What caused the meltdown? How about CDS deals? Credit default swap deals: $55 trillion market.

15 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
While some Republicans recently desperately tried to blame the current meltdown on Wall St. on the Community Reinvestment Act in general, and Clinton and Obama specifically ( :-) ), there seems to be other ideas on what may have been the major factor. Newsweek just came out with an article that talks about Credit Default Swap deals, or CDS. The CDS market is a $55 trillion market that apparently is totally unregulated! Although that seems like it will change soon. Here's part of the article and the link it:

The Monster That Ate Wall Street

How 'credit default swaps'--an insurance against bad loans--turned from a smart bet into a killer.

They're called "Off-Site Weekends"--rituals of the high-finance world in which teams of bankers gather someplace sunny to blow off steam and celebrate their successes as Masters of the Universe. Think yacht parties, bikini models, $1,000 bottles of Cristal. One 1994 trip by a group of JPMorgan bankers to the tony Boca Raton Resort & Club in Florida has become the stuff of Wall Street legend--though not for the raucous partying (although there was plenty of that, too). Holed up for most of the weekend in a conference room at the pink, Spanish-style resort, the JPMorgan bankers were trying to get their heads around a question as old as banking itself: how do you mitigate your risk when you loan money to someone? By the mid-'90s, JPMorgan's books were loaded with tens of billions of dollars in loans to corporations and foreign governments, and by federal law it had to keep huge amounts of capital in reserve in case any of them went bad. But what if JPMorgan could create a device that would protect it if those loans defaulted, and free up that capital?

What the bankers hit on was a sort of insurance policy: a third party would assume the risk of the debt going sour, and in exchange would receive regular payments from the bank, similar to insurance premiums. JPMorgan would then get to remove the risk from its books and free up the reserves. The scheme was called a "credit default swap," and it was a twist on something bankers had been doing for a while to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates and commodity prices. While the concept had been floating around the markets for a couple of years, JPMorgan was the first bank to make a big bet on credit default swaps. It built up a "swaps" desk in the mid-'90s and hired young math and science grads from schools like MIT and Cambridge to create a market for the complex instruments. Within a few years, the credit default swap (CDS) became the hot financial instrument, the safest way to parse out risk while maintaining a steady return. "I've known people who worked on the Manhattan Project," says Mark Brickell, who at the time was a 40-year-old managing director at JPMorgan. "And for those of us on that trip, there was the same kind of feeling of being present at the creation of something incredibly important."

Like Robert Oppenheimer and his team of nuclear physicists in the 1940s, Brickell and his JPMorgan colleagues didn't realize they were creating a monster. Today, the economy is teetering and Wall Street is in ruins, thanks in no small part to the beast they unleashed 14 years ago. The country's biggest insurance company, AIG, had to be bailed out by American taxpayers after it defaulted on $14 billion worth of credit default swaps it had made to investment banks, insurance companies and scores of other entities. So much of what's gone wrong with the financial system in the past year can be traced back to credit default swaps, which ballooned into a $62 trillion market before ratcheting down to $55 trillion last week--nearly four times the value of all stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange. There's a reason Warren Buffett called these instruments "financial weapons of mass destruction." Since credit default swaps are privately negotiated contracts between two parties and aren't regulated by the government, there's no central reporting mechanism to determine their value. That has clouded up the markets with billions of dollars' worth of opaque "dark matter," as some economists like to say. Like rogue nukes, they've proliferated around the world and now lie hiding, waiting to blow up the balance sheets of countless other financial institutions.

