Quality Not Quantity Is The Right Approach For Article Marketing
I remember a while back I read a report I found free online about how to make 100.00 a day using article marketing. I was really excited to put the plan into action because it seemed like it would work.
The only problem was that it suggested you submit 30 articles a day to the directories to try and saturate your niche. It promised if you did this over the course of a month you were gauranteed to make 100 a day after that.
I knew that this was the wrong approach. If I was going to submit that many articles in one day there are several roadblocks the free ebook failed to mention. Like not having platinum status on eza or having to many of them going live at once.
I found that it is much better to do proper keyword research and spend some time trying to rank for fewer articles then a whole bunch. The purpose should be to get the views to your articles which will lead to traffic. If I just mass submitted articles I would not have the time to build up their ranking.
A much better way would have been to just do a few that are optimised for a good keyword and try to rank for those articles. Which one do you think would be better. 30 articles a day with 50-75 views each. Or one article with 1000 views? Of course the 30 seems better, but if they are all on bad keywords you can see even fewer views. The book I read sounded good in theory, but that is all it seemed to me was theory. I am sure you might make a little bit. But I would think that most people would not achieve the 100.00 a day doing this. What do you think?
The only problem was that it suggested you submit 30 articles a day to the directories to try and saturate your niche. It promised if you did this over the course of a month you were gauranteed to make 100 a day after that.
I knew that this was the wrong approach. If I was going to submit that many articles in one day there are several roadblocks the free ebook failed to mention. Like not having platinum status on eza or having to many of them going live at once.
I found that it is much better to do proper keyword research and spend some time trying to rank for fewer articles then a whole bunch. The purpose should be to get the views to your articles which will lead to traffic. If I just mass submitted articles I would not have the time to build up their ranking.
A much better way would have been to just do a few that are optimised for a good keyword and try to rank for those articles. Which one do you think would be better. 30 articles a day with 50-75 views each. Or one article with 1000 views? Of course the 30 seems better, but if they are all on bad keywords you can see even fewer views. The book I read sounded good in theory, but that is all it seemed to me was theory. I am sure you might make a little bit. But I would think that most people would not achieve the 100.00 a day doing this. What do you think?
PS my PM system is broken. Sorry I can't help anymore.