Anyone worried aboutt the warm winter the whole planet has just had?

82 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Wow....winter has been and gone and i have to say I am worried.

You see unlike many who deny it, I base my decisions on the science.

It's definitely warming up at an alarming rate. Records are being broke it seems monthly now. We had the warmest winter on record, the warmest January, the hottest October day and the warmest March on record..but hey GW skeptics it's all "natural" right? Nothing to concern our-selves with.

And yet......many seem to actually like it or deny it. I haven't heard anyone say "it's worrying"

So..which side are you on? Worried? Liking it?

PS: I can't beleive some of the temps I have seen Northern US states and Canada at this winter. Why has there been very little news about this event?
  • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
    Worried?

    Ummmm.......no.
    Signature
    Professional Googler
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913381].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    OK good for you. One less thing to worry aobut. (G.W.) Probably love 100F+ winters (130F+ summers) LOL won't that be peachy!..Coming soon.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913388].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      OK good for you. One less thing to worry aobut. (G.W.) Probably love 100F+ winters (130F+ summers) LOL won't that be peachy!..Coming soon.
      Beyond my personal control. But I CAN throw a few more ice cubes in the sweet tea...
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913428].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chihuahua
    Nothing for us to do anyway. We can worried all we want but the world leaders keep burning fossil fuels and contribute to the global warming.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913392].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    I hear you...on ethe one hand they want US to switch off lights, drive less (we'll increase fuel prices to save the planet LOL) THEN they go and make airports bigger for the Olympics...What a joke!

    You are dead right....Big oil/politics/greed is in control. Sadly I have come to the same conclusion.

    Still it's sad to think what we are doing now to nature in the name of money.

    Nothing for us to do anyway. We can worried all we want but the world leaders keep burning fossil fuels and contribute to the global warming.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913408].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    so you are clearly on the "Actually like it hotter side of the fence then?"

    See what you say when you get hit by super Hurricanes.. Floods, etc..
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913447].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      so you are clearly on the "Actually like it hotter side of the fence then?"

      See what you say when you get hit by super Hurricanes.. Floods, etc..
      Wow....I had no idea a couple extra ice cubes had such far reaching consequences...

      I should be more careful. :rolleyes:
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913944].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    sadly that seems the attitude of most.....shows how most people go with the flow and pass the buck.

    Beyond my personal control.
    So is death.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913455].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      sadly that seems the attitude of most.....shows how most people go with the flow and pass the buck.

      So is death.
      Love comments like this. Tell us what YOU'RE doing then?

      Last winter, we had record snowfalls where I live. I could not take down my outside Christmas decoratins until March. The year before was not much better. So I LOVED the break this year.

      I remember back when I was a kid - it was the same. Record cold one year, record warm the next.

      Our planet has had several ice ages. Is mankind contributing? Absolutely. Is it only those big evil companies? Hahaha... hardly. But they're worse than, say, you or me.

      So back to your post... instead of smacking people for their "nothing I can do about it" comments, contribute a useful suggestion to show how they CAN help - such as using mass transit one day per week instead of driving by yourself to work (or carpool). Or leave the air conditioner off and use your fan. You get the idea
      Signature

      Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913561].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
    Something is different - you can bet on that. Local weather is crazy all across the globe. Azores anti-cyclone moved north-west, and weather guys/scientists are trying to figure out what happened.

    Now, and since the Azores anti-cyclone moved, Portugal has no north winds like it's usual, and no rain. Craziest dry here, no rain since DECEMBER!

    So YES, worried about my kids, and what will happen next years...
    Signature
    People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913469].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      We just had a week of 70F.+ weather even had a couple of days where it hit 80F. We broke some record highs but only by a degree. Plus even though the whole winter was unusually warm, it was only like the 5th. warmest winter we've had. So no I wasn't worried.
      As far as climate change goes, that's a no brainer really.
      We've been slowly changing the climate for a few hundred years now.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913598].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Mildest winter I can remember in the greater D.C. area and I've seen at least 30 of them.

    70 degree days in December etc.

    No heavy snowstorms this winter - just a couple of dustings - that's it.

    Since we in the USA have one of our two major parties totally denying man-made climate change, ...

