People sharing your products for free - Why Worry?

23 replies
I recently found a couple of my products being shared on sites and at first it really got my back up and bothered me for days.

I recently read an article about author Tim Ferris promoting his new book through Bit Torrent

The author created a 680Mb bundle with behind-the-scenes videos, a number of author notes, and a sample chapter from his book, which was published for everyone on BitTorrent’s networks.

Tim Ferriss’ decision to sign with Amazon and promote his work through BitTorrent didn’t make most of the major book retailers happy, and Barnes and Noble was no exception. But even taking into account their boycotts, the result of this unusual cooperation turned out to be more than promising: the book was sold in more than 250.000 copies, while also appearing on all bestseller lists.

When asked about people downloading illegal copies he says that if a person wants to spend time finding a bootleg source and read a DRM-broken hard-to-read copy of his book on a computer screen which is not intended for reading in the first place, and all this is only done to save $12, he or she wasn’t ever his core audience, so there are no regrets about lost sales.

That last sentence says it all, the people going to these sites to download your products would probably never buy it anyhow so you really haven't lost any sales......Why Worry?

You can read the full article here

By the way if you are wondering why I am browsing these sites I have been using them legally for quite a while to promote my own products.

Anton





.
#free #people #products #sharing #worry
  • Profile picture of the author GobBluthJD
    Exactly. Those are people who were never even going to pay in the first place, are not your target market, and have little to no impact on your intended audience. Don't fret over them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008778].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by anton343 View Post

    the people going to these sites to download your products would probably never buy it anyhow
    I've seen hundreds of people say this, online.

    I think it's completely wrong.

    The sad reality is that the world is full of people who, when they want to read a particular e-book or whatever, will do a serious search for a copy they can download illicitly without paying (from a torrent, black-hat, or file-sharing site), and then buy it only if they can't find one.

    I myself know many people who do that. And so do you, Anton. And so does Tim Ferriss, who should know better than to propagate nonsense like this.

    He just likes to be seen to be coming from "a place of relaxed abundance", I suspect - and he certainly doesn't always quite think through what he says.

    This "perspective" (it's such nonsense that I wouldn't even go so far as to call it a "theory" - a "theory", however deeply mistaken, has to be based on something genuinely observed, and this doesn't qualify) is all part and parcel of the attitude which some people (quite unaccountably) have toward product security: they say they believe that worrying about product security is "negative thinking" and that because there's no such thing as 100% security without compromising on customer convenience (which I'm sure is perfectly true), the 98% or 99% product security you can fairly easily have, without inconveniencing anyone at all, is somehow "not worth bothering with" (which is far from true!).

    It makes me wonder whether the fact that no door-lock will keep out a dedicated, professional burglar means that they don't bother closing their front doors when they go out, either.

    Frankly, I think the whole thing's just silly. :p

    Originally Posted by GobBluthJD View Post

    Those are people who were never even going to pay in the first place
    No rudeness intended at all, but it totally baffles me that intelligent, educated people can seriously believe this. To me, it's not very significantly different from the conversations in the Off Topic Fourm about fluffy rabbits living on Mars with no air and no water. Really, it makes me realise how very, very out-of-step I so often am with some of the perspectives quite widely expressed here.

    You're a highly intelligent, highly educated, highly literate, perceptive, professional guy: how can you seriously believe that to be true? Many of them would have paid if they couldn't steal it. They have a different morality from yours and mine. They feel differently about the internet, and they don't respect other people's intellectual property rights online. When they want to acquire a digital product, before paying they try to find it free instead. Huge numbers of them! Come on - someone who has been through law school is not this naive: you must be aware that people (including people who will pay when they can't steal) do this, surely?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008802].message }}
    • Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      The sad reality is that the world is full of people who, when they want to read a particular e-book or whatever, will do a serious search for a copy they can download illicitly without paying (from a torrent, black-hat, or file-sharing site), and then buy it only if they can't find one.
      I fully believe this to be true. This of course goes mainly for the folks who "know" that if something is being sold online, a free version must be available somewhere online.

      Ethics in many cases go out the door, especially if one can save a few hundred bucks.

      The difference with some of our products however, is that if even if you are able to steal our sound effects or music and use it in a product presentation video etc, then it's better to pray that your project does not take off and goes viral. (which is really counter productive).
      Signature
      Arnold Stolting - Stolting Media Group
      "I LOVE The Song! The Vibe Is Positive And Firm!" - Kymani Marley. (Son of Bob Marley).

      "Very High Quality!" Jeremy Harding - Manager / Producer. Sean Paul.
      "They Are FANTASTIC!" - Willie Crawford.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008869].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author anton343
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      You're a highly intelligent, highly educated, highly literate, perceptive, professional guy: how can you seriously believe that to be true? Many of them would have paid if they couldn't steal it. They have a different morality from yours and mine. They feel differently about the internet, and they don't respect other people's intellectual property rights online. When they want to acquire a digital product, before paying they try to find it free instead. Huge numbers of them! Come on - someone who has been through law school is not this naive: you must be aware that people (including people who will pay when they can't steal) do this, surely?
      I think you have got me mixed up with someone else Alexa.

