Do you believe in facts?

98 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Here's a simple but very complicated question to consider.

Do you believe in facts?

For example, if 100,000 people came up to you (I know it's a lot of people, but stick with me) and told you that the sky was green, would you believe them?

Or as another example, if your entire school came up to you and told you that tomorrow was the principals birthday (seeing as in this situation you didn't know the principals literal birthday), would you consider it a fact?

And if you would on either level, does that mean whatever we are told is a fact?

What if 99.9999% of the human race told you that the moon was an illusion. Would it be considered a "fact?

How about every single scientist telling you that space was actually white, and they considered it a fact. Would it then be considered a fact in your head?

I ask this because I personally do not believe in anything that we as a human race consider "fact" unless I personally went through the situation myself and knew from my own experiences that it happened.

This doesn't mean I think the world is flat, nor does it mean that I am a complete nut (or so I think?), but I feel it keeps my eyes open at what life presents before me, instead of closing them.

So, what are your theories on facts, theories, and so forth?

Be creative
  • Profile picture of the author williams22
    You may sound me bit harsh but i only believe in my Eyes and Ears .... no matter what the matter it may be !
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4516322].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DazedandConfused
    Do you have any facts to back up the fact that you believe in facts?
    Facts should have some basis in reality - but a reality does not necessarily have to be based on facts.

    (see parallax view)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4516364].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
    What is your definition of a fact? ...something that can be proven scientifically? ...any agreed upon reality? ...is anything a fact, or merely our perceptions of reality?
    Signature

    Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4516449].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
    Facts are ever changing, and no one person can have all the facts about a given subject or situation. We can endeavor to base our believing or make the best decision based on the facts we already know or are presented with, but this still does not gaurantee that you are making the correct decision or believing correctly. Unless you have a baseline, or a definate standard for truth, not fact, but truth. You gotta be able to bring everything that comes at your 5 senses back to a baseline or standard for truth. Most do not have this assurance........

    For example, if 100,000 people came up to you (I know it's a lot of people, but stick with me) and told you that the sky was green, would you believe them?
    No, because most people from their early childhood were taught that the sky is blue. So, that one would be hard for anyone to budge on.

    Or as another example, if your entire school came up to you and told you that tomorrow was the principals birthday (seeing as in this situation you didn't know the principals literal birthday), would you consider it a fact?
    Maybe, more than likely yes. Why, because you have not heard anything to the contrary. And I believe that most people in general are trusting individuals. We were built to believe. We would look at that situation and probably not think twice about it, because it's not that big of a deal or life changing or threatning. And if we did think twice about it, we would probably come to the conclusion of "why would so many people be telling me this if it were not true".

    And if you would on either level, does that mean whatever we are told is a fact?
    No, that should be an obvious conclusion. Because there is no logic to that at all. Only IF there were no such thing as truth could that be possible. Meaning. That could only exist in a world where that is not real, not tangible, a world that is not made up of solid physical laws and spiritual laws. A world that is realityless. Which is not possible.

    What if 99.9999% of the human race told you that the moon was an illusion. Would it be considered a "fact?
    Nope........

    What's funny is this. There is truth and fact. Reality though has to come from truth. Facts are ever changing. Some facts are truth based , and some facts are biased, they are not really truth facts. They are just accepted as facts.

    On a side note, many people's reality, is not truth, nor facts. Their reality can be tainted by emotions, and biases, facts that are not truth, so much that they the world they live and breath, and walk in (from their perception) is not reality as another sees it....

    How about every single scientist telling you that space was actually white, and they considered it a fact. Would it then be considered a fact in your head?
    Definately not, because scientist are not infallible and many, many times change what they believe over time. And other reasons I can't really discuss.

    I ask this because I personally do not believe in anything that we as a human race consider "fact" unless I personally went through the situation myself and knew from my own experiences that it happened.
    That's tricky. Just because you experience something does not mean it was truth. It may have been a factual happening but not truth, meaning not reality. Reality via truth. Which is based on one thing and one thing only, which cannot be OPENLY discussed on this forum, because to many people freak out when they discuss it.
    Signature
    Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4516519].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DazedandConfused
    Columbus "discovered" "America" in 1492 -
    We are taught in school this is a fact - but is it ?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4516677].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BloggingPro
    Anything my Government tells me...well then, it must be fact! [citation needed]

    Signature
    You're going to fail. If you're afraid of failure then you do not belong in the Internet Marketing Business. Period.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4516681].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author promhut729
    Sometimes need to believe in yourself, instead of listening to others, only you will have the answer after experience
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4516749].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ephame
    You have indeed opened a can of worms. I believe what i believe and don't push it on anyone so long as i don't have other people's oppinions put onto me. Whether all that has happened and we believe is truely fact or not doesn't stop the vast majority of the population making it seem like it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4517116].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

    Do you believe in facts?

    For example, if 100,000 people came up to you (I know it's a lot of people, but stick with me) and told you that the sky was green, would you believe them?
    That's not about "facts": it's about societal agreement about the meaning of the word "green".
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4518050].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      That's not about "facts": it's about societal agreement about the meaning of the word "green".
      I figured someone would have that answer

      Actually I was referring to the point of people calling you color blind or any scenario where you couldn't see color or went completely blind.

      Sounds a bit weird, but I know if I was blind and thousands of people told me something was something, I'd probably be like, oh okay. Seeing as I had no first hand experience, I'd have to thing they were being honest. But they could all be screwing with me
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4518143].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author JWatson
        I absolutely do believe in facts.

        Though not so much in "absolutes."
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4518614].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
    There is such a vast scope of facts and knowledge that no one person can know all of the existing facts. We must then rely on groups of people in the authority of a given set of similar facts, or subjects...and unfortunately we, for the most part must trust in what they tell us.

    Here is the interesting thing:

    It becomes dangerous when groups of authority, or percieved authority realize that are so depended on, and have little accountability...for instance something dealing with a deep and complex form of science for example...the layman isn't anywhere near capable of chalenging any facts presented to us.

    So we have to take there word for it.

    ...and this is where manipulation and agendas start to creep into the reality that affects all of us.

