What do you really mean by saying "unique content"?

26 replies
Dear Warriors,

People always say that you have to write unique content if you want to have chances for SEO or generally speaking chances to succceed in internet marketing. But when you say "unique" content do you mean to write something with your own words that already exist or to write something that nobody has ever written for? If the answer is the second one then an average person will miserably fail to make money online because there are a ton of information in every field.

Thank you,
Zourkas
#unique content
  • Profile picture of the author JPaston
    You're right, it's practically impossible to write something that no-one has written before. Even if you write content off-the-cuff you'll almost certainly have been influenced by what you've read and therefore will repeat phrases and so on.

    However, when marketers talk about 'unique content' they normally mean content that isn't curated from somewhere else, even if it's spun.

    For SEO you could broaden that further and say that anything that passes the Copyscape test is 'unique content' in that it isn't identifiable as a copy elsewhere on the 'net. But that is stretching the definition somewhat!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249522].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author zourkas
      Hi Paston,

      I thought to read books and write about the best information in these books according to my judgment but with my own words, and when I write the title of my article in google search results I am astonished to see millions of already existing results! And yes I also believe that practically it is impossible to write something that nobody has ever written before.

      Thank you,
      Zourkas
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249545].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by zourkas View Post

    when you say "unique" content do you mean to write something with your own words that already exist or to write something that nobody has ever written for?
    Neither.

    I suspect you may be confusing "original" and "unique".

    "Unique" means "not previously published" - that's all.

    Originally Posted by zourkas View Post

    If the answer is the second one then an average person will miserably fail to make money online because there are a ton of information in every field.
    That doesn't have to matter. It's not about whether people can find information: it's about whether they do find information, and how it's presented to them.

    By the way, the average person does fail miserably, in internet marketing - but that isn't the reason.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249530].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SuccessMarketer
    Originally Posted by zourkas View Post

    If the answer is the second one then an average person will miserably fail to make money online because there are a ton of information in every field.

    Thank you,
    Zourkas
    The answer is the second... an article in your own words.
    Sometimes is not what you say so much in your article but how you say so it has an impact in your audience.

    How many times you've read something about a particular subject that you did not "get it" or agree with and then you read the same information elsewhere but - this time - you actually "get it" and agree...?

    The second time you read the info it made more sense for a variety of reasons (ie; you respect the author's opinion, you relate to the author, the subject is explained better than before, etc)

    The truth is that there is no saturation... this is a big world!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249560].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author zourkas
      Originally Posted by SuccessMarketer View Post

      The answer is the second... an article in your own words.
      Sometimes is not what you say so much in your article but how you say so it has an impact in your audience.

      How many times you've read something about a particular subject that you did not "get it" or agree with and then you read the same information elsewhere but - this time - you actually "get it" and agree...?

      The second time you read the info it made more sense for a variety of reasons (ie; you respect the author's opinion, you relate to the author, the subject is explained better than before, etc)

      The truth is that there is no saturation... this is a big world!
      The second is to write for something that nobody ever written before
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249575].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Istvan Horvath
    Originally Posted by zourkas View Post

    Dear Warriors,

    People always say that you have to write unique content if you want to have chances for SEO or generally speaking chances to succceed in internet marketing. But when you say "unique" content do you mean to write something with your own words that already exist or to write something that nobody has ever written for? If the answer is the second one then an average person will miserably fail to make money online because there are a ton of information in every field.

    Thank you,
    Zourkas
    The is a Latin saying: Nihil sub sole novum* [nothing new under the sun] and it was coined thousands of years ago... way before the "information age" and IM

    Even the non-fiction stories of the whole "world literature" can be traced back to 7-8 archetypal plots featuring a few characters.

    Which means you may be right about the impossibility of coming up with something absolutely new... but that doesn't stop thousands of writers, film makers and other creative individuals from attempting to give us newer and newer versions of the same old. And the best ones always succeed

    Now, back to our incredibly small and narrow(minded) world of IM [misnomer because usually we think of MMO=making money online] - this world is full of urban legends, misconceptions and plain old BS.

    If you think your average person's only chance to make money online is to write "unique content" - then I have to question your premise.

    _____________________________________
    *actually, it is a quote from Vulgata
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249574].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cheddarben
      Originally Posted by Istvan Horvath View Post

      The is a Latin saying: Nihil sub sole novum* [nothing new under the sun] and it was coined thousands of years ago... way before the "information age" and IM

      Even the non-fiction stories of the whole "world literature" can be traced back to 7-8 archetypal plots featuring a few characters.