    ... I'm worried big-time because if they're anywhere near the levels of national power they ( and their blue-dog friends from the other side of the isle )...

    ... will continue to block any attempt to do something about it here - as they have been doing.


    I'm Hoping For The Best!!

    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913558].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

      Mildest winter I can remember in the greater D.C. area and I've seen at least 30 of them.

      70 degree days in December etc.

      No heavy snowstorms this winter - just a couple of dustings - that's it.

      Since we in the USA have one of our two major parties totally denying man-made climate change, ...

      ... I'm worried big-time because if they're anywhere near the levels of national power they ( and their blue-dog friends from the other side of the isle )...

      ... will continue to block any attempt to do something about it here - as they have been doing.


      I'm Hoping For The Best!!

      TL

      Leave it to TL to turn this into a political discussion

      FWIW, just because people don't think an additional set of taxes will solve this problem doesn't mean they deny it's happening. No matter what Huffington Post may say
      Signature

      Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913579].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

        Leave it to TL to turn this into a political discussion

        FWIW, just because people don't think an additional set of taxes will solve this problem doesn't mean they deny it's happening. No matter what Huffington Post may say


        I gave my analysis as to why I'm worried.

        BTW...


        - We do have major party pres candidates calling man made climate change a hoax.

        - The front runner isn't convinced yet.


        Your taxing comment:


        It's just another issue where some people use the "no higher taxes defense" ...


        ( along with the "total/partial denial" ruse )


        ... to escape responsibly dealing in any way, with a (MAJOR) problem...


        ... as they shill for large corporate interests that don't coincide with the public welfare on many issues.


        Regarding me and the Huff Post...


        All the sites I visit for political info are leaning to the so-called left and I don't mind admitting it since I'm also well aware of the arguments from the other side.


        Lord knows what you've been reading given many of your earlier wacky comments...


        ... for example...


        During the take out OBL thread...


        ...You alluded that the POTUS was out of the loop on the take out OBL mission when that didn't make any sense at all.


        All The Best!!


        TL
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913700].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

          I gave my analysis as to why I'm worried.

          BTW...


          - We do have major party pres candidates calling man made climate change a hoax.

          - The front runner isn't convinced yet.


          Your taxing comment:


          It's just another issue where some people use the "no higher taxes defense" ...


          ( along with the "total/partial denial" ruse )


          ... to escape responsibly dealing in any way, with a (MAJOR) problem...


          ... as they shill for large corporate interests that don't coincide with the public welfare on many issues.


          Regarding me and the Huff Post...


          All the sites I visit for political info are leaning to the so-called left and I don't mind admitting it since I'm also well aware of the arguments from the other side.


          Lord knows what you've been reading given many of your earlier wacky comments...


          ... for example...


          During the take out OBL thread...


          ...You alluded that the POTUS was out of the loop on the take out OBL mission when that didn't make any sense at all.


          All The Best!!


          TL
          TL,

          I don't disagree with you on your points. I believe there is big time climate change going on. And I'm on the "other side" politically than you

          I take issue with your continuing comments that ONLY people on this side deny climate change.

          Many people do, no matter what their political viewpoint. And many people do not, no matter their political viewpoint. You tend to take a "if you disagree with me you are wrong" stance. I simply say, not true.

          I also take issue when people state that if they believe there is climate change, but it's not ALL man made, then they must be denyng (see sloanjims comment to my post for clear example of what I mean).

          It's simply ridiculous sometimes the way this particular argument gets twisted for political benefit. It impedes on looking for real solutions.

          As to your last comment, I alluded that the President was out of the loop until the last moment. And I also stated that it was something I would expect no matter who the President was. Plausible denyibility in case of a screw up.

          Don't let the fact that I am not a liberal convince you that I am against all things liberal. That only serves to skew YOUR viewpoint
          Signature

          Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914068].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
            Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

            TL,

            I don't disagree with you on your points. I believe there is big time climate change going on. And I'm on the "other side" politically than you

            I take issue with your continuing comments that ONLY people on this side deny climate change.

            Many people do no matter what their political viewpoint. And many people do not, no matter their political viewpoint. You tend to take a "if you disagree with me you are wrong" stance. I simply say, not true.

