one can rewrite it - because it doesn't have to be 100% unique, it just has to be spun the right way (hint - alternative sentences are not the most effective. Shorter, more regular changes that change the length of the whole sentence work better).

Hi unitminer,

Maybe it would be interesting to develop free web service, which will allow you to upload text and result will be 10, 50 or 1000 variations of article

Didn't Brad Callen release one *based* (irony) on Sebastian's PAR? Why would someone want to use a web-based version when well spun articles are so difficult to come by? Why risk handing them to someone else with a larger distribution network?

Hi Allen,

if they stay ethical about it and don't fall into the "Link Trap."

I don't focus on article directories myself - there are too many other better services that allow more links and also within the text body - but I do like to use the content mainly for backlinking, not so much for the reader, but more for the SE's. I'm not sure if you're saying that you don't like seeing A.D.'s bombarded with crap (which I guess you don't) or whether you think it's a bad idea to use this system for SE backlinks?

Hi WillDee,

Thanks. I'll have a play with it and see if it has advantages over PAR - do you know of any?

Personally, I'd like to see the 'thesaurus/suggestion' side of spinners advanced/automated so that it assists the user in programming it with replacements (that work universally and with each new project) offer those replacements (highlighted) so that the user can skim through quickly and accept/reject those replacements - for clarity, I don't mean the actual thesaurus suggestions, but ones that have been created and successfully applied by the user previously and the user has deemed them as suitable for suggestion whenever the same word/phrase appears again.

If someone doesn't create this to work with a PAR type spinner, I'm looking to get it created myself. I think PAR is supposed to do this, but it doesn't seem to do it well and I would like to advance it to make it even easier/suitable for phrases as well as single words.

Also - where do I enter the serial number? And why can't I access the thesaurus/suggestions? IS it because I haven't entered the serial number? Thanks.

Hi JackTP,

I can spend 1 hour rewriting an article with PAR and get 20 good rewrites. They even get accepted in Ezine first try.

Honestly they are better than to get some penny a word writer to do the rewriting.

So 20 articles a day becomes 600 a month. That should account for something.

The trick is to find ways to get even more than 20 uses from each spin - this way, you get more bang for the time spent preparing.

[Jon Alexander]

Originally Posted by Allen Graves

If you are smart about it (like ExRat) and use a good piece of software (like Glenn's), then you'll be OK.

Software like Glenn's was created for those who are not looking for a short cut to get a million backlinks, but for those who want to increase their production by getting good content out of it.

If you use a cheap software and get articles that a human thinks sucks, then what's the point? You'll never get a single click-through to your site and any respectable article irectory is going to catch it and decline the article.

There is a place for everything, but crappy spinners don't belong in the article marketing industry of today. Best to either use your brain with Dragon Naturally Speaking or to spend some time, USE YOUR BRAIN and increase your productivity using software like Glenn's.

If you're intelligent about it and employ a good bit of software, then you will be OK. Software like Glenn's was made for people that aren't searching for a short cut to get 1,000,000 backlinks, but for those that need to increase their production by getting excellent content out of it. If you employ an inexpensive software and get articles a human thinks sucks, then what is the point? You can never really get a single click-through to your website and any respectable article irectory is going to catch it and reject the article. There's a place for everything, but ****ty spinners do not belong in the article promotion industry of today. Best to either use your noggin with Dragon Naturally Talking or to spend a while, use your mind and boost your productivity using software like Glenn's.

that was spun with a single button click, as a matter of fact.

[ExRat]

Hi Jon,

that was spun with a single button click, as a matter of fact.

You don't mention which tool did that.

If it's the one we discussed previously, then like previously, you must be using it in a special manner because no-one got readable results like that when they tried it for real.

Has it been upgraded or something?

[WillDee]

Hi WillDee,

Thanks. I'll have a play with it and see if it has advantages over PAR - do you know of any?

Personally, I'd like to see the 'thesaurus/suggestion' side of spinners advanced/automated so that it assists the user in programming it with replacements (that work universally and with each new project) offer those replacements (highlighted) so that the user can skim through quickly and accept/reject those replacements - for clarity, I don't mean the actual thesaurus suggestions, but ones that have been created and successfully applied by the user previously and the user has deemed them as suitable for suggestion whenever the same word/phrase appears again.

If someone doesn't create this to work with a PAR type spinner, I'm looking to get it created myself. I think PAR is supposed to do this, but it doesn't seem to do it well and I would like to advance it to make it even easier/suitable for phrases as well as single words.

Also - where do I enter the serial number? And why can't I access the thesaurus/suggestions? IS it because I haven't entered the serial number? Thanks.

If you downloaded the full version, you wouldn't be able to install without the serial, so I assume you've downloaded the trial - get the full version and run the setup. It asks for a serial or it won't install.

That aside, you should have access to the thesaurus even in the trial version. Highlight a word you'd like to replace and it gets copied into the textbox at the top. Right click on that and it'll suggest synonyms if they're available. If not, you can elect to open the thesaurus itself to do a more thorough search for synonyms, antonyms, related words and similarly spelled words. It's got around 30,000 available.

There's a short camtasia video in the help folder in the installation directory that shows you how to do this.

Regarding the ability to add custom phrases or snippets, it's something I was toying with for the next release, as I'm adding a dictionary/spellchecker to it anyway, and that allows you to add your own words. If you've seen MS Word's spellcheck, then you have an idea of what it will do. I'm probably going to revisit the gui too. It could do with a refresh. XP is so...well, XP.