    The control of information is one of the 2 most powerful things on this planet. The control of money is the other.

    Both of those combined, control the laws and protocols we live by, and it trickles down from there.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4518734].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
    Fact #1: The subject title of this thread at the time of me posting this reply is
    Do you believe in facts?

    Fact #2: The subject title of this thread can be changed by to OP to make Fact #1
    appear incorrect.

    Fact #3: Changing the subject title of this thread by the OP would not effect the
    subject title of this post.

    Fact #4: I can change the subject title of this post but the OP can't.

    Fact #5: All the above facts are facts at the time of my posting this reply.

    Fact #6: All the facts above could become fiction if the Admin chooses to change them.

    So, Yes I believe in proven facts. I take hearsay for what it worth until it
    can be proven.

    Have a Great Day,
    Michael
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4518864].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

    Here's a simple but very complicated question to consider.

    Do you believe in facts?

    For example, if 100,000 people came up to you (I know it's a lot of people, but stick with me) and told you that the sky was green, would you believe them?
    If were BLIND, MAYBE! I can see and the sky MIGHT be green! It might look GREEN to me! WHO KNOWS!?!?!? The FACT is that whatever color I see in the sky is, to me, within fixed norms. If someone tells me the sky is GREEN, and I look up and see the norms I know have historically been BLUE, I will tell them they are WRONG, it is BLUE! EVEN if, if they saw the color I saw it MAY look green to them. BTW I used to deal with electronics, and they have color charts. MY understanding of how the world perceives color is enforced by those charts. So the color I perceive as blue says it is blue. Again, I may ACTUALLY be seeing a different color, but the differences are distinct.

    Or as another example, if your entire school came up to you and told you that tomorrow was the principals birthday (seeing as in this situation you didn't know the principals literal birthday), would you consider it a fact?
    Not a fact, but I might relate it to the principal.

    And if you would on either level, does that mean whatever we are told is a fact?
    NOPE! Most of what we are told is probably lies and half truths! Mark Joyner actually gave names to getting people to agree or "remember" something by planting SHILLS in the audience! It is ASTOUNDING what people OPENLYdo to make sales or sell a point.

    What if 99.9999% of the human race told you that the moon was an illusion. Would it be considered a "fact?
    NOPE! Differences in the surface, different media, and changes relating to its relative position show it to be what it is.

    How about every single scientist telling you that space was actually white, and they considered it a fact. Would it then be considered a fact in your head?
    It flies in the fact of logic and perception. Logic dictates that colors are based on how the light is generated and/or the material they hit. Since space is devoid of anything, and doesn't generate light, it should be black. The sky appears blue because of the way the light is diffused in the atmosphere. At night there is no light, so it is black. Apolarbears fur ends up reflecting the light making it appear white.

    I ask this because I personally do not believe in anything that we as a human race consider "fact" unless I personally went through the situation myself and knew from my own experiences that it happened.
    THAT is how I am. If things don't fit, I may throw them out. I am willing to believe that the color I see in the sky is green. That IS possible! BUT, if that is possible, then the color I perceive as green is perceived by most others as one they relate to being blue. Color is VERY hard to describe, ESPECIALLY if you can't use color as a reference. For example, I could say yellow and blue make green. WHAT is yellow? WHAT is blue? I could show what I understand to be yellow and blue, but do THEY know we are BOTH seeing the same thing?

    This doesn't mean I think the world is flat, nor does it mean that I am a complete nut (or so I think?), but I feel it keeps my eyes open at what life presents before me, instead of closing them.
    I would have believed the earth was round from day one! The planets are ALL roughly round! Based on the way they move, a round shape is understandable. Looking into the distance you can see a difference, etc... In a sense, the world IS flat! ALL levels are ROUGHLY the same distance from an equidistant point. And that explains EVERYTHING, including how a ball can roll on the ground. Of course, the only way everything can be equidistant from one point is to be round! But the bigger it is, the flatter any one spot appears to be.

    So, what are your theories on facts, theories, and so forth?

    Be creative
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4519628].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DazedandConfused
    Btw: The Sky IS green! -

    The reason the sky looks blue to you is due to light refraction and reflection -
    When you see a Rainbow, it is refracting more of the colors in the light spectrum -
    just as a prism...just because you normally don't see them does not mean they are not there...


    It all boils down to perception...what you PERCEIVE to be the truth and fact.

    A more interesting question might be - What color is the sky to an ape? - or a dog?


    @Roaddog below - that is correct! It is all merely a matter of semantics...

    Just as I know man and dinosaurs used to live together in harmony -
    Because I saw it on "The Flintstones"! :rolleyes:
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4519702].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Roaddog
    OHHhhh!!...facts...all this time I was believing in conjecture...

    Dammit....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4519710].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      If you "believe" in facts, you are delusional. The fact is, facts are relative to your perception of reality, bias, societal consensus, belief system and even what you perceive as "authoritative" sources. So-called relative "facts" often even change in the absolute sense of the term. For example, what most people think of gravity as a "fact" is in reality untrue. This "truth" is relative within narrow conditions, and scientists themselves don't have all the "facts". The "law" of gravity itself is unproven, and "authoritative" sources maintain it's only a theory, not fact. So don't confuse me with your facts, I already know what is true. :confused: :rolleyes: :p
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520029].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author DazedandConfused
        Originally Posted by myob View Post

        If you "believe" in facts, you are delusional. The fact is, facts are relative to your perception of reality, bias, societal consensus, belief system and even what you perceive as "authoritative" sources. So-called relative "facts" often even change in the absolute sense of the term. For example, what most people think of gravity as a "fact" is in reality untrue. This "truth" is relative within narrow conditions, and scientists themselves don't have all the "facts". The "law" of gravity itself is unproven, and "authoritative" sources maintain it's only a theory, not fact. So don't confuse me with your facts, I already know what is true. :confused: :rolleyes: :p
        If we go by your hypothesis, you state you already know what is true -
        when in fact from your statement - you are stating nothing is true...
        Everything you know to be true would be untrue...
        So which is it?
        The Lady or the Tiger? :rolleyes:
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520249].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author myob
          Originally Posted by DazedandConfused View Post

          If we go by your hypothesis, you state you already know what is true -
          when in fact from your statement - you are stating nothing is true...
          Everything you know to be true would be untrue...
          So which is it?
          The Lady or the Tiger? :rolleyes:
          What I have stated is truth of which truth is. Searching within limited silly artifices such as your cute lady or pet tiger serves no purpose. All is perception.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520628].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
          @Dazed, I would have to say that everything is untrue.

