Why did this blog post get 28 million views?

15 replies
I didn't finish college so I didn't really major in anything. However I do study "viralology." Having a successful blog myself, I am obsessed with the factors that lead to viral posts.

This one is an excellent case study. I'm not sure if it has come up on this forum before:

A few months ago, a guy named Seth Adam Smith wrote "Marriage isn't for you."

It was viewed 28 million times. I know something about the ad network he uses (WordAds) so I can tell you that he made around 50 grand on that one post. Not to mention the books he sold and the subsequent book deals he got from it.

He was featured on the Today Show, GMA, all the major online news outlets, etc.

It was huge.

Meanwhile, the article itself is rather weak. The writing is passable but flimsy. His writing style is stale. He uses emoticons. The overall message of the piece is nice but bland: "you shouldn't be selfish in your marriage."

Duh.

I've always been a "content is king" type of guy... but there are exceptions. This is one. Everything Buzzfeed has ever done would be another.

So, Warriors, why do you think this one went mega-viral? What can we learn from it? How can we duplicate that success?

It had a clickbait title. We know that. The picture of him and his wife probably helped. Relatable message. Accessible. Built a narrative. Is that it?

What else? Luck?

I don't believe in luck.

What do you think?
#blog #million #post #views
  • Profile picture of the author standon23
    interesting im in for answers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934527].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author beasty513
    Sometimes... "viral" content is not something to be reasoned.

    Some of the most sillest, mind boggling stuff is never understood.


    Are you trying to get viral?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934533].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RickCopy
    a perfect headline and just one big name site syndicating your article is all it takes for content to go viral....its like dominoes.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934534].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author David Keith
    hmmm. Well, I guess beyond the clickbait curiosity peaking title, i think it has to do with the fact that the title seems to be "selling" (validating) what millions of people are thinking.

    If you just read the title and know that our divorce rates are sky high and that most of the populations of the civilized world are marrying much older in life, then its easy to see why many would be predisposed to identifying with the idea of "why marriage is not right for you".

    Along the same lines, much of the informational media most of us take in is more about affirming our pre-existing beliefs rather than actually getting informed about a subject.

    Thats why fox news and msnbc have been so highly successful. On any given night they run mostly the same stories with almost exact opposite views and commentary. The facts of the story are the same, but the spin is the exact opposite. Their audiences are both growing faster than most other main stream less polarizing news sources.

    Basically, conservatives just want their ideas and world view to be validates so they watch fox and liberals feel the same way about msnbc. For the most part, the masses of people that tune into those news sources regularly are not really seeking the truth or the real news. But rather they are seeking validation of their opinion.

    in my opinion, the title to this article elicited much of the same response. From the title alone, many people felt they were about to have their opinions on a major life event validated.

    Predictably, people like to feel validated, so if thats what your "selling" i think there will always be a solid chance of attracting a big audience.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934579].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author stillanovice
      Originally Posted by David Keith View Post

      hmmm. Well, I guess beyond the clickbait curiosity peaking title, i think it has to do with the fact that the title seems to be "selling" (validating) what millions of people are thinking.

      If you just read the title and know that our divorce rates are sky high and that most of the populations of the civilized world are marrying much older in life, then its easy to see why many would be predisposed to identifying with the idea of "why marriage is not right for you".

      Along the same lines, much of the informational media most of us take in is more about affirming our pre-existing beliefs rather than actually getting informed about a subject.

      Thats why fox news and cnbc have been so highly successful. On any given night they run mostly the same stories with almost exact opposite views and commentary. The facts of the story are the same, but the spin is the exact opposite. Their audiences are both growing faster than most other main stream less polarizing news sources.

      Basically, conservatives just want their ideas and world view to be validates so they watch fox and liberals feel the same way about cnbc. For the most part, the masses of people that tune into those news sources regularly are not really seeking the truth or the real news. But rather they are seeking validation of their opinion.

      in my opinion, the title to this article elicited much of the same response. From the title alone, many people felt they were about to have their opinions on a major life event validated.

      Predictably, people like to feel validated, so if thats what your "selling" i think there will always be a solid chance of attracting a big audience.
      Great points (although I think you meant MSNBC, not CNBC).

