Teachers having sex with kids

by Michael Motley 67 replies
I see a lot of stories of teachers having sex with children. Around here, I see way more female teachers having sex with the boys than the males having sex with the females.

When these trysts come to light, parents always are tearfully saying how their child is messed up for life.

Now maybe i'm just thinking of this as an older male, but i find it very hard to believe that a teenaged male is going to be 'damaged' by having sex with his teacher.

For instance..this is one of the teachers that had sex with a student here in tampa


Debra lafave. This kids parents were all over tv about how their child is mentally damaged..yadda..yadda..yadda.

I dont know what highschool is like today, but in my day you would be a fricken SUPERSTAR if you were caught having sex with that teacher

Young females..maybe they are 'damaged'..but I kind of doubt that too, but i just dont see a young guy being anything but a hero to his classmates
#off topic forum
Avatar of Unregistered
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

    Now maybe i'm just thinking of this as an older male, but i find it very hard to believe that a teenaged male is going to be 'damaged' by having sex with his teacher.
    Age of majority should be lowered to 14. For all purposes - contracts, voting, driving, drinking, smoking, prison sentences, execution, etc.

    One full generation after that, we'll have teenagers and young adults who actually know how to behave themselves.
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754484].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
      You can't be serious. You aren't a parent are you. Lol

      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      Age of majority should be lowered to 14. For all purposes - contracts, voting, driving, drinking, smoking, prison sentences, execution, etc.

      One full generation after that, we'll have teenagers and young adults who actually know how to behave themselves.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754572].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      Age of majority should be lowered to 14. For all purposes - contracts, voting, driving, drinking, smoking, prison sentences, execution, etc.
      OK, you ARE nuts!

      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      One full generation after that, we'll have teenagers and young adults who actually know how to behave themselves.

      Wanna bet!?!?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754926].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    Originally Posted by Laura Knight View Post

    Some of what you say is right...though I believe you tread on dangerous ground, my friend. CD is right too...in a sense...but do you really know the consequences of your actions at age 14? And if you're caught, isn't it the automatic reflex of "the child" to deny any part in it?....hmmmm....I speak as a woman who started having children at the age of 15, and while I never had sex with a teacher, I did prefer the much older man...40+. (At this point, this could develop into a whole other topic!)
    Yeah, but you're looking at it from the point of view of a female. Teen males are a hormone fueled penis with legs. You can't 'rape' the willing.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754555].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sumit Menon
    How did they find out? The guy is a nutjob if he'd told anyone. I mean at least wait till you graduate.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754589].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by Sumit Menon View Post

      How did they find out? The guy is a nutjob if he'd told anyone. I mean at least wait till you graduate.
      His cousin (who was the only one that knew about it) told on him.

      I would have been kicking my cousin's butt if he knocked me out of that.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754660].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by Laura Knight View Post

    but do you really know the consequences of your actions at age 14?
    Do you really know them at 18?

    I'm Jewish. We hold our children accountable as adults from the age of 13. We've done this for six thousand years. It actually seems to work rather well.

    From a more modern standpoint, the brain undergoes a massive growth of grey and white matter every 12-14 years. Studies show no appreciable difference in maturity between those growth cycles. A person who has been through one such cycle is just about as mature the day afterward as he is the day before the next cycle. Changes in maturity happen at those cycles.

    The car insurance companies have known this for almost a century. Rates go down when you turn 26 - and the average person has just been through the second cycle.

    Indeed, the Founding Fathers seem to have known it: the President must be at least 35, the multiple of 5 closest to the third cycle. An awful lot of empirical judgments over the ages seem to bear out what science is now discovering just in the past couple years.
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754608].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      Do you really know them at 18?

      I'm Jewish. We hold our children accountable as adults from the age of 13. We've done this for six thousand years. It actually seems to work rather well.

      From a more modern standpoint, the brain undergoes a massive growth of grey and white matter every 12-14 years. Studies show no appreciable difference in maturity between those growth cycles. A person who has been through one such cycle is just about as mature the day afterward as he is the day before the next cycle. Changes in maturity happen at those cycles.

      The car insurance companies have known this for almost a century. Rates go down when you turn 26 - and the average person has just been through the second cycle.

