How taboo is the other women?

73 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Hey peoples,

I recently had a long time friend confess an affair with a married man. Eeks! It was pretty startling because I knew this girl from Bible school.... anywho, like a lot of us she has changed a ton since then.

I don't know what surprised me more, that she was a part of this situation or that she was so okay with it. She explained to me that she was very lonely this past year (bad breakup) and so this man was filling a void for her. She came to me not because she wanted him to leave his wife but that he wanted more from her than she wanted to give. She simply wanted a physical relationship and thought that being with a married man would provide a good "no strings attached" sort of deal. Only now, he is becoming a bit needy.

The whole thing boggles my mind! I guess when I try to be very logical about it I can see why my friend would want this type of relationship. And I could even be accepting of a relationship where all parties knew and were okay with it. I have heard of women who knowlingly share their husbands. From a logical and libertarian perspective I see the value in this sort of deal... just as long as nobody gets hurt. I mean, as long as each party views it as sex and not a moral obligation. Once morals (or religion) get involved then can you truly guage how much people will be hurt.

Anyway, sorry this is so long... my real question is how taboo is it to be "the other women" these days. I'm not talking about scandalous Tiger Woods type other women... I mean everyday, normal, I guess like my friend (!) other women.

A few years back, I would probably have forsaken my friend the moment she confessed. Ah the glories of self righteousness Now I just feel sorry for her. Sorry that she needed this sort of relationship, and sorry that she may be hurting this random women. I think that you guys are a great collection of different backgrounds so I am curious how you would guage this sort of behavior. Should we go back to stoning? lol Just kidding!
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    Its pretty easy to accept her behavior because she's your friend. Because she is your friend, 'its ok'..and 'i can understand'...and all the other justifications that you can come up for her actions so that you dont have to call her 'homewrecker', 'slut', 'whore'...but it doesnt change what she is.

    Would you be so understanding if she was banging YOUR husband behind your back?

    Sorry, but i have no sympathy for people that cheat in their marriages or get involved with married people, friend or not.


    And how is your friend any better than the women that got involved with woods' knowing he is a married man? They are all doing the same thing.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1525280].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author LynnM
      Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

      you dont have to call her 'homewrecker', 'slut', 'whore'...but it doesnt change what she is.

      Would you be so understanding if she was banging YOUR husband behind your back?
      Would be interested to hear your words for him...


      Lynn
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1525313].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
        Originally Posted by LynnM View Post

        Would be interested to hear your words for him...


        Lynn
        he's an a$$hole..even worse than her. There may have been a time in this relationship when she didnt know she was the other woman, but he always knew it.

        He doesnt deserve to be married, and hopefully his wife will find out and tear his sack off in divorce court.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1525331].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    OK, we have entered the twilight zone! I have been agreeing with michael motley a little too much. 8-/

    And this is NOT necessarily a victimless crime. It is like on House where one member has an affair and they find out because one or the other gets a disease because of it.

    AND, you may cause the other to pay for a child THEY have no part of, etc.... So you can NOT remove morality out of the picture unless we get rid of it ENTIRELY! Would YOU like someone else eating all your food, drive your car, maybe kill you, etc..... If NOT, then HOW can you justify your spouse stealing food, time, and resources from your family!?!?!?

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1525408].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    I've got a business partner that i thought was fooling around on his wife. And even though he and I are making money together and his marriage has nothing to do with me, I was just about ready to go our seperate ways.

    I believe that if a person is cheating on their spouse, then why would you think that they will be honest with you? And if someone is involved with a married individual knowingly, that tells you what kind of moral character they have. They are selfishly thinking only of themselves and sooner or later there will be a time when YOU will be the person on the losing end of that person's decision process because they will always think of themselves over you.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1525435].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thedogtreatjar
      I'm glad to see that the world, atleast as it is related to you guys, hasn't changed much on this issue.

      Obviously I am a little softer on my friend just for the sake of being friends.

      I am still floored that she initiated this whole deal. I know the original post was long so you might have skimmed it but, she was looking for a married man for the sake of having a no strings attached type deal.

      Now this guy is getting needy and she is freaking out. Serves her right.

      However... I do believe there are some situations that having a mistress is okay. Not in the traditional sense, of course but when all three parties are involved in the decision and agree to it.

      I don't think that one area of moral laxity translates across the board though. Just because a person is willing to be the other women doesn't mean they are willing to do anything else to hurt people.... that's sort of saying all criminals are alike. I mean... I'm sure we can all agree that a person who steals is different than a person who murders, or a person who gets a traffic ticket is different than a pedophile.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526034].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author drwhogoesthere
    We all have one major problem in life, we judge people based on our values and morals and not theirs.

    What makes our morals and values better, more correct or more important than somebody elses? The simple answer of course is because they are ours.

    This is a crazy, mixed up, muddled up world, and we need to live in it together.

    I will not do what a lot of other people do, but then agian I do what a lot of people wont. However, I try not to judge somebody by what they do just because I wont do it.

    Your friend may be fine with the situation, but it is easy to tell that you are not. Does your friends actions change the person she is? She is still the same person that she always was, you are just looking at her differently, based on your morals and values.

    If she never told you, you would still see her as the same person.

    Let me ask you this, what are your other friends up too? Do you really know what goes on with your friends when they leave you? Does it matter?

    If you like this friend for who she when you are together then continue to like her. What she does behind closed doors is not important as it is her life, and she needs to live it.

    As for the relationship I say only this. I have a simple belief in life, do what ever you want in life as long as you do not endager or harm (both physicaly and emotionaly) anybody else.
    Signature



    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526040].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by drwhogoesthere View Post


      If you like this friend for who she when you are together then continue to like her. What she does behind closed doors is not important as it is her life, and she needs to live it.

      As for the relationship I say only this. I have a simple belief in life, do what ever you want in life as long as you do not endager or harm (both physicaly and emotionaly) anybody else.
      You must be single.

      Yeah, thats what you should do. Ignore the fact that she made a point to go out and specifically find a married man, showing you that she has the character of an alley cat. She's obviously a very caring and giving person...great friend material.

      Back in the day when i used to work in strip clubs, i used to see these that would come in regularly because of 1 specific girl. And you could tell these guys were getting hooked on this chick. And do you know what their justification in their mind was for their 'true love's' job? 'She cares for me', she's my friend', 'she loves me'. It never dawned on them that she cared, loved and was their friend because it benefited her.

      you might want to think about that.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526221].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

        It never dawned on them that she cared, loved and was their friend because it benefited her.
        Sometimes they don't care.

        A lot of people go to strip clubs to pretend these women really like them. Just for a couple hours. Then they go back to their normal mundane lives where nobody likes them, until they just can't stand it anymore and have to go back to the strip club.

        They're not delusional. They're playing a game. The club just provides them with a place to play it.
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526442].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by drwhogoesthere View Post

      If you like this friend for who she when you are together then continue to like her. What she does behind closed doors is not important as it is her life, and she needs to live it.

      As for the relationship I say only this. I have a simple belief in life, do what ever you want in life as long as you do not endager or harm (both physicaly and emotionaly) anybody else.
      What you said is HYPOCRITICAL!!!!!!!!!! If they have SEX behind closed doors, you say that is OK!

      If she and ANOTHER are to have sex, then she IS endangering another! You say that is NOT right.

      WHICH IS IT!?!?

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1527322].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    I don't believe in lifelong monogamy. Never did. Never will. Every relationship I've been in, I've been very up front from day one that I want an open relationship, and if you take too long to come to your senses on that front - I'll just leave you.

    I think there are many people who do believe in lifelong monogamy, and they're fine with it. I don't understand that, but there are people like that out there.

    And in between, I think there are a lot of people who don't believe in it, but would like to BELIEVE they do... and they make promises they can't keep. When one of them is married to someone who really does believe in lifelong monogamy, there has to be a secret "other woman" - or "other man" - for both of them to be happy. The non-monogamist needs to have someone else. The monogamist needs not to know.

    There's nothing else that works. You can't tell the monogamist to be miserable knowing that the spouse is off with someone else. You can't tell the non-monogamist to be miserable staying monogamous. If you can't get the two of them to agree that they are either both monogamous or both not monogamous, the clandestine affair is all that's left.

    Someone will undoubtedly speculate that my wife left me with the kids over this open relationship thing, but actually, it was about money. We'd been living with a 25 year old blonde for the past six months, and yes, that does mean what you think. The blonde stayed with me.
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526204].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I have a simple belief in life, do what ever you want in life as long as you do not endager or harm (both physicaly and emotionaly) anybody else.
    That is very Laveyan of you.

    Unfortunately - I don't hear in this situation that the wife has any idea that this situation is going on. I'm pretty sure if that is the case then they ARE hurting someone, even if she is not yet aware -someday she will be.