      You bring up an interesting facet at the end. This post became "controversial" because the people with cynical views on marriage messaged or commented to tell him what a naïve sap his is. But they only clicked because they thought they were about to hear someone preaching to their chorus. This probably irritated them and prompted the reaction. This reaction is part of what made the post a "story," which led to media coverage, which led to the massive view count.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934773].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author onSubie
    I think this went viral for a number of reasons that many pieces go viral and astute writers and marketers are beginning to learn and take advantage.

    First it starts off with a provocative title that goes against conventional ideas = marriage is bad. And not just bad, bad for you

    It starts with the overt premise that after getting married this guy does not like marriage = what the? What an ass! What about his poor wife? Why did the jerk marry her then?

    Only to prove the "twist" that it wasn't because he didn't love his wife, it was because he loved her SO much! His marriage isn't for him, it's for her = Awwww! What a great guy! I wish I had a guy like that...weep...

    It targets marriage which is always hot.

    It starts out with a negative premise to hook you in and get your "judgement" up prematurely.

    Has all the tropes for its audience: family, marriage, youthful self-doubt, sage fatherly advice, emasculated male becomes sensitive stud, love triumphs all fears

    It pays off with saccharine romance. It appeals to women. It makes a great story.

    Many big viral pieces have these qualities. It's getting to the point that every headline and article I see shared on facebook has these qualities. The problem is most viral pieces have the click-bait headline with out the payoff in the content to really make it go.

    How many headlines in facebook feeds like this just lead to mundane articles that do not 'live up to the hype' - "When this man came on stage he was hated and booed, but after saying one word he had everyone standing and cheering" .

    I read that "Marriage isn't for you" piece from a post by a facebook friend and I remember rolling my eyes and in my best Charlie Brown impersonation thinking, "Good grief!"

    Edit: Wow, David Keith's post is excellent insight into the mentality - thanks for that.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934733].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author stillanovice
      Originally Posted by onSubie View Post

      I think this went viral for a number of reasons that many pieces go viral and astute writers and marketers are beginning to learn and take advantage.

      First it starts off with a provocative title that goes against conventional ideas = marriage is bad. And not just bad, bad for you

      It starts with the overt premise that after getting married this guy does not like marriage = what the? What an ass! What about his poor wife? Why did the jerk marry her then?

      Only to prove the "twist" that it wasn't because he didn't love his wife, it was because he loved her SO much! His marriage isn't for him, it's for her = Awwww! What a great guy! I wish I had a guy like that...weep...

      It targets marriage which is always hot.

      It starts out with a negative premise to hook you in and get your "judgement" up prematurely.

      Has all the tropes for its audience: family, marriage, youthful self-doubt, sage fatherly advice, emasculated male becomes sensitive stud, love triumphs all fears

      It pays off with saccharine romance. It appeals to women. It makes a great story.

      Many big viral pieces have these qualities. It's getting to the point that every headline and article I see shared on facebook has these qualities. The problem is most viral pieces have the click-bait headline with out the payoff in the content to really make it go.

      How many headlines in facebook feeds like this just lead to mundane articles that do not 'live up to the hype' - "When this man came on stage he was hated and booed, but after saying one word he had everyone standing and cheering" .

      I read that "Marriage isn't for you" piece from a post by a facebook friend and I remember rolling my eyes and in my best Charlie Brown impersonation thinking, "Good grief!"

      Edit: Wow, David Keith's post is excellent insight into the mentality - thanks for that.
      Great insights. I guess the takeaway here is that anyone can have one viral post if they can think of a clickbait title and stitch together a few semi-coherent sentences about marriage or kids. But the challenge is getting beyond one hit wonder status. Interesting note: if you look at the guy's site now, he gets only a couple dozen comments per post. Not sure what his traffic is, but I'm guessing it's plummeted by well over 95 percent.

      There are a few different personal blogs (as opposed to the BuzzFeeds and Viral Nova type sites) that I see shared on Facebook and Twitter ALL OF THE TIME. Those... the ones that seem to have a loyal following of hundreds of thousands of people... employ some cheap tactics with misleading headlines, but they come through with great content. Maybe not content I agree with... but solid stuff, nonetheless.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934763].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author savidge4
      The post just has everything going for it. The title, the twist, Family, the gushy stuff. It just spot on hits a particular Demographic perfect! Viral blogging there is with no question a pattern. When was the last time you read a 'viral' blog about sports? Or Stock trading? or WWF Wrestling? You simply DON'T. Why? They are not targeted towards WOMEN! women are far more social.. women share far more than men. Pinterest being a great example of this... The user demographic is 80% women.