          Even what you believe you know might just be a figment of your imagination, that is if there is an imagination Maybe we are all just in some screwed up universe (if there are universes?) whereas the original universe is absolutely different.
          Signature

          My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520985].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author HeySal
            Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

            @Dazed, I would have to say that everything is untrue.

            Even what you believe you know might just be a figment of your imagination, that is if there is an imagination Maybe we are all just in some screwed up universe (if there are universes?) whereas the original universe is absolutely different.

            So let me guess, Justin. Epistemology 101?

            I have perceptions. I do not question my own existence (I think, therefore I am ~ um.... Descartes, if I remember rightly).

            What I can not be sure of is whether my perceptions are illusions or reality. I may be singular.

            There are indications that others exist. A being I percieve may impart knowledge to me that I hitherto had not thought of yet seemingly corresponds to my perception of my environment. While this may be indication of other's existing and a world that exists beyond my personal illusion of it - there is no way to prove that is the case. Everything may evolve from my own perceptions, or illusions.

            Quantum physics is fairly aligned with several religions in seeing that there is no many - everything is just one.

            Being that there is no way for me to prove otherwise, at least at this moment in what I perceive to be history -- and not one of my perceived others have brought me such an idea -- it behooves me to at least go along with my perception of others and a solid environment that operates according to a consensus of perceptions.

            After all - there's not really much else to do, is there?



            Why?

            Because.
            Signature

            Sal
            When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
            Beyond the Path

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4521424].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
        Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post

        OHHhhh!!...facts...all this time I was believing in conjecture...

        Dammit....
        Aw Jim, dang it ... and here I thought you were different.

        Originally Posted by myob View Post

        If you "believe" in facts, you are delusional. The fact is, facts are relative to your perception of reality, bias, societal consensus, belief system and even what you perceive as "authoritative" sources. So-called relative "facts" often even change in the absolute sense of the term. For example, what most people think of gravity as a "fact" is in reality untrue. This "truth" is relative within narrow conditions, and scientists themselves don't have all the "facts". The "law" of gravity itself is unproven, and "authoritative" sources maintain it's only a theory, not fact. So don't confuse me with your facts, I already know what is true. :confused: :rolleyes: :p
        Nice, Paul. That's what I was alluding to in my original post, but you said it much better.
        Signature

        Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520508].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Pauly60451
        Originally Posted by myob View Post

        For example, what most people think of gravity as a "fact" is in reality untrue.
        Gravity is not just a good idea, it's the law!

        Everyone has to believe in something - I believe I'll have another beer. :p
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4647228].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author myob
          Originally Posted by Pauly60451 View Post

          Gravity is not just a good idea, it's the law!

          Everyone has to believe in something - I believe I'll have another beer. :p
          This "law" has no jurisdiction in some cosmic neighborhoods. I believe I'll grab another beer too.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4647713].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DazedandConfused
    Aha, Grasshopper!
    Therein lies the conundrum...
    Perception is itself merely a perception...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520668].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      Despite your apparent misperception, I am not a grasshopper. And that's a true fact.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520760].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
        @myob,

        But how do you know for sure? What if you are a grasshopper and we are all just a dream. You can never out something even if it sounds crazy, because the crazy happens all the time.
        Signature

        My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4520975].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author myob
          Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

          @myob,

          But how do you know for sure? What if you are a grasshopper and we are all just a dream. You can never out something even if it sounds crazy, because the crazy happens all the time.
          Your logic makes reason stare back and say, "However possible, this is highly improbable. More than likely, it's past time for you to lower your medication." :rolleyes:
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4521362].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4521071].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DazedandConfused
    Just remember not to put Descartes before De Horse....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4521473].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sunfyre7896
    It's good to be skeptical as long as at some point when the evidence to suggest something is overwhelming in the favor of the argument such as gravity. You can question it all day long, and there's nothing to say that if we wake up tomorrow that it might not be the same, but up to now it has been consistent. That's all you can ask of facts and science. There are data to back up the facts, but at any time things can change based on new developments or actual changes in the physicality of the situation. Nothing is ever set or guaranteed other than death. Things can change at any time, but we must also take things into consideration as they are at the present and assume that some things will remain consistent unless shown to be otherwise.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4521582].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      Originally Posted by Sunfyre7896 View Post

      It's good to be skeptical as long as at some point when the evidence to suggest something is overwhelming in the favor of the argument such as gravity. You can question it all day long, and there's nothing to say that if we wake up tomorrow that it might not be the same, but up to now it has been consistent. That's all you can ask of facts and science. There are data to back up the facts, but at any time things can change based on new developments or actual changes in the physicality of the situation. Nothing is ever set or guaranteed other than death. Things can change at any time, but we must also take things into consideration as they are at the present and assume that some things will remain consistent unless shown to be otherwise.
      I just want to question if you believe in a possibility of anti-gravity. It's considered impossible due to general relativity. Just want to see what you think on the subject.

      As for your statement, I do agree to a point.

      You must also take into theory if I was a scientist and I wanted to make something up, it's possible. I'm not saying that scientists lie, I'm just stating that there is no "absolute" in anything. Just because 50,000 scientists say something, doesn't make it a fact. Everything is a theory.

      We are rediscovering our world every single day. So many of what were once considered facts are no longer and are replaced, only to be replaced again.
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4522362].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jun Balona
    After all I've read above, my head hurts.

    And that is a fact.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4521643].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    For those that don't consider facts...Let's put this to a test. Let me take you to the top of a 40 story building. I will explain the fact that if you step off the top, you will fall. I've never tested this myself, and am only relying on experts.