            I also take issue when people state that if they believe there is climate change, but it's not ALL man made, then they must be denyng (see sloanjims comment to my post for clear meaning of what I mean).

            It's simply ridiculous sometimes the way this particular argument gets twisted for political benefit. It impedes on looking for real solutions.

            As to your last comment, I alluded that the President was out of the loop until the last moment. And I also stated that it was something I would expect no matter who the President was. Plausible denyibility in case of a screw up.

            Don't let the fact that I am not a liberal convince you that I am against all things liberal. That only serves to skew YOUR viewpoint


            I'm glad you've finally admitted which way you swing.


            You said...

            I take issue with your continuing comments that ONLY people on this side deny climate change.


            I say...

            take all the issue you want, but the facts of this matter is that you're the exception on your side of the isle, if you believe climate change is man made.


            OK, to be fair, with non elected officials...


            ... it might be 15-30% non-deniers and that leaves a good 70-85% following the party line.


            ( I'm just estimating from my numerous encounters with your type of people )


            But...


            If we're talking about elected officials on the national level, it's a slam dunk.


            I'm talking about damn near every one of them.



            You said...

            As to your last comment, I alluded that the President was out of the loop until the last moment.


            And I also stated that it was something I would expect no matter who the President was.

            Plausible denyibility in case of a screw up.


            I say...


            Still a unsupported position because it would be impossible for the POTUS to deny involvement in any operation of that type.


            It just doesn't make any sense in modern day America.


            All The Best!!

            TL
            Signature

            "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914256].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
              Here's your problem TL.
              take all the issue you want, but the facts of this matter is that you're the exception on your side of the isle, if you believe climate change is man made.
              You really need to understand that for many of us here, there is no side of the isle. Myself, I've been voting and following politics for 40 years. I have never voted because of the party a candidate belonged to, NEVER.
              I don't follow or subscribe to any parties platform and never will.
              When will you understand that both parties carry equal blame for what is going on in this country.
              Signature

              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
              Getting old ain't for sissy's
              As you are I was, as I am you will be
              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914316].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                Here's your problem TL.

                You really need to understand that for many of us here, there is no side of the isle. Myself, I've been voting and following politics for 40 years. I have never voted because of the party a candidate belonged to, NEVER.
                I don't follow or subscribe to any parties platform and never will.
                When will you understand that both parties carry equal blame for what is going on in this country.
                Ditto what Thom said!

                I don't belong to any party and as a matter of fact, I didn't vote in the primary for the first time ever this year because in order to do so, you had to claim a party.

                I couldn't and wouldn't and therefore, didn't.

                Terra
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914349].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Not to this scale Mike or we wouldn't have broken so many records would we? Tell me how many March "winter days in Chicago of 27C almost 90F you have seen in the past?

    Record cold one year, record warm the next.
    Ok...so no matter what happens you will always deny it..good for you. So...you actualy do not believe in the science of it Mike..tha'ts what you ar raelly saying right?
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913599].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Not to this scale Mike or we wouldn't have broken so many records would we? Tell me how many March "winter days in Chicago of 27C almost 90F you have seen in the past?



      Ok...so no matter what happens you will always deny it..good for you. So...you actualy do not believe in the science of it Mike..tha'ts what you ar raelly saying right?

      I'll debate this with you when you learn to:

      A) Read what I post

      B) Don't put words in my mouth.

      Have a good day.
      Signature

      Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914022].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    I wish! No brainer...see how many here will even deny it is man made. Like Old Mikey. He still says it's natural or sun spots, etc... LOL It could hit 100F in Toronto Xmas day and he's say it's natural.

