Is it safe to put pictures of your child(ren) on the internet?

58 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
I know a lot of people do put pictures of their child(ren) on their websites or even in their profiles. I'm thinking that maybe this isn't the best or safest idea. It really doesn't take much to find out an address of someone online.

Unfortunately, in this world there are way too many sickos, maniacs, and psychos. Do you think by putting pictures of your child(ren) online is unintentionally putting your kid(s) at risk?

Just to illustrate my point, there was a story a year or so ago. The gist of it is people had pure bred puppies for sale. They put pictures of the puppies online. The woman who was selling the puppies was in the some of the pictures holding them. The woman in the picture was very visibly pregnant.

A couple called them up saying they were interested in the puppies. They really weren't. They only wanted the unborn baby. They went to the house and took the unborn baby out of the woman's stomach.

I know this is an extreme case, but I'm wondering if the risks of putting up pictures of your child(ren) is really worth it?

What do you think?
#children #internet #pictures #put #safe
  • Profile picture of the author BinderGang
    This is all a matter of opinion, really.

    If I had a kid: I would only post pictures online (on my own blog, facebook, etc) if it was a picture of us together, during something like a family trip. Something where I was getting across my experience, and they happened to be there with me.

    Pics of just my kid in the pic and nothing else? Nope.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132208].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Daniel Scott
    Jason,

    Some would say you're being paranoid.

    Maybe so... but if (heaven forbid) I ever "spawned"... I'd want to keep my kids safe as well.

    Is there a particular reason you are thinking of putting your kid's photos online?

    Are they old enough to have an opinion on the matter?

    -Dan
    Signature

    Always looking for badass direct-response copywriters. PM me if we don't know each other and you're looking for work.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132211].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jason_V
      Originally Posted by Daniel Scott View Post

      Jason,

      Some would say you're being paranoid.

      Maybe so... but if (heaven forbid) I ever "spawned"... I'd want to keep my kids safe as well.

      Is there a particular reason you are thinking of putting your kid's photos online?

      Are they old enough to have an opinion on the matter?

      -Dan
      That's why I'm asking. I do want to know if I'm being paranoid, or if this is a legitimate concern.

      I mean the reality is many people do put pictures of their kids online. I'm wondering if they ever thought about the dangers or if they figure that it's really nothing to be concerned about.

      I'm not talking about kids who are tweens or teenagers I'm talking about little kids.

      Even so, how many horror stories have you heard about teenagers and tweens who post not only their picture but their cell phone number, address, etc...on their Facebook or MySpace page.
      Signature
      "When you do something exactly wrong, you always turn up something."
      -Andy Warhol
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132223].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Lance K
    They better hope that they're more in love with the 2nd amendment than I am.


    P.S.

    I love it A LOT!!!


    Originally Posted by Jason_V View Post

    I know a lot of people do put pictures of their child(ren) on their websites or even in their profiles. I'm thinking that maybe this isn't the best or safest idea. It really doesn't take much to find out an address of someone online.

    Unfortunately, in this world there are way too many sickos, maniacs, and psychos. Do you think by putting pictures of your child(ren) online is unintentionally putting your kid(s) at risk?

    Just to illustrate my point, there was a story a year or so ago. The gist of it is people had pure bred puppies for sale. They put pictures of the puppies online. The woman who was selling the puppies was in the some of the pictures holding them. The woman in the picture was very visibly pregnant.

    A couple called them up saying they were interested in the puppies. They really weren't. They only wanted the unborn baby. They went to the house and took the unborn baby out of the woman's stomach.

    I know this is an extreme case, but I'm wondering if the risks of putting up pictures of your child(ren) is really worth it?

    What do you think?
    Signature
    "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
    ~ Zig Ziglar
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132215].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lilgrace
    I had pictures of my child on my facebook but had the settings set as private and only my friends could see them. Well....that all changed when I figured out that if one of MY friends commented on one of my pictures, even if it was set as private....then ALL their friends can see the picture. Some of my friends have friends that I don't want seeing pics of my child so I took them all down and have a pic of myself only on my profile. Oh and one scenery shot my daughter took!!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132218].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Daniel Scott
    Well let's put it this way...

    Personally, I would never do it. I meet enough fruitcakes as it is... I don't even want them to know who I am or where I live, let alone if I had kids.

    The chances of something going wrong are pretty slim... but that's not a chance I'd ever want to take.

    -Dan
    Signature

    Always looking for badass direct-response copywriters. PM me if we don't know each other and you're looking for work.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132231].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jagged
    Wasn't too long ago that I remember someone (I believe a warrior member) on another forum where photo's of themself & their children were copied....photoshopped into some pretty disgusting images & passed around to other forum members....

    Some truly sick people out there....

    Me...I do not post any pictures of my or anyone elses kids....if I did it would be on a password protected site...for family & close friends viewing only...

    JMO,
    Ken
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132254].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matt Fulger
    I think maybe you are being a bit paranoid. But perhaps rightly so.

    Personally, I have one pic online of me with my son on my back.
    You can see it in my profile. However, I don't post tons of pics
    of my kids online. In fact, that's the ONLY pic of any of my kids
    that is online (that I'm aware of).

    However, my kids live with their mother, not myself (fighting for
    custody). Unfortunately, they have unsupervised internet access
    and undoubtedly will eventually upload pics of themselves, if they
    haven't already.