      Not in the first sentence

      just the part in red, I haven't been through law school and I have never said that I have in any of my posts.

      thanks for the compliments though

      Anton
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009341].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        Originally Posted by anton343 View Post

        I think you have got me mixed up with someone else Alexa.
        I was replying to GobBluthJD, there, Anton ("JD" = Doctor of Jurisprudence: it's a US law school degree ). I did "quote" him, with his name showing, right before the comment?

        Sorry for the confusion.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009392].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author anton343
          Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

          I was replying to GobBluthJD, there, Anton ("JD" = Doctor of Jurisprudence: it's a US law school degree ). I did "quote" him, with his name showing, right before the comment?

          Sorry for the confusion.
          my mistake, guess I am not that intelligent
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009430].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
            Banned
            I beg to differ, the rest of the description applied to you anyway. And I apologise for so vociferously not agreeing with Tim Ferriss. This subject is always one I react to because I think there's some woolly thinking about "product security" around, in general.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009556].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Raydal
              Originally Posted by anton343 View Post

              I recently found a couple of my products being shared on sites and at first it really got my back up and bothered me for days.
              Anton
              Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

              No rudeness intended at all, but it totally baffles me that intelligent, educated people can seriously believe this.
              Well here we have two different approaches to the same
              problem. You can worry about it for days or comfort yourself
              that the grapes were sour anyway.

              The problem is a hard one to solve (almost like death) so you
              have to come to terms with it somehow.

              -Ray Edwards
              Signature
              The most powerful and concentrated copywriting training online today bar none! Autoresponder Writing Email SECRETS
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009768].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
                Banned
                Originally Posted by Raydal View Post

                Well here we have two different approaches to the same problem.
                Maybe so, Ray, but you've quoted me out of context, here.

                You give a quotation from Anton's original post, immediately followed by a quotation of mine made in a later post replying to somebody else who said something different from what Anton said.

                The word "this" in what you've quoted from me does not refer to what Anton said, as your juxtaposition of the two quotations makes it appear.

                You can make anything look like anything else if you quote one thing and then another, referring to "this", which was actually replying to something completely different.

                You surprise me. Really.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009821].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Raydal
                  Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

                  Maybe so, Ray, but you've quoted me out of context, here.

                  You give a quotation from Anton's original post, immediately followed by a quotation of mine made in a later post replying to somebody else who said something different from what Anton said.

                  The word "this" in what you've quoted from me does not refer to what Anton said, as your juxtaposition of the two quotations makes it appear.

                  You can make anything look like anything else if you quote one thing and then another, referring to "this", which was actually replying to something completely different.

                  You surprise me. Really.
                  I thought that you were referring to the "they were not
                  going to pay in the first place." That's what I interpreted
                  your "this" to mean.

                  I was simply saying that Tim Ferris' position and the OP
                  positions were two options of which neither is the real
                  solution.

                  So really none of the two approaches I referred to was
                  yours really. I quoted you because of your response
                  to one of those approaches, not to critique yours.

                  -Ray Edwards
                  Signature
                  The most powerful and concentrated copywriting training online today bar none! Autoresponder Writing Email SECRETS
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009864].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
                    Banned
                    Originally Posted by Raydal View Post

                    I thought that you were referring to the "they were not
                    going to pay in the first place." That's what I interpreted your "this" to mean.
                    When you quote something else immediately before quoting something referring to "this", it naturally appears to readers as if the word "this" refers to what you've chosen to put immediately before it. It's tantamount to misquoting.

                    And following it up with a comment about the grapes being sour doesn't exactly help, either.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009888].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author anton343
              Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

              I beg to differ, the rest of the description applied to you anyway. And I apologise for so vociferously not agreeing with Tim Ferriss. This subject is always one I react to because I think there's some woolly thinking about "product security" around, in general.
              There is no need to apologise for having a point of view. I think maybe a few people have missed the point of the post. I never mentioned that you should not try and secure your product in the best way possible and I agree with you when you say... there's some woolly thinking about "product security" around, in general"

              One point I was trying to get across was the fact that sharing my products really bothered me for days and it seemed that this was the only thing I concentrated on. Yes, I issued all the relevant notices etc. to get them took down but after reading the article it just seemed to me that I was worrying about something that I didn't have a lot of control over which isn't a healthy attitude to have.

              Another point I was trying to make, was that used correctly these types of sites can be a great source for traffic and sales. This I know from my own experience.

              Anton
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8010925].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ernest Simon
    With WSOs specifically, some people would check those places to see if there is a free copy shared before buying. That is, they would buy, but if there is a free copy then why bother? Specially if it is just an ebook or video course.

    Proof? I've seen courses sold and people getting results on creating small sites with a fake download link (which in fact is your affiliate link) to rank page 1 on google. Because people were getting results means that many potential buyers try to find a free copy and if they can't they end up buying the product.

    Thus, you are losing sales.