    As far as climate change goes, that's a no brainer really.
    We've been slowly changing the climate for a few hundred years now.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913607].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      I wish! No brainer...see how many here will even deny it is man made. Like Old Mikey. He still says it's natural or sun spots, etc... LOL It could hit 100F in Toronto Xmas day and he's say it's natural.
      Mike didn't deny it.
      Is mankind contributing? Absolutely. Is it only those big evil companies? Hahaha... hardly. But they're worse than, say, you or me.
      But I think he understands that it isn't something new.
      Around here we have weather records going back to 1830.
      So in 180 years we've had 4 winters where the whole winter was warmer then this winter.
      What is laughable is the approach our govts. take to "fix" the problem.
      Yes we need to pollute less, but that isn't going to fix anything on it's own it will only slow things down a little. In addition to that we need to stop all deforestation yesterday and get our asses in gear planting more trees.
      On a personal level, fill your house with plants inside and out.
      There is also some research out there that shows how powerful Fungi are at cleaning pollutants out of the soil. The symbiotic relationship between Fungi and the plant kingdom has been know for a long time.
      So if we pollute less, plant more trees (and stop killing the ones we already have), and use Fungi to clean the soil, we can put a huge dent in the made made pollution. Will that stop the climate change? Nope. But it will make man a much lesser part of it.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913866].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    I think we might be changing it a little faster than "slowly" though...

    We've been slowly changing the climate for a few hundred years now.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913614].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
      When mosquitoes are biting in March, that's a change!

      When Michigan had 3 days in the upper 80's that was warmer than Florida in March, that's a change!

      As a matter of fact, we had 5 days in a row of breaking all time records and one whole week of upper 70's and eighties and broke another record with that.

      Last night everyone had to cover their plants that have come up early because it dropped to 23 degrees over night. The fruit trees like the Cherry trees for instance, couldn't be covered obviously, so I'm worried about the crop, but I agree. What can you do about it?

      Terra
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913684].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    The first step is getting people to realize people are contributing to the issue.

    Personally, I drive as little as possible and am trying to make green energy a focus of my life and my online business.

    For what we can do, I believe in the possibility of "cloud whitening". Despite critics, I believe it's low risk as it's easily reversable. However, it isn't a cure and will only delay global warming.

    https://www.google.com/search?source...0&aqi=g4&pbx=1
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914587].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      The first step is getting people to realize people are contributing to the issue.

      Personally, I drive as little as possible and am trying to make green energy a focus of my life and my online business.

      For what we can do, I believe in the possibility of "cloud whitening". Despite critics, I believe it's low risk as it's easily reversable. However, it isn't a cure and will only delay global warming.

      https://www.google.com/search?source...0&aqi=g4&pbx=1
      Didn't really know much about cloud whitening, thanks for the link.
      It did take a little digging to find exactly what it was without any bias.
      To be honest from the little I read, I wasn't impressed.
      The general gist that I took away from it was that it could lower temperatures. Maybe that's an over simplification, but if that's all it does isn't that like putting on a coat in a drafty house instead of fixing the drafts?
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914827].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        Didn't really know much about cloud whitening, thanks for the link.
        It did take a little digging to find exactly what it was without any bias.
        To be honest from the little I read, I wasn't impressed.
        The general gist that I took away from it was that it could lower temperatures. Maybe that's an over simplification, but if that's all it does isn't that like putting on a coat in a drafty house instead of fixing the drafts?

        Sort of...But I'd say if it's cold, put on that coat until your landlord fixes the drafts.

        Again, it isn't a solution by itself and will only delay global warming. However, it is very cheap, estimates are about $6-7 billion a year if my memory is correct. And it doesn't add any bad chemicals to the environment.

        Also, it isn't permanent. If you stop the process, you revert to the way you were before.

        I see the problems being more political than scientific...There's some countries that will benefit from global warming.
        Signature
        Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
        Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914972].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          Sort of...But I'd say if it's cold, put on that coat until your landlord fixes the drafts.

          Again, it isn't a solution by itself and will only delay global warming. However, it is very cheap, estimates are about $6-7 billion a year if my memory is correct. And it doesn't add any bad chemicals to the environment.

          Also, it isn't permanent. If you stop the process, you revert to the way you were before.

          I see the problems being more political than scientific...There's some countries that will benefit from global warming.
          That's why I said this
          "It did take a little digging to find exactly what it was without any bias."
          I can see it as a tool we can use.
          I think the key to us ending our contribution to climate change is to use all the tools we have and not just hoping doing a couple things will fix the problem. And it really is the responsibility of everyone to do their part.
          If everyone worked on leaving as small a foot print as possible, we would be a lot closer to fixing this problem then we are now.
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915437].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Mike,

    Sure there are "some natural factors" in this....Where did i say it was 100% man made.. BUT I'd say we have over ridden the natural cycles by a long shot. Don'y take my word for it...like you i hold no climate qusalifictions nor studies but please do read some of the scientific papers on it. From real scientists as oppsoed to Mcbloggers who hate Al Gore.