      Which means you may be right about the impossibility of coming up with something absolutely new... but that doesn't stop thousands of writers, film makers and other creative individuals from attempting to give us newer and newer versions of the same old. And the best ones always succeed

      Now, back to our incredibly small and narrow(minded) world of IM [misnomer because usually we think of MMO=making money online] - this world is full of urban legends, misconceptions and plain old BS.

      If you think your average person's only chance to make money online is to write "unique content" - then I have to question your premise.

      _____________________________________
      *actually, it is a quote from Vulgata
      Thank you for the insightful and educational comment!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250409].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
        Originally Posted by JPaston View Post

        You're right, it's practically impossible to write something that no-one has written before. Even if you write content off-the-cuff you'll almost certainly have been influenced by what you've read and therefore will repeat phrases and so on.
        Which is why I advise people who want to be better writers to read widely. If you concentrate too heavily on one or two authors, you tend to start sounding like them through osmosis.

        Originally Posted by JPaston View Post

        However, when marketers talk about 'unique content' they normally mean content that isn't curated from somewhere else, even if it's spun.
        Most "marketers" have a distorted, Google-centric view of unique content. Somehow they got the idea that Google would punish them if they strung together more than two words in the same order as anyone else in the database. Which led to the tortured messes some try to pass off as 'unique content', which is often unique, seldom original and almost never content.

        Originally Posted by JPaston View Post

        For SEO you could broaden that further and say that anything that passes the Copyscape test is 'unique content' in that it isn't identifiable as a copy elsewhere on the 'net. But that is stretching the definition somewhat!
        I can create "unique" content by taking a page out of the 1946 Manhattan phone book and simply rearranging the names and numbers. But what good is it?

        Even if, by some miracle, the gibberish that often passes for content does influence a site ranking and does garner a click, what human reader in their right mind will hit anything but the back button?

        Originally Posted by zourkas View Post

        Hi Paston,

        I thought to read books and write about the best information in these books according to my judgment but with my own words, and when I write the title of my article in google search results I am astonished to see millions of already existing results! And yes I also believe that practically it is impossible to write something that nobody has ever written before.

        Thank you,
        Zourkas
        I've had that frustrating experience with titles myself. That oh so clever title I dreamed up has been used many time before. Consider "The Rock" - are you talking about the prison, the movie or the pro wrestler-turned-actor?

        If you can't tweak your title to something better and less popular, use the title that fits.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250526].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steve B
    Originally Posted by zourkas View Post

    People always say that you have to write unique content if you want to have chances for SEO or generally speaking chances to succceed in internet marketing.
    Zourkas,

    SEO and avoiding copyright issues are probably the main two reasons why most folks in the IM world continue to encourage "unique content."

    Think about this -

    How many of your prospects/customers know if a page of content, or an ad, or a blog post is unique? To them, the "test of uniqueness" is simply whether they have seen the content before.

    Like "beauty" the label "unique" most likely is formulated in the eye of the beholder.

    Hence, unique doesn't make one piece of content better or worse than another; it simply suggests that it is different from anything a reader has seen before.

    With so many new folks coming online and joining the IM ranks, chances are pretty good that most content in this niche is new (and therefore unique) to those individuals and they will never know if, in fact, that content is actually unique or not.

    I like to write my own content or credit (with permission) content that is authored elsewhere. But in all reality, very, very few people will ever know if your content is original, partially original, or wholly unoriginal, with this exception . . .

    Your persona or "voice" implanted in your content is usually unique to you as an individual. Your subscribers and readers, the more they read your content, will begin to recognize your voice. Soon they will be able to tell if you authored content or not based upon the consistency that content piece has with what they expect from you.

    Good luck to you,

    Steve
    Signature

    Steve Browne, online business strategies, tips, guidance, and resources
    SteveBrowneDirect

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249727].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
      I believe your "voice" has a lot to do with it.

      Perhaps the information has been published before, but a person's individual voice and writing style make it unique.

      Having rewritten hundreds of pages of content for clients, the feedback shows this to be true. Many have said, "Wow! I never thought a piece about (______) could be that interesting, or fun, or so engaging." Or, And I thought the piece I sent you was good to begin with, but you put it into a whole new league!"

      My point is that when you have a skilled writer, that writer can make any information not only unique, but very original as well.

      Terra

      Edit: Sorry if it sounds like I am tooting my own horn, that wasn't my intention at all.

      Please just take away that any talented and skilled writer can take information and present it in a unique way as to be different from other pieces about the same thing.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8249781].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vicdd
    Fiction novels can be unique (or rather original, like Alexa said), or a diary. Or local news. Things like that.
    I think, when it comes to information, unless you come up with something new, nobody has ever thought of, you're quaranteed to find the very same information elsewhere (you've probably gathered your knowledge somewhere anyway). Internet is an Information Technology, and it's about spreading information, not inventing it.
    And unique, as we see it, is just
    unique phrasing
    and /or unique mix of information
    and /or unique personal point of viev on existing information.