    Not to mention the fact that schools these days have websites
    that also post pics of their students online.

    The fact is, you probably have sickos right in your neighborhood
    that already know what your children look like and where they live.
    I know that we have several registered sex offenders just one street
    over from us. Of course, my kids aren't allowed to wander off in that
    direction when they are here, but that doesn't mean the sex offenders
    couldn't be prowling the neighborhoods virtually unnoticed.

    Such is life.

    You can't keep them hidden away forever, but no need to advertise
    them either.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132274].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Johnycage
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132283].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by Jason_V View Post

    Unfortunately, in this world there are way too many sickos, maniacs, and psychos.
    What makes you think they're only on the internet?

    The sickos are your neighbours. The maniacs work at the grocery store. The psychos drive the school bus.

    What are you going to do, lock your kids in the basement?
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132311].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rapidscc
    The story about the pregnant lady sent shivers up my spine! is that true?

    But to give us a good perspective on this lets do some guesstimate.

    There hundreds of millions of profiles in social sites today, lets put it at just a low of 200 million. Then lets guesstimate again that one fourth of those are parents that have pictures of their children there, so it brings us to 25 million. Now lets estimate how many news reports of such bizarre crimes there are..Citing your post, this is the first time this year or any other year I've heard of such a story..so I would say that based on estimated statistics it's still safe to put pictures of your children online.

    But what we should look out for instead is to be careful on the post we make on our social properties particularly our vacation plans. I've heard of some reports about people scanning social sites for vacation related keywords. They check out if its near their location..and you know what happens next..

    Be safe..

    Omar
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132357].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author teleam
    I wouldn't put pictures of my children or any small child on the internet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132359].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author testaccount9998
    An armed populous is a polite populous.

    I vote keep your kids pictures off the internet as much as possible because there are all kinds of crazies on the internet.

    Keep a weapon for the real life encounters.


    Rebtl
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132361].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kezz
    I always say if you're not sure about something, choose the option that gives greater benefit and less harm.

    In this case, if you're not sure even one little bit, I think it's completely fair and reasonable to err on the side of protecting your kids.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132362].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jay Jennings
    Yes, it's safe.

    Go to your local library tomorrow and borrow a copy of "Free-Range Kids" -- the statistics and facts in there are eye-openers.

    Jay Jennings
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132371].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MichaelHiles
    Facebook profile, but not on the web at large.

    I am one of those people that if the media ever showed up at my house, they'd call my collection a "cache of weapons".
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132410].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by MichaelHiles View Post

      I am one of those people that if the media ever showed up at my house, they'd call my collection a "cache of weapons".
      My eldest son has been an escrimador since he was three. The youngest starts training in a couple months. Next year, we start the eldest on firearms training.

      I pity the moron who thinks he can prey on my children.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132420].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Matt Fulger
        Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

        What makes you think they're only on the internet?

        The sickos are your neighbours. The maniacs work at the grocery store. The psychos drive the school bus.

        What are you going to do, lock your kids in the basement?
        Exactly!

        The crazies are everywhere, could even be someone in your own family.

        I've met a good many of women who were molested as children. In MOST
        cases they were being molested by their own family members.

        I've also met quite a few boys who were also molested. Most of them were
        molested by their Pastors.

        Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

        My eldest son has been an escrimador since he was three. The youngest starts training in a couple months. Next year, we start the eldest on firearms training.

        I pity the moron who thinks he can prey on my children.
        I think you are on to something here. Train your kids to be able to protect
        themselves and they are much less likely to become a victim.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132460].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steven D Smith
    I am a former police officer, and I would strongly recommend keeping your kids pictures off the internet. I once arrested a man that told me he would pick out his "hopeful targets" by either finding pictures of them or just seeing a kid while driving.

    He told me he was so attracted to kids that he once got into a car crash because he spotted a kid about a block away, got so excited he smashed into a car. He also told me that he would "work on each target kid" for at least a month once he picked one out.

    That is the type of weirdos that are out there.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132435].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Peter Temp
    I dont think there is any problem, i have all my family pictures put up online but the settings are saved so that its only visible on invitation to my friends and family, so there is no harm in sharing pictures online with friends. Its only a matter of opinion. Thanks
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132453].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ozespirit
    In this day and age I would avoid doing that. The internet has become a paedophiles playground
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132715].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      theres no problem, no need to worry to post pictures
      Why on earth would anyone say that?

      If you want to plaster your picture everywhere, that's fine. Though many of the "photos" here aren't the person's own picture....

      Parents who proudly post their children's photos online are fools in my opinion. Some of them make it very easy - with a page that contains their full name AND tells where whey live.

      Would you take a child to a large public gathering where people of all kinds - good and bad - were present....and leave that child there alone? Of course not. But some will put their child online and think that's a good idea!

      We've all heard the stories and these things happened before the internet, too. It's not the "day and age" - it's the false sense of security some have when they access the internet from their homes. It's lack of common sense!

      kay
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1132975].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jay Jennings
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        Why on earth would anyone say that? ... It's lack of common sense!
        I've seen a lot of common sense that has little to do with reality.

        You take your children places in your car, right? Their odds of dying in a car wreck are 1 in 83.

