Opinions on Reporting on Revenue vs. Value
Most interfaces I've seen always treat ecommerce purchases as revenue and everything else as "value". I've always disliked this for some reason and have tried to use a single metric "revenue" combined with revenue types such as "virtual revenue", "hard revenue", etc. My thinking is that a lead for instance might generate a potential revenue so to speak, or an ad click (you could assume an certain amount of revenue, although it' not cash in hand yet), etc.
Nothing seems to feel right. There doesn't seem to be any standard terminology as far as virtual vs. true revenue, or hard vs. soft revenue? Does anyone have any opinions on this subject (revenue vs. value) and how they prefer to value and track different types of conversions? Should ecommerce revenue has it's own distinct terminology? I've always disliked the goals vs. conversions and revenue vs. value distinction.. I just like to think of conversions and revenue.
I have an icon site for instance where I track demo views, downloads, leads, and actual purchases, which got me down this path of trying to figure out out how to keep the reporting of all conversion types together using the same terminology.
So to summarize would something like this be totally confusing:
All Revenue
Virtual Revenue
Hard Revenue, etc.
Or does it just make more sense to say:
Revenue
Value
Revenue + Value
And just lump any non-ecommerce conversions into value?
All advice is greatly appreciated.
Make a Full Time Living With Options <- Warrior Discount