    Who here doesn't believe my statement of fact and is willing to take me up on this challenge to prove me wrong?
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523120].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Roaddog
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      For those that don't consider facts...Let's put this to a test. Let me take you to the top of a 40 story building. I will explain the fact that if you step off the top, you will fall. I've never tested this myself, and am only relying on experts.

      Who here doesn't believe my statement of fact and is willing to take me up on this challenge to prove me wrong?

      I volunteer Carlos Castaneda...:p
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523131].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        I've always questioned "facts" and this has led me to some weird thinking.

        One thing that bothered me as a child was wondering if "blue" was the same color for everyone. How could I know if my friend saw red and called it "blue" or if what I thought of as "green" was "blue" to someone else. What if their parent was color blind and gave them the wrong word for a color?

        To my kid's mind - the question could not be answered because I couldn't see through someone else's eyes...

        kay
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523172].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
          Originally Posted by myob View Post

          I volunteer to put this to the test. But, I get to choose the location of the 40 story building.
          Haha. Good come back question the "fact"ers, haha, get it?

          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          I've always questioned "facts" and this has led me to some weird thinking.

          One thing that bothered me as a child was wondering if "blue" was the same color for everyone. How could I know if my friend saw red and called it "blue" or if what I thought of as "green" was "blue" to someone else. What if their parent was color blind and gave them the wrong word for a color?

          To my kid's mind - the question could not be answered because I couldn't see through someone else's eyes...

          kay
          I have something else for you to consider.

          Many people in this world believe that our color is the correct color code. But that is highly unlikely. Just because we see something as one color doesn't mean that another species would see it the same way.

          If for example there were extra-stellar humans that were staring into the night sky, isn't it quite possible that they could be seeing black as white, and yellow as green? Atleast our colors anyways.

          It's pretty crazy if you think about it. Imagine looking up into the sky to see nothing but white space and what look like trees (would look like shadows to them?) It's pretty interesting to think about.
          Signature

          My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523673].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          I've always questioned "facts" and this has led me to some weird thinking.

          One thing that bothered me as a child was wondering if "blue" was the same color for everyone. How could I know if my friend saw red and called it "blue" or if what I thought of as "green" was "blue" to someone else. What if their parent was color blind and gave them the wrong word for a color?

          To my kid's mind - the question could not be answered because I couldn't see through someone else's eyes...

          kay
          It's a proven fact that what you see as blue, others see as blue also, but not always the same blue. It can be a different value of blue to a lesser or greater degree. This all has to do with how your own eyes perceive color.

          I won't bore you with the scientific details of it...
          Signature
          Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4550247].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      For those that don't consider facts...Let's put this to a test. Let me take you to the top of a 40 story building. I will explain the fact that if you step off the top, you will fall. I've never tested this myself, and am only relying on experts.

      Who here doesn't believe my statement of fact and is willing to take me up on this challenge to prove me wrong?
      I volunteer to put this to the test. But, I get to choose the location of the 40 story building.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523187].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      For those that don't consider facts...Let's put this to a test. Let me take you to the top of a 40 story building. I will explain the fact that if you step off the top, you will fall. I've never tested this myself, and am only relying on experts.

      Who here doesn't believe my statement of fact and is willing to take me up on this challenge to prove me wrong?
      Well, I don't "know" if a trillion volts can kill you, but I know that a hundred can pack a wallop. In theory, a trillion could instantly fry you, etc...

      SO, since I know I can fall an inch, or sseveral feet, I guess I will believe the 40 stories.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523667].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        Well, I don't "know" if a trillion volts can kill you, but I know that a hundred can pack a wallop. In theory, a trillion could instantly fry you, etc...

        SO, since I know I can fall an inch, or sseveral feet, I guess I will believe the 40 stories.

        Steve

        I am not against the notion that saying certain things will happen because they just seem so real. I have not yet fallen off a building.. heck I'm scared to look out of a 40 story building, let alone go outside on one.

        I would say that if I walked out onto my balcony right now and jumped off, I would probably feel pain. But it's not an absolute fact. Yes I would be "falling" but I don't feel that results as a complete fact either. What if we actually aren't "falling" and instead the earth is moving towards us. I know that sounds obscure, but humans don't know everything.

        Just because we say something is something, doesn't mean it is.

        Here's another way to state it.

        I could be in a classroom where the teacher is teaching addition.

        When the teacher states, add 2 + 2, I may not be adding 2 + 2 in my head, instead I could be multiplying, or doubling, or increasing by 100% or even dividing from the answer down.

        I do math a different way. I know it's odd, but instead of adding 2 + 2, I would actually divide 6 by 2, then get 3, so then I knew the answer would be 4.

        Some would say it's a fact that I divided, but at the same time it's not. Even if I comprehend it as dividing or adding, it doesn't mean it's a complete fact that I did either.

        These are just my theories on how things work. It's not like I'm bashing anymore, nor do I feel like anyone should take offense to this, but the idea here is to get out of the box.

        If you start thinking differently, facts become irrelevant.
        Signature

        My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523742].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
          Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

          I am not against the notion that saying certain things will happen because they just seem so real. I have not yet fallen off a building.. heck I'm scared to look out of a 40 story building, let alone go outside on one.

          I would say that if I walked out onto my balcony right now and jumped off, I would probably feel pain. But it's not an absolute fact. Yes I would be "falling" but I don't feel that results as a complete fact either. What if we actually aren't "falling" and instead the earth is moving towards us. I know that sounds obscure, but humans don't know everything.

          Just because we say something is something, doesn't mean it is.

          Here's another way to state it.

          I could be in a classroom where the teacher is teaching addition.

          When the teacher states, add 2 + 2, I may not be adding 2 + 2 in my head, instead I could be multiplying, or doubling, or increasing by 100% or even dividing from the answer down.

          I do math a different way. I know it's odd, but instead of adding 2 + 2, I would actually divide 6 by 2, then get 3, so then I knew the answer would be 4.

          Some would say it's a fact that I divided, but at the same time it's not. Even if I comprehend it as dividing or adding, it doesn't mean it's a complete fact that I did either.

          These are just my theories on how things work. It's not like I'm bashing anymore, nor do I feel like anyone should take offense to this, but the idea here is to get out of the box.