        Do you let your children swim? Their odds of dying by drowning are 1 in 1,100.

        But the odds of a kid being abducted and murdered are 1 in a 1,000,000.

        (Facts and figures pulled from stats.org and reason.com)

        So where does common sense fit into this?

        Jay Jennings
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1133482].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
          I've always found good sales copy needs to go along with the pictures. Just having the caption read "For Sale" doesn't quite get it done.

          If your kid is pet friendly, include that in your copy. Same if they do their chores. If they're constantly pulling the cats' tail and they never make their bed, leave that out.

          The next owner will find that out in due time.

          And always go with a No Refund policy. Taking them back just means more work, and trying to get them back in the same school can be a drag.

          Best of luck,

          KJ
          Signature
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1133543].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TeddyP
    I'd put pictures of my child on things like facebook etc... I don't think there is a direct correlation between children's pictures on the net and kidnap rates.

    The internet has been exponentially getting more popular. Are there any studies that show that their is a similar growth rate in kidnapping or molestation? Of the cases of kidnapping and molestation - what percentage were deemed to be internet motivated?

    If I had some concrete answers to those questions it might make me more worried.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1133579].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MizzCindy
    Nope. Will not put pics of the kids online.

    There was recently a news report about a mother who was contacted by a good samaritan regarding her infant son's photo. Some creepo had copied the photo off of Facebook (or someplace similar - I can't remember where she had posted it now) and was using the photo as a child 'available for adoption'.

    He was running a scam trying to bilk money from desperate wanna-be parents and using her child's image to do it.

    The good samaritan became suspicious and looked at the photo properties. The family name was right there on the photo, so she contacted the mother.

    Another story - a member of one of the mommy forums I belong to just recently had her entire adoption story 'stolen', pics and all. She had a personal blog up detailing her adoption journey. It had several pics of the child and the orphanage and the whole family.

    Well, some wacko copied all the details and the pics and started posting all over the place that it was actually HER child and HER adoption story. It was a big mess. Yikes!

    Nope, too many ways someone could exploit a child's image and once it's out there...it's out there.

    Cindy
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134206].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by MizzCindy View Post

      Nope. Will not put pics of the kids online.

      There was recently a news report about a mother who was contacted by a good samaritan regarding her infant son's photo. Some creepo had copied the photo off of Facebook (or someplace similar - I can't remember where she had posted it now) and was using the photo as a child 'available for adoption'.

      He was running a scam trying to bilk money from desperate wanna-be parents and using her child's image to do it.

      The good samaritan became suspicious and looked at the photo properties. The family name was right there on the photo, so she contacted the mother.

      Another story - a member of one of the mommy forums I belong to just recently had her entire adoption story 'stolen', pics and all. She had a personal blog up detailing her adoption journey. It had several pics of the child and the orphanage and the whole family.

      Well, some wacko copied all the details and the pics and started posting all over the place that it was actually HER child and HER adoption story. It was a big mess. Yikes!

      Nope, too many ways someone could exploit a child's image and once it's out there...it's out there.

      Cindy
      I've seen the same thing with houses, cars, motorcycles, you name it.
      I had a whole website copied and put up by someone else.
      They even left my affiliate links in it, straight copy and paste from view source.
      My point is some people will use anything not just kids pictures.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134279].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    OH MAN!!!!!!! Keep your kids pictures, age, birthdate, full name, and specific location APART!!!! Try to NEVER put it on the internet!

    I go to the airport, and hear people using kids names outloud, dressed in shirts with their names, etc... STUPID!

    There are a LOT of idiots around, etc... The police are IDIOTS that DON'T CARE!!!!!

    Want PROOF? I will tell you of a conspiracy that is only NOW being revealed, and reveal some things you might not have heard, because they seem to be hiding them. WHY!?!?!?

    At one point, a family decided to MOVE, because they didn't think their daughter was safe. They moved to another place that was SUPPOSED to be safer. About a week before the end of school, the father was not TOO far away from his daughter. He saw ANOTHER car cut his daughter off, and they KIDNAPPED his daughter! He reported it to the police, but they didn't care. He went on the media, etc.... but NOTHING! The kidnappers hid the evidence in their back yard, setup camp, and the man raped the kidnapped girl. She had two kids. The first kid was born when she was about 14yo!!!!!

    3 YEARS ago, a neighbor found out about this, told the police, but they merely went there SUPPOSEDLY. They never even went into the backyard! Recently, the male kidnapper tried to do something with the 2 younger kids, and THOSE police officers got suspicious and found out everything! So how did it end up:

    Jaycee Lee Dugard Found: Missing Girl Located After 18 Years - ABC News

    And the KIDNAPPER is acting like she is fine, wasn't harmed, etc... They kidnapped her, they imprisoned her for 18 years, they RAPED her, they forced her to have kids, they denied her an education, who knows what else, and they claimed they didn't harm her!

    I was once robbed, gave the police EVIDENCE LEADING STRAIGHT TO THE THEIVES, and they IGNORED IT! I didn't know they ignored it until months later, and they asked me to give them ANOTHER copy after people forgot, moved, etc.... So take it from me, ALL they care about is the power, benefits, and that paycheck!

    BTW IMAGINE! Her oldest child is now 4 years OLDER than she was when she was kidnapped! Her youngest child is about as old as she was when she was kidnapped. INCREDIBLE!