      Indeed, the Founding Fathers seem to have known it: the President must be at least 35, the multiple of 5 closest to the third cycle. An awful lot of empirical judgments over the ages seem to bear out what science is now discovering just in the past couple years.
      Interesting. I still would not want a 14 year old kid VOTING - hell I hate it that half the adults are allowed to vote. Voting isn't just a matter of maturity, it's a matter of EDUCATION. At 14 the average kid (and even some exceptional ones) do not have the accumulated education about government or many of the issues needed to cast an informed vote. Voting privilege, I've always felt, should be held for only those who can pass certain tests of knowledge to acquire the right. If that 14 yr old can pass that test, give him a vote card - if a 50 year old can't, they don't have a say since they had plenty of time to learn and didn't do so.
      Signature

      Sal
      New PLR - Disaster prep duo report pkg: The Art of the Graceful Bug out, and Preparing Pets for a Disaster. - PM me for report details.
      Quality PLR Ebooks and Reports:
      Mind/Language - Weight, - Pet/Dog - Disaster - 2011 Earthquake Report - Hair Care

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754935].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
        Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

        Interesting. I still would not want a 14 year old kid VOTING - hell I hate it that half the adults are allowed to vote. Voting isn't just a matter of maturity, it's a matter of EDUCATION. At 14 the average kid (and even some exceptional ones) do not have the accumulated education about government or many of the issues needed to cast an informed vote. Voting privilege, I've always felt, should be held for only those who can pass certain tests of knowledge to acquire the right. If that 14 yr old can pass that test, give him a vote card - if a 50 year old can't, they don't have a say since they had plenty of time to learn and didn't do so.
        I wish we held our politicians to such strict standards...

        KJ
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754960].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Killer Joe View Post

          I wish we held our politicians to such strict standards...

          KJ
          SAME HERE! And there is a rumor going around that they want to start teaching US history from 1877! Given the way many think, etc.... I think the parts about how the country was created, and the major wars that unified the country should be covered. And this is AMAZING, considering that I HATED history. I don't think EXACT dates or names should necessarily be required, but at least the IDEAS, what happened, why, and ABOUT when certainly should be.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755067].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            SAME HERE! And there is a rumor going around that they want to start teaching US history from 1877!

            Steve
            Thats interesting Steve...hadn't heard the rumor myself but, here's what happened in 1877...Compromise of 1877
            Signature
            Professional Googler
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755136].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
        The problem with this is who writes the test? We had that for decades in this country as a way to discriminate against blacks and other non whites. We don't need to go backwards.

        Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

        Voting privilege, I've always felt, should be held for only those who can pass certain tests of knowledge to acquire the right. If that 14 yr old can pass that test, give him a vote card - if a 50 year old can't, they don't have a say since they had plenty of time to learn and didn't do so.
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755265].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
          Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

          The problem with this is who writes the test? We had that for decades in this country as a way to discriminate against blacks and other non whites. We don't need to go backwards.
          Tim...could you please explain EXACTLY what you mean by that?
          Signature
          Professional Googler
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755303].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
            Sure Dave. Here's a timeline of voting rights/discrimination:

            Well, it all started in 1790 when only male white adult property owners were allowed to vote.

            Then in 1850 Property ownership and tax requirements were eliminated. Almost all adult white males could vote.

            1855 Connecticut adopts the nation's first literacy test for voting. Massachusetts follows suit in 1857. The tests were implemented to discriminate against Irish-Catholic immigrants.

            1870 The 15th Amendment is passed. It gives former slaves the right to vote and protects the voting rights of adult male citizens of any race.

            1890 Mississippi adopts a literacy test to keep African Americans from voting. Numerous other states—not just in the south—also establish literacy tests. However, the tests also exclude many whites from voting. To get around this, states add grandfather clauses that allow those who could vote before 1870, or their descendants, to vote regardless of literacy or tax qualifications.

            1920 women are allowed to vote

            1964 The 24th Amendment bans the poll tax as a requirement for voting in federal elections.

            1965 The Voting Rights Act protects the rights of minority voters and eliminates voting barriers such as the literacy test.

            So for over a century actually literacy tests were used to discriminate against non whites or Irish Catholics. Non whites were granted the right to vote by the 15th Amendment but the states found a way around this with the literacy tests, which whites didn't have to take. Pretty disgusting isn't it?

            Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

            Tim...could you please explain EXACTLY what you mean by that?
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755373].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

          The problem with this is who writes the test? We had that for decades in this country as a way to discriminate against blacks and other non whites. We don't need to go backwards.
          Gee, what illegitimate question could they ask? Are you black? OK, answered yes, can't vote. I mean I heard of poll taxes, maybe they should bring them back, and literacy tests, which they SHOULD bring back. BTW whites should have to pay the tax, and take the tests also. But NOT asking for literacy is TOO MUCH to ask! THAT is part of the problem.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755502].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
            I'm sure I could write a test that you would fail Steve. Easily. If you can't see the problem with literacy tests or poll taxes, especially with the history of how they have been used to discriminate, frankly I don't think you SHOULD be voting!

            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            Gee, what illegitimate question could they ask? Are you black? OK, answered yes, can't vote. I mean I heard of poll taxes, maybe they should bring them back, and literacy tests, which they SHOULD bring back. BTW whites should have to pay the tax, and take the tests also. But NOT asking for literacy is TOO MUCH to ask! THAT is part of the problem.
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755539].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author seasoned
              Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

              I'm sure I could write a test that you would fail Steve. Easily. If you can't see the problem with literacy tests or poll taxes, especially with the history of how they have been used to discriminate, frankly I don't think you SHOULD be voting!
              So you are saying BLACKS are all illiterate? WARNING! THAT may be considered RACIST! And some people vote all over, etc... Maybe a poll tax would help to limit that.

              HEY, I could write a test YOU would fail, but that isn't the type of test anyone here is talking about.

              It was DIFFERENT with slaves that were even FORBIDDEN to learn various things, or have money. The times are VERY different!

              Steve
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755570].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
                Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                So you are saying BLACKS are all illiterate?

                Steve
                ...or a majority?

                THAT was the point of my question in the first place...

                I was wondering if he thought the same reasoning they used 100 years ago would still work because he believed there was still a majority of blacks/non-whites that couldn't pass a literacy test...
                Signature
                Professional Googler
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755583].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                  Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

                  ...or a majority?

                  THAT was the point of my question in the first place...

                  I was wondering if he thought the same reasoning they used 100 years ago would still work because he believed there was still a majority of blacks/non-whites that couldn't pass a literacy test...
                  I wouldn't have even mentioned it in such an era.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755606].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                  It wasn't only 100 years ago. If it wasn't for the voting rights bill in 1966 these phony racist "literacy" tests would still be given.

                  My point is simple: there shouldn't be any restrictions like tests or taxes to vote. We've had those before and they were used for the sole purpose to take away people's rights. I'm for protecting our rights, not taking them away. Are you?

                  Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

                  I was wondering if he thought the same reasoning they used 100 years ago would still work because he believed there was still a majority of blacks/non-whites that couldn't pass a literacy test...
                  Signature
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755680].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
                    Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                    It wasn't only 100 years ago. If it wasn't for the voting rights bill in 1966 these phony racist "literacy" tests would still be given.

                    My point is simple: there shouldn't be any restrictions like tests or taxes to vote. We've had those before and they were used for the sole purpose to take away people's rights. I'm for protecting our rights, not taking them away. Are you?
                    You're asking a guy who remembers very well an Uncle who always claimed to be non-racist yet voted for George Wallace because he shook his hand?

                    Looking back...I think he was too stupid to vote.
                    Signature
                    Professional Googler
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755709].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                    Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                    It wasn't only 100 years ago. If it wasn't for the voting rights bill in 1966 these phony racist "literacy" tests would still be given.

                    My point is simple: there shouldn't be any restrictions like tests or taxes to vote. We've had those before and they were used for the sole purpose to take away people's rights. I'm for protecting our rights, not taking them away. Are you?
                    Frankly, if anyone tried to make it racist, I doubt it would go far.

                    Anyway, this is getting too much in the realm of political, so I am stopping HERE!

                    Steve
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755736].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                I guess the point went over your head Steve. Wow, you really shouldn't be voting. The point is that the tests weren't fair and were used to discriminate.
                Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                So you are saying BLACKS are all illiterate? WARNING! THAT may be considered RACIST! And some people vote all over, etc... Maybe a poll tax would help to limit that.

                HEY, I could write a test YOU would fail, but that isn't the type of test anyone here is talking about.