          If you start thinking differently, facts become irrelevant.
          You are both falling, and the earth is moving toward you. both are facts.

          with 2+2...it equals 4. There are other ways to arrive at 4..such as 8-2-2. You can understand in your own way how you might come to know the answer would be four. So all of these avenues or processes lead to 4 it still doesnt change the fact that the original 2+2 equals 4.

          I think you are overthinking everything to the point of absurdity. Questioning anything and everything is a pointless excersize because during your whole life up till now you have experienced consistency in the world around you...in almost everything. You wake up each day and everything in the world is largely the same as it was the day before. the motion and processes of everything remain constant. You've been able to rely on this every day of your life to get where you are and grow and learn precept upon precept....if this were not so...you wake up every day and have to relearn an entirly new working world.

          The reason this is so...is becouse there are underlying facts that glue everything together and keep it in motion. These facts never change.

          Our understanding of them can change....but the core of the fact remains the way it always has, in order to hold up its purpetual role in the universe, no matter how significant or miniscule.

          Peoples individual reality...is separate from fact. It is simply their understanding of a fact...right or wrong.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523831].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      For those that don't consider facts...Let's put this to a test. Let me take you to the top of a 40 story building. I will explain the fact that if you step off the top, you will fall. I've never tested this myself, and am only relying on experts.

      Who here doesn't believe my statement of fact and is willing to take me up on this challenge to prove me wrong?
      How does a perception of someone being squished into a sidewalk prove that they were real and not illusory?

      Laugh - this is close to an incident in my epistemology class when my professor sat on the corner of his desk and it collapsed. He fell on the floor and whacked his head pretty hard. He said he knew he existed in some form because he felt pain - but asked how the incident could prove to any of us that he exists. LMAO.

      The post I made previously was a close replica of an answer to one of his test questions, too. But I was right. Even if everything around me is an illusion, I might as well just play along because there wouldn't be anything else to do anyway.

      It was a fun subject.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4524341].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
    Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

    Here's a simple but very complicated question to consider.

    Do you believe in facts?

    For example, if 100,000 people came up to you (I know it's a lot of people, but stick with me) and told you that the sky was green, would you believe them?

    Or as another example, if your entire school came up to you and told you that tomorrow was the principals birthday (seeing as in this situation you didn't know the principals literal birthday), would you consider it a fact?

    And if you would on either level, does that mean whatever we are told is a fact?

    What if 99.9999% of the human race told you that the moon was an illusion. Would it be considered a "fact?

    How about every single scientist telling you that space was actually white, and they considered it a fact. Would it then be considered a fact in your head?

    I ask this because I personally do not believe in anything that we as a human race consider "fact" unless I personally went through the situation myself and knew from my own experiences that it happened.

    This doesn't mean I think the world is flat, nor does it mean that I am a complete nut (or so I think?), but I feel it keeps my eyes open at what life presents before me, instead of closing them.

    So, what are your theories on facts, theories, and so forth?

    Be creative
    You post is very disturbing and annoying.

    I have a feeling the world is not ready for someone like you.

    I also have a feeling the worlds greatest scientists and/or richest people will soon have another member and his name will be Justin
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523155].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      Originally Posted by PatrickP View Post

      You post is very disturbing and annoying.

      I have a feeling the world is not ready for someone like you.

      I also have a feeling the worlds greatest scientists and/or richest people will soon have another member and his name will be Justin
      LOL. I don't know if I should take this as a compliment or what, but I can say that I appreciate the comment.
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523655].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
        Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

        LOL. I don't know if I should take this as a compliment or what, but I can say that I appreciate the comment.
        100% as a compliment. It is the kids who colored outside the lines, the ones who question authority, the ones who didn't do things the way they were suppose to be done but still accomplished the task who truly make their mark on this world and accomplish the most amazing things.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4525413].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThatMichaelKid
          Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill View Post

          What is your definition of a fact? ...something that can be proven scientifically? ...any agreed upon reality? ...is anything a fact, or merely our perceptions of reality?
          Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

          No one knows what a fact is.

          My.

          @Dennis,even though your question is merely rhetorical, I believe that a fact is our own perceptions of reality. A fact to a person is nothing more than their belief on how their beliefs works, this is what I believe a fact is. I don't think it something that is proven by science or evidence at all.

          Someone's opinion creates a fact in their own world.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4525431].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
            Originally Posted by ThatMichaelKid View Post

            @Dennis,even though your question is merely rhetorical, I believe that a fact is our own perceptions of reality. A fact to a person is nothing more than their belief on how their beliefs works, this is what I believe a fact is. I don't think it something that is proven by science or evidence at all.

            Someone's opinion creates a fact in their own world.
            I respectfully dissagree...opinion can have factual basis to help form that opinion...but opinion, unlike fact, is succeptible to error and change.

            To test the fact in one persons reality you should be able to take that fact and drop it into another persons reality and have it achieve the same result...if it does not...then it was not a fact in the first place, merely that persons perception of the fact. One or both individuals perception/understanding of the fact is in error.

            Facts, by their very nature, are constant, unchanging, permantently set. That is why we call them facts.

            When humans discovered that the world wasn't flat, but round....the underlying fact didn't change...we just discovered we were wrong about the fact. This merely altered our perception of reality to a new idea. The world didn't actually go through a physical change from flat to round in an instant....only in our understanding.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4526213].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author misharuski
    Of course I beleive in facts =)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4523676].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author telemartnetwork
    Facts are the actuality of experiences. If someone have experience & gone through any particular situation & closely viewed by own eyes, then, it is the fact for that person. Some believe in facts when any other person says & some do not believe in such views untill & unless, they personally face the situation.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4524262].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    Test #2. Someone give me a $100 bill for me to "break" for you. I will give you back a $5 bill and tell you that we're even, because maybe we are?
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4527046].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      I listen to opinions - but I decide on my own what facts I believe.

      ...and I wouldn't care about the principal's birthday anyway
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4647748].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        I listen to opinions - but I decide on my own what facts I believe.

        ...and I wouldn't care about the principal's birthday anyway
        Haha.

