And the Madness Escalates

41 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Scientists push to implement edible RFID tracking chips in food

Any sane reason you would WANT to eat computer chips?

Oh, I haven't even mentioned they want to put Lithium in the public water supply!
  • Profile picture of the author MrCaracicatriz
    I cannot believe what I just read. Thanks John for the interesting read. I still can't wrap my head around how simply eating food can become less complex as they so claim: "..simplify the eating experience by programming data into food so that humans essentially do not have to think about what they are
    doing." 0_0'
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4011033].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Originally Posted by John M Kane View Post

    Scientists push to implement edible RFID tracking chips in food

    Any sane reason you would WANT to eat computer chips?

    Oh, I haven't even mentioned they want to put Lithium in the public water supply!
    (NaturalNews) It will monitor your calorie intake, show from where your food was sourced, and even let you know when the food in your fridge is about to go bad -- these are some of the enticing claims made by the developers of a new system that embeds edible radio frequency identification (RFID) chips directly into food. Its creators insist the technology will revolutionize the way humans eat for the better, but critical-thinking onlookers will recognize the ploy as just another way to track and control human behavior.
    Monitor calorie intake? BULL!!!!! If I buy a gallon of icecream, and eat one pint, how many calories did I take in? What about pretzels?

    And I haven't really delved into RFID, but many metals are POISONOUS!!!!!!! Iron(Can KILL!), Zinc(Can cause a copper deficiency), Copper(I forgt, but it can be bad, the wicked witch of the west on wizard of oz nearly died from copper poisoning!), Silver(Can cause an odd skin condition that makes people look weird, etc...), Nickle(Nerve damage), Aluminum(Nerve Damage),Lead(Nerve Damage) ARE, or can be POISONOUS! Gold might be the ONLY metal I have heard of that doesn't cause such problems, to the best of my knowledge.

    And litium is poisonous ALSO! Actually, you are not even supposed to thrown lithium batteries away, because they are not to go to dumps!

    WHY are companies allowed to even WHISPER of such things!?!?!?!?

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4011906].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      Sites like that take a stance and present a position on new technology but there may be more to the new product.

      Medical testing might be improved. Such a product might be useful for treatment of dangerously obese persons. Technology advances constantly and it's up to us to use it in responsible ways.

      My dogs are micro chipped and if lost they can be identified and I can be be notified quickly. Every day in hospitals there are injured people who cannot be identified and family cannot be contacted. Yet most of us would strongly oppose micro chipping people with name and emergency contact info.

      Children are lost for days in the woods or may be taken by a family member or stranger. We have the technology with GPS to have a safety device that would show a child's location - but most people would strongly argue against that option.

      At the same time, we quickly adopt new technologies meant only to enertain us or enhance "communication".

      Not proposing anything - just think our reaction to technology is a bit lop sided at times.

      kay
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
      January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
      So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4012887].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        Sites like that take a stance and present a position on new technology but there may be more to the new product.

        Medical testing might be improved. Such a product might be useful for treatment of dangerously obese persons. Technology advances constantly and it's up to us to use it in responsible ways.

        My dogs are micro chipped and if lost they can be identified and I can be be notified quickly. Every day in hospitals there are injured people who cannot be identified and family cannot be contacted. Yet most of us would strongly oppose micro chipping people with name and emergency contact info.

        Children are lost for days in the woods or may be taken by a family member or stranger. We have the technology with GPS to have a safety device that would show a child's location - but most people would strongly argue against that option.

        At the same time, we quickly adopt new technologies meant only to enertain us or enhance "communication".

        Not proposing anything - just think our reaction to technology is a bit lop sided at times.

        kay
        Dogs are microchiped with ONE little self contained unit that is about the size of like a grain of rice injected just below the skin. They DON'T EAT it. Your dog is a dog! The chip will always be a chip. A device receives a signal from the chip that gives the dog a number that can retrieve FIXED information!

        Well, 1 gallon ice cream will almost NEVER be 1 gallon of icecream once used. HOW could the RFID technology figure you ate 1/10th of it?