      If you happen to notice, the piece that went 'viral' was not even posted on the Authors site to begin with. If it was... it would have never gone viral more than likely. Its not that the guy is a bad writer... Its more that was a stretch in to his normal topics. Or to be more plain the 'viral' post was not relevant content on his page.

      I think anyone that creates content in any way shape or form dreams of having something go viral. The reality is it just happens. Other than the rule above, You cant put a finger on it.

      Think about this... Name someone that has 'gone viral' twice. I cant think of any. - of course I am expecting to be shown wrong on this... but maybe not!
      Signature
      Success is an ACT not an idea
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934798].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Stuart Walker
    Was it written in relation to a current trend at the time? That usually helps things go viral.

    Read this about how Glen at Viper Chill creates viral topics, he managed 9,000 unique visitors in one day...

    9,000 Uniques in One Day: A Viral Marketing Case Study - Moz
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934908].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author IMStrategus
    some viral content was simply created after analysing a ton of current data like trends, topics etc. + some marketing strategy attached to it.
    Signature

    I lie on marketing forums. Social media is for fun, pics & hook ups.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8934927].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author David Keith
    Data trends dont make things go viral really. They are an affect...not a cause.

    A data trend exists by definition because a lot of people are doing/searching/... for something to such a degree that it becomes statistically relevant.

    However, there is always a deeper reason behind the trend to begin with. And truthfully, "me too" products and content rarely perform as well as leaders who understand the underlying reasons of why a trend might begin in the first place.

    And of course with things that go viral, there is always some degree of luck. Although I would argue that in most cases these days the "luck" was often times manufactured by a very clever person or business that clearly understands peoples psychology and tendencies as it relates to a particular piece of content.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8935656].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vedremo
    Banned
    The article/post went mega-viral because America is one of the top 10 nations with the highest divorce rates. Russia is in the top spot. The population of these 2 countries is huge. A lot of married couples are struggling with their marriages and any new concept or secret formula that can save their marriages is worth the try.

    It's a typical, straight-forward post. It became successful since the writer wrote from his heart. He narrated a story the way ordinary people will be able to relate and comprehend. A big portion of the world's population prefer reading short posts/articles. Anything kilometric (more than 500 words) becomes boring, dragging and less engaging.

    Data trend can be used but only a select few will be very successful. There are things that cannot be measured by analytical tools, software, etc. This must be the magic of love, of the human heart transcending the world wide web.

    This is not a sure formula but it's worth the try. Search for a trending topic then write something that appeals to the human emotion. Look for an enticing picture and use a catchy title. Let the online people use the power of social media.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8935735].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author elormfizeau
    there are topics that most don't consider to be viral but they turn out to be i guess..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8936299].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author donhx
    Originally Posted by stillanovice View Post

    ... I am obsessed with the factors that lead to viral posts....

    What do you think?
    Personally, I think why things go viral is a bad thing to be obsessed about. Not to worry, however. I am a bit obsessed about the phenomena of spontaneous combustion, and I hope it doesn't happen to me!

    However, I suggest you view this article. It offers a lot of scientific insight about why things go viral.

    US Military Scientists Solve the Fundamental Problem of Viral Marketing | MIT Technology Review
    Signature
    Quality content to beat the competition. Personalized Author Services
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8936821].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MonopolyOnline
      Originally Posted by donhx View Post

      Personally, I think why things go viral is a bad thing to be obsessed about. Not to worry, however. I am a bit obsessed about the phenomena of spontaneous combustion, and I hope it doesn't happen to me!

      However, I suggest you view this article. It offers a lot of scientific insight about why things go viral.

      US Military Scientists Solve the Fundamental Problem of Viral Marketing | MIT Technology Review
      Donhx, thanks for the link.

      Interesting article about finding the seed groups. Their formula makes sense.

      Instead of "finding the smallest seed group", "finding the smallest number of seed groups required". Again, interesting.

      sidenote: science has proven chick's love emoticons - that's why it went viral

      P.S. Judging by your avatar, I could be your doppelganger.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8938810].message }}

Trending Topics