    If I had children, I think I would tell them to NEVER reveal their birthdate, NEVER say their full real name to a stranger, and NEVER use their pictures on the internet. I don't know if you noticed, but I am that careful MYSELF! GRANTED some know EXACTLY where I live, and my approximate age. More even COULD find out my name and/or location. AND, granted, they COULD find out much more, but I don't freely give it out. When it came to my kids, I would SUE THE PANTS off of anyone even FACILITATING such things. and C.O.P.P.A would make that VERY easy! BTW COPPA was created because all I have said is TRUE! http://www.coppa.org/comply.htm

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134323].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jay Jennings
    So it's stupid to call your kids by name when you're in public?

    1 in a million, Steve, 1 in a million.

    Parents need to stop being paranoid and afraid.

    Jay Jennings
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134462].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by Jay Jennings View Post

      So it's stupid to call your kids by name when you're in public?

      1 in a million, Steve, 1 in a million.

      Parents need to stop being paranoid and afraid.

      Jay Jennings
      Well I raised 4 girls the youngest being 21 now so I think I can speak about that.
      You're right.
      Being paranoid and afraid will create more problems then it will solve.
      A parent needs to be aware and responsible.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134491].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Jay Jennings View Post

      So it's stupid to call your kids by name when you're in public?

      1 in a million, Steve, 1 in a million.

      Parents need to stop being paranoid and afraid.

      Jay Jennings
      In places like airports, etc....? YEP!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134593].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jay Jennings
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        In places like airports, etc....? YEP!
        What makes an airport any worse than Wal-Mart, or the park, or outside the kids' school?

        You have an opinion that's not based on anything reasonable. Do you think it's stupid to take a child swimming or somewhere in the car? They are FAR more likely to be killed in one of those ways than by being abducted. It's not even close.

        COPPA and most of those laws were (in my belief) created as the fear-based result of some horrific incident. And they get passed because no politician wants to be seen as being "against child safety" or as being "soft on pedophiles."

        According to the facts and figures I've seen the rate of serious child abduction has remained steady over the last 50 years.

        Which means if it was okay to let kids out of your sight 50 years ago, it's okay to let them out of your sight today. Or even to call them by name.

        Jay Jennings
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134700].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Jay Jennings View Post

          What makes an airport any worse than Wal-Mart, or the park, or outside the kids' school?
          You kind of have a point there, of course an airport could be more confusing and they could even end up in a different country. I guess I have just been in SO many airports, and seen SO many kids that had some problems. Some unaccompanied minors weren't even properly watched, and were going to be picked up by people they didn't really know.

          You have an opinion that's not based on anything reasonable. Do you think it's stupid to take a child swimming or somewhere in the car? They are FAR more likely to be killed in one of those ways than by being abducted. It's not even close.
          Well, putting a persons name on the internet isn't putting them in a car or water. MOST places in the US now require a lifeguard or parental supervision. Still. one would hope they can swim. HEY, I almost died in a car crash! In fact, the DRIVER did, the car was totalled, and I broke my leg. Still, some things you just can't prevent.

          COPPA and most of those laws were (in my belief) created as the fear-based result of some horrific incident. And they get passed because no politician wants to be seen as being "against child safety" or as being "soft on pedophiles."
          OH, people ARE soft on pedophiles! THAT is why Jaycee was kidnapped! They let Garriddo out, didn't properly handle probation, didn't consider him a suspect, didn't properly follow up the lead. I would say that is SOFT! COPPA doesn't do anything against pedophiles. The goal is to limit the spread of identifying info, so pedophiles fnd it harder to use the internet to kidnap.

          According to the facts and figures I've seen the rate of serious child abduction has remained steady over the last 50 years.

          Which means if it was okay to let kids out of your sight 50 years ago, it's okay to let them out of your sight today. Or even to call them by name.

          Jay Jennings
          Given what you said, that would be a reasonable belief. Based on what I have seen and heard, it isn't. One wonders what is happening then. Most areas just DON'T seem as safe. Then again, if places seem worse, people may be more careful, and that would limit abductions.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134750].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Jay Jennings
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            OH, people ARE soft on pedophiles! THAT is why Jaycee was kidnapped! They let Garriddo out, didn't properly handle probation, didn't consider him a suspect, didn't properly follow up the lead. I would say that is SOFT!
            I'm not saying everything was done right, but from what I've read, Garrido wasn't classed as a pedophile -- he served time for the abduction and rape of an adult.

            Sure, I think parents should be cautious, but I see SO many instances of smothering kids in the name of "safety" that it depresses me.

            Jay Jennings
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134803].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
    There are a LOT of idiots around, etc... The police are IDIOTS that DON'T CARE!!!!!
    NO everybody who makes generalized statements is an IDIOT.

    Some police do care, some not as much. But to say police are idiots is a dumb thing to say. You use two horrific examples, but that's not enough to condemn an entire profession.

    To say COPPA was created BECAUSE of all you said doesn't make sense. That suggests that COPPA was created, in part, due to the Dugard case - sorry, but that timetable doesn't make sense.

    However, about using your child's name in public...use a nickname that only sounds right coming from you. It works.

    ~M~
    Signature

    "Ich bin en fuego!"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134521].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

      NO everybody who makes generalized statements is an IDIOT.