    But I guess according to some they are wrong and we a re right:

    http://www.newscientist.com/topic/climate-change

    As for al lthis "there are natural forces at wrok as well." It's a bit like never looknig after your health as we are al lgoing to die one day anyway....Makes no sense at all. Any how I have found msot people have made thie own minds up, wil lingor ethe science so it's awaste of time trying to reason with them.

    Here's your typical denier:


    Political? I did not merntion anytihng politicall. I don't give a sh88 about politics actually. I do not vite as it's basically a WASTE IOF TIME... It's 99% of the deniers weho start gonig on and on about politics and taxes any way.

    So if G.W is say 70% man made...we should concentrate on the 30% natural things going on? WHY? Explain this theory to me. At least you aren't actually denying it. 10 years ago people wouldn't even admit it. Mayeb in 10 years time peope,will finally accept the truth...? Well I can dream.

    I also take issue when people state that if they believe there is climate change, but it's not "ALL" man made, then they must be denyng (see sloanjims comment to my post for clear example of what I mean).


    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914694].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Mike,

      Sure there are "some natural factors" in this....Where did i say it was 100% man made.. BUT I'd say we have over ridden the natural cycles by a,ong shot now and accelerating it beyond anything we can predict.

      Political? I did not merntion anytihng politicall. I don't give a sh88 about politics actually. I do not vite as it's basically a WASTE IOF TIME... It's 99% of the deniers weho start gonig on and on about politics and taxes any way.

      So if G.W is say 70% man made...we should concentrate on the 30% natural things going on? WHY? Explain this theory to me. At least you aren't actually denying it. 10 years ago people wouldn't even admit it. Mayeb in 10 years time peope,will finally accept the truth...? Well I can dream.
      And THAT is your contribution to that which you fear...
      Signature
      Professional Googler
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914750].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Mike,

      Sure there are "some natural factors" in this....Where did i say it was 100% man made.. BUT I'd say we have over ridden the natural cycles by a,ong shot now and accelerating it beyond anything we can predict.

      Political? I did not merntion anytihng politicall. I don't give a sh88 about politics actually. I do not vite as it's basically a WASTE IOF TIME... It's 99% of the deniers weho start gonig on and on about politics and taxes any way.

      So if G.W is say 70% man made...we should concentrate on the 30% natural things going on? WHY? Explain this theory to me. At least you aren't actually denying it. 10 years ago people wouldn't even admit it. Mayeb in 10 years time peope,will finally accept the truth...? Well I can dream.
      (sigh)

      I was referring to this comment you made:

      Ok...so no matter what happens you will always deny it..good for you. So...you actualy do not believe in the science of it Mike..tha'ts what you ar raelly saying right?

      I never denied G.W. You inferred that I did. You put words in my mouth. When you do things like that, I stop caring about your viewpoint.

      Simple.

      Signature

      Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914918].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Christopher Fox
        You see unlike many who deny it, I base my decisions on the science.
        Are you so certain of that? Or are you and TLTheliberator just parroting what Al Gore told you? Have you spent any time whatsoever looking at the tens of thousands of scientists who are, umm ... what was the word? Oh yes, it was deniers. Do you have any clue what the source of this 'scientific consensus' is? WHo sold it to you?

        I do. And no, I am not a denier, like some skinhead nazi holocaust denier. I just don't fall for every con-man (read:Al Gore and the UN IPCC) that comes along with a bottle of snake oil.

        Tens of thousands of scientists worldwide have signed petitions saying, "umm ... hold on with all of this human caused climate change stuff as we do not think the science supports it."

        A denier? Pffft. Try open minded ....
        Signature
        One man alone can be pretty dumb sometimes, but for real bona fide stupidity, there ain't nothing can beat teamwork.