                It was DIFFERENT with slaves that were even FORBIDDEN to learn various things, or have money. The times are VERY different!

                Steve
                Signature
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755594].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                  Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                  I guess the point went over your head Steve. Wow, you really shouldn't be voting. The point is that the tests weren't fair and were used to discriminate.
                  Gee, I guess you didn't understand my last post then! As I said, the times are very different. And we SHOULD DISCRIMINATE!

                  1 a : to make a distinction <discriminate among historical sources> b : to use good judgment
                  If we aren't going to discriminate, then WHY VOTE!?!?!? That is the WHOLE POINT of voting!

                  And YES, I know what you probably meant, but I just wanted to see if I could make a point one last time!

                  Steve
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755651].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                    Sure, voters have the right to discriminate by using their votes, but states don't have the right to discriminate against voters.

                    Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                    Gee, I guess you didn't understand my last post then! As I said, the times are very different. And we SHOULD DISCRIMINATE!



                    If we aren't going to discriminate, then WHY VOTE!?!?!? That is the WHOLE POINT of voting!

                    And YES, I know what you probably meant, but I just wanted to see if I could make a point one last time!

                    Steve
                    Signature
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755723].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
        Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

        Interesting. I still would not want a 14 year old kid VOTING - hell I hate it that half the adults are allowed to vote. Voting isn't just a matter of maturity, it's a matter of EDUCATION. At 14 the average kid (and even some exceptional ones) do not have the accumulated education about government or many of the issues needed to cast an informed vote. Voting privilege, I've always felt, should be held for only those who can pass certain tests of knowledge to acquire the right. If that 14 yr old can pass that test, give him a vote card - if a 50 year old can't, they don't have a say since they had plenty of time to learn and didn't do so.
        I'd be willing to bet that the average 14 year old is probably smarter than 1/2 the registered voters
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1758345].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      Do you really know them at 18?

      I'm Jewish. We hold our children accountable as adults from the age of 13.
      Not 100%!

      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      We've done this for six thousand years. It actually seems to work rather well.
      How about some examples...

      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      From a more modern standpoint, the brain undergoes a massive growth of grey and white matter every 12-14 years. Studies show no appreciable difference in maturity between those growth cycles. A person who has been through one such cycle is just about as mature the day afterward as he is the day before the next cycle. Changes in maturity happen at those cycles.
      WOW, one happens before 2, and one happens before about 8, and one before about 13, and they say things kind of stop around 35, though they earlier said they stop earlier. In fact, the earlier ones grow to a larger degree faster.

      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      The car insurance companies have known this for almost a century. Rates go down when you turn 26 - and the average person has just been through the second cycle.
      Well, the case where they said it stops at 35, they DID say that was why you had to be that old to be president, but the 12-14 year span just doesn't make sense, considering the pruning around 2(If it goes crazy, you have CDD),8(Some claim if it goes crazy, you will get autism, but problems DO start earlier.), and 13.

      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

      Indeed, the Founding Fathers seem to have known it: the President must be at least 35, the multiple of 5 closest to the third cycle. An awful lot of empirical judgments over the ages seem to bear out what science is now discovering just in the past couple years.
      GEE, why didn't they pick 36 or 42?

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755036].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Harveydos
      Well said, I totally agree with this. I am Asian and morality about decency is ingrained into your subconcious from an early age and it has been seen to work from generation to the next.
      But I would still have told all my buddies if I got it on with this 'hottie'...Think of your street cred....lol
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756358].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tryinhere
    And what about if the teacher was fugly ? would the kid be getting teased and bullied by all at school, then would everyone be crying this is wrong?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754696].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    doubt it...he's probably still the only kid in school that can say he's having sex and have proof.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754717].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
    Sal didn't say literacy....she was referring to basic knowledge...

    Heck...I've met MANY folks who could hardly read or write but were INTELLIGENT as hell...
    Signature
    Professional Googler
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755551].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
      Basic knowledge? Of what? Math? French? Art history? Politics?

      It's the same thing Dave. Any test would be a step backward and a way to take rights away from people. I'm surprised Sal, who is always talking about having our rights taken away, would support such a backwards idea that does exactly that.

      Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

      Sal didn't say literacy....she was referring to basic knowledge...