      ~M~
      Hmmmm....???
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134538].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
        Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

        Hmmmm....???
        LOL

        I was wondering if anybody would pick up on that.



        ~M~
        Signature

        "Ich bin en fuego!"
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134543].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
          Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

          LOL

          I was wondering if anybody would pick up on that.



          ~M~
          P.S. - .......
          Signature
          Professional Googler
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134552].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

      NO everybody who makes generalized statements is an IDIOT.

      Some police do care, some not as much. But to say police are idiots is a dumb thing to say. You use two horrific examples, but that's not enough to condemn an entire profession.

      To say COPPA was created BECAUSE of all you said doesn't make sense. That suggests that COPPA was created, in part, due to the Dugard case - sorry, but that timetable doesn't make sense.

      However, about using your child's name in public...use a nickname that only sounds right coming from you. It works.

      ~M~
      I was speaking of the police as a GROUP! When the case FIRST came up, Garrido should have been one of the FIRST suspects! He was in the area, and had a HISTORY of kidnapping, etc... Failing that, with the 2006 lead, they sshould have quickly gotten a search warrant and searched the place! They DIDN'T!!!!!!!

      Of course, there are ALWAYS going to be people that do the right thing, etc.... The Garrido next door neighbor DID report them! EVENTUALLY two cops DID solve the case. But wouldn't it haave been nice to solve it 18 years ago? Even THREE years ago? MY case STILL hasn't been solved, and it was one of ELEVEN just at MY apartment THAT DAY! Apparently, it happened all the time, and they took less than 3 hours at my place. I know, because that is how long I was gone. The police didn't even have time to get to my place, so it was likely less than 2 hours! So when I say they didn't solve MY case, that represents at LEAST 11! In MY case ALONE it was a theft of over $3000 USD! BTW it happened over 15 YEARS ago! SO, do you see why I have SUCH a low opinion of cops in general? Oh yeah, you DID see how I gave them EVIDENCE! I actually called a place, and they said those people WOULD be remembered! They bought over $750 dollars worth of merchandise from a COMMISSIONED salesperson, and the average sale was $50!

      COPPA was developed because kids tend to be open, and kidnappers and rapists know that! I forget the actual case that created it, but it was NOT done out of paranoia, but NEED!

      As for the bit about kids names, if you have a kid that looks cute to someone, they may remember. If you start screaming it, or use it too much, it can cause a confusion, etc... if someone else uses it. Even the police say you should have some keyword to let the child know that the people are to be trusted.

      That is done, in part, because the name causes confusion. That will ALWAYS be the first line of defense though. Almost like 2 people at front desks I knew that had a nickname that ONLY their friends and guests knew. If salespeople came in, they would use the wrong name, and the guys knew they were just making COLD calls.

      HEY, I am only trying to help. You know me. If you don't want to heed the advice, have a cute kid, and are around some bad guy, don't be surprised.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134639].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author designyourlife
    Kids don't belong in the bedroom of the online world....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134548].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
    It comes down to a few things.

    1. If you don't have kids of your own, then you offer nothing more than theory on the issue. Even if you know the stats, or whatever, until you know the emotional bond you have with your own kids, you really can't fully comprehend this issue.

    2. I wouldn't put a picture of any of my kids online. But my oldest is now in the second year of college, and uses social websites - not much I can do to keep a young adult from posting a pic or two.

    3. Apart from being really stupid, it's up to each parent to decide what's best for their child(ren). By stupid I mean putting up a pic, with address, birthday, likes, dislikes, school info, etc.

    4. You have to balance letting them be kids and enjoying life with protecting them. It can be a fine line, but again, it's up to each parent to make that call.

    ~M~
    Signature

    "Ich bin en fuego!"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134572].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

      It comes down to a few things.

      1. If you don't have kids of your own, then you offer nothing more than theory on the issue. Even if you know the stats, or whatever, until you know the emotional bond you have with your own kids, you really can't fully comprehend this issue.

      2. I wouldn't put a picture of any of my kids online. But my oldest is now in the second year of college, and uses social websites - not much I can do to keep a young adult from posting a pic or two.

      3. Apart from being really stupid, it's up to each parent to decide what's best for their child(ren). By stupid I mean putting up a pic, with address, birthday, likes, dislikes, school info, etc.

      4. You have to balance letting them be kids and enjoying life with protecting them. It can be a fine line, but again, it's up to each parent to make that call.

      ~M~
      Yeah, OBVIOUSLY, at some point, the kids are LESS likely to be kidnapped and are better able to protect themselves, etc... Even Coppa only goes to 14. Males are probably safer, and if they are a good size, strong, etc.... or look mature, it is probably safer. An 11 year old girl is only about 4'9"(80lbs) at 14, she is 5'3"(110lbs), or about adult height! That might make all the difference. Jaycee looks pretty as an adult, but the kidnapper might not have considered her if she were even 3 years older. In any event, I certainly wouldn't admonish a 20 year old either.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134670].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dorim
    Reikidad1961 started a thread just like this about a month ago.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134649].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DotComBum
    If you're uneasy about it then just don't do it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134665].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
    I TRIED to READ all of YOUR post, STEVE, I REALLY did, BUT for SOME REASON I found THAT something kept DISTRACTING me. SORRY, I know it SHOULDN'T matter, BUT it just gets DIFFICULT to READ SOMETIMES.