        You are right about reactions being lopsided, but this is DIFFERENT!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4012918].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I'm sorry, but when technology is used to implant information gathering or tracking devices into our bodies, I will oppose it with every fiber in my being. There are just some things that aren't supposed to be and when it comes to the use of ANYTHING that helps to potentially track my life - they need to keep it for someone who doesn't mind slavery. My dog has a microchip and when I get out of this godforsaken nightmare that they call a "state", I'll probably have it removed. If someone is actually so unconcerned with another being having that much control of their life that they will willing eat a chip or have one implanted, that's just fine and dandy - but when you start slipping that kind of thing to someone who is opposed to the idea - that is SLAVERY pure and simple. Your choice.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4014745].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      Steve -

      My point is that a knee jerk negative reaction that points out obvious problems that might occur - can eliminate the potential for good processes that might arise from the same technology. Open minds learn - closed minds don't.

      I don't know why anyone would remove a microchip from their dog. If my dog is lost, I want her found.

      When Doodah was young he was an escape artist He wasn't running away from home but he was a mistreated street dog before I took him in. He would climb the fence and tour the neighborhood - then would return home, climb back in the fence and come in the dog door. Several times he roamed so far he couldn't find his way back and only days of searching brought him home.

      I had him micro chipped and also put a tag on his collar that said "fence climber" with my phone number to call. It saved him several times and got him home quickly. As he got older he realized leaving home wasn't bright and stopped the bad behavior.

      When I found 2 chocolate labs in the middle of the highway obviously lost I took them to my vet - who scanned their microchips and called their frantic owner who lived 2 miles away.

      When it comes to tracking devices - seems to me it would be smart to have a bracelet with an embedded tracking chip if you are traveling or camping with kids. When it comes to pets and children, protection is more important to me than their "rights to privacy".

      A technological advance may be used for bad purposes - but the same product might also save lives if used wisely. I think it's harmful to argue against something new before the full range of potential uses is clearly defined.

      kay
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
      January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
      So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4014874].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ThomM
        When it comes to tracking devices - seems to me it would be smart to have a bracelet with an embedded tracking chip if you are traveling or camping with kids. When it comes to pets and children, protection is more important to me than their "rights to privacy".
        I can agree with the collar's with RFD chips, but not putting them into bodies. Sure protecting children is important, but they will end up being adults. I know if my mother put a chip in me when I was a child I would of been seriously upset about it when I got older. I know you can have them removed. But why should I have to put myself through that operation.
        Seems to me kids and pets have been doing great for 1,000's of years with out them.
        Pets I can understand getting out and going for a run ending up lost.
        But as far as kids go I'm not buying it at all.
        It's not about "rights to privacy" it's about the right to not have your body altered simply because your parents where brainwashed into believing a chip will protect you.
        Signature

        Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
        Getting old ain't for sissy's
        As you are I was, as I am you will be
        You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4014988].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Kay King
          Seems to me kids and pets have been doing great for 1,000's of years with out them.
          Of course they have - as long as they aren't the pets or children who are lost or abducted. If nothing bad happens, there's not a problem. Over those years how many children and pets have been lost forever or could have een saved if they could have been found?

          I agree with the problems inherent in implanting a device. Unfortunately the negative reaction to that often leads to not using a technology at all - even when there might be less invasive applications available.
          Signature
          Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
          ***
          Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
          January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
          So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4015048].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

            Of course they have - as long as they aren't the pets or children who are lost or abducted. If nothing bad happens, there's not a problem. Over those years how many children and pets have been lost forever or could have een saved if they could have been found?

            I agree with the problems inherent in implanting a device. Unfortunately the negative reaction to that often leads to not using a technology at all - even when there might be less invasive applications available.
            RFID was used BEFORE these debates! If children are abducted, RFID won't help. There are other things that can help from a distance, and the children can speak for themselves, etc...

            Steve
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4015298].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author HeySal
              Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

              RFID was used BEFORE these debates! If children are abducted, RFID won't help. There are other things that can help from a distance, and the children can speak for themselves, etc...