      Heck...I've met MANY folks who could hardly read or write but were INTELLIGENT as hell...
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755584].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

        Basic knowledge? Of what? Math? French? Art history? Politics?

        It's the same thing Dave. Any test would be a step backward and a way to take rights away from people. I'm surprised Sal, who is always talking about having our rights taken away, would support such a backwards idea that does exactly that.
        How about just what the issues are that are being discussed. With math, you would think the basics would be fine, but even a lot of politicians seem to get THAT wrong. That's part of the reason why we are in this mess. Politics(like what parties are supposed to be, names of parties, their positions, etc... shouldn't even enter into it.) And FRENCH!?!? Why stop there? Why didn't you mention Zulu, Greek, Chinese, Hindi? NOPE, I think we can do without that. English would be fine. I mean if people don't have a common language of discussion, how can they know all the news, and people's positions?

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755625].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author badrovichx
    I m sure the teenager when he will get 18 he will say damn it if only i had 18 that time i would not complain having sex with that sexy teacher ,
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755581].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
    And for the record...

    I had sex with a teacher in 11th grade in a storage closet at school.

    She still lives and breathes so, I'm sure not ratting her out now...lol!
    Signature
    Professional Googler
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755622].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

      And for the record...

      I had sex with a teacher in 11th grade in a storage closet at school.

      She still lives and breathes ...
      OK, is this a joke, or real. 8-)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755659].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        OK, is this a joke, or real. 8-)
        It's true....we knocked "Luther" the skeleton over which made a heluva racket.
        Signature
        Professional Googler
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755670].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Shane Dolby
    Actually Kids have even more Knowledge than we did at 14 with all the ways to tap into media from the internet to their cellphone. They have more of a vast knowledge of the world than we could hope to of had back than.

    Everything we knew was in the history books. Now its played out right in front of people
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755728].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Shane Dolby View Post

      Actually Kids have even more Knowledge than we did at 14 with all the ways to tap into media from the internet to their cellphone. They have more of a vast knowledge of the world than we could hope to of had back than.

      Everything we knew was in the history books. Now its played out right in front of people
      Well, I will agree that PEOPLE(not only kids, but PEOPLE) have a LOT more knowledge available to them now. And yeah, history is repeating itself all over. I could say more but.....

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755782].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        Frankly, if anyone tried to make it racist, I doubt it would go far.

        Anyway, this is getting too much in the realm of political, so I am stopping HERE!

        Steve
        The above post was then followed by:

        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        You're right. And I have fallen into a lot of this. I'm not going any farther. As for religious, I think one person only MENTIONED they were jewish. That wouldn't be considered bad. The problem is that things can go on an on, and there are 100 messages that are effectively just insulting, etc....

        So I think this went a little too far with politics, but the one that deals with religion is probably ok. He just used it to lead into the idea of the age of responsibility being 13.

        Steve
        ...And then....

        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        Well, I will agree that PEOPLE(not only kids, but PEOPLE) have a LOT more knowledge available to them now. And yeah, history is repeating itself all over. I could say more but.....

        Steve

        Maybe the test should be on how well people know themselves and not how well they know the issues?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755799].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          The above post was then followed by:



          ...And then....




          Maybe the test should be on how well people know themselves and not how well they know the issues?
          I did stop. Should I not explain why, etc? Heck, I didn't see the message you quoted in the second part until after I had posted the first. And with the third, I just didn't go on.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755868].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
      Originally Posted by Shane Dolby View Post

      Actually Kids have even more Knowledge than we did at 14 with all the ways to tap into media from the internet to their cellphone. They have more of a vast knowledge of the world than we could hope to of had back than.

      Everything we knew was in the history books. Now its played out right in front of people
      And don't buy any of that statement.

      They know more trivia, but trivia is not knowledge.

      In fact, they are probably headed to be the least enlightened generation in quite a while. Not only are they being stripped of their communication skills, their ability to distinguish reality from fantasy is being eroded at a far faster pace than previous generations.

      KJ
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755793].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Originally Posted by Laura Knight View Post

    Uh, I know I'm new, but could someone please enlighten me? There aren't supposed to be political or religious threads, and yet this thread seems to contain both :confused:
    You're right. And I have fallen into a lot of this. I'm not going any farther. As for religious, I think one person only MENTIONED they were jewish. That wouldn't be considered bad. The problem is that things can go on an on, and there are 100 messages that are effectively just insulting, etc....