    Also, I don't think spun content is enough to be considered unique, even is search engines may see it that way.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250105].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Omarkenawy
    Unique content is not only duplicate content, but it also the content that bring value and fresh ideas for the readers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250385].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author writeaway
    Originally Posted by mikedcarroll View Post

    I think what you are trying to achieve is writing content with your unique viewpoints on it. You'll always be influenced by what you have read in books and blogs, heard on a podcast, watched on TV....but only you can add your perspective on it.
    Exactly. Your personal writing style is part of your overall brand. The information or facts might be the same but it is your unique viewpoint and presentation (different from opinion, mind you) that makes your content different. This is why I don't understand why many content providers insist on writing in a dull, flat, generic way.

    Copyscape uniquness is just PART of what make content 'unique.' There's also a qualitative/experiential component. You know, the part that appeals to human readers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250632].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seobro
    Something that was not cut and paste from another web site. Like it can pass copy scape. Perhaps we need to define uniqueness. What we refer to it work that was done by you.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250649].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
      Originally Posted by seobro View Post

      Something that was not cut and paste from another web site. Like it can pass copy scape. Perhaps we need to define uniqueness. What we refer to it work that was done by you.
      I see people talking about running things through Copyscape and coming up with stuff like "67.27343% unique." As I see it, either something is unique or it isn't. Kind of like being 57% pregnant.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250795].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by zourkas View Post

    an average person will miserably fail to make money online
    This is all you really needed to write
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8250883].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TimothyTorrents
    Probably the most used words in the content writing industry are "high quality" and "unique". The terms are thrown around so freely no one even knows what they mean anymore.

    The general definition of "unique content" is just content that is not copied word for word from another source. But writing articles that are truly unique is a different story.

    Like other members have mentioned, I think that content becomes truly unique when a writer does thorough research, formats all the information neatly, and writes a article with his or her personal writing style. If you need to write some content, you simply have to borrow information from other sources. It is called research. But the way you write ABOUT the information you find is what makes your content unique.

    So don't just focus on writing content that will pass a online plagiarism checker. Write content that expresses your unique personality. Once you can do that, your content will be truly unique.

    Good luck!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8251048].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author azulita
    Hi. It just means that you have to write articles with your own words. As you said is so much information out there that it would be so easy to just copy but don´t do that. As you said, it has to be "Unique Conten" your own knowledge.

    take care =)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8251500].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author goindeep
    Ahhhh.

    Dude stop over thinking, we dont want you to have an anxiety attack or anything like that/

    Basically, write good sh*t.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8251692].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author zourkas
    Thanks to all of you guys! Now the whole story is clear in my mind
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8251748].message }}
    • Heya Zourkas,

      Unique content, in my opinion, is:

      • Content integrated with a person's own observations, inferences, test results, theories and perspectives, aimed at providing a specific target audience with benefits not found elsewhere, delivered in a style and packaging not found elsewhere...
      Signature
      • Deep Learning & Machine Vision Engineer: ARIA Research (Sydney, AU)
      • Founder: Grayscale (Manila, PH) & SEO Campaign Manager: Kiteworks, Inc. (SF, US)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8251765].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Donowhy
    Due to the recursive nature of linguistics, any phrase that has a logical meaning behind it can be said in infinitely many ways. It will be interesting to see how google's algorithms incorporate this for the future of internet.

    With our exponential rate of information growth on the internet, pretty soon entire articles will be very close to being word for word similar to someone they've never even met writing about the same topic.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8251772].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author janicej
      Banned
      I think it's highly unlikely to make one of your articles very similar to someone else's without actually trying, but it's always worth the effort to check.

      I saw a few online services that allow you to paste entire articles into a box and they'll tell you how original it is (usually a value of over 80-90% is considered to be good from what i've heard). Many of them are not available for free though.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8252138].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
      Originally Posted by Donowhy View Post

      With our exponential rate of information growth on the internet, pretty soon entire articles will be very close to being word for word similar to someone they've never even met writing about the same topic.
      Especially if enough of the lazy keep following advice like "find an article you like and just change a few of the words so it's not a word-for-word copy."

      Taking an article about dog training and changing the word "dog" to "Chihuahua" doesn't make the article unique or original, no matter what some bot says.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8252344].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CherryAffairs
    Alexa is spot on again. Just write something that's never been there. rephrase the whole paragraph and add in your own views or research should be good enough. At the end on the day, it still depends on duration of visit by the visitors, relevance and number to back links you get.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8252389].message }}

Trending Topics