        - Seldom Seen Smith
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914994].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Kurt
          Originally Posted by Christopher Fox View Post

          Are you so certain of that? Or are you and TLTheliberator just parroting what Al Gore told you? Have you spent any time whatsoever looking at the tens of thousands of scientists who are, umm ... what was the word? Oh yes, it was deniers. Do you have any clue what the source of this 'scientific consensus' is? WHo sold it to you?

          I do. And no, I am not a denier, like some skinhead nazi holocaust denier. I just don't fall for every con-man (read:Al Gore and the UN IPCC) that comes along with a bottle of snake oil.

          Tens of thousands of scientists worldwide have signed petitions saying, "umm ... hold on with all of this human caused climate change stuff as we do not think the science supports it."

          A denier? Pffft. Try open minded ....

          The fact is, of climatologists that are published and peer-reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences, something like 98% believe global warming is man made.

          Of your"10,000's scientists", only a handful are climatologists. Not to mention, there's a lot of "funny" stuff going on with that group.

          Your group of "10,000s scientists" is lead by Art Robinson, who also believes radiation from nuclear plants is good for us. Are you willing to take his word on that subject too?

          Since you have such an open mind, why not spend a little time and get to know Art Robinson, since he's the "head guy" leading the opposing scientists and the person you want to believe. Here he is in an interview with Rachel Maddow:



          You can believe that guy. I won't.
          Signature
          Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
          Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915095].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
    TL,

    Just one clarification to your last response...

    I never said the I believe this is a "man made" problem. What I am saying (to be clear, cause I am tired of being told what I believe - LOL) is that warming and cooling cycles on this planet were going on since before there were man on the planet. There's mountains of evidence to show this.

    However, I ALSO believe that man is indeed making things worse. MUCH worse. I don't actually believe ANY solution will "stop" or "reverse" the warming cycle, but I do believe we can stop the acceleration. One day, the planet will warm. Then it will cool. Just like it has many documented times in the planets history. Nothing we can do to STOP it.

    That's what I believe. To me, that's common sense and basic science I learned in middle school.

    As for the other issue about denying - I don't care. That was an entirely different issue and doesn't belong in this thread - especially if what I "said" will be incorrectly referenced. If you want to discuss that further, open a new thread

    Mike
    Signature

    Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914906].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    And there is a small group of scientist that claim that 1 million mirrors, each a meter in diameter, and strategically placed in space could reflect enough of the sun's rays to cool the planet.

    I don't know enough about this to agree or not, but I give them credit for trying to come up with a solution.

    But compared to the cost of putting a million mirrors in space, I think I'll go with cloud whitening first.
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915016].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
      I drive about 8,000 miles a year. I recycle. I do what I can.

      It is what it is. I'm not going to worry myself sick about something that is
      pretty much out of my control outside of what I'm already doing.

      FWIW, this past October, we were driven out of our home because of a freak
      snowstorm that left us without power for 4 days.

      Global Warming?

      I'm not exactly 100% convinced.

      I've had more than my fair share of days freezing my ass off.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915092].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by Steven Wagenheim View Post

        I drive about 8,000 miles a year. I recycle. I do what I can.

        It is what it is. I'm not going to worry myself sick about something that is
        pretty much out of my control outside of what I'm already doing.

        FWIW, this past October, we were driven out of our home because of a freak
        snowstorm that left us without power for 4 days.

        Global Warming?

        I'm not exactly 100% convinced.

        I've had more than my fair share of days freezing my ass off.
        Hey Steven,

        Global warming doesn't mean every day will be warmer on average. As a matter of fact, global warming means there will be more extreme weather, including record lows...But the over-all average temps will rise in MOST places.

        Here's an example of extreme weather: In Feb, we broke a record for most snow in that month here.

        In March, which is our snowiest month, we haven't gotten a single flake and the temps have been about 10-15 degrees above normal almost every day. Again, we haven't seen a single flake in our snowiest month, after setting an all-time record the previous month.
        Signature
        Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
        Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915172].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          Hey Steven,

          Global warming doesn't mean every day will be warmer on average. As a matter of fact, global warming means there will be more extreme weather, including record lows...But the over-all average temps will rise in MOST places.