It didn't start out that way. One of the earliest CDS deals came out of JPMorgan in December 1997, when the firm put into place the idea hatched in Boca Raton. It essentially took 300 different loans, totaling $9.7 billion, that had been made to a variety of big companies like Ford, Wal-Mart and IBM, and cut them up into pieces known as "tranches" (that's French for "slices"). The bank then identified the riskiest 10 percent tranche and sold it to investors in what was called the Broad Index Securitized Trust Offering, or Bistro for short. The Bistro was put together by Terri Duhon, at the time a 25-year-old MIT graduate working on JPMorgan's credit swaps desk in New York--a division that would eventually earn the name the Morgan Mafia for the number of former members who went on to senior positions at global banks and hedge funds. "We made it possible for banks to get their credit risk off their books and into nonfinancial institutions like insurance companies and pension funds," says Duhon, who now heads her own derivatives consulting business in London.

Before long, credit default swaps were being used to encourage investors to buy into risky emerging markets such as Latin America and Russia by insuring the debt of developing countries. Later, after corporate blowouts like Enron and WorldCom, it became clear there was a big need for protection against company implosions, and credit default swaps proved just the tool. By then, the CDS market was more than doubling every year, surpassing $100 billion in 2000 and totaling $6.4 trillion by 2004.

And then came the housing boom. As the Federal Reserve cut interest rates and Americans started buying homes in record numbers, mortgage-backed securities became the hot new investment. Mortgages were pooled together, and sliced and diced into bonds that were bought by just about every financial institution imaginable: investment banks, commercial banks, hedge funds, pension funds. For many of those mortgage-backed securities, credit default swaps were taken out to protect against default. "These structures were such a great deal, everyone and their dog decided to jump in, which led to massive growth in the CDS market," says Rohan Douglas, who ran Salomon Brothers and Citigroup's global credit swaps division through the 1990s.

Soon, companies like AIG weren't just insuring houses. They were also insuring the mortgages on those houses by issuing credit default swaps. By the time AIG was bailed out, it held $440 billion of credit default swaps. AIG's fatal flaw appears to have been applying traditional insurance methods to the CDS market. There is no correlation between traditional insurance events; if your neighbor gets into a car wreck, it doesn't necessarily increase your risk of getting into one. But with bonds, it's a different story: when one defaults, it starts a chain reaction that increases the risk of others going bust. Investors get skittish, worrying that the issues plaguing one big player will affect another. So they start to bail, the markets freak out and lenders pull back credit.

The problem was exacerbated by the fact that so many institutions were tethered to one another through these deals. For example, Lehman Brothers had itself made more than $700 billion worth of swaps, and many of them were backed by AIG. And when mortgage-backed securities started going bad, AIG had to make good on billions of dollars of credit default swaps. Soon it became clear it wasn't going to be able to cover its losses. And since AIG's stock was one of the components of the Dow Jones industrial average, the plunge in its share price pulled down the entire average, contributing to the panic.
How Credit Default Swaps Became a Timebomb | Newsweek Business | Newsweek.com
  • Profile picture of the author CWreports
    Tim,

    Thanks for the article. The more I read about this mess our country is in the more agitated I become. It's truly Gawd awful.

    I wonder just how many pension funds, money market funds, etc will be impacted negatively by this..how many more bank failures..how many other businesses will go bankrupt. Ugly,ugly, ugly.

    Bailout or not I personally feel we're in for some major changes...unlike any most of us have ever encountered.

    It won't really make much difference what it's called; repression or depression. The impact will be the same I feel.

    Anyway, thanks for the article

    Carol
    Signature
    “I must create a system or be enslaved by another man’s.” W.Blake
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[137205].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      That was only part of it. These so-called "derivatives" magnified losses far beyond the value of the underlying instruments making them 'toxic". The bailout is expected to address these issues and clear out the clogs.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[137236].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        I think we should cordially Indict the FED and all concerned with it's continuance, too. All these business cycles are making me sea sick.

        How could Friedman ever have heard of the FED, Greenspan, and Bush and made such a statement about no free lunches?
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[137563].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dan Grossman
          Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

          I think we should cordially Indict the FED and all concerned with it's continuance, too.
          Finally someone putting the blame in the right place. The mass amounts of credit would not have been available to give all those people bad mortgages had the Fed not been printing money and manipulating inflation and interest for years under Greenspan.