    So I think this went a little too far with politics, but the one that deals with religion is probably ok. He just used it to lead into the idea of the age of responsibility being 13.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755759].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    Let's say a WWII vet was in the hospital for a long period of time and was unaware of the specific issues but wanted to vote based on traditional party lines.

    Who here is willing to take away his vote based on him not knowing the issues of the day?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755770].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      Let's say a WWII vet was in the hospital for a long period of time and was unaware of the specific issues but wanted to vote based on traditional party lines.

      Who here is willing to take away his vote based on him not knowing the issues of the day?
      Damn you Kurt...
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755806].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

        Damn you Kurt...

        Right back at ya Dave....

        Seriously, I think it's dangerous to give the right to vote based on what one knows, especially without considering what one DID.

        How do we take away any the vote of anyone that served in the military, even if they can't pass a test?

        I never served, but still believe that those that did have earned their right to vote, irregardless of what they score on some test. And I believe they served to protect my right to vote.

        In this example, I find it very egotistical to say one has a right to vote because they know something, but never put their life on the line, over someone that did serve and may not pass a test simply because he/she wasn't in the country because they were pulling duty in Iraq.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1755863].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    Kids probably braggin to all his mates. Taboo is such a wonderful thing.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756510].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    What the HELL?

    I think this guy wakes up in the morning thinking, "gee, what can I topic can I think of to post to get people fighting and arguing and how can I create the most drama?"

    Must be a slow day cause this was in the headlines years ago.

    And how did it go from promoting teacher/student sex which is wrong legally and to anyone with morals to arguing about voting?

    Psshh Sal, kids couldn't do a worse job voting than any adult. Only 2 men to choose from, a 50/50 chance of whoever the "good" guy is. Oh wait, there isn't one. Reduce age to 4, they can't do any worse than any 40 year old.

    Ok now I'll help this wacky dude with future topics so he'll have less thinking to do in the morning on how to stir up drama, then get out the thread and watch everyone go at it while he plants his virtual corn and milks his virtual cows.

    Tue- Abortion
    Wed- Death penalty
    Thu- Assisted suicide
    Fri- Polygamy
    Sat- Corporal punishment ie. spanking kids (that's been done but you can do it again)
    Sun- Way back day like today- Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky
    Mon- Refusing vaccinations
    Tue- Racism
    Wed- Dog and cat fur farms
    Thu- Punishment for kids who murder

    There you go 10 days of topics already created free of charge. Just post and watch your beloved forum soap opera.
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756643].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      What the HELL?

      I think this guy wakes up in the morning thinking, "gee, what can I topic can I think of to post to get people fighting and arguing and how can I create the most drama?"

      Must be a slow day cause this was in the headlines years ago.

      And how did it go from promoting teacher/student sex which is wrong legally and to anyone with morals to arguing about voting?

      Psshh Sal, kids couldn't do a worse job voting than any adult. Only 2 men to choose from, a 50/50 chance of whoever the "good" guy is. Oh wait, there isn't one. Reduce age to 4, they can't do any worse than any 40 year old.

      Ok now I'll help this wacky dude with future topics so he'll have less thinking to do in the morning on how to stir up drama, then get out the thread and watch everyone go at it while he plants his virtual corn and milks his virtual cows.

      Tue- Abortion
      Wed- Death penalty
      Thu- Assisted suicide
      Fri- Polygamy
      Sat- Corporal punishment ie. spanking kids (that's been done but you can do it again)
      Sun- Way back day like today- Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky
      Mon- Refusing vaccinations
      Tue- Racism
      Wed- Dog and cat fur farms
      Thu- Punishment for kids who murder

      There you go 10 days of topics already created free of charge. Just post and watch your beloved forum soap opera.
      I think somebodies sombrero must be a bit tight..
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756659].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      What the HELL?

      I think this guy wakes up in the morning thinking, "gee, what can I topic can I think of to post to get people fighting and arguing and how can I create the most drama?"

      Must be a slow day cause this was in the headlines years ago.

      And how did it go from promoting teacher/student sex which is wrong legally and to anyone with morals to arguing about voting?

      Psshh Sal, kids couldn't do a worse job voting than any adult. Only 2 men to choose from, a 50/50 chance of whoever the "good" guy is. Oh wait, there isn't one. Reduce age to 4, they can't do any worse than any 40 year old.