Advantages over PAR - it's slightly more robust and the developer's still around and answering emails. ;-)

[ExRat]

Hi WillDee,

Thanks for that!

[milan]

My article submitter comes with a spinner which has all the features of the best spinners out there (and more), and the whole package costs less than competitive spinners.
Here is a demo:
Automatic Article Submitter - How To Spin The Articles

[Jon Alexander]

Originally Posted by ExRat

Hi Jon,

You don't mention which tool did that.

If it's the one we discussed previously, then like previously, you must be using it in a special manner because no-one got readable results like that when they tried it for real.

it's in my sig.

click.

You do not say which tool did that. If it is the one we talked about previously, then like formerly, you have to be using it in a particular way because nobody got readable results like that when they attempted it in reality

[ExRat]

Hi Jon,

You missed my question.

it's in my sig.

click.

As you know, I have clicked previously, paid for it and tested it out. The results were way different to the ones you posted above, as they were at the time I tested it when you posted an example before.

Has it been re-programmed or something?

[Allen Graves]

Originally Posted by Jon Alexander

If you're intelligent about it and employ a good bit of software, then you will be OK. Software like Glenn's was made for people that aren't searching for a short cut to get 1,000,000 backlinks, but for those that need to increase their production by getting excellent content out of it. If you employ an inexpensive software and get articles a human thinks sucks, then what is the point? You can never really get a single click-through to your website and any respectable article irectory is going to catch it and reject the article. There's a place for everything, but ****ty spinners do not belong in the article promotion industry of today. Best to either use your noggin with Dragon Naturally Talking or to spend a while, use your mind and boost your productivity using software like Glenn's.

that was spun with a single button click, as a matter of fact.

Yes, I can totally tell this is spun content. There are several flags which are thrown that scream - "THIS ARTICLE WAS SPUN" - to an experienced editor.

A good bit of software?
1,000,000 is gramatically incorrect.
There is no such thing as an "article promotion industry."
Who uses a noggin?
Dragon Naturally Talking?

...and that is just one paragraph.

It does get the point across well, which is important, but here's the deal. When you submitted the original article to a directory, it was read by a human before it was approved. Then when you submit this one, the human knows that this is the exact same content that he/she just read!!!!!

The spinners that ExRat and Glenn Leader are using do not create duplicated content if you use them correctly...unfortunately, yours does...even if it was duplicated with a single click.

Sorry - Declined.

Allen

[Allen Graves]

Originally Posted by ExRat

Hi Jon,

You missed my question.



As you know, I have clicked previously, paid for it and tested it out. The results were way different to the ones you posted above, as they were at the time I tested it when you posted an example before.

Has it been re-programmed or something?

LOL - I guess if you are going to openly promote and sell your stuff in the main forum (which I still believe should be against the rules but is happening all over this thread), you're wide open for the reality of others telling everyone else that your stuff completely sucks.

AL

[Jon Alexander]

Originally Posted by Allen Graves

LOL - I guess if you are going to openly promote and sell your stuff in the main forum (which I still believe should be against the rules but is happening all over this thread), you're wide open for the reality of others telling everyone else that your stuff completely sucks.

AL

As an article writer, you have to take that position, of course, Unfortunately, spinning is here, and it's only going to get more pervasive over time. Unless the whole world gets together to firm up the laws on copyright, there really isn't any way to stop it.

Just like there's no way to stop anyone taking one of your articles from ezines (or wherever) and manually 'repurposing' it sufficiently to get it past the directory / search engine dupe filters

If you have REALLY good english, and plenty of experience, you can tell what has and what hasn't been spun. I, for example, can see my own articles re-appearing on articlebase, dashboard etc. But the 'editors' of those sites can't, and neither, so it would appear, can google.

[Allen Graves]

That wasn't necessarily a shot at you Jon.

I'm just tired of folks pushing their own stuff on this forum. This used to be SO against the rules.

In my opinion, it's better to let others push your stuff from their own personal experience and ethical testimonials.

AL

[Jon Alexander]

Originally Posted by Allen Graves

That wasn't necessarily a shot at you Jon.

I'm just tired of folks pushing their own stuff on this forum. This used to be SO against the rules.

In my opinion, it's better to let others push your stuff from their own personal experience and ethical testimonials.

AL

accepted Allen.

I see some interesting developments in the near future, and tools such as spinners aren't necessarily *bad* for article writers like yourself, despite what you may be thinking now. Here's why - people who use articles, obviously want the 'best bangs per buck'. That includes people who commission articles. They are all waking up to the idea that they need to submit variations of their articles to different destinations in order to avoid duplication issues. So pretty soon, I'd expect the typical article buyer to want a fully jet-spinner prepared version for his $5, not just a plain article.

Putting an article into jetspinner format by hand can takes as long as writing the thing in the first place, so article writers either have to find some way to up their costs to compensate for the extra work, or take the hit.

And that's where software comes in. Expect to see premium 'auto jetspinner' tools sooner rather than later. And expect your customers to want you to go that extra mile for the sale.

BTW, your website seems to be a bit knackered - the rss thingy at the top of the pages is showing code, not rss stuff. Just thought you'd like to know.

[Jon Alexander]

Originally Posted by ExRat

Hi Jon,

You missed my question.



As you know, I have clicked previously, paid for it and tested it out. The results were way different to the ones you posted above, as they were at the time I tested it when you posted an example before.

Has it been re-programmed or something?

As you know, they already announced that it's constantly evolving. The more it gets used the better it gets. Whatever your problems were, are likely to have been evolved away, unless they were down to something like not reading the manual or something. PM me something you want wrangling, I'll wrangle it for you free.