              Steve
              Not true Steve - It will help them find the dead body after the damage has been done

              RFID chips in humans. How many ways do we spell "inventory"? Makes me want to go get scanned just to make sure I haven't been unwittingly injected. If that ever happens someone better be able to tell me who did it and be able to remove it. If all I am is inventory - I will be extremely toxic to the ones who read the chip. Trust me on that one.
              Signature

              Sal
              When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
              Beyond the Path

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4015572].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

                Not true Steve - It will help them find the dead body after the damage has been done

                RFID chips in humans. How many ways do we spell "inventory"? Makes me want to go get scanned just to make sure I haven't been unwittingly injected. If that ever happens someone better be able to tell me who did it and be able to remove it. If all I am is inventory - I will be extremely toxic to the ones who read the chip. Trust me on that one.
                Well, if someone is killed, the chip may end up separate, or the can decompose such that it won't be certain. STILL, BAD idea!

                Steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4016606].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        Steve -

        My point is that a knee jerk negative reaction that points out obvious problems that might occur - can eliminate the potential for good processes that might arise from the same technology. Open minds learn - closed minds don't.

        I don't know why anyone would remove a microchip from their dog. If my dog is lost, I want her found.

        When Doodah was young he was an escape artist He wasn't running away from home but he was a mistreated street dog before I took him in. He would climb the fence and tour the neighborhood - then would return home, climb back in the fence and come in the dog door. Several times he roamed so far he couldn't find his way back and only days of searching brought him home.

        I had him micro chipped and also put a tag on his collar that said "fence climber" with my phone number to call. It saved him several times and got him home quickly. As he got older he realized leaving home wasn't bright and stopped the bad behavior.

        When I found 2 chocolate labs in the middle of the highway obviously lost I took them to my vet - who scanned their microchips and called their frantic owner who lived 2 miles away.

        When it comes to tracking devices - seems to me it would be smart to have a bracelet with an embedded tracking chip if you are traveling or camping with kids. When it comes to pets and children, protection is more important to me than their "rights to privacy".

        A technological advance may be used for bad purposes - but the same product might also save lives if used wisely. I think it's harmful to argue against something new before the full range of potential uses is clearly defined.

        kay
        RFID was basically MADE for inventory and tracking. THAT use is reasonable! That is what stores use it for, and even your DOG! And YOU see your dog as your PROPERTY! SURE, call it a friend, pet, or whatever, it is still PROPERTY! You treat it like PROPERTY! Oh SURE, maybe you are kind to it, gave it a name, and MAYBE it is better off. ICSM! Anyway, some parents see their KIDS as their property. HECK, some adults see kids as property of the adult community! Still, they will likely be adults one day. Adults that DON'T want to be tracked like test animals!

        So RFID in chocolate LABradore retrievers is generally OK. RFID on a BOX containing chocolates is generally OK. RFID on your kid or chocolates is NOT!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4015278].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Thomas
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        A technological advance may be used for bad purposes - but the same product might also save lives if used wisely. I think it's harmful to argue against something new before the full range of potential uses is clearly defined.
        I've always been in two minds about tracking technologies too. However, having worked in a field that necessitated finding people, I can say this:
        1. Most people are actually very easy to find and track without needing any fancy-schmancy new technology anyway.
        2. Most people (almost 100%, in fact) aren't of sufficient interest to Big Brother to bother tracking in the first place. (As pervasive as he might be, Big Bother still has a budget.)
        3. Even the majority of the movements and activities of those who might be of very particular interest to the authorities are ultimately of little or no interest whatsoever.
        All that notwithstanding, much of what's claimed as 'Big Brother's next plan to track everyone and everything' has been technically feasible and cheap enough to be in common usage for many years anyway. For example, I know of at least 2 murders here that were solved by locating/tracking mobile phones (both 5 -10 years ago). In the first instance, the phone was turned off, but police were led to within a few metres of the victim's body, in whose pocket it was. In the second instance, the movements of the prime suspect was restrospectively tracked several weeks later. And of significance is the fact that, prior to the murder, he was of no interest whatsoever to the authorities, and, thus, was not under surveillance or subjected to any special technologies. Think about that...
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4023049].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Kay King
          Thomas - a rational response.