    If what they are doing is okay - why don't they tell his wife and let her decide how she wants to deal with it, leave or stay. This is the greatest theft and greatest usary of all. You can get money back -- you can find love again....but you never get time wasted again. SHe is being kept an unknowing slave - she puts time and effort into a fantasy instead of building a life around a foundation of truth.

    That man is guilty - he is using another human being just to keep something for himself while looking to replace it. If he were worth having at all, he'd be honest with his wife and let her choose her way of life.

    What would a woman want a man for that she already knows she can't trust as far as the front door? He can blame his actions on his wife all he wants, but if he will do that to one woman he will do it to others - that is his nature, obviously. He is not a man - he is stuck in the I want so I get 2 year old stage.

    As far as your friend.....we make mistakes, yet she should have waken up to a mistake already. She is just as bad as this man -- use someone for her own purposes then toss them away when she is bored. It's okay who she hurts in the meantime, because she's getting her ego fix.

    For me -- I've had friends pull this one before. To tell you the truth every one of them I've known has had other integrity problems, too - and most had ego problems along with them and would tear anyone a new one just to prove that they were a better woman. Those bitches get old real fast. I don't want them in my house making eyes at my guy, telling lies, or stealing things around my place - yes, many will lift stuff off you if they want it, too, as far as I've seen.

    What have I seen? True story --
    I had a friend who was being supported by the married man she was seeing. She got bored with him and started seeing someone else. (throw away people, to her). The whole time she's coming over bending my ear and feeling so sorry for herself. Suddenly he finds out she's sleeping with someone he doesn't want to "be there after" and stops the money train. She ends up on my couch and a few days later tries to get tight with my guy. It backfired on her when he started yelling from the other room -
    this is what I heard: "You stupid slut, she gave your filthy butt a roof and you'd stab her just like you did [guys name]'s wife. You cheated on him and after all this you think I'd look twice at your twisted little a** - get the F*** out of this house - NOW, not tomorrow - NOW". Her reply - "Well exactly where am I supposed to go?" - Like either of us were still supposed to care.

    From that day on when I get privvy to someone who is cheating or invading another person's relationships- male or female, I just turn and walk away. They can run their drama without me.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526449].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Caliban - monogamy isn't the point here. It's the lies that are the point - and the using of another person to fill your own wants no matter what pain it might cause them.

    I know many people who have open relationships - some it works for, some it doesn't -- but the point that the truth was given so that the partner can decide whether that is a life they can or wish to have. There is nothing wrong with choosing a path that is different from those around you........honesty is justification enough in that situation.
    If someone doesn't like the way you very frankly tell them you are going to live and they get hurt for staying, that's their own fault.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526490].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Caliban - monogamy isn't the point here. It's the lies that are the point - and the using of another person to fill your own wants no matter what pain it might cause them.
      Sometimes the lie is better than the truth.

      "John, I know we've been married for several years and have two wonderful kids. I love our house and our life and all the things we do together. You're honestly my best friend.

      "Trouble is, you don't seem to understand how sex works. For the past ten years, you've basically acted like sex is just a way to deliver sperm into a vagina, and an erection is how your penis tells you it's full. You don't seem to know the first damn thing about female anatomy, let alone how to make a woman feel good, and I don't think you even know what foreplay means.

      "And honestly, I'm curious: do you even understand that a woman can have an orgasm? Because I've simply never had one with you, mostly because you average around fifteen seconds, and I'm just plain tired of it.

      "So tomorrow, I'm going to start meeting your friend Bill in the motel down the road twice a week, because I've got it on good authority from a few of my unmarried friends that he knows how to make a woman scream like a banshee - sometimes three and four times in a row. And I think that would be really great, for a change.

      "But I'm not leaving you; like I said, you're my best friend, and our life together is so much more than just the vulgar sexual parts. It's just that deep down, I am fundamentally a vulgar sexual person, and I'd like to be vulgar and sexual here and there."

      Yeah. That's going to play out REAL well, isn't it?

      Wouldn't it give John a much better illusion of his life being happy if his wife just went and rode Bill like a bronco twice a week and didn't say anything?

      I mean, maybe he could still look Bill in the face. Maybe he could still feel like he's done a good job providing for his family. Maybe he'd still feel like a man, instead of a failure.

      How selfish is it to take all that away from John, just for the sake of not telling a lie?

      It's not as cut and dried as you think it is.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526856].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author bravo75
        You crack me up


        Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

        Sometimes the lie is better than the truth.

        "John, I know we've been married for several years and have two wonderful kids. I love our house and our life and all the things we do together. You're honestly my best friend.

        "Trouble is, you don't seem to understand how sex works. For the past ten years, you've basically acted like sex is just a way to deliver sperm into a vagina, and an erection is how your penis tells you it's full. You don't seem to know the first damn thing about female anatomy, let alone how to make a woman feel good, and I don't think you even know what foreplay means.

        "And honestly, I'm curious: do you even understand that a woman can have an orgasm? Because I've simply never had one with you, mostly because you average around fifteen seconds, and I'm just plain tired of it.

        "So tomorrow, I'm going to start meeting your friend Bill in the motel down the road twice a week, because I've got it on good authority from a few of my unmarried friends that he knows how to make a woman scream like a banshee - sometimes three and four times in a row. And I think that would be really great, for a change.

        "But I'm not leaving you; like I said, you're my best friend, and our life together is so much more than just the vulgar sexual parts. It's just that deep down, I am fundamentally a vulgar sexual person, and I'd like to be vulgar and sexual here and there."

        Yeah. That's going to play out REAL well, isn't it?

        Wouldn't it give John a much better illusion of his life being happy if his wife just went and rode Bill like a bronco twice a week and didn't say anything?

        I mean, maybe he could still look Bill in the face. Maybe he could still feel like he's done a good job providing for his family. Maybe he'd still feel like a man, instead of a failure.

        How selfish is it to take all that away from John, just for the sake of not telling a lie?

        It's not as cut and dried as you think it is.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1527814].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    oh dear,

    CDarklock, I am an open relationships person as well, dont waste your time on people who wish to live in fantasy land about cheating in relationships and who take a hollier than thou attitudes in relation to this.

    simple fact is it happens much more often than michael or anyone else for that matter realises.

    Back in my monogamous days with my 2nd girlfriend, we were inseparable, may as well have been married, we did everything together, spent all available time together and calling each other. She was very affectionate, was always there, never gave me any chick drama, no b*tchiness, was never distant, basically gave me no reason to think anything was wrong.

    When I caught her, apart from realising I got played very very well, I also realised a very important life lesson:

    No matter how much time you spend with a person or how much you think you know about a person, we all have our secrets and you dont really know jack about the other person.

    There is no such thing as 'true' honesty in relationships, only tailored honesty.

    I might also point out is has been published that women like pinching other womens men and it is also a fantasy as well, that book: My Secret Garden is very enlightening, I think the married men should read this book.

    as for monogamy:

    The science repeatedly tells us monogamy doesn't work.

    The news repeatedly tells us monogamy doesn't work.

    The statistics repeatedly tell us monogamy doesn't work.

    Watching the experiences of our friends and family repeatedly tells us monogamy doesn't work.

    Our own experiences repeatedly tell us monogamy doesn't work.

    And yet we keep trying it, continuing to think it will work.


    Also, HaySal, I think you are forgetting that many women will put up with a man they suspect of cheating as long as it is not made public and rubbed in her face.




    Chris
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526571].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      The science repeatedly tells us monogamy doesn't work.
      WRONG!!!!! It CAN work! Only SOCIETY says it isn't that likely. DUH!!!!!!

      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      The news repeatedly tells us monogamy doesn't work.
      WRONG! News NEVER says something so subjective doesn't work. It CAN'T, and it just DOESN'T TRY!

      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      The statistics repeatedly tell us monogamy doesn't work.
      AGAIN, statistics NEVER say something doesn't work, and they don't try to. They try to ESTIMATE probability.

      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      Watching the experiences of our friends and family repeatedly tells us monogamy doesn't work.
      WRONG! I have seen people that seemed VERY happy together.

      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      Our own experiences repeatedly tell us monogamy doesn't work.
      Well, I see the law, and various statistics, and just don't gamble.

      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      And yet we keep trying it, continuing to think it will work.
      See last statement.


      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      Also, HaySal, I think you are forgetting that many women will put up with a man they suspect of cheating as long as it is not made public and rubbed in her face.
      And many WON'T! What is yoour point!?!?!?

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1527360].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Also, HaySal, I think you are forgetting that many women will put up with a man they suspect of cheating as long as it is not made public and rubbed in her face.
    Oh yeah. IF they choose to put up - then that is their choice.

    I have been in non-exclusive relationships that didn't work -- not because of that, but because it turned out we just plain didn't care enough about each other and it wouldn't have worked on an exclusive basis either. We just wandered off to more interesting people.