    YEAH, I KNOW you were talking ABOUT police AS a GROUP. That was my POINT. YOU can't condemn an ENTIRE profession based on A FEW CASES - NO MATTER how BAD they ARE. YOU are USING a FEW examples to "PROVE" a POINT. HOW many OTHER cases DID they SOLVE? OH WAIT - answering THAT wouldn't back UP your POINT - SO feel FREE to IGNORE all the GOOD WORK they have DONE, and CONTINUE to DO.

    I have had POLICE help me, HELP me STAY ALIVE. There have been a FEW bad EXPERIENCES with THEM, BUT VERY FEW. They have a TOUGH job, AND I APPRECIATE what they DO.

    JUST don't make IT sound LIKE THEY are ALL bad. THEY'RE not.

    As far as kids go, my point was just what you mentioned. Use a nickname with them. At the age of 40 my dad still calls me by my childhood nickname, but if ANYONE else called me that, it wouldn't sound RIGHT. The SAME IDEA applies to your KIDS.

    Oh, and stop acting like a. "If you don't want to heed the advice, have a cute kid, and are around some bad guy, don't be surprised." What does that mean? Like it would be the fault of the parent? Or does it mean that the sickos ONLY go after "cute" kids? Or ONLY your advice will keep them safe? Lots of misconceptions crammed into that sentence.

    Also, the insinuation - YES YOU WERE INSINUATING - that I somehow don't care about my kids is insulting. So, when you say, "You know me." I can only respond by saying, yes, I do, and you never let me down with your comments. They challenge me at a different level, and that's a good thing.



    ~M~
    Signature

    "Ich bin en fuego!"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134666].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

      Oh, and stop acting like a. "If you don't want to heed the advice, have a cute kid, and are around some bad guy, don't be surprised." What does that mean? Like it would be the fault of the parent? Or does it mean that the sickos ONLY go after "cute" kids? Or ONLY your advice will keep them safe? Lots of misconceptions crammed into that sentence.

      Also, the insinuation - YES YOU WERE INSINUATING - that I somehow don't care about my kids is insulting. So, when you say, "You know me." I can only respond by saying, yes, I do, and you never let me down with your comments.

      ~M~
      I didn't target it at anyone in particular. I certainly didn't mean to claim you were a bad parent, etc...

      And HEY, you meet ALL KINDS! But somehow it seems the most common ones are cute girls. It just looks like they are more likely to have this happen to them. And HEY, it is a VERY small percentage. It may NEVER affect ANYONE here. It may seem to NEVER happen. But whoever it DOES happen to won't care, because they were that one a million, etc... And the area doesn't seem to matter. It may happen in the busiest place in LA, or
      the quietest place in montana. It may happen in a busy airport, or a quiet street.

      ALL I am saying is:
      1. LIMIT the spread of identifying info.
      2. KNOW where they will be, and make sure they got there.(for YOUNG ADULTS, they have some GPS systems for phones and cars to make that less intrusive)
      3. Try to facilitate safe travel.
      4. Have some sort of keyword in case you need a stranger to pick them up.
      5. DON'T expect the police to spend time on it, or follow up, so try to be proactive and make sure they do

      FIVE simple steps! SURE the child might be a bit upset at letting you know plans, follow up, etc... but you can give more freedom say at 15 or so, and protect them when the odds are more against them.

      Oh well, I guess some got a good laugh, if nothing else.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134716].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        I didn't target it at anyone in particular. I certainly didn't mean to claim you were a bad parent, etc...

        And HEY, you meet ALL KINDS! But somehow it seems the most common ones are cute girls. It just looks like they are more likely to have this happen to them. And HEY, it is a VERY small percentage. It may NEVER affect ANYONE here. It may seem to NEVER happen. But whoever it DOES happen to won't care, because they were that one a million, etc... And the area doesn't seem to matter. It may happen in the busiest place in LA, or
        the quietest place in montana. It may happen in a busy airport, or a quiet street.
        I wish I could remember the book, but I can tell you why it "seems" the most common ones are cute girls: It's because their picture looks better on the TV news. Seriously. I wish I could cite the source, it was very eye-opening. Also, the book went on to say that it is usually "cute white girls", which is really sad, considering kids of both genders and all backgrounds fall victim to predators.

        ALL I am saying is:
        1. LIMIT the spread of identifying info.
        2. KNOW where they will be, and make sure they got there.(for YOUNG ADULTS, they have some GPS systems for phones and cars to make that less intrusive)
        3. Try to facilitate safe travel.
        4. Have some sort of keyword in case you need a stranger to pick them up.
        5. DON'T expect the police to spend time on it, or follow up, so try to be proactive and make sure they do

        FIVE simple steps! SURE the child might be a bit upset at letting you know plans, follow up, etc... but you can give more freedom say at 15 or so, and protect them when the odds are more against them.

        Oh well, I guess some got a good laugh, if nothing else.

        Steve
        I think those are reasonable tips, though one more can be added. Role play with your kids and be sure they have a plan for what to do in different situations.