          I agree fully with #2 and #3 - but we've had several "lost" instances in the past months here where it took quite some time to locate a lost child 3 days), a person with alzheimers (2 days) or the photog lost in the woods (7 days, I think). Another alzheimers patient was found after 4 days - and it was too late. I think there are time and circumstances where a bracelet with a tracking device makes sense. The only people who would care - are the people who care about that person.

          This same topic came up a few months ago when a friend was glad she'd been "warned" by a twittering friend about some proposal or other to implant tracking devices in certain products.

          I thought it was hilarious. This woman carries multiple digital gadgets and she's expressing outrage over "tracking"...using her iphone.

          No, I didn't tell her - I don't think she could take it!
          Signature
          Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
          ***
          Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
          January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
          So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4023286].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    If one of my parents thought so little of MY rights as to embed a chip into me that would allow government or any form of tracking - I would have it removed and I would never speak to them again. I am having a real hard time thinking that anyone would actually believe that is okay.

    Life is a gamble - always has been. There have always been a myriad dangers in life and there always will be. Yet people continue to just hand away freedoms because they think they will be safe if they do so. Our freedoms are about gone - you feel safer yet? No well then lets use chips!

    Just another example of allowing emotions dictate actions instead of using logic. Make em scared enough their kids will come to harm if we can't track em and they will start to "chip" their kids willingly and we won't even need force to get it done.

    The thought of a parent chipping another human because they have the power to do so disgusts me so badly that I can't even express it. Nope - if my parents did that, I would disown them in a heartbeat.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4015050].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
    I'm with Sal on this.

    If anyone tries implanting me with one of these chips, I'll insert it into them and won't bother with anaesthetic or any other niceties which might be involved. They may just find themselves having it removed from areas of their bodies where they weren't meant to go.

    Sheesh, talk about Big Brother. Orwell must be rolling over in his grave over this.
    Signature
    Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
    So that blind people can hate them as well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4015862].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Over those years how many children and pets have been lost forever or could have een saved if they could have been found?
      Not nearly as many as where found without an implant. Not to mention the huge number who where never lost.
      Sorry Kay, there's no other reason to put tracking chips in humans other then to turn them into inventory. Over reacting has to stop.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4016309].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        Not nearly as many as where found without an implant. Not to mention the huge number who where never lost.
        Sorry Kay, there's no other reason to put tracking chips in humans other then to turn them into inventory. Over reacting has to stop.
        YEAH, RFID has a LIMITED range, and kidnappers won't let you get close enough. Look at Jaycee Lee Dugard! She was in a YARD HIDDEN! Would RFID have helped HER? NOPE!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4016640].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Kay King
          I'm not arguing FOR implanting people - just rolling the ideas around in my head of what benefit there might be - not saying there is a benefit.

          Is it true that many of the electronic gadgets people carry today have had tracking devices added recently? Was on the news but don't know the accuracy of the report.

          As for my dogs - they have id's implanted because it is my responsibility to keep them safe. They can't tell someone to call me or give their address.

          As for my dogs, I'm never sure if I own them - or they own me. Doesn't matter - we're a team.

          kay
          Signature
          Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
          ***
          Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
          January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
          So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4017765].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author ThomM
            Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

            I'm not arguing FOR implanting people - just rolling the ideas around in my head of what benefit there might be - not saying there is a benefit.

            Is it true that many of the electronic gadgets people carry today have had tracking devices added recently? Was on the news but don't know the accuracy of the report.

            As for my dogs - they have id's implanted because it is my responsibility to keep them safe. They can't tell someone to call me or give their address.

            As for my dogs, I'm never sure if I own them - or they own me. Doesn't matter - we're a team.

            kay
            I'm pretty positive they can track you through your cell phone and also the newer cars.
            As for your dogs, if they are like my cat they own you. They just let you think you're in charge
            Signature

            Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
            Getting old ain't for sissy's
            As you are I was, as I am you will be
            You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4019911].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

      I'm with Sal on this.