          Originally Posted by HeySal

          All these business cycles are making me sea sick.
          A healthy market economy will have a cycle. The Fed's been brainwashing you into thinking they're something bad to be corrected by printing more money whenever there's any sign of a slowdown. Small ups and downs should happen regularly to correct mistakes made by the market (due to lack of information or misinformation about actual conditions).
          Signature
          Improvely: Built to track, test and optimize your marketing.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[139956].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author derekwong28
    The Newsweek article probably got it just about right. There was failure of leadership and risk managment at every level.

    Housing bubble - what bubble? House price collapse - what collapse?

    Seriously the housing bubble and the drop in prices in the US is kindergarten stuff compare to other property bubbles around the world. Such a relatively minor crash just should have resulted in such a financial mess.

    Here in Hong Kong, banks are currently taking a lot of flak for selling all sorts of esoretic structured investments and derivatives to walk in customers. Some of them have lost a lot of money because of the Lehman collapse. One example of the stuff they were selling was this.

    1. A customer walks into a bank and wants to set up a 3 month fixed deposit of $50000 New Zealand dollars with an interest rate of 6%
    2. The bank teller tells the customer that the bank can give another 3% in interest if he agrees to do an equity linked investment. He tells the customer that there is almost no risk.
    3. After 3 months, the underlying equity falls before the contract price and the customer is forced to buy the equity at the contract price for a great loss.

    So for an extra 3% of interest, the customer had taken quite a high risk in something that he does not know. Just what the heck does New Zealand dollars have got to do with Hong Kong equities? This is just pure gambling BS set up by the greedy banks. This is the sort of financial engineering that has now got the whole world in trouble.
    Signature

    Do not get between a wombat and a chocolate biscuit; you will regret it dearly!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[138348].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Andres
    What caused the meltdown was the housing market. Remember the housing market in the US was a false boom and banks were more than willing to lend to less than credit worthy borrowers.

    Those loans are packaged with 'good loans' and sold off as mortgage backed securities in the open market. Now with the value dropping due to an oversupply of houses - those borrower are looking at a 600K mortgage and the value is 300K. Those are now floating all over the world, hence the problem in Europe.

    As with any bubble it will burst and the housing bubble burst more quickly then anyone expected. Why? The government wasn't thinking of the ramifications. All it saw was the $$$ rolling in as people borrowed against their house to buy another house, car, home improvements and vacations.

    I should know I saw it first hand when I was a loan officer in California for 5 years. We once had a borrower want to take out 50k and spend it on Vegas!

    WTF

    Andres
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[139674].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      Originally Posted by Andres View Post

      What caused the meltdown was the housing market. Remember the housing market in the US was a false boom and banks were more than willing to lend to less than credit worthy borrowers.

      Those loans are packaged with 'good loans' and sold off as mortgage backed securities in the open market. Now with the value dropping due to an oversupply of houses - those borrower are looking at a 600K mortgage and the value is 300K. Those are now floating all over the world, hence the problem in Europe.

      As with any bubble it will burst and the housing bubble burst more quickly then anyone expected. Why? The government wasn't thinking of the ramifications. All it saw was the $$$ rolling in as people borrowed against their house to buy another house, car, home improvements and vacations.

      I should know I saw it first hand when I was a loan officer in California for 5 years. We once had a borrower want to take out 50k and spend it on Vegas!

      WTF

      Andres
      You really don't have a clue. If it was that simple, we would not have had a meltdown in the stock market of $1.4 trillion just today , and sliding lower. The damage was done from derivatives of these mortgages - which were packaged for example as bets that these loans actually would default. The resulting loss was hundreds of times the amount of the underlying securities.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[139690].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Andres
        Originally Posted by myob View Post

        You really don't have a clue. If it was that simple, we would not have had a meltdown in the stock market of $1.4 trillion just today , and sliding lower. The damage was done from derivatives of these mortgages - which were packaged for example as bets that these loans actually would default. The resulting loss was hundreds of times the amount of the underlying securities.