        Great answer dude. I definitely agree.
        Signature

        My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4746480].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
    I have an opinion (which is not a fact), people should stop taking things so seriously I see a lot of people trying to push others down for their thoughts. Just let it be

    Yes, it is thinking outside the lines of regular processes, but it's not wrong because someone says it. It's their belief. I personally feel facts are just not exactly what we perceive them as being. Just because something is written as a fact (moreso talking about scientific and historical information, than just random basic things) it doesn't mean that it's an absolute.
    Signature

    My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4528433].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
    @Kurt, I love your concepts on the question

    I was moreso talking about scientific/historical events in past and present.

    Also your perception of $100 to $5 being even could be pondered against but I doubt anyone has the patience to put in the effort.

    But, you could give me $5 for my $100 and let's just say I didn't value currency and the paper was the same, I would then say, sure we're even, end of story
    Signature

    My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4528494].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
    Justin, since you put it that way, I'll have to say that your op is in fact the
    first post in this thread.

    And another fact is that I will say before I conclude this post,
    Have a Great Day Twice.

    Have a Great Day!
    Michael

    PS, Just in case. I wasn't talking about posting it two times. I was literally
    talking about adding the word Twice to it. It's all in perception. Reality
    is what you make it based on your present knowledge.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4528560].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      Originally Posted by Michael Mayo View Post

      Justin, since you put it that way, I'll have to say that your op is in fact the
      first post in this thread.

      And another fact is that I will say before I conclude this post,
      Have a Great Day Twice.

      Have a Great Day!
      Michael

      PS, Just in case. I wasn't talking about posting it two times. I was literally
      talking about adding the word Twice to it. It's all in perception. Reality
      is what you make it based on your present knowledge.
      You sir are winning

      But how do I know it's a fact that you are whom you say you are?

      And how do you know I was the one to actually type my opinion? Or maybe it was someone elses I could be blind for all you know. With no arms or legs.
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4531089].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
        Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

        You sir are winning
        Thank You, Thank You very much!
        But how do I know it's a fact that you are whom you say you are?
        Irrelevant, I never said I was who I am nor did I say I am who I was!
        After my prior reply, I may be Elvis for we all know! :rolleyes:
        And how do you know I was the one to actually type my opinion? Or maybe it was someone elses I could be blind for all you know. With no arms or legs.
        I would give you that point if I had said you did make the post.
        Although I chose to use the abbreviation of "OP" to describe the person
        that posted the Original Post(OP).

        I was careful not to go OT...lol

        Have a Great Day!
        Michael

        PS.
        Here is another Fact. ?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4538125].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author wickedinnovation
    Of course, I believe in facts because facts are true! Even so, we all know that some facts are lies and for you to know if it is a lie, you must have experienced it first!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4530991].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author lcombs
      Originally Posted by wickedinnovation View Post

      Of course, I believe in facts because facts are true! Even so, we all know that some facts are lies and for you to know if it is a lie, you must have experienced it first!
      Facts, by definition, are true.
      So, it is impossible for a fact to be a lie.

      In fact, I don't understand the point of the question or the thread.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4541916].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
        Originally Posted by lcombs View Post

        Facts, by definition, are true.
        So, it is impossible for a fact to be a lie.

        In fact, I don't understand the point of the question or the thread.
        Actually facts are based on the physical, and as any scientist knows, the physical is ever changing. So by nature, a fact, if it were actually a fact, would only be so for a short period of time...
        Signature
        Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4550279].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
          Very good example Steve, that's a good way to look at it.
          Signature

          My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4647155].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
          @Steve, so you believe in perception, but is "perception" always factual? I do agree what you state isn't something that should be totally argued upon, but does that mean whatever someone perceives is fact?
          Signature

          My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4647159].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author swchiiz
    The Fact that Dinosaur exist... do you believe in this fact?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4531868].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
    @Swchiiz,

    For one you stated that Dinosaurs exist. Meaning they are still in existence.

    To be honest, that's a theory. So would the fact be that they don't exist.

    We may never know for certain.

    And even in the situation of finding a live dinosaur, it doesn't mean they exist Just as everything could be an illusion
    Signature

    My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4535621].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

      @Swchiiz,

      For one you stated that Dinosaurs exist. Meaning they are still in existence.

      To be honest, that's a theory. So would the fact be that they don't exist.

      We may never know for certain.

      And even in the situation of finding a live dinosaur, it doesn't mean they exist Just as everything could be an illusion
      Dinosaurs are not a theory, we have their bones. What they looked like fleshed out, whether they were cold or warm blooded are theories.

      The next time you see a live gator - you are looking at a live dinosaur. They have evolved a tad (not that much really), but that's basically what they are.

      Just goes to show, as Ken said - not knowing the truth doesn't negate it.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4547397].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author trevesty
    Truth is about perception. Facts are ever-changing, but hard truths.

    It may be true that the sky is blue... but not if you're color blind. The fact is that there is a sky and its colors changes depending upon weather, etc.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4536742].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

      If you think 2+2=5, you're wrong no matter your perspective.

      Truth has little to do with perception.

      The fact that blind people can't see color doesn't make red less red.

      Ignorance is not truth. It's just ignorance.
      I'll just be short as you sent 3 replies on 3 seperate posts

      I disagree.

      I believe that the original poster that you replied to with this statement had a pretty good concept on what things are.

      You can't ignore something that you view as a fact, but is quite different.

      Of course if you say something is blue and someone views it as a different color (perception wise) they would still call it "blue" even though in their eyes it was actually considered "red" in the other persons eyes.

      So it's very possible to have multiple "opinions" and "perceptions" about things.

      Just because everyone thinks they see the same color, it's possible they don't? Of course to you, blue is in fact "blue" but this is perception/opinion.

      Just a random thought to take into consideration I'm not saying any of this in fact is true. I'm moreso expressing that you can't just perceive something as factual, as that is a perception.
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4546244].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
        Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

        ...and what I'm saying is try perceiving a brick wall away before you run into it.

        Let me know how that works our for you.
        @Ken,

        I am in no way absolutely putting your statement down.

        I just think there are other reasoning's.

        Yes, you can say that if you run into a brick wall that you will not go through it.

        But just because currently you can't or have never been able to. What if you did run right through the brick wall?