        ~M~
        Signature

        "Ich bin en fuego!"
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134764].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

          I wish I could remember the book, but I can tell you why it "seems" the most common ones are cute girls: It's because their picture looks better on the TV news. Seriously. I wish I could cite the source, it was very eye-opening. Also, the book went on to say that it is usually "cute white girls", which is really sad, considering kids of both genders and all backgrounds fall victim to predators.


          I think those are reasonable tips, though one more can be added. Role play with your kids and be sure they have a plan for what to do in different situations.

          ~M~
          Well, I HAVE seen black, hispanic, and asian girls kidnapped, or at least missing, ALSO! And you might be right about the news, but still, if they use that method, it figures others would also.

          Your role play idea is good, and another some have suggested. But hey, I just tried to come up with some good ideas. I don't have a child and don't have a list of things to handle this stuff written down.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134780].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matt Fulger
    Steve,

    Although I do like you and usually enjoy the content you provide....

    YOU are one of the MOST paranoid people I've ever come across.

    The story you pointed out has NOTHING to do with someone
    being kidnapped as a direct result of pictures being posted on
    the internet. In fact, the only thing that case has to do with
    the internet is the reporting of it going on now.

    She was abducted apparently right in front of her father on
    her way to the school bus 18 years ago, by a complete stranger.
    She was probably randomly selected while the kidnapper was
    driving down the road.

    This has absolutely NOTHING to do with posting pictures of
    your children on the internet. Surely, you, of all people can
    come up with something better than that to back up your
    reasons NOT to put pictures of children online?

    While I wouldn't go around posting pics of my kids all over
    the internet, I'm not going to live in fear of them being
    abducted if they post pics of themselves somewhere online.

    I don't really think posting pics on the internet raises their
    chances of being abducted and/or murdered anymore than
    allowing them to go to the mall or the movies or even over
    to a friends house. Hell, just letting them go to the bus stop
    alone leaves the possibility of being kidnapped, murdered, etc.

    In fact, there's probably a better chance of them being molested
    at church than there is being abducted because of a picture
    posted online.

    Obviously, I could be wrong here. But I do KNOW that I refuse
    to live in fear and don't expect my children to live in fear either.
    I think that just makes them a more likely victim than a child that
    is taught to defend themselves in case of some weird incident.

    Just my thoughts.

    Matt
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134751].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Matt Fulger View Post

      Obviously, I could be wrong here. But I do KNOW that I refuse
      to live in fear and don't expect my children to live in fear either.
      I think that just makes them a more likely victim than a child that
      is taught to defend themselves in case of some weird incident.

      Just my thoughts.

      Matt
      You are right, Garrido apparently just happened by, though he might have cased it for a while. The internet is simply a method that HAS been used. I was just showing one wierdo that was out there and how the police "responded".

      And I certainly wasnn't asking ANYONE to live in fear. I am certainly not suggesting even limiting your kids actions. JUST being careful. As it relates to the internet, even just following coppa would go a LONG way. Some POLICE try to look like minors violating coppa to trap pedophiles. So the POLICE know it is being used. I figured YOU should know ALSO!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134773].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Matt Fulger
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        You are right, Garrido apparently just happened by, though he might have cased it for a while. The internet is simply a method that HAS been used. I was just showing one wierdo that was out there and how the police "responded".

        And I certainly wasnn't asking ANYONE to live in fear. I am certainly not suggesting even limiting your kids actions. JUST being careful. As it relates to the internet, even just following coppa would go a LONG way. Some POLICE try to look like minors violating coppa to trap pedophiles. So the POLICE know it is being used. I figured YOU should know ALSO!

        Steve
        Well, I've lost faith in the police long ago. Hell, these days it's hard to
        even report a crime w/o being looked at as the criminal. I've personally
        witnessed too many innocent people go to prison while the guilty continue
        to plague our streets. What makes it worse is the fact that they are
        trying to make it illegal to even defend yourself, your family and your
        home.

        Instead, they expect you to call the police and hope they show up in
        time to help. Yeah, right.

        In fact, just a couple of years back someone threatened to kill my girlfriend
        and her kids. She called the police to report the person and they said to
        give them a call when he showed up at the door, gun in hand. They
        never even spoke to the man in question (who's an abusive, alcoholic
        drug user....all on file with the "system" too).

        Fortunately, against the advice of the police, I personally put the fear
        into him myself. Who the hell knows what he might have done had I not
        personally handled the situation?

        Mike,

        Just so you know, I'm NOT condemning ALL police, etc. However,
        how can anyone have faith in a system that continually lets rapist,
        kidnappers, child molestors, etc. out of prison to make room for
        pot users? Not even the dealers, the USERS.

        Don't try to say it doesn't happen, cuz it does all the time.

        When I was in high school I dated a girl who had been raped when
        she was 14. They caught the man and locked him up for a whole
        2 years. Guess what he did within a week of being released?
        That's right. He raped again. The SAME girl.

        At that time, they were making room for all the marijuana users
        with an early release program for criminals of all types.

        Now, I KNOW that there really ARE a lot of cops who truly DO
        care and TRY their best to protect and serve. Unfortunately,
        the system seems to work against them every step of the way.

        Also, why is it that cops are trained to LIE to people during
        questioning in order to SCARE a confession out of people?
        They don't even seem to care if you are guilty or not, they
        just want a confession.