        Are you serious?

        What do you think my post was about? Did you read the whole thing? It started from the housing market bubble and all these bad loans being written and now defaulting. The derivatives was a result due to other factors but an enormous chunk is the Federal Reserve's cheap money policy creating the subprime-housing boom.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[139714].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author myob
          The Federal Reserve's cheap money policy that created the subprime-housing boom really was not a significant problem. If it had only been that, there would have been no such melt down as we are experiencing now. Only a small portion of those loans have actually gone bad, but with the derivatives it's enough to destabilize the whole financial industry. The uncollateralized derivatives are estimated to have contributed to $516trillion of the exposure up from less than $100 trillion just five years ago.

          Here is a quote from Warren Buffet to his annual shareholders meeting in 2002. "Charlie (a business partner) and I are of one mind in how we feel about derivatives and the trading activities that go with them: We view them as time bombs, both for the parties that deal in them and the economic system."
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[139877].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
            Originally Posted by myob View Post


            Here is a quote from Warren Buffet to his annual shareholders meeting in 2002. "Charlie (a business partner) and I are of one mind in how we feel about derivatives and the trading activities that go with them: We view them as time bombs, both for the parties that deal in them and the economic system."
            Paul, where do you stand on this crisis? Buffet says this can be our biggest crisis ever. Surpassing 1929 even. What do you think?
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[139946].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author myob
              Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

              Paul, where do you stand on this crisis? Buffet says this can be our biggest crisis ever. Surpassing 1929 even. What do you think?
              If Warren Buffet, said it, he must have really felt it himself. Over the long term, I remain optimistic and we will recover, because history has shown we always do.

              My heart really goes out to those who have lost their homes, business, and retirement income. It is really going to be tough perhaps for as long as 2-3 years for many. Personally I lost a ton of money and it will at take at least that long for my stock holdings to recover.

              The bailout was a wrong idea, and its defeat is a triumph in my opinion in that a government takeover by Henry Paulson et al was thwarted. We still have some decent members in Congress who believe in the Constitution, and they listened to We The People. Freedom has always been costly, and this is just another bill that is coming due.

              The system works as designed by our Founding Fathers to balance corruption, but only if people will stand up to government abuses and VOTE for representatives with sound judgement and integrity. My belief is this crisis too will pass.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[140008].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author derekwong28
    For once, I am with Paul on this one. Housing bubbles appear and burst everywhere in the world. But it is just inconceivable just a relatively minor 20% fall in prices could lead to this. Afterall, the median US house price of $200,000 is very cheap compared to the per capita income in the US.

    In Asia, it is not uncommon for a 20% fall to occur just within a few months. But the banks are well covered because they demand a downpayment of up to 30%. It is clear that the US financial system is not geared to any fall in house prices of any kind.

    But there are other factors involved. The Iraq war and the US deficit lead to a slump in the US dollar. That in turn led to high oil and commodity prices and inflation. So even without the housing bubble, a disaster was going to occur down the line.

    -Derek
    Signature

    Do not get between a wombat and a chocolate biscuit; you will regret it dearly!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[139970].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    Comparable to 1929? I need to know where the nearest soup kitchen will be so I can go ahead and get in line.
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[140052].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      Originally Posted by annoyedgirl View Post

      Comparable to 1929? I need to know where the nearest soup kitchen will be so I can go ahead and get in line.
      Annoyedgirl, you are absolutely brilliant! What do they serve in soup kitchens? Why Campbells Soup! Their stock (CPB) was the only one in the entire stock market that ROSE today! Up just, 12 cents, but hey every penny counts nowadays.

      Bank stock prices should rise also as bankers come down out of windows.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[140062].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    Oh are the bankers gonna jump from high windows? That would save the trouble of having to hunt them down.
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[140061].message }}

Trending Topics