        It's not that I believe you will go through it. It's that I don't believe in an absolute.

        I think there are multiple possibilities for the same scenario.

        But to be fair. I agree on your notion of imagining a brick wall to disappear. I don't see that happening. But just because I don't believe it, nor have I ever seen it, doesn't mean that it's a fact that it's not possible
        Signature

        My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4546757].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
          Originally Posted by Justin Lewis View Post

          @Ken,

          I am in no way absolutely putting your statement down.

          I just think there are other reasoning's.

          Yes, you can say that if you run into a brick wall that you will not go through it.

          But just because currently you can't or have never been able to. What if you did run right through the brick wall? Agreed, under certain conditions I may be able to run through a brick wall...there may be some type of science that allows for this...but right now likely we havn't got the facts right. Other conditions may allow for this that I know of like if my matter was changed from flesh, to the state of being a ghost.

          It's not that I believe you will go through it. It's that I don't believe in an absolute. Eventually there is an absolute, "consistency" is proof of that. The absolute may be beyond our reach or knowledge, or may not come to fruition until a multitude of conditions have played out. Make no mistake, absolutes are a fundamental part of the universe.

          I think there are multiple possibilities for the same scenario. I think you might be describing perception, but this is too general a statement anyway...and sure I agree with you generally...but I'll hold that there will be exceptions, where there is only one absolute possibility.

          But to be fair. I agree on your notion of imagining a brick wall to disappear. I don't see that happening. But just because I don't believe it, nor have I ever seen it, doesn't mean that it's a fact that it's not possible
          ...you know, the reason anything gets invented in the first place is because someone believed it was possible, so there is merit to your notion.

          I think though, that to entertain serious thought about ideas like..."what if the world really does revolve around each person" or what if when I put on my sunglasses I really am changing the color of the sky... is wasted mental energy. (unless you are going to write a hollywood script and get paid) You've probably noted a others who have little patience for it.

          In the reality of this world and our lives there are absolutes that we can count on. They are what they are, and we can test against them with consistent results. ( which also happens to be the other half of the reason anything ever gets invented)

          Interesting note after looking at the words "Fact" and "Reality" using an Thesorus and a dictionary....there seems to be more gray area regarding fact...yet we use the word to mean an absolute...and the word reality is very strict in its meaning with very little room for interpretation beyond the idea that reality is a rigid absolute.

          Yet we use the term loosely as if to describe our own perception of everything. (shrug)
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4549478].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
    @Trevesty, that's a great way to look at it.

    You could also consider the fact that some of us only see certain things, but not everyone personally experiences something. It goes on the same concept of what you are talking about, but a little different.

    Of course if someone is color blind, the color may look different. Because that is there experience.

    Just because 150,000 people see a color as blue, and then 1 person sees a color as red. Doesn't mean either are facts. It could be that the 1 person is normal, whilst the 150,000 people are actually colorblind. Or it could be the fact that the 150,000 people are normal, while the 1 person is colorblind.

    But also "facts" aren't just about perception. Many consider it a "fact" that the earth is round. But I bet you very few of them have actually seen the earth as a whole. So they may perceive it as flat or slightly curved.
    Signature

    My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4537928].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    If up is up & down is down, what's left, right? :confused:
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4538166].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4538174].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
        Yep. I prefer facts. I also realize that most of the decisions in life will be made without all of the facts.

        In the absence of facts, I'll look at the evidence at hand. The factual evidence at hand.

        The big fly in the ointment is the human animal's staggering ability to play word-twisting mind-games.

        Of course... that doesn't change the facts.

        Joe Mobley
        Signature

        .

        Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4538226].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      If up is up & down is down, what's left, right? :confused:
      My biggest question has always been, How do I know that when I see a
      color that it is the actual color someone else sees?

      Lets say I see the color blue and you see it as red although you have
      always known it to be blue. I call it blue and you think what you see
      is blue based on what you have learned???

      Now I see the color red as pink and you believe that because you have
      learned that is what everyone else calls it even though they see pink, red
      orange and believe it's pink too???

      The rest of your life you will agree with me that those colors are in fact
      what we think they are although either one of us You/I and or Both are
      wrong and the colors are actually something else???


      Then again the person we learned this from could be color blind and see
      only shades of grey/gray.

      Therefore life is just something we do because death sucks as we know it.

      Damn, That made my head hurt! :confused:

      Have a Great Day!
      Michael

      PS.
      what's left, right? :confused:
      Can't answer that question because we are not allowed to talk about Politics!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4538236].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
    Originally Posted by mosescans View Post

    Yes of course. To see is to believe.
    You got that right.

    Oh I believe that if I check your other 3 posts and they are as informative as
    this one then your time here on the forum may be very short.

    Then again I could be wrong.

    What the hell is a Fact anyway???

    Have a Great Day!
    Michael
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4538349].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
    There should be a clear distinction between fact and perception.

    Facts never change...they cannot change. The very meaning of the word fact itself, infers a state of permanence.

    There are underlying facts about everything in existence...and they never change. It is what holds the universe together and makes it function.

    Perception however, is ever evolving and changing....and it changes in accordance with new understanding of an underlying fact.

    Those with higher understanding of a set of facts will likely have a truer perception about said facts than someone who isn't as well versed in the set of facts.

    For example, someone with more understanding of the relevant sciences might state that the facts are: The sky reflects a myriad of colors simultaneously.
    The facts are: Humans have visual receptors which limit them to seeing only blue. or whatever it is to the individual. The receptors in dogs etc, have their own set of limitations. The fact still remains that the sky reflects a myriad of colors simultaneously.

    The facts are: That third party forces such as weather, preciptiation and sunlight can further alter how our receptors recieve the reflected light of the sky much the same as putting sunglasses on changes my current perception of the sky, not the sky itself.

    Because there is consistency in the world, that is proof of unchanging fact. That is the reason we can even advance in knowledge, get from here to there, or even wake up still shaped like a human.