          Here's an example of extreme weather: In Feb, we broke a record for most snow in that month here.

          In March, which is our snowiest month, we haven't gotten a single flake and the temps have been about 10-15 degrees above normal almost every day. Again, we haven't seen a single flake in our snowiest month, after setting an all-time record the previous month.
          I guess I need to do some reading up on exactly what global warming is
          supposed to be. I'll be the first to admit that when it comes to all this
          science stuff I'm not exactly a wiz kid.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915233].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Why would I agree with what less than 0.5% who disagree whrn 99.5% agree it is real?

    Can you tell me why I should believe the scientists who deny it as opposed to vast majority who agree upon it? Please, educate me!

    Are you so certain of that? Or are you and TLTheliberator just parroting what Al Gore told you? Have you spent any time whatsoever looking at the tens of thousands of scientists who are, umm ... what was the word? Oh yes, it was deniers. Do you have any clue what the source of this 'scientific consensus' is? WHo sold it to you?

    I do. And no, I am not a denier, like some skinhead nazi holocaust denier. I just don't fall for every con-man (read:Al Gore and the UN IPCC) that comes along with a bottle of snake oil.

    Tens of thousands of scientists worldwide have signed petitions saying, "umm ... hold on with all of this human caused climate change stuff as we do not think the science supports it."

    A denier? Pffft. Try open minded ....
    See typical response. Al Gore is thrown in....sigh....just ignore the vast majority of scientific proof of man made G.W.

    Instead of ranting why not simply read the science of it (take biases, politics out) and make your OWN mind up!
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915041].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Hmm.. They once beleived the world was flat and the earth was the centre of the Universe.....glad the real scirentists proved them wrong as opposed to "making things up"

    It's all answered here with real science. Not biased opinion. FACT!

    Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915134].message }}
  • usufruct
    u·su·fruct   [yoo-zoo-fruhkt, -soo-, yooz-yoo-, yoos-]
    (noun) Roman and Civil Law .
    the right of enjoying all the advantages derivable from the use of something that belongs to another, as far as is compatible with the substance of the thing not being destroyed or injured.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915142].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Yeah it's amazing..we should ignore the 98% and believe the 2% (who are mostly driven by big oil anyway)

    The fact is, of climatologists that are published and peer-reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences, something like 98% believe global warming is man made.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915144].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    I watched a documentary about a G.W skeptic last year. He went all ove rthe world chear leading groups into takknig about how much G.W was really B*S*

    So..at the end they get himtogetehr with areal climate scientist to discuss their opinions. The scientist made mince meat out of his arguement. He was speechless at the end. Couldn't back any of his "points of view" up with any kind of research at all. At the end he admitted. OK G.W is real and it is man made "but it isn't going to be that bad." UNBELIEVable!

    I'd bet my house the science will trump over any "point of views" held by the few.

    The fact is, of climatologists that are published and peer-reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences, something like 98% believe global warming is man made.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915173].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Her'es the deniers Top ranked excuses:

    1) The climate changed before
    2) It's the sun
    3) It's not bad
    4) There's no consencus
    5) It's cooling
    6) The moduls conflict
    7) Temp record is unreliable
    8) Animals and plants can adapt
    9) It hasn't warmed since 1998
    10) Antartica is gaining ice
    11) F** you Al Gore lover!

    EVERY one of these "arguements" is shot down to little pices using real scitenific proof. (well al lexcept the last one)

    Still...
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915204].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Her'es the deniers Top ranked excuses:

      1) The climate changed before
      2) It's the sun
      3) It's not bad
      4) There's no consencus
      5) It's cooling
      6) The moduls conflict
      7) Temp record is unreliable
      8) Animals and plants can adapt
      9) It hasn't warmed since 1998
      10) Antartica is gaining ice
      11) F** you Al Gore lover!

      EVERY one of these "arguements" is shot down to little pices using real scitenific proof. (well al lexcept the last one)

      Still...
      12. Researches are faking the evidence so they can get government grants.


      I love this one...Classic ad homenim attack/logical fallacy. First, no one has ever proven a single incident of this and they just throw out allegations.

      Second, they base this on an assumption that scientists are greