4 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
I find that for images on websites, low image quality (IQ) usually is good enough. This is because A) it downloads faster and B)if someone were to steal it, they'd only be getting a low resolution image. That is why my IQ is low for a lot of sites.
#low iq
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Hey, that's kind of smart.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3397517].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bravo75
    Sorry, seasoned already said that.

    quite smart that.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3398418].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bravo75
    Evidently, your IQ is higher than your picture quality.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3398428].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
      Originally Posted by bravo75 View Post

      Evidently, your IQ is higher than your picture quality.
      I was just playing around with a variation of Howard Stern's announcement that he has a small p*nis, using another common taboo regarding IQ (few would admit to having an average or small one, even to themselves. Most present themselves as above average). Pretty effective, I'd say. Copywriters could test it out its effectiveness.
      Signature

      Project HERE.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3465569].message }}

Trending Topics