      Ok now I'll help this wacky dude with future topics so he'll have less thinking to do in the morning on how to stir up drama, then get out the thread and watch everyone go at it while he plants his virtual corn and milks his virtual cows.

      Tue- Abortion
      Wed- Death penalty
      Thu- Assisted suicide
      Fri- Polygamy
      Sat- Corporal punishment ie. spanking kids (that's been done but you can do it again)
      Sun- Way back day like today- Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky
      Mon- Refusing vaccinations
      Tue- Racism
      Wed- Dog and cat fur farms
      Thu- Punishment for kids who murder

      There you go 10 days of topics already created free of charge. Just post and watch your beloved forum soap opera.
      is this not the off-topic discussion forum?

      These are off topic discussions..i like hearing people's replies. Nobody is making you read OR reply to any of my posts. I believe there is also an ignore button if they bother you that much.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1758387].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    It sure the hell is, wanna get it off?
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756675].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      It sure the hell is, wanna get it off?
      Sounds like a trick question....I'm afraid to even touch your hat.
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756681].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      What the HELL?

      I think this guy wakes up in the morning thinking, "gee, what can I topic can I think of to post to get people fighting and arguing and how can I create the most drama?"

      Must be a slow day cause this was in the headlines years ago.

      And how did it go from promoting teacher/student sex which is wrong legally and to anyone with morals to arguing about voting?

      Psshh Sal, kids couldn't do a worse job voting than any adult. Only 2 men to choose from, a 50/50 chance of whoever the "good" guy is. Oh wait, there isn't one. Reduce age to 4, they can't do any worse than any 40 year old.

      Ok now I'll help this wacky dude with future topics so he'll have less thinking to do in the morning on how to stir up drama, then get out the thread and watch everyone go at it while he plants his virtual corn and milks his virtual cows.

      Tue- Abortion
      Wed- Death penalty
      Thu- Assisted suicide
      Fri- Polygamy
      Sat- Corporal punishment ie. spanking kids (that's been done but you can do it again)
      Sun- Way back day like today- Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky
      Mon- Refusing vaccinations
      Tue- Racism
      Wed- Dog and cat fur farms
      Thu- Punishment for kids who murder

      There you go 10 days of topics already created free of charge. Just post and watch your beloved forum soap opera.
      Time of the month ey?
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756704].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      It sure the hell is, wanna get it off?
      Is that some kind of dominatrix proposition :confused:

      KJ
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756716].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
        Originally Posted by Killer Joe View Post

        Is that some kind of dominatrix proposition :confused:

        KJ
        Don't think that's it KJ...I kinda thought she had that "touch-my-hat-and-I'm-snappin'-your-arm-off-at-the-shoulder" look in her eye...
        Signature
        Professional Googler
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756745].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    Don't be scared of a cute lil hat Dave :p
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756812].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Thomas
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      Don't be scared of a cute lil hat Dave :p
      My hat is better than your hat.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756819].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      Don't be scared of a cute lil hat Dave :p
      It's not the hat. It's the cute lil gal that was formerly known as annoyedgirl that makes me nervous...

      You see, my ex-wife was cute. She had a sombrero. She always looked calm. And she smiled as she tried to run over me in the driveway. Twice!
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756869].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
        Originally Posted by Dave Patterson View Post

        It's not the hat. It's the cute lil gal that was formerly known as annoyedgirl that makes me nervous...

        You see, my ex-wife was cute. She had a sombrero. She always looked calm. And she smiled as she tried to run over me in the driveway. Twice!
        What's wrong with her, how could she miss????? Bad aim, drunk? You musta done something very naughty to piss her off like that :p

        Ya see it's always the calm and quiet ones you have to worry about People with tempers vent regularly. The quiet and calm ones just study their prey, keeping everything bottled up, till one day everyone's saying, "I just can't believe it! They were so quiet and sweet. How could they do something like that?"

        Wise words: Crazy beats bad everytime
        Signature

        siggy taking a break...

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756931].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
          Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

          What's wrong with her, how could she miss?????
          Case closed.

          Signature
          Professional Googler
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756957].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    No it's not, leprechaun hats are no good.
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1756838].message }}

Trending Topics