Warrior forum peeves
Like any community, there's bound to be characters good, bad and in-between. Just can't be helped.
Hopefully, as time moves on, you hope to learn something.
Like when I thought it would be a good idea to have professional reviewers, senior warriors, for WSO's.
WRONG.
"Theoretically" is sounded plausible, but in reality, not so much. Because people who KNOW their stuff are spending time DOING their stuff and OTHER stuff as a result of that. They simply don't have time to review every new product because THEIR stuff is busy working, making them money, making them a life.
Now my peeve, actual reviewers here, of the serial kind.
These seem to comment and buy somewhere between 50%-75% of new stuff that comes out and give it a positive review, even if they don't use, know how to use or know anything about that field.
9.5 out of 10 reviews are positive and "sweet". The only time they give a bad review is if the product had multiple problems downloading, access problems and/or when they tried customer service, it was also very slow at coming and responding.
I steer clear of these guys and their comments. There comments are mostly fluff, valueless and lots of " thanks, keep up the good work" type crap.
Some are also serial freebie getters, in other words, if something is offered free, they're mostly there with some dumb post comment with not much value.
They are also folks who have non-indepth, cookie cutter advice to every noob question that come along, like " Keep trying , all the best " kind of malarkey.
On all counts, I just don't know whats going on there.
I notice most relevant, meaningful reviews usually come from people who don't post too often, or review less than 30% of the time.
For my taste, I know for now, maybe about 4 or 5 warriors that when they either put out a product or recommend a product, its dead-nails superior quality.
There are other warriors who are extremely reputable, but their taste, methods, teaching and recommendations are not suited for me, though most swear by them.
The ones that come out occasionally and review usually do so because it makes something they are already doing more automated, easier and/or the few "new" applications/product that actually work in the real world that makes a significant difference in their bank account, along with a product trait that it is going to work and last for a LONG time, in the long term, legit and above board marketing practices.
Another thing that gets me.
If a guy receives a free review copy, a free product, I've yet to see more than maybe, 3 or 4 since I been here, who gets a free review copy and tell it like it is both positive and negative aspects of the product in the clearest of sense, might not get another review copy or free product.
Rare type of reviewer indeed.
The 13th Warrior
Hopefully, as time moves on, you hope to learn something.
Like when I thought it would be a good idea to have professional reviewers, senior warriors, for WSO's.
WRONG.
"Theoretically" is sounded plausible, but in reality, not so much. Because people who KNOW their stuff are spending time DOING their stuff and OTHER stuff as a result of that. They simply don't have time to review every new product because THEIR stuff is busy working, making them money, making them a life.
Now my peeve, actual reviewers here, of the serial kind.
These seem to comment and buy somewhere between 50%-75% of new stuff that comes out and give it a positive review, even if they don't use, know how to use or know anything about that field.
9.5 out of 10 reviews are positive and "sweet". The only time they give a bad review is if the product had multiple problems downloading, access problems and/or when they tried customer service, it was also very slow at coming and responding.
I steer clear of these guys and their comments. There comments are mostly fluff, valueless and lots of " thanks, keep up the good work" type crap.
Some are also serial freebie getters, in other words, if something is offered free, they're mostly there with some dumb post comment with not much value.
They are also folks who have non-indepth, cookie cutter advice to every noob question that come along, like " Keep trying , all the best " kind of malarkey.
On all counts, I just don't know whats going on there.
I notice most relevant, meaningful reviews usually come from people who don't post too often, or review less than 30% of the time.
For my taste, I know for now, maybe about 4 or 5 warriors that when they either put out a product or recommend a product, its dead-nails superior quality.
There are other warriors who are extremely reputable, but their taste, methods, teaching and recommendations are not suited for me, though most swear by them.
The ones that come out occasionally and review usually do so because it makes something they are already doing more automated, easier and/or the few "new" applications/product that actually work in the real world that makes a significant difference in their bank account, along with a product trait that it is going to work and last for a LONG time, in the long term, legit and above board marketing practices.
Another thing that gets me.
If a guy receives a free review copy, a free product, I've yet to see more than maybe, 3 or 4 since I been here, who gets a free review copy and tell it like it is both positive and negative aspects of the product in the clearest of sense, might not get another review copy or free product.
Rare type of reviewer indeed.
The 13th Warrior
Learn IM From the Experts Who Are Already Doing It!
"Sammy-approved, baby!" -- Offline Brat Pack
Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.
Need a QR Code? Check out my QR Code Generator. It's FREE!