    Then again...if something drops on my head tomorrow and I die, only to find out I'm really a fish in a bowl having a vivid dream...I'm going to be seriously pissed.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4539071].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
    Facts change all the time. No where in the definition of the word fact does permanence show up.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4539125].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
      Originally Posted by PatrickP View Post

      Facts change all the time. No where in the definition of the word fact does permanence show up.
      Thats why I used the word "infered"

      ...but again, it isn't the facts that are changing...it is your understanding of the fact (perception). This understanding may change due to the introduction of other facts or any number of other things.

      It means that whatever was thought about the original fact ( our perception), was simply wrong or incomplete. The original fact itself remained unchanged.

      Nearly all of our lives are governed by our perception of the facts. Our perception of those facts change on a daily basis.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4541548].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author alvinnmarsh
    The fact is constantly changing, no one can have all the facts on a subject or situation. We believe that our efforts to make the best decision base or on the basis of what we already know the facts or submitted, but it still does not guarantee you make the right decision or believe is correct.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4539628].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
    You don't understand the meaning of the word fact.

    It is merely what is BELIEVED to be true.

    fact (fkt)n.1. Something believed to be true or real:


    Einstein's theory of relativity was a fact until it was discovered that it is incorrect.

    Please refer to Stephen Hawkins for the definition of a fact and that yes indeed facts are changing every day.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4541604].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
      Originally Posted by PatrickP View Post

      You don't understand the meaning of the word fact.

      It is merely what is BELIEVED to be true.

      fact (fkt)n.1. Something believed to be true or real:


      Einstein's theory of relativity was a fact until it was discovered that it is incorrect.

      Please refer to Stephen Hawkins for the definition of a fact and that yes indeed facts are changing every day.
      Hawkins is refering to what we understand as facts up to this point. In other words, our perceptions. We write the facts down in a book and call them facts...until we find out we were wrong then we re-write the fact in the next edition of the book. Again what happens there is the real fact never changed...our perception of it changes. The theory of relativity....whatever it was Einstein was testing didn't change....our understanding of it changed. His perception was simply wrong about the fact.

      The above definition of fact, sounds to me exactly like the definition of perception. To say that fact is what one believes to be true, is equal to saying "I believe this, therefore it is a fact and true"

      If that were the case, then the easter bunny and santa claus should actually exist.

      Perhaps we should replace the word fact with something else...a word that describes something that cannot change and cannot be effected by perception or belief. Give me such a word to use and I will feel better
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4542108].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
    Facts are like statistics. 50% of the time they are not true lol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4541926].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      Originally Posted by PatrickP View Post

      Facts are like statistics. 50% of the time they are not true lol
      @Patrick,

      I believe that is moreso a "theory" or "opinion".

      It's not a fact that 50% of the time facts aren't true. Nor is it a fact that any fact is absolute.

      Even statistics aren't really "facts". Statistics can be easily flawed. Now we are told that 100,000 people voting on something are likely going to be the same result of 1,000,000 people voting on something (percentage wise).

      Now we won't bring politics into this. But there always possibilities that there are scnearios that aren't considered.

      What if 20,000 of those 100,000 people (even thouhg seeming absolutely different) had similar experiences in their life? Whiles 800,000 out of the 1,000,000 had different experiences.

      Anyhow this is just a random note to consider. I don't feel like going way deep into it Just consider it next time you hear something. It's not a fact that 4 out of 5 dentists prefer Crest toothpaste. But maybe 4,016.32 out of every 5,205.21 dentists do? But just because this is considered a "fact" doesn't mean it's an absolute. The doctors could be lieing. But then does that means it's a fact that they are lieing? Maybe not to others, but to them maybe it's a fact.

      It's confusing but a lot of things refer to perception.
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4546172].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ibnujusup
    my theories of facts is that fact is still an unproved but acceptable theories :-) it only approved on certain time scale.. when a new data or research collected, the fact will became updated..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4543072].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Roaddog
    Here is Wiki on facts...but for a fact, I'm not sure it's really there...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4546243].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post

      Here is Wiki on facts...but for a fact, I'm not sure it's really there...
      It would be interesting to find out that it's not even there. It's just perception of the person being presented with the website.

      Ha. I know others are going to say they see it too, but what if the world actually does "revolve" around each person. Not saying that's realistic, but it sounds like an interesting scenario
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4546258].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
      @RoadDog, well I perceive it as there. But from what Steve says, it makes me wonder if it's really there as someone whom is blind (I'm nearly blind without contacts) might not see it.
      Signature

      My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4647171].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Christine2011
    I only understand "facts" as based on reality. But with the different ideas presented, I got new insights...

    Thanks for sharing guys
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4546348].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author michael26a
    What an interesting thread I believe in facts if they can be backed up by proven research. A fact by definition is something that has been proven to be true. If a fact isn't real, then it cannot be a fact, it must be an opinion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4547564].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author uebomoyi
    I believe we are powerful beings who are capable of doing anything we set our mind to. If we laser focus on something like the sun's rays going through a magnifying glass, I believe we can accomplish anything. Our potential is unlimited and the only limitations we have are those which we place on ourselves. The only facts I think there are are just the laws like the law of gravity and such.

    James
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4647774].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MsMystic
    The Fact is I need help how to promote my blog.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4746557].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rick B
    Any Judge or Lawyer will tell you that eye-witness testimony is the most unreliable form of evidence. For that reason I'm extremely reluctant to believe in something simply because other people say it's so.

    I always think of a case that was in the news a decade or two ago. A man was convicted of robbing a Kentucky Fried Chicken and killing someone in the process. He was obviously guilty because more than a dozen eye-witnesses swore that they were positive he was the perpetrator. Then several years later a guy who looked similar admitted to the crime and other evidence substantiated his admission.

    Or what about all of the sailors of yesteryear who swore that they saw the edge of the Earth during a sea voyage? Then later we discovered that the Earth is round and has no edge.

    Or the people who swear that they saw the faces of aliens inside their flying saucer and then some guy admits that the ufo was a Japanese Lantern that he set off as a hoax.

    Some of those witnesses were liars and some of them simply saw something that they couldn't explain so they came up with an explanation that made sense to them. But in any case, they were wrong.

    So much for believing in things just because lots of other people swear it's true.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4756182].message }}

Trending Topics