      If anyone tries implanting me with one of these chips, I'll insert it into them and won't bother with anaesthetic or any other niceties which might be involved. They may just find themselves having it removed from areas of their bodies where they weren't meant to go.

      Sheesh, talk about Big Brother. Orwell must be rolling over in his grave over this.
      Well, if they did it with ME, I would probably just take a watch battery or something, and insert it. Of course, that means an incision and STITCHES!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4016619].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Roaddog
    A chip? Might as well call yourself Faust and sell your soul now.

    The only chip going in me is a chocolate one.


    The fact that anyone would even entertain this thought....shows how far the stupidity has gone, apparently unnoticed.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4020159].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    All new vehicles have gps. You have to disable it or they can already track a newer model car. Some states use RFID in driver's licenses, license plates, or the stickers on the plates.

    When I get my license plate stickers I put them in a microwave for a few seconds - and repeat that about 5 or 6 times to disable the chip. You just have to make sure that you don't melt the sticker. Wallets- electrostatic bags or tinfoil. A couple of small magnets on the back of license plates kills a chip.

    A cell phone doesn't even need to be turned on to be tracked. It is also capable of two way reception so they can listen to you while they are tracking you if you are actually using your phone. And ESCHELON is not a conspiracy theory - it actually existed and was already in use back when I worked for US West AT. If you use a word in your conversation that triggers that system, your conversation is recorded, so the idea that "why would they watch me?" doesn't even apply. You say anything keyed into that system and your conversation WILL be recorded.

    Alfred (whatever..) Orwell wouldn't have used some of the stuff they are using now in his book because it would have made the book just too outrageously outlandish for people to give the willing suspension of disbelief. It would have read worse than a Science fiction B movie.

    Kay - you can roll this one over in your brain as long as you want to. You'll never make any logical sense out of chipping a human being that doesn't involve someone else's dominance and control.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4020288].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Heysal,

    I once nearly got arrested because, SUPPOSEDLY, someone ELSE had my plates! Luckily, my car was different, I was the wrong race, etc... And when a person hit ME, MY car was almost impounded for no registration/insurance. It was LATE, I forgot my insurance information, and I could hardly see all the small print on the registration, going through them at like 1am. I was hit. I could have had a concusion. I was the one who was NOW on his way to the emergency room(only about .5 miles away). Yet I was the one put through that torment. I told him "EVERYTHING IS CURRENT, CALL IT IN!". HE said "I'll just do that!", in a halfway sarcastic and halfway threatening tone. Funny thing, I made it to the hospital, etc... I guess his office said "Don't bother the guy, he is honest and paid up!"!

    BTW I NORMALLY wouldn't have gone to the ER, but I felt where the back of my neck hit the headrest hard and I take warfarin so a MINOR injury in the head that many could laugh off could be MAJOR. ALL I wanted to do was go to the drug store for a snack. I guess the person behind me decided that I could let the driver go through my car, or she would simply go through both. Funny thing, most cars don't let you go through them.

    Oh well, she rear ended me hard, we had a police report, and we BOTH had the same insurance company, so THE INSURANCE company treated me better than the police did.

    But isn't it interesting that the police could EASILY just call up the info in their car? They could EVEN find out if I had unpaid tickets, a lien, a warrant, a record, etc... Yet they DIDN'T even BOTHER!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4022901].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John M Kane
    I've distilled this into the simple idea that I do NOT want the government FORCING anything upon me unless the Constitution has it written in it.

    That statement alone marks me as a terrorist according to our government.
    As well as belief in the Bible, the right to own firearms, and the belief our crap heads in DC are all crooks, idiots and should be jailed.

    They are ALL corrupt,every last one of them.Evil wicked mean and nasty.
    Rats, pond scum and diseases are more valuable.

    I am of the belief that when these topics are IN the news, the thing has ALREADY has taken place, meaning chips have already been in food.
    Just like you are forbidden to have the right of choosing if you want GMO foods.
    Labels are not required, in fact they are forbidden.

    WTF NOT!

