4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

HOW is this TECHNICAL?

by seasoned
3 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
    • |
They said she is TECHNICALLY in violation of parol?

1. IMPROPER declaration of residence, for parol, SSI, etc!
2. SQUATTING on private property!(This HAS to be a violation, even if it may be allowed to some degree)
3. Theft of facilities.
4. FRAUD for SSI
5. LYING TO A POLICE OFFICER
6. ID THEFT(Claims to own the home, and probably would try to get money from it, if she hasn't already)
7. Filing at least one false police report.

SERIOUSLY, with all those they say she is TECHNICALLY in violation?


Couldn't happen in a better way though. Squatting on a squatter! I LOVE IT!

Steve
  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
    And his/her name is Lynn Arthur Thompson?

    Whatever - I think the work boots add a touch of femininity...
    Signature
    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9655387].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    As far as I'm concerned - she's lucky the homeowner didn't "technically" put a bullet through her forehead.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9655462].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
      Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

      And his/her name is Lynn Arthur Thompson?

      Whatever - I think the work boots add a touch of femininity...
      Terra-cally, the boots should be pink.

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      As far as I'm concerned - she's lucky the homeowner didn't "technically" put a bullet through her forehead.
      Technically, you are correct. Allegedly.
      Signature

      "If you think you're the smartest person in the room, then you're probably in the wrong room."

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9656199].message }}

Trending Topics