        When I was in high school I had this happen to me time and
        time again. Of course, it never worked on me but I know plenty
        of people who it did work on and were scared into a confession
        of a crime they had no clue about.

        It's sad if you ask me.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134821].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author garyv
    I've been posting photos and videos of my kids online for over a decade. I've even had live video in or around my house for nearly 10 years so that the Grandparents could watch the kids play. Maybe I'm being naive. But in my opinion there's a greater chance of a kid being abducted if he's neglected, or il-prepared to handle a stranger.

    My children are never neglected, and they've been taught from the earliest age possible how to handle a stranger. And actually my willingness to put them online may actually make them safer than other kids. For one, it would be practically impossible for a stranger to enter my property without one of my live webcams picking them up. And if by chance on of my kids were taken, their pictures are already plastered on the internet, so it wouldn't take long to get the word out.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134936].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sylvia Meier
    I agree very much with Gary. I have 5 wonderful little children and their pictures are everywhere, they are on my twitter page with me at times, they are on my personal blog, they are on my facebook, there are little videos of my kids on youtube etc.

    And I keep track of my children, my daughter has a cell phone that has an auto 911 button, and has had it since she was 7 years old.

    When I go out with my kids they wear harnesses (and I don't care what comments come of that, I have 2 autistic sons who would wonder into traffic if I didn't) the ones that understand know not to go with strangers etc, my children never play outside without an adult, except when it is the older two who are 6 and 11, and then my daughter always has says phone on her. My children have a set route back and fourth from school and they know if they are more than 5 minutes past expected time home Momma's coming looking.

    You can be safe or you can be overly paranoid and cause your children to live in fear. I would rather my children grow up not being afraid of their own shadow, but knowing to be careful of those that may lurk in shadows.

    Just my 2 cents as a mom to many,
    Sylvia
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134979].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author adam gilbert
    It's up to you but I'd never do it
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1134988].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    It's true there are people that stalk kids via the internet. It's also true that kids are harmed by their own parents at times.

    The net is made up of the same people who are your neighbors, co-workers, enemies, etc. You have to be as careful whether you are online or on the street. If you don't use some common sense, you can be vicitimized. You can be victimized going to the store, but have you quit grocery shopping over it? A lot of women are abducted from Mall parking lots. It's the rare woman who quits shopping rather than just adapt some healthy and smart habits while in the parking lot, though.

    I worked in a crisis center - rape and molestation. You would think that step-daddies are a bit dangerous? Not as often as real daddies are. Yep - daddies are the leaders in the stats for molesting little kids.
    2 out of 5 little girls are molested by the time they are 18. That's one scary figure that nothing else will compare to.

    We used to hold classes and educate kids about their own safety. You can't be with someone 24/7. Kids have to know how to help themselves -- and now, that means educated about internet stalkers, too. While it is much less likely they will be abducted by an internet stalker as it is that they will be molested in their own home, it's still a frightening reality. There are psychos all over, if there is a psycho on solid ground, there's going to be a psycho on the net.

    I think we need to just understand that the Net is just an extension of society and it's not completely safe any more than any other place is. Look at the murderers who get victims from online dating. We had a serial killer out here that took out over 56 women before he got caught - internet dates. Do we presume to think he'd have never found victims if he hadn't gotten online? I hardly doubt that would have stopped him, maybe slowed him down a tad. And just try sometime to find a college campus that's not crawlin' with psychos. Good luck.

    Use common sense but don't go completely schizo over possibilities. You might not want to post your kid's pic with a story about him and his town, but don't get freaky if the kid's pic is posted standing in a group of other kids somewhere. Be realistic.

    Another thing you need to remember is that when a child goes missing - the internet can also help FIND that child in time - and it doesn't matter where the pervert came from, online or on pavement.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1135183].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Matt Fulger
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      I worked in a crisis center - rape and molestation. You would think that step-daddies are a bit dangerous? Not as often as real daddies are. Yep - daddies are the leaders in the stats for molesting little kids.
      2 out of 5 little girls are molested by the time they are 18. That's one scary figure that nothing else will compare to.

      We used to hold classes and educate kids about their own safety. You can't be with someone 24/7. Kids have to know how to help themselves -- and now, that means educated about internet stalkers, too. While it is much less likely they will be abducted by an internet stalker as it is that they will be molested in their own home, it's still a frightening reality. There are psychos all over, if there is a psycho on solid ground, there's going to be a psycho on the net.
      Exactly. Thanks for pointing that out.

      My eX was a victim of molestation as a child and while it
      wasn't her daddy molesting her, it was her uncle on her
      daddies side. No matter how much she cried out for help,
      no one would believe her. Her dad simply refused to believe
      that his own brother would ever do a thing like that. In fact,
      he stayed in denial to the day he died.

      She never did get any professional help and has flash backs
      to this day. Whenever she drives by one of the places her
      uncle used to take her, she freaks out. She also used to
      have flash backs of being molested during sex (probably
      still does). That's a scary thing to experience.

      My point is, the psychos could be your own family members
      and you'd never even know it. When brought to your attention,
      you are likely to deny it out of hand. No one wants to believe
      their own family members could be a psycho, even when told
      flat out by friends and/or possibly even your own kids.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1136914].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    I wouldnt do it. Too many weirdos out there with too much time on their hands
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1136962].message }}

Trending Topics