    Sell unpasteurized milk and expect a armed raid by the FDA goon squad. Laws are not made to "help" you, they are made to control you.
    Sell juice that is PROVEN to have health benefits and state such on a label, and the FDA will TAKE your business and all assets because you are selling an "unapproved drug."

    This country has tanked and there is no chance to EVER recover, sorry, but it is only down hill from here. Get out while you still can.

    Realist NOT a pessimist
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4027722].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lcombs
    We're all Bozos on this bus....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4028777].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lcombs
    Seriously though....

    Nazi Germany was the safest society in history and that's where we're heading.
    In fact, we almost there.

    The Bozos are more than willing to trade safety from perceived threats for individual freedom.

    Big Brother is watching and growing stronger.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4028792].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Ken - Good idea - I will be mozying back up to the country of Idaho before too long myself. I'd invite you over since we'll be practically neighbors, but, well - you're from Chicago so you're probably already chipped. You shouldn't have fallen for those damned wheaties commercials. Good god, they get you guys via testosterone every time you turn around. I swear.

    John - good rant. It was a fun thread. I'll miss it when it's gone. I do agree with every word you just spat out though.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4030229].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

      It's just as well. I would've only broken your heart.
      Yeah, I like to save time on that one at my age. I'll just be hurt now for a minute instead
      Okay - I'm done.

      Okay people - a few hours ago my niece was eating chips when she came in - she held the bag out toward me and said "ya want some chips" and I went into giggles. This is not a good thing. I'm not the nut case who thought up chipping people so why am I the one who looks like the nut case giggling about chips. This forum is NOT being good for me sometimes.

      As far as a bracelot or something like that - that wouldn't bother me so much - you can take that off if you want. Even a hidden chip that an attacker wouldn't be aware of isn't so bad...........as long as you can take it off and leave it elsewhere --- DO NOT put that in an organic body. Life is not meant to be under control.

      Tommy --- #2 - Orwell couldn't have thought that one up - it's too surreal. Scared me just hearing it.

      BTW - I never did eat any of those potato chips tonight. Seems I've lost my appetite for processed foods suddenly.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4030845].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John M Kane
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      John - good rant. It was a fun thread. I'll miss it when it's gone. I do agree with every word you just spat out though.
      THANKS Sal! Maybe after all I am NOT obscene after all(SOME socially redeeming value) as my "X" liked to pigeon hole me into. cooo cooo cooo LOL
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4090155].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    Chips in food? Hideous idea. Dogs good idea. People with diminished capacity good idea.

    Kids, well I am on both sides of this debate - critical to find them before they are killed or held as sex slaves; and so many are still 'disappeared' after 20 years - decades of torture for their parents who die never knowing what happened to them.

    Nonetheless, I can see where you wouldn't want the chip after you grew up. Maybe it could be a part of graduation - cop your diploma and have your chip removed.

    ... but I am glad my car has Onstar and that if my airbags go off they will be notified where I am and send an ambulance.

    The reason is because one of the weirdest experiences I ever had was one night driving on a freeway in heavy fog. Somehow in front of me was a white Volkswagon driving cross-wise - It was surreal. I will never forget it.

    How he made it across four lanes without anybody hitting him I will never know but I suppose because it was heavy traffic and fog people were going slow.

    Anyway he went right off an embankment and down into a gully where nobody could see the car. I got off at the next exit and called the Highway Patrol (before I had Onstar which is a phone too). They had no idea the guy was down there.

    He might have died there but they did rescue him in time. I called later to check, and they wouldn't give me any details about his condition because I wasn't a relative but said he was alive.

    Anyway, I am glad somebody would know if I was in a wreck - also if my car was stolen they would know where to find it right off.

    Brutal crime is rampant and the crooks and freaks seem to have the upper hand. I am willing to give up some freedoms if technology can turn it back in our favor. BUT I do realize the implications as far as control -it's scary alright.

    ... but then you know how many demonic people are walking around and we are their prey because THEY are free and protected in the name of civil rights. It is sick when one of them walks on some legal technicality. Free to kill again. People think it is worth it. I wonder.

    It is a complex issue.

    Seems like we 'are damned if we do or damned if we don't'.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4030640].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    p.s. thanks for an interesting and thought provoking thread for a change. lately this place is inane - nothing like a little controversy to spice things back up like the old daze...
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4031193].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dagaul101
    This could be serious, there is already suspicion that flouride in our tap water could be causing damage to our teeth
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4032286].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by dagaul101 View Post

      This could be serious, there is already suspicion that flouride in our tap water could be causing damage to our teeth
      That isn't a suspicion, it's fact. The fluoride they are dumping isn't calcium/magnesium fluoride (Natural). It's sodium/silica fluoride which is too poisonous for the EPA to allow corporations that produce it (by product of some processes) to dump - so they thought up a load of BS about it - completely neglecting to acknowledge the difference in the two substances, and the gov bought it. So we are drinking the toxins that they couldn't find other means to dispose of.

      Doncha love corporations? Considering the damage they do to the environment and organisms, I think they should be reclassified from businesses to harmful organic substances and be made illegal - that corporation gets big enough to do damage and it needs to be disposed of as the hazardous waste it actually is. Think of how much better off average people would be financially as small businesses prospered - as the corps were no longer able to lay vast amounts of natural resources and ecology to waste, or to pollute humans and other organisms until they start dying of the toxin.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4034027].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ThomM
        Doncha love corporations? Considering the damage they do to the environment and organisms, I think they should be reclassified from businesses to harmful organic substances and be made illegal - that corporation gets big enough to do damage and it needs to be disposed of as the hazardous waste it actually is. Think of how much better off average people would be financially as small businesses prospered - as the corps were no longer able to lay vast amounts of natural resources and ecology to waste, or to pollute humans and other organisms until they start dying of the toxin.
        I've been giving corps. and the such a lot of thought lately.
        I actually think I came up with a way to A. have close to full employment
        B.Provide a strong economy. C. Rid the need for government regulations and reduce the size of the federal and states governments.
        In a nut shell it would mean going to regional production of pretty much everything with active citizen participation.
        The main problems with my plan are.
        A. Everyone would have to be responsible for themselves.
        I think this is the biggest hurdle. We as a people and individuals need to do our own research and know what it is we are buying and putting into our bodies. If we find any items that are sub standard or dangerous, we don't buy them and we tell others who also tell others. If a company can't sell an item they won't make the item plan and simple.
        B. We need to support our communities and our nation.
        This means supporting the people who live there.
        If I need help I should be able to turn to my neighbors for it and visa-versa. If my community needs help it should be able to turn to the adjacent communities for help and so on for the nation.
        The idea is to abolish large corporations and banks and produce those products regionally but be able to sell nationally and globally with the emphasis on providing regionally.
        Because they would be regionally focused they would provide jobs for the communities. Also because the communities would be involved as employees and consumers they would in a sense become the regulators of the products eliminating the need for federal and state regulations those reducing the size of govt. and reducing the budgets on both levels.
        There's more, but I'm getting tired of typing
        Signature

        Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
        Getting old ain't for sissy's
        As you are I was, as I am you will be
        You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4034277].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lcombs
    Something that hasn't been mentioned yet is Google Earth.
    So, not only can they find you in any number of ways, but, when they do, can watch you and follow you visually.

    When I can afford it I'm going to buy a remote island and get the hell out of Dodge.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4033055].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John M Kane
    Agree if his techniques work or not Dr Burzynski has miraculously fought off the FDA's onslaught...so far.
    He seems to be a lone gun that had success, while all else get ruined.
    Makes me think about him being part of the "controlled opposition". Maybe, maybe not, just makes me go "hmmm"
    I could and do talk for hours on this schtupf to those who aren't totally bamboozled into thinking that our DC SH*ts are here to help us.
    .., then we get to be distracted by the Weiners of DC. What a great BIG man he is
    LOL
    Utah would be sweet if I had a clue on where to head to.
    Sal wants to keep it secret, to prevent a crap load of WF knob-heads(moi?) showing up at her door. HAHAH
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4090135].message }}
  • I wish this were a joke. Soon there will be no privacy left at all.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4090194].message }}

Trending Topics