    I was also in a monogamous (make that monotonous) relationship that when I decided to leave was asked if we could just stay together in a non-exclusive manner. LOL - because this guy had turned into nothing but a lot of cost and work with no real benefits to myself - I fled. I wasn't leaving because he did anything dishonest. He was just all work and no fun. It wouldn't have mattered if I had all the freedom to see who I wanted - I didn't want to be with him at all and I told him so.

    I don't care how people decide to live their lives .......just if they are okay living a life that is only working because they are liars, I don't want any part of them. I like to determine my paths based on truth and don't want someone around that will deal me sh** just to get what they want from me. And I think that's a very fair position to take.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526848].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Josey
    I have a problem with this, as well. I compare this to Tiger Woods. What the hell did he get married for? Marriage is supposed to be sacred and you are supposed to revere your partner. If you have no plans on being faithful, don't get married. Live your single life and see as many people as you like. Marriage isn't a game. It takes hard work and sacrifice. It's pretty simple. Do unto others. You wouldn't want to be that person being hurt, now would you? Go look for a single man and stop looking where you have no right to look.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526874].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
      Originally Posted by Josey View Post

      I have a problem with this, as well. I compare this to Tiger Woods. What the hell did he get married for? Marriage is supposed to be sacred and you are supposed to revere your partner. If you have no plans on being faithful, don't get married.
      Although in this day and age there are exceptions to every rule, people do not get married with the mindset of I am going to cheat on this person first chance I get.


      Originally Posted by Josey View Post

      Marriage isn't a game.
      You are very naive, iv yet to see or here of a 'successful' '50/50' relationship. Most feminine women secretly desire that the man make the decisions, and lose alot of respect for the man if he acts like a pussy and cant make decisions and subsequently loses interest eventually and then I think you can guess what usually happens next(and no they dont sit down and have a deep and meaningful, hate to burst your fantasy bubble)

      And I am pretty certain that if you or Heysal had to choose which was more important: good sexual relationship or power over the husband, you would choose the power like every other woman and once you did get that power over him(security i believe women call this need), you would eventually lose interest all together. Something of which most married men do not understand and cant understand why their wives have 'headaches' all the time and spend alot of time reading "Lady Chatterley's Lover" instead.

      Originally Posted by Josey View Post

      It takes hard work and sacrifice.
      Indeed although it depends on what you are sacrificing.

      Originally Posted by Josey View Post

      It's pretty simple. Do unto others. You wouldn't want to be that person being hurt now would you?
      Indeed it is called karma

      Originally Posted by Josey View Post

      Go look for a single man and stop looking where you have no right to look.
      Since when do you OWN your partner?

      I laugh when women say this, they repeatedly complain how they dont like feeling controlled by their partners yet want to control their partner at the same time

      this attitude of ownership is one of the biggest problems with people who are monogamous.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1527001].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
        Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

        You are very naive, iv yet to see or here of a 'successful' '50/50' relationship. Most feminine women secretly desire that the man make the decisions, and lose alot of respect for the man if he acts like a pussy and cant make decisions and subsequently loses interest eventually and then I think you can guess what usually happens next(and no they dont sit down and have a deep and meaningful, hate to burst your fantasy bubble)
        This is the problem. YOU have never seen or heard of a successful relationship so you think it doesnt exist. They exist. You just apparently hang around the wrong kind of males to see it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1528395].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
          Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

          This is the problem. YOU have never seen or heard of a successful relationship so you think it doesnt exist. They exist. You just apparently hang around the wrong kind of males to see it.
          According to a very depressing study on couples that were still married after 20 years, only 10% stilll had the same chemical reaction go off in their brain that gave them that warm fuzzy feeling when they looked at each other, the same as when they first hooked up.

          If you are a member of that group then my hats off to you, you are very fortunate.

          WRONG! I have seen people that seemed VERY happy together
          lol, SEEMED being the keyword there. get grandpa away from grandma for a night, get him a little liquored up and ask him about all the extra stuff he got on the side and ask how he feels today.

          You may well be in for the biggest shock of your life.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1528431].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
            Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

            According to a very depressing study on couples that were still married after 20 years, only 10% stilll had the same chemical reaction go off in their brain that gave them that warm fuzzy feeling when they looked at each other, the same as when they first hooked up.

            If you are a member of that group then my hats off to you, you are very fortunate.
            You make a commitment when you get married, that is the whole point of the ritual of marriage. Nobody says it is going to be easy, and everyone you ask that is in a successful marriage will tell you it takes work. Do you think that they are joking? Its not going to be easy, thats why not everyone can make a commitment. Thats what makes a marriage special..because you have to work at it.

            Nothing worth having is free or comes easy.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1528629].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author thedogtreatjar
              I just wanted to throw out there that I am glad at least one of my threads is getting some action, lol.

              This topic is touchy, but reading through your replies I am definitely learning a lot about you guys!

              Thanks for being so honest ;-)
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1528716].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author ExRat
                Hi CDarklock,

                Sometimes the lie is better than the truth.

                "John, I know we've been married for several years and have two wonderful kids. I love our house and our life and all the things we do together. You're honestly my best friend.

                "Trouble is, you don't seem to understand how sex works. For the past ten years, you've basically acted like sex is just a way to deliver sperm into a vagina, and an erection is how your penis tells you it's full. You don't seem to know the first damn thing about female anatomy, let alone how to make a woman feel good, and I don't think you even know what foreplay means.

                "And honestly, I'm curious: do you even understand that a woman can have an orgasm? Because I've simply never had one with you, mostly because you average around fifteen seconds, and I'm just plain tired of it.

                "So tomorrow, I'm going to start meeting your friend Bill in the motel down the road twice a week, because I've got it on good authority from a few of my unmarried friends that he knows how to make a woman scream like a banshee - sometimes three and four times in a row. And I think that would be really great, for a change.

                "But I'm not leaving you; like I said, you're my best friend, and our life together is so much more than just the vulgar sexual parts. It's just that deep down, I am fundamentally a vulgar sexual person, and I'd like to be vulgar and sexual here and there."

                Yeah. That's going to play out REAL well, isn't it?

                Wouldn't it give John a much better illusion of his life being happy if his wife just went and rode Bill like a bronco twice a week and didn't say anything?

                I mean, maybe he could still look Bill in the face. Maybe he could still feel like he's done a good job providing for his family. Maybe he'd still feel like a man, instead of a failure.

                How selfish is it to take all that away from John, just for the sake of not telling a lie?

                It's not as cut and dried as you think it is.
                How about this for a scenario that you don't seem to even consider -

                Wife - 'John, you're my best friend and all that, but there's something I need to tell you that you might find hard to accept at first -

                I don't want to ruin this marriage or deceive you, so I have to be honest with you and tell you that I really need you to improve your sexual performance, your attitude towards sex and your understanding of what makes me as a woman, tick - sexually.'

                Why isn't that scenario even considered before you decide that John is better off being deceived?

                I can categorically tell you that I would be happier facing any truth, and happier alone, than I would by being deceived.

                I know, because I'm living the consequences of someone deciding for me that deception was better and kinder to me than the truth.

                It's simply a pathetic excuse used by weak people, and they play a different tune when it happens to them.

                Hi Skyfox7,

                There is no such thing as 'true' honesty in relationships, only tailored honesty
                Speak for yourself, the people you know and those you have observed - but the statement I have quoted proves that you have no idea what you are talking about and that your cynicism is over-riding any logic.
                Signature


                Roger Davis

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529538].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                  Originally Posted by ExRat View Post

                  Speak for yourself, the people you know and those you have observed - but the statement I have quoted proves that you have no idea what you are talking about and that your cynicism is over-riding any logic.

                  I HATE to say this BUT, with regard to the "tailored honesty" message, I have to agree, although HE may not have meant what I do. MANY women ask questions that they MUST know the real answer to, but you CAN'T answer them truthfully.

                  Am I getting fat?
                  Am I too thin?
                  How old do I look?
                  If I .... would you still LOVE me?
                  I feel THIS way, how about you?

                  Sound familiar? If you think about it, they are probably familiar EVEN if you're FIVE YEARS OLD!!!!!!

                  Steve
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529604].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
                    Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                    I HATE to say this BUT, with regard to the "tailored honesty" message, I have to agree, although HE may not have meant what I do. MANY women ask questions that they MUST know the real answer to, but you CAN'T answer them truthfully.

                    Am I getting fat?
                    Am I too thin?
                    How old do I look?
                    If I .... would you still LOVE me?
                    I feel THIS way, how about you?

                    Sound familiar? If you think about it, they are probably familiar EVEN if you're FIVE YEARS OLD!!!!!!

                    Steve
                    Yeah, but there's a difference between giving someone 'tailored honesty' and dishonesty.

                    Honestlty doesnt have to be brutal or hurtful, its all in the delivery. But softening up the truth so that its not hurtful isnt the same thing as being dishonest.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529658].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author ExRat
                      Hi Steve,

                      I get your point but there's a difference between -

                      There is no such thing as 'true' honesty in relationships, only tailored honesty
                      and -

                      True honesty is rare, tailored honesty is very common.

                      It seems that you are saying the latter, but it's not an absolute like the former. Big difference - enough of a difference that I feel justified in giving the response I gave -

                      but the statement I have quoted proves that you have no idea what you are talking about and that your cynicism is over-riding any logic.
                      Signature


                      Roger Davis

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529717].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                        Originally Posted by ExRat View Post

                        Hi Steve,

                        I get your point but there's a difference between -



                        and -

                        True honesty is rare, tailored honesty is very common.

                        It seems that you are saying the latter, but it's not an absolute like the former. Big difference - enough of a difference that I feel justified in giving the response I gave -
                        Michael Motley, and exrat, I DID say "HE may not have meant what I do. ". 8-)

                        HEY, i was just playing devils advocate.

                        Steve
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530123].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
                    Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                    I HATE to say this BUT, with regard to the "tailored honesty" message, I have to agree, although HE may not have meant what I do. MANY women ask questions that they MUST know the real answer to, but you CAN'T answer them truthfully.

                    Am I getting fat?
                    Am I too thin?
                    How old do I look?
                    If I .... would you still LOVE me?
                    I feel THIS way, how about you?

                    Sound familiar? If you think about it, they are probably familiar EVEN if you're FIVE YEARS OLD!!!!!!

                    Steve
                    What you are refering to is a double bind, and no it is not in relation to what I meant.

                    Women do this constantly. It is designed to get you to suck up to them and do what they want.

                    For example.

                    your at a party, you, your girlfriend, and another female friend and your playing truth or dare.

                    your girlfriend dares you to kiss the other girl.

                    if you do kiss the other girl, your girlfriend gets to act all hurt and make you look like a bad guy so that you will beg and plead her to forgive you and she gets to enjoy the feelings of validation she gets from that.

                    If you dont, your girlfriend gets to tease you, make fun of you for being a pussy and enjoy the feeling of power she has over you.

                    See the problem here?

                    Personally I would kiss the friend and ignore the GF when she starts trying to act upset. nor do I have any sympathy for any woman that puts herself into this situation.
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1531077].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                      See the problem here?
                      Yes, I do. It's junior high, she's a spoiled drama queen and he's a wuss.

                      Signature
                      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                      ***
                      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1531146].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

                      What you are refering to is a double bind, and no it is not in relation to what I meant.

                      Women do this constantly. It is designed to get you to suck up to them and do what they want.

                      ...

                      See the problem here?

                      Personally I would kiss the friend and ignore the GF when she starts trying to act upset. nor do I have any sympathy for any woman that puts herself into this situation.

                      Well, I DID say something like "surely, they must know the truth". BUT, if they are faking 100%, they seem to have tricked themselves as much. ALSO, with some of this stuff, it is hard to take them seriously if they are feminists.

                      Steve
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1532665].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                  Originally Posted by ExRat View Post

                  Why isn't that scenario even considered before you decide that John is better off being deceived?
                  Because we're talking about infidelity, and your scenario doesn't have any.
                  Signature
                  "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1535639].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author ExRat
                    Hi CDarklock,

                    Here we are again - context -

                    You responded to this -

                    Quote:
                    Originally Posted by HeySal
                    Caliban - monogamy isn't the point here. It's the lies that are the point - and the using of another person to fill your own wants no matter what pain it might cause them.
                    With an opening line of this -

                    Sometimes the lie is better than the truth.
                    And then an elaboration on why you feel the above statement stands up.

                    Of course there's no infidelity in the scenario I mentioned - that's the whole point. It's a scenario designed to avoid infidelity by honest, sensible communication between the partners, as opposed to one partner taking the liberty of avoiding the communication and indulging in infidelity on the basis that because the other partner isn't sexually satisfying them, it's better that they are lied to and deceived rather than having to face some truths about their performance.

                    The problem with cheating is that it's the cheater who is making the decision that 'it's better that I lie to them.' That's not a partnership, marriage or anything resembling one.

                    Obviously, they can't ask the other if they would prefer to be lied to or not, unless the monogamous partner is a weak individual who would prefer that. But in a major way, they are technically then not actually being lied to about fidelity. They are just not being furnished with details, but are aware of the possibility of infidelity.

                    And it's one thing to consider this in isolation, but throw in children, money, a home and everything else that is shared and then damaged on break up, and it gets very complicated and devastating for all involved when it goes wrong, and one partner realises that the other has surreptitiously decided to take the role of 'behind the scenes' life-changing decision maker for both of them.

                    In conclusion -

                    Sometimes the lie is better than the truth
                    Possibly, in totally unrelated situations. But in the one we're discussing - IE - infidelity - it is merely a convenient excuse for a cheater to use and can logically only be appropriate where the monogamous partner specifically states that they would prefer to be lied to than know the truth.

                    If monogamy has been agreed upon, and both are expecting that agreement to be upheld, nothing can justify that agreement being broken by one side - no person has the right to destroy everything that is precious to another, no matter how much they need to brush up on their bedroom performance.

                    What you're saying is the equivalent of this analogy - if you feel that your boss isn't paying you enough, it's OK to steal enough to make up the difference without even bothering to ask the boss whether they will give you a pay raise.
                    Signature


                    Roger Davis

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1535916].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                      Originally Posted by ExRat View Post

                      Here we are again - context
                      Yes, and the title of the thread clearly places this in the context of infidelity. I didn't use the scenario you provided because I did not find it relevant to the point I was making.

                      And then an elaboration on why you feel the above statement stands up.
                      And to which you responded that there are other situations than the one I mentioned. Which is why I said "sometimes" and not "every single time without any exceptions whatsoever" in the first place. I provided a single example of a situation in which I felt the lie was better than the truth.

                      You then provided an example of a situation where the truth was better than a lie, which is irrelevant. I don't care that sometimes the truth is better. I said sometimes the lie is better. The rest of the time, the lie isn't better, and some of THAT time the truth will be better. I'm not trying to say that every person who cheats on their spouse is justified. I'm saying that some of them ARE justified - because people of both genders will lie for the purpose of landing a spouse, and also have a certain tendency to change after marriage.

                      We don't have any good answer for this. But what's very clear is that eternal monogamy is not an answer that works for everybody, and it's frequently after that commitment when you learn it doesn't work for you. So you're committed to eternal monogamy, your partner likes it just fine, and the only option you have is to terminate your marriage altogether... to throw the whole thing away over sex.

                      And there's a REALLY BIG GAP between "sex is far too important to ignore completely" and "sex is so important I'll get divorced over it" - with a certain area between the two that dictates you really ought to take a lover. But when your partner is of the opinion that "adultery = divorce" no matter what the reason, you can't exactly be honest about it.

                      What you're saying is the equivalent of this analogy - if you feel that your boss isn't paying you enough, it's OK to steal enough to make up the difference without even bothering to ask the boss whether they will give you a pay raise.
                      Actually, it's more like saying "if your boss isn't paying you enough, it's OK to get another job." And it is.
                      Signature
                      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1535999].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    So it is okay for us to make someone live an illusion because it will allow us to have it all as we want and the hell with what happens to the other when they find out their life is a lie?

    Yeah - I saw that movie, too. It was called THE MATRIX.


    Sure, truth hurts, but the foundation stays steady - and finding out that we are living a lie hurts a hell of a lot worse than truth. It shakes a person's whole belief system and sense of reality.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1526886].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Sure, truth hurts, but the foundation stays steady
      Not when you're talking about sex. People are insane freaks about sex. They don't make rational decisions, and you can't expect that from them. Just because one person can discuss it rationally doesn't mean the other one can.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1527751].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Most feminine women secretly desire that the man make the decisions
    And I am pretty certain that if you or Heysal had to choose which was more important: good sexual relationship or power over the husband, you would choose the power like every other woman and once you did get that power over him(security i believe women call this need), you would eventually lose interest all together.
    What the hell little male Island is your brain floating on to think of this one? Maybe this idea of who has the control is why things don't work out between people. It is sheer stupidity of you to think that you know my mind the least bit no matter what you THINK you know about women -- you are thinking with your libido chum.

    Do you people even start to know how to walk beside each other as partners or is it all about ownership and control of the other and what you can get to make your life comfy? That is where I walk out.....I refuse to be dominated and I will not be put in the position of being a dominator. I am very honest before going too far into a relationship about what I can and can't deal comfortably with and what I will consider the relationship over for. And I am very serious when I say it. They are warned if they can't handle that - don't go there in the first place. Yet time and time again I get caught with someone who thinks I'm going to put in 100% to every 10% of theirs and in the meantime that I will be willing to watch what they are doing. BULL HOCKEY.

    If you can't trust someone to be straight with you why be with them at all? I like my life centered and a liar or a dominator just throw that off kilter. I expect a man to be able to run his own life - but when one thinks they are going to run mine they are history so fast their head spins. In the same - if they violate what I told them I will not be able to live with, they are gone. It's a real good system. Everyone knows where they stand and everyone does what they please other than what was laid on the line as an action that breaks the commitment.

    I've only had one relationship break because the guy thought I was supposed to be faithful while he was free to be with who he pleased. The rest are gone because they thought that having a penis entitled them to tell me how to run my life even though I gave them the honor of never having to be pointed and laughed at for being a fool or being lied to.

    You guys have got to quit speaking for what women want because every time I see your stumbling guesses at it - they are just dead out wrong delusions that come from too much testosterone and ego clogging your sense of reality.

    IF you want to know what a woman wants -- ask her and then DAMNED WELL LISTEN when she tells you. If you can't handle what she says - leave.

    I once had a relationship with a man that lasted until his death. We were in love and neither of us would have thought of even wanting to be with another - it just wasn't there. We shared work 50-50, we talked when we needed a compromise. We told each other the truth and worked through differences - we never transgressed on the other person's "can't live withs" and we made sure that every day we found a way to cause joy for the other. I still miss that man, never found another like him.

    Oh - and one more thing...........I hear a lot of people talking about how bored they get with their mates. You know what I've found? I've found that when one person leaves the other with the majority of the work the person they leave the work to gets too tired from all the responsibility to be fun or to clean up and look sexy and feel sexy for the lazy dolt. The Lazy jerk (female or male) then starts to wander around and sees all the fresh lively faces elsewhere and decides their partner is too boring so they will go off with the person who they only have to see when they are at their best. If they leave the person they wore out and go to the other, soon enough they have to put up with the other in the whole life spectrum instead of just during their best "party and fun" times and they just end up wearing that person out too.

    If you want someone to be faithful to you, if that is something you need from a relationship -- you have to put in your 50% of the not fun stuff in life so the other won't be towed under into numb apathy by you using them to keep your life fun and exciting and free of your responsibilities.

    Jesus people - you all sound like two year olds - gimmee gimmmeee gimmee with no idea of what joy sharing can be when you share with someone who you can honestly love to the exclusion of everyone else.

    I feel sorry for you - you think you're having a great life? You have no idea in heck what you have missed.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529800].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    Heysal, that sounds really nice, but in the real world, you cant have two captains of the same boat, two generals of the same army or two chefs in the same kitchen. Someone leads, someone follows or its not going to work.

    That whole idea of 'walking side by side' sounds really sweet on a hallmark card, but side by side you can't go through a door.

    And you cant ask a woman what she wants and get a straight answer because even a woman doesnt know what a woman wants.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529933].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
      You can if the doorway is wide enough. Same with a relationship, if one person is narrow minded there won't be any "walking side by side".

      Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post


      That whole idea of 'walking side by side' sounds really sweet on a hallmark card, but side by side you can't go through a door.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530038].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

      Heysal, that sounds really nice, but in the real world, you cant have two captains of the same boat, two generals of the same army or two chefs in the same kitchen. Someone leads, someone follows or its not going to work.

      That whole idea of 'walking side by side' sounds really sweet on a hallmark card, but side by side you can't go through a door.

      And you cant ask a woman what she wants and get a straight answer because even a woman doesnt know what a woman wants.
      You are right there. In MOST of the animal kindom, EACH sex "rules the roost". They just rule different parts. Even on leave it to beaver, the father AND the mother had their own parts. Some women today just want to have EVERYTHING, etc... You could even show its relationship to the DINK syndrome! (Dual Income, No Kids)

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530145].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        Steve - I agree with much of what you say.

        Some women want to have it all - and some men do, too. In good marriages, roles are flexible and one person leads in one area while the spouse leads in another. Instead of trying to fit into any defined system, they define a system of their own that works for them.

        It doesn't matter who leads and who follows as long you are headed to the same place. It doesn't matter which of you changes diapers, cooks, or works as long as it works for you both. If you have love, laughter, respect, kindness and tolerance, you have it made. If you focus on "my rights and my needs" or need to control everything around you, you lose.

        In the OP's original post - what angered me was not that her friend was having an affair. Do I care? No.

        Do I care if my friends have affairs? No - they make their own morals and it's their business. But I don't want to be pulled into their sordid little drama.

        You have a woman who cheats on her husband - and then cheats on her "secret" lover by talking about him....and sees nothing wrong with burdening her friend with the mess (to get more attention?). How lame can you get?

        She'd be an ex-friend to me but it would be due to her mouth, not her morals.

        kay


        Sal - The strongest woman sometimes needs a place to lean and the weakest man can rise to the occasion if given the chance. For it to work a woman must trust that her partner won't let her fall and a man trust that he won't be slapped down. Minds can be narrow and blinders worn on both extremes of the spectrum or so open brain matter leaks out.
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530446].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          Steve - I agree with much of what you say.

          Some women want to have it all - and some men do, too. In good marriages, roles are flexible and one person leads in one area while the spouse leads in another. Instead of trying to fit into any defined system, they define a system of their own that works for them.

          It doesn't matter who leads and who follows as long you are headed to the same place. It doesn't matter which of you changes diapers, cooks, or works as long as it works for you both. If you have love, laughter, respect, kindness and tolerance, you have it made. If you focus on "my rights and my needs" or need to control everything around you, you lose.

          In the OP's original post - what angered me was not that her friend was having an affair. Do I care? No.

          Do I care if my friends have affairs? No - they make their own morals and it's their business. But I don't want to be pulled into their sordid little drama.

          You have a woman who cheats on her husband - and then cheats on her "secret" lover by talking about him....and sees nothing wrong with burdening her friend with the mess (to get more attention?). How lame can you get?

          She'd be an ex-friend to me but it would be due to her mouth, not her morals.

          kay


          Sal - The strongest woman sometimes needs a place to lean and the weakest man can rise to the occasion if given the chance. For it to work a woman must trust that her partner won't let her fall and a man trust that he won't be slapped down. Minds can be narrow and blinders worn on both extremes of the spectrum or so open brain matter leaks out.
          well, I agree with much of what YOU said ALSO. I guess, in a way, relationships can be likened to water. Some MEN feel they are doing TOO MUCH, or are just LAZY, or figure THEY should control ALL. And that could be seen as taking over some of the woman's role, and treating her like a slave. Some WOMEN feel like they are somehow put at an inferior level or want more control, etc... and want to move towards the other side. Anyway, that means nobody is home to take care of things, costs go up, the kids aren't taken care of as well, and work is harder to get and pays less in relation over all. So things end up kind of backfiring. Any money that they work is worth less, and more money goes towards people to replace them in areas they were needed, etc....

          Women DO tend to take care of kids better and traditionally have been the cooks and homekeepers. Women moved into roles as operators on telephones because they were better with customers and all. TRUE STORY! They started with men, and it apparently just didn't work out.

          And your message to sal was right on the mark ALSO. SO many women denigrate men that it is a staple on almost EVERY sitcom that covers a family over the past 50 years. I don't think they did it on "leave it to beaver", but "that 70s show","the dick van dyke show",BOTH "bob newharts", BOTH "bill cosbys","the king of queens", "married with children", EVEN popular artists like "toby keith" talk about it. Rosanne barr made a LIVING denigrating men! And DON'T get me wrong! If I had a wife, I would LOVE her to be smart, Quick thinking, etc... But the idea of her leaving something for me, and considering it a pleasure, and my being able to make her happier through such things, is nice also.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530954].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Aronya
    Just throwing this out there.

    NOTHING has been said about the relationship the cheating husband has with his wife, but a lot of assumptions have been made.

    Maybe she knows about what's going on, and maybe she has from the beginning.
    Maybe she's OK with it.
    Maybe their marriage is empty and emotionally dead.
    Maybe she's cheating too, and maybe she has a history of doing so.
    Maybe she's abusive, either verbally or physically.
    Maybe she encouraged it in order to add some spice to their marriage.
    There are a hundred possible scenarios.

    I'm not coming down on either side of the fence here, because there just isn't enough information to make a fair and educated decision about who's wrong, or who's hurting who, or anything else. I do find it interesting how quick people are to jump to conclusions, though.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529959].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by Aronya View Post

      Just throwing this out there.

      NOTHING has been said about the relationship the cheating husband has with his wife, but a lot of assumptions have been made.

      Maybe she knows about what's going on, and maybe she has from the beginning.
      Maybe she's OK with it.
      Maybe their marriage is empty and emotionally dead.
      Maybe she's cheating too, and maybe she has a history of doing so.
      Maybe she's abusive, either verbally or physically.
      Maybe she encouraged it in order to add some spice to their marriage.
      There are a hundred possible scenarios.

      I'm not coming down on either side of the fence here, because there just isn't enough information to make a fair and educated decision about who's wrong, or who's hurting who, or anything else. I do find it interesting how quick people are to jump to conclusions, though.
      BUT if all that is true, wouldnt you calling him 'cheating' be an assumption as well?

      There is a saying in my head..i cant quite remember it..something about glass houses and stones...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1529976].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Aronya
        Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

        BUT if all that is true, wouldnt you calling him 'cheating' be an assumption as well?

        There is a saying in my head..i cant quite remember it..something about glass houses and stones...
        Michael,
        First of all, I didn't say that ANY of those things are true. BUT, even if ALL of them were true, isn't he still cheating?

        When you use the glass houses saying, you are accusing someone of something. Just curious who you're directing that to.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530060].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    All I can say to all this crap about MEN deciding what is good for women or what women are like or what they want is that if you can find women who will put up with your horse manure than bully for you (or maybe bully describes you). Have fun destroying each other. Have fun never finding a real bond.

    With your bizarre notions of a relationship having to have a controller, it is not hard to figure why things might fail for you in finding a really awesome partner, er, no that isn't the right word....um......slave, yes that it the right one.
    You can if the doorway is wide enough. Same with a relationship, if one person is narrow minded there won't be any "walking side by side".
    Tim - why do I see behind this a couple who stays together because, and only because, they are ecstatically happy to be with each other? I had that for 10 years and life together was the most incredible adventure -- every day. My parents had that and didn't just love each other but were IN love with each other for 38 years. A light went out of my father's eyes the day she died that I have only see a flicker of since - and that is since he met his present wife. To be with someone because you can't imagine ever wanting to be with anyone else is such a rare gift - and it takes a lot of letting go of our selfish desire to dominate to get it. Most never even come close to finding it. I see a lot of that going on in this thread.

    I am so glad for you that you have found such a partner. I know you understand why, for now, I prefer to be single. Some day, when I find someone who can step without stepping on, I will be a partner again. Until then, I am fine on my own - don't need someone else just to have an identity.

    No matter what else goes on in your life Tim - you have been blessed with a rare and enlightened gift. Good on you, guy!
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530351].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
      Thanks Sal, but I'm not with anyone now. My ex fiance dumped me about 4 months ago completely out of the blue. It was crazy, I was shocked.

      Anyways, I have had relationships where there wasn't a dominant partner, where it was as equal as possible and that's the way I like it also. It takes two people who understand themselves and have control over their own egos.

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      I am so glad for you that you have found such a partner. I know you understand why, for now, I prefer to be single. Some day, when I find someone who can step without stepping on, I will be a partner again. Until then, I am fine on my own - don't need someone else just to have an identity.

      No matter what else goes on in your life Tim - you have been blessed with a rare and enlightened gift. Good on you, guy!
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530790].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

        Thanks Sal, but I'm not with anyone now. My ex fiance dumped me about 4 months ago completely out of the blue. It was crazy, I was shocked.

        Anyways, I have had relationships where there wasn't a dominant partner, where it was as equal as possible and that's the way I like it also. It takes two people who understand themselves and have control over their own egos.

        Holy crap, Tim. I can imagine you were stunned. Ah well - at least she left when she felt it necessary and let you have your life back instead of just keeping you around for whatever. You don't seem like the type that would happy being kept around "to be kind to you". Whatever went wrong left her with enough respect for you to do right by you. I'm thinkin' a lot of people in this thread didn't get that much from their partners.

        Ah well - you are in the same boat as I, for now. I hope you find someone else that you enjoy.......and feels the same forever.
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1531840].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ExRat
          Hi skyfox7,

          Whenever you try and make a point, you seem to see ALL relationships as black and white, and they sound as if they are pulled directly from a PUA manual -

          Women do this constantly. It is designed to get you to suck up to them and do what they want.
          Take 'women do this constantly.' Do you not see how absolute and all-encompassing this is, and therefore inaccurate?

          'It is designed to...'

          So because of the first statement, the insinuation is that ALL women play games constantly.

          By simply using words like 'quite often' you can say virtually the same thing, without offending those who know for a fact that these absolutes are false.

          And it wouldn't look as if you were basing all of your knowledge on a PUA manual and a handful of brief encounters with teenage girls.

          Personally I would kiss the friend and ignore the GF when she starts trying to act upset. nor do I have any sympathy for any woman that puts herself into this situation.
          That's my point. 'Women' have generally progressed from the type of party situations you describe which they might have got involved in when they were 'girls'.

          You're trying to preach to adults that you know better then them, by using examples drawn from the school playground.
          Signature


          Roger Davis

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1532311].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Sal - The strongest woman sometimes needs a place to lean and the weakest man can rise to the occasion if given the chance. For it to work a woman must trust that her partner won't let her fall and a man trust that he won't be slapped down. Minds can be narrow and blinders worn on both extremes of the spectrum or so open brain matter leaks out.
    And in a true partnership - those matters will fall into place. Leading is not always dominance, following not always subservience. Sometimes the path narrows and one will have to walk in front of the other. But to either lead or follow because it is "your place" doesn't allow for a partnership just as the predisposition that all people cheat or that women want [this] does not.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1530513].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    I said most feminine women expect the guy to LEAD, not be a TYRANT.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1531023].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      I said most feminine women expect the guy to LEAD, not be a TYRANT.
      Oh - well, I don't know many that need or like to be "lead" either. Most women can find their own way just fine, thank you.

      I usually only have a man around because I happen to enjoy his company and keep him around until he becomes more work or expense than pleasure. In fact, life is usually a lot easier without most of em. There are very few who are worth the bother, actually. I have only found one that turned out more than worth my time, and he died. Not much I can do about that one, but after 10 years, I can honestly say he'd still be with me had he survived. He never presumed I needed any leading - unless I asked him to help me with something.

      I suppose I could just keep them around and cheat on them when they proved to be more headache than fun........but I'm not like that - I tell them the truth then ask them to leave. It would be kind of mean to keep them holding on when I don't really care about them, don't you think?
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1531815].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
        Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

        Oh - well, I don't know many that need or like to be "lead" either. Most women can find their own way just fine, thank you.
        most women can kill spiders just fine also, take out trash just fine, wash the car, reach things on a high shelf..etc..etc just fine, but they still ask their man to do it if they have one.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1532401].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Diana Lane
    Some of the assumptions made on this thread are astonishing. There's a lot of black and white here, with little mention of any shades of grey. 'Women do this constantly...' is particularly breathtaking. I can honestly say that I've never asked a man to kill a spider either, I just pick up creepies and put them somewhere out of harm's way. The spiders, not the men.

    Infidelity has had a big impact on me and mine. My dad was twenty seven years older than my mum. I loved him madly and worshipped the ground he walked on, and thought my mum did too. That is, until she ran off with my first husband just after we buried my dad. They'd been having an affair for two years, having redefined the concept of a 'close' family.

    It was a painful time, and one that's left me unlikely to trust anyone ever again, but even then I could see what had led up to it. My mum had been fostered by a series of unsuitable 'carers' right from being a baby, the kind that punished toddlers just for wetting the bed, was even sexually abused by one 'uncle' and still has a couple of cigarette burn scars on her arm that were inflicted on her as a child. She met my dad in a pub when she was nineteen and moved in with him the same night. He was not of the same generation as her though and it showed, and there was none of the socialising and other stuff that women her own age did. I think she's spent her entire life looking for affection and approval, often in the most inappropriate of places. Don't get me wrong though, just because I can understand to some extent what made her the way she is does not mean we have not had some very bitter rows over events in the past and I've called her a lot worse than some of the names brought up here, but I still do not feel that anyone else is entitled to call her a 'slut' or a 'whore' because of what she has done when they don't even know her.

    My ex husband (who you can all feel free to call an a$$hole - form an orderly queue) was a violent man, who hit women because his father did. His mother had had enough when my ex was ten, and bailed out to live with another woman. I think he'd been looking for a mother-figure ever since, and chose mine. Because of his tendency to use his fists to make a point, I often used to wish my ex would run off with someone else. It's experiences such as this that teach you the truth in the saying 'be careful what you wish for...'

    Eighteen years on and they're still together. It makes for some awkward times, but I speak to my mum fairly often now, the last time about seven hours ago when she rang to tell me that my younger sister has been carted off to hospital with swine flu and she'd call me as soon as there was any news, which is why I am sitting here rambling on at 5.30 in the morning. I don't regret my first marriage - I got the two most wonderful and amazing sons out of it, and just for that would do it again.

    Yes, I have been on the wrong end of infidelity, and no, being lied to isn't pretty. But I would still stop short of making a blanket judgement on the places people are in if I had no idea of the path that had taken them there.

    I really am going on a bit, aren't I? Merry Christmas to all of you, whichever side of the issue your views lay. Have a good one
    Signature

    Plot short fiction, long fiction, even outline non-fiction * Edit the question prompts to suit your genre * Easily export text and image files for use with your word processor or Scrivener.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1535501].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    Diana,

    please don't take this the wrong way, but intentionally marrying a abusive person, then stating that you would go through that all over again to get pregnant again, most people will agree you need counseling.

    Hey Exrat,

    That's my point. 'Women' have generally progressed from the type of party situations you describe which they might have got involved in when they were 'girls'.
    It was an example. Most of these things are a little more subtle such as when women ask "does this make my ass look fat" I here that constantly from women of all ages and similar crap about their makeup and their dresses etc. So I beg to differ on them snapping out of this kind of stuff.

    Hey seasoned,

    The feminists are probable the most insecure group of women I have ever met. First they were pro sex, and then they turned anti-sex last time I read, or have they changed their minds again?

    Germaine Greer got it the wrong way around as to who the female eunuchs were.


    Merry xmas to you all
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1535925].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ExRat
      Hi Skyfox7,

      It was an example. Most of these things are a little more subtle such as when women ask "does this make my ass look fat" I here that constantly from women of all ages and similar crap about their makeup and their dresses etc. So I beg to differ on them snapping out of this kind of stuff.
      Well it was a bad example to use when the majority of the people involved in the discussion are quite obviously not teenagers and when your theories are blanket statements and absolutes that are obviously incorrect.

      And just where are you getting all of these women of various ages asking you about the size of their ass? Do you have your own harem? I doubt it, and would suggest it's safe to assume that you are coming to your blanket conclusions about women from watching TV, reading men's magazines and websites designed by clever marketers that make money from selling courses designed purely to make the buyer think that they are somehow superior in the 'battle of the sexes' after studying the course - A.K.A. purchasing an inflated ego. Out of interest, how old are you skyfox7?

      What you are refering to is a double bind, and no it is not in relation to what I meant.

      Women do this constantly. It is designed to get you to suck up to them and do what they want.
      I have experienced living, breathing proof that women do not do this constantly as I'm sure many others have.

      Diana,

      please don't take this the wrong way, but intentionally marrying a abusive person, then stating that you would go through that all over again to get pregnant again, most people will agree you need counseling.
      How considerate of you take a heartfelt post about someone's difficult experiences and make conclusions based on faulty assumptions and then summize that she needs 'counselling'? And again, you blanketize your statement with 'most people would agree'.

      I really think you need to stop thinking and speaking for 'most people' as you clearly have no idea about 'most people'.

      a) where did Diana say that she intentionally married an abusive person? Did she categorically state that she knew he was abusive before she married him?

      b) obviously the following statement can be interpreted many ways -

      I don't regret my first marriage - I got the two most wonderful and amazing sons out of it, and just for that would do it again.
      You have chosen to interpret it as meaning that Diana would go through physical abuse again to have more children.

      Conversely, it could just as easily be interpreted as simply meaning 'despite all of the pain, my children are so wonderful that it was worth going through it, I don't regret it, and would go through *a similar amount of pain* for a such a wonderful outcome.'

      But instead you decide to make an assumption, and attach a particularly insulting conclusion to it.

      That's totally uncalled for and unnecessary. I actually think that it's you that needs someone to counsel you to come to terms with and cure your obvious anger towards women in general, and your delusion that what you think is what everyone else thinks.
      Signature


      Roger Davis

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1535963].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      stating that you would go through that all over again to get pregnant again
      This is the single most moronic statement I've seen from you yet, and that's saying something. She wouldn't go through that for the pregnancy; she'd go through it for the child. She's expressing normal and natural maternal love for her children. Trying to make it into some sort of neurosis just makes you sound like a dickhead.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536003].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
        Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

        She wouldn't go through that for the pregnancy; she'd go through it for the child. She's expressing normal and natural maternal love for her children.
        obviously as she is a woman. I am refering to the fact that she knowingly married an abusive partner. Which is the basis of my statement of needing to see a counselor, and the same applies for both sexes.

        It is stories like Diana's that make me very glad to have had the parentsI had.


        either way, I am done with this thread and I will leave you and exrat to argue amongst yourselves about white lies and such.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536094].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Diana Lane,

      Hopefully I didn't encourage that comment. I have tried to be as fair as possible. Not all women are that way, but many are. Just like the ex husband you spoke of doesn't represent all men, and I am sure he represents only a minority. Heck, if one were to apply the abilities/actions of the worst subset of women out there to all women, NOBODY would be considered a fit mother. Happily, VERY few do so.

      There have been BOOKS and even basically genres printed about how men and women act/think VERY differently. Most men seem to somewhat accept it even if they don't usually understand it. It seems most women don't even want to acknowledge it as a possibility. They will figure their husband hates them, is lazy, forgetful, etc.... BTW with regard to hate, I am NOT talking about hitting, etc... but forgetting to send cards, failing to do something women think is important, etc... EVEN maybe not saying they love you.

      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      Hey seasoned,

      The feminists are probable the most insecure group of women I have ever met. First they were pro sex, and then they turned anti-sex last time I read, or have they changed their minds again?
      No, that is the typical entitlement mindset. See the world as you like it in the moment. Feminists will, for example, say that women should be able to work at EVERY job, and have AT LEAST the same opportunity as men. That means, for example, that if they are 70% as strong, that all strength requirements should be lowered AT LEAST 30%. If they are typically 3" shorter, the requirement should be lowered AT LEAST that much. In the SAME breath, they will say that they want to be protected, and given preference in alimony.

      BTW diana, I certainly don't mean ALL women here, and the mindset ALSO applies to SOME union workers, SOME minorities, etc....

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536206].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    exrat,

    correct me if I am wrong, but people dont go sudenly from loving tending caring partner to waking up one morning out of the blue and start abusing and being violent to the other partner.

    I am not sure where you get the idea I hate women from, if you are drawing that from my posts then you obviously haven't realized that subtlety and sugar coating are not a strong suit of mine and I prefer to just get straight to the point and can be very blunt and come across in way the wrong manner. something I am trying to work on fixing.

    as for that PUA crap(love systems?) I have read it and frankly what those people are teaching guys to do violates basic human social dynamics. If I remember correctly, they tell guys to go out, talk about themselves non stop(not very good when trying to befriend people) and make up stories that sub communicate how much everyone likes them etc. I think they also tell them to go around trying to read womens palms as well.

    The real genius of the marketing they use is that they tell guys to have 'routines' (act like a dancing monkey basicly) and when they don't 'get the girl' they say it is something wrong with the routine when it is actually something wrong with them themselves in how they are coming across.

    the effect being when they keep getting rejected, they blame the routine instead of themselves, gradually becoming more frustrated, they turn back to these people who magically have another product which will help them become the ultimate player or whatever.

    My age is irrelevant.


    getting back to marrying abusive partners...


    My aunt is the same, traumatic experience with her father(the primary male figure of her life, whom even you cant deny the numerous relationship studies and from personal experience(I would imagine) the importance of women having good relationship with their fathers as it affects how they relate to other men in their lives, or am I speaking for every1 again?)

    She has low self esteem and trust issues and married a guy who she knew was abusive, and yes I know she knew he was, because women who have the above mentioned characteristics typically have the unfortunate disposition of mistaking abusive behaviour from their partner as a sign of a self confident male trustworthy male.

    I could go into a psychoanalysis of people who have low self esteem and lack the basic levels of trust but that would take forever.

    *a similar amount of pain* for a such a wonderful outcome
    Refer to the above.

    Are you saying that intentionally marrying an abusive person is normal?



    Chris
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536089].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post


      My age is irrelevant.


      Must be a kid.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536124].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    i think i want to start a maleist organization.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536211].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    My point about the feminists was an observation.

    In the sexual revolution, the feminists were all free love and want not, they were even pro pornography at the time as well. Then they decided for whatever political reason to turn against it (dehumanizes women) even though they happily supported it in the beginning and their changing stances on love and relationships.

    There was a study that was published not too long ago about the differences in the way men and women communicate, and it was conducted by a feminist psychiatrist. Now the results of this study weren't exactly a shock, women using more expressive language and men sticking to raw data and facts, women liking to talk etc. And why there weren't more women in jobs that would typically be associated with men etc.

    Now quite alot of die hard feminists didn't like this at all because they felt it promoted stereotypes, and all they seemed to be able to do was make personal attacks towards the author, yet they never refuted the findings. This is what I meant when I said they were insecure. They seem to be afraid of their femininity and try to act like men instead.

    The free love stuff obviously not the best example to use.

    Now as for the entitlement belief, you are never in a relationship with a woman until you are sleeping together, until that time you are just a source of attention. and besides, good sex = happy relationship, tested and proved time and time again.

    I do not believe that men and women can coexist on a platonic level at all with the exception of course of your family(incest is wrong) . Heck, the only reason you approached that cute girl over the other girl back when you were in school was because you wanted to have sex with her because you found her attractive over the other. And likewise every other attractive woman you have approached or offered to 'help'

    In response the the alimony stuff, I know divorce rates have been discussed already, but if you take an even more in depth study, you may notice that the countries with the highest rates, US, Aus, scandinavia etc, feminism is rampant, this equal relationship fantasy. Yet in the cultures where the family structuring was majority patriarchal than matriarchal, the divorce rates are almost non-existant, places such as India etc.

    Interestingly enough, you have to compensate your partner for giving up her job etc for carrying your children and raising them, yet when it is dad that becomes mum instead and the woman the bread winner, if she ditches you, which happens alarmingly often in these arrangements, google house husbands wives divorcing them, she still gets the kids and you have to support her now even though you were the one that gave up your career instead and raised the children.

    Which is why I do not agree with alimony/spousal support especially as very few if any single fathers receive support from the mother.


    And to Diana,

    I do oppologise for my counseling comment, I realize it was uncalled for and unfair. I truly am sorry to here about your parents and experience with your husband and likewise it is not my place to make any judgments about who you are as a person either. I will never truely understand at an emotional level how some women will put up with being abused repeatedly, even if for the childrens sake and why they dont just run.


    Sincerely

    Chris
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536369].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ExRat
      Hi CDarklock,

      Fair points, I understand now - my error - sorry about that.

      Hi Skyfox7,

      I am refering to the fact that she knowingly married an abusive partner
      Where did she say she did that? I tell you what, don't worry about it.

      either way, I am done with this thread and I will leave you and exrat to argue amongst yourselves about white lies and such.
      Try meaning what you say.

      Here, I'll show you how it's done - watch me not come back.
      Signature


      Roger Davis

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536594].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      I do not believe that men and women can coexist on a platonic level at all with the exception of course of your family(incest is wrong) . Heck, the only reason you approached that cute girl over the other girl back when you were in school was because you wanted to have sex with her because you found her attractive over the other. And likewise every other attractive woman you have approached or offered to 'help'
      Well, that certainly hasn't been true with ME. gee, I knew a girl in highschool that was nice, smart, pretty, and liked me. I just liked her as a person, and had trouble going farther in school. I regret that now. 8-( Others weren't so pretty, but I still was nice to them even though the idea of sex was never entertained.

      Interestingly enough, you have to compensate your partner for giving up her job etc for carrying your children and raising them, yet when it is dad that becomes mum instead and the woman the bread winner, if she ditches you, which happens alarmingly often in these arrangements, google house husbands wives divorcing them, she still gets the kids and you have to support her now even though you were the one that gave up your career instead and raised the children.
      Yeah, and SOME "fathers" were even forced to pay even AFTER it was proven that the child wasn't theirs! Basically it is "Well, THEY thought you were their father, and you took care of them all these years, so YOU OWE THEM!" MAN is that convoluted. In such a case, the woman should pay the guy back for every cent paid on the child. It is BAD ENOUGH that he paid the money, but the REAL father got off for FREE, the wife was unfaithful, and she LIED to him!

      steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536629].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      I do not believe that men and women can coexist on a platonic level at all with the exception of course of your family(incest is wrong) .
      It is not only possible to be platonic friends with a woman... but that is, in fact, the only relationship you can ever have with the overwhelming majority of women you meet.

      If you're not okay with that, women aren't going to like you, and your open relationship will be worthless - because there will be nowhere for you to go.

      Unless you happen to swing that way.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1537359].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Diana Lane
    I didn't mention that when all the above blew up I was living fifteen doors up the road from my mother, with the result that I inadvertently helped to provide the entire street with gossip for about a year and so am unlikely to be too bothered if someone reads what I wrote last night and thinks we've brought the crackers out early, but I suppose the 'counselling' comment deserves a response.

    I had no idea my ex was a demented, fist-happy control freak when I married him. We were far too busy being at it like rabbits at first for the cracks to show. To put it frankly, it was good sex. Very good sex. Naturally, I'd dispute the claim that 'good sex = happy relationship, tested and proved time and time again'. It's been disproven too, if only by me, but I suspect I'm far from being the only one.

    The only reason I stayed as long as I did was because he said he'd hurt my dad if I left. As already mentioned, my parents were living very close by and my dad was in his seventies at the time. Of course I believed him - he'd already demonstrated a fondness for taking on people who'd have a harder time fighting back, but I always knew that once my dad was gone then I'd be out of there. There's more to it than that (isn't there always) but I have rambled on for as long as I'm going to. The middle of both ends of it is that I did not intentionally enter into an abusive marriage, I just made the wrong choice. If that merits counselling then I think I'll give it a miss - the poor overworked therapists must be busy enough with the millions of other people who have done the same thing.

    To say I'd do it again is not to say that I wouldn't do it differently, and with a pair of industrial strength b*ll*ck crushers. Those that said it was just a normal maternal expression of the love a mother has for her kids were right. Anyone who saw anything else was just doing what I seem to be doing - reading the thread upside down. I'm sure we were talking about infidelity and don't know why the subject has become domestic abuse, rampant feminism and an unnaturally large sector of the female population somewhere who are desperate for the male view on how big their arses are. The 'Off Topic' forum certainly knows how to live up to it's name
    Signature

    Plot short fiction, long fiction, even outline non-fiction * Edit the question prompts to suit your genre * Easily export text and image files for use with your word processor or Scrivener.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1536752].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WD Mino
    Hmmm.

    I have been married for 4 yrs. in that time I have had women come on to me sometimes very strongly.using words that are not really repeatable here.

    the definition of integrity is that you are the same in private as you are in public a person of uncompromising moral character. Understandably this will not be received very well but that is not my issue.

    For a man to be in a marriage and a woman as well there needs to be compromise respect and yes sexual fulfillment. only thing is if your not being satisfied then it is up to you to communicate to your spouse so they can improve if there is a problem. see when one gets married that means the cookie jar is now closed menus are no longer ordered from and the kitchen is not serving anymore.

    To take your own words and run them into the ground because you feel you are missing something is just screwy. Till death do us part is exactly that sex is a coming together of man and woman and so there is also a big bond called a soul tie. now why would you compromise yourself or your partner to begin with.

    Marriage is a gift but it is like business it requires work perseverance dedication and compromise I could have cheated on my wife lots did I ...NOT EVER why? because I love my wife and myself and value her as a person and my partner. there is no excuse for cheating there is no excuse for justifying it there is no excuse for instant gratificationcheating is in one word -WRONG!
    I know some of you are saying it is ok not to respect yourself and or your partner if you need to get off then it is ok to step out and you shouldn't say because you will just hurt their feelings.-What??. how whacky is that?
    -WD
    Signature

    "As a man thinks in his heart so is he-Proverbs 23:7"

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1540443].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thedogtreatjar
      Originally Posted by WD Products View Post



      ....when one gets married that means the cookie jar is now closed menus are no longer ordered from and the kitchen is not serving anymore.


      "this cookie jar is closed..."

      lol, nicely put WD!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1543999].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jgand
    I'm not sure how taboo anything is at this point, I think we've all seen it all on the news. Look at all the women admitting to sleeping with tiger woods, its getting less and less surprising. I think its par for the course nowadays.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1545893].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ReneeArticles
    Originally Posted by thedogtreatjar View Post

    Hey peoples,

    I recently had a long time friend confess an affair with a married man. Eeks! It was pretty startling because I knew this girl from Bible school.... anywho, like a lot of us she has changed a ton since then.

    I don't know what surprised me more, that she was a part of this situation or that she was so okay with it. She explained to me that she was very lonely this past year (bad breakup) and so this man was filling a void for her. She came to me not because she wanted him to leave his wife but that he wanted more from her than she wanted to give. She simply wanted a physical relationship and thought that being with a married man would provide a good "no strings attached" sort of deal. Only now, he is becoming a bit needy.

    The whole thing boggles my mind! I guess when I try to be very logical about it I can see why my friend would want this type of relationship. And I could even be accepting of a relationship where all parties knew and were okay with it. I have heard of women who knowlingly share their husbands. From a logical and libertarian perspective I see the value in this sort of deal... just as long as nobody gets hurt. I mean, as long as each party views it as sex and not a moral obligation. Once morals (or religion) get involved then can you truly guage how much people will be hurt.

    Anyway, sorry this is so long... my real question is how taboo is it to be "the other women" these days. I'm not talking about scandalous Tiger Woods type other women... I mean everyday, normal, I guess like my friend (!) other women.

    A few years back, I would probably have forsaken my friend the moment she confessed. Ah the glories of self righteousness Now I just feel sorry for her. Sorry that she needed this sort of relationship, and sorry that she may be hurting this random women. I think that you guys are a great collection of different backgrounds so I am curious how you would guage this sort of behavior. Should we go back to stoning? lol Just kidding!
    From what I've read, some people practice an alternative lifestyle called swinging - physical relationship, no strings attached - a sort of 'friends with benefits' thing.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1550199].message }}

Trending Topics