    However, if you are a major product seller and you use those places for branding (specially outside this forum) then it can turn out profitable.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008803].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JensSteyaert
      Originally Posted by lincher View Post

      With WSOs specifically, some people would check those places to see if there is a free copy shared before buying. That is, they would buy, but if there is a free copy then why bother? Specially if it is just an ebook or video course.

      Proof? I've seen courses sold and people getting results on creating small sites with a fake download link (which in fact is your affiliate link) to rank page 1 on google. Because people were getting results means that many potential buyers try to find a free copy and if they can't they end up buying the product.

      Thus, you are losing sales.

      However, if you are a major product seller and you use those places for branding (specially outside this forum) then it can turn out profitable.
      Did you know a Wso was made using this technique to fool the people trying to get a free copy?

      They eventually lose patience and buy the product anyway...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009980].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author charlier
    I think it is really tough to stop. Also the follow up on those ppl would not be profitable and I think that is what Tim meant by this is not my core audience bec to him that would not be a profitable lead. Thanks for sharing good read.
    Signature

    Please do not promote affiliate programs in your signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008809].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    Well, publishing it on Amazon rather than distributing it via pdf are two entirely different things. The Blackhat sites get it and distribute it to people who would have been your target market. Many of them sell it themselves in memberships sites and outrank you for your own product name in the serps. If it weren't available on Blackhat sites, you would undoubtedly make more sales. Some of these ebooks/products are distributed via BH sites by the thousands. You can't tell me that some of those that are interested in that product would not have bought it from you if that's the only way they could have acquired it.

    I use DMCAs to the file sharing sites that they place them on with great success. I don't subscribe to the "they weren't my target markets" or the "you should feel flattered that they liked it enough to share it" theories.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008878].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author timpears
    Interesting point of view. Thanks for sharing it.
    Signature

    Tim Pears

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008902].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author onSubie
    He did not upload a copy of his book, he only uploaded a sample chapter.

    So everyone downloading his torrent package was getting a promotional package for his book designed to increase sales.

    He did not share the book he was selling.

    Also, you say "despite the boycott", but you didn't mention a boycott so I'm not sure what you are referring to.

    Who boycotted, online retailers? Who sold 250,000 copies if it was not online retailers?

    The music industry and movie industry used to use this marketing tactic too. They would release a partial clip with advertising on Torrent sites and people would download "new hit song - hot artist" thinking they were cleverly stealing the song, but they just end up with an advertisment for the song.

    As sbucciarel said, in the IM industry, the problem isn't just torrents and file share sites. Your work gets copied, shared and promoted directly to your target audience through 'black hat' marketing forums.

    These forums get a lot of Google love so searching for "Product Name" brings up all the unauthorized forum sharing threads over legitimate sites.

    Alexis' post is bang-on too. All this "people who download would never by anything, ever, anyway" is a pretty big assumption with no evidence to back it up.

    It also doesn't explain why companies spend money to advertise on torrent sites if they have no hope of ever reaching a paying customer.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8008989].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Luis Vaugier
    Well. that's part of this business, a good recommendation is to put a lot of affiliates and USEFUL links so they get those products and you earn anyway.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8009149].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TravisO
    There is something that you should worry about, and something you should be happy about.

    I would start with something that you should worry about. If people shares your product for free without your consent, they may have brainwashed the people that your product was free, now, they just give it to them.

    And now something that you should be happy about is that you market your product for free. You won't experience hassle in marketing your product. People will know your product and not only one, but many of them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8010968].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TrumpiaTim
    If those people who received it were never going to purchase in the first place, where is the loss? I suppose it's because we can't say definitely that they were never going to purchase.
    Signature

    www.Trumpia.com

    Trumpia: The Most Completed SMS Text Messaging Software & API Solution.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8010986].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author opalfx
    im not sure if i agree with Tim. Sometimes people want a risk free offer. and i think that the people who are looking for torrent may in fact turn into paying customers. i think he should instead put a squeeze page link and make it a .zip file and have give up at least their email address to get the product. he'd least be able to funnel with additional free videos and convert them in the long run.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8011003].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jchengery
    Hello everyone,

    I know I have heard of people putting affiliate links in their ebooks, books, etc. as a "compromise" of sorts for when, if the blackhat sites and such do get illegal copies of their ebooks/books, etc. and pass them around, the original product owner hopes that the "extra publicity" of sorts will lead to additional profit.

    Of course, that doesn't mean that those who "stole" the book will necessarily use and purchase from those affiliate links.

    With that all said, the challenge of protecting your books to the point where stealing from you is virtually impossible to do. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try, but, there will be times when theft does occur - you just attempt to learn from it and close off the loopholes as much as possible so that you get the hard-earned and deserved money to go where it should go - in your pocket/accounts. :-)

    Just my 2 cents.

    Take care,

    Joe Chengery
    Signature

    My free ebook on pancreatic cancer: http://ow.ly/nPVhm Let's help my friend Courtney Reagan strike out cancer!

    Are you WORRIED about what wheat is doing to your waistline and your health? You SHOULD be! http://ow.ly/jSIY9 Internet marketer, copyeditor, copywriter, content creator, author - http://www.joechengery.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8011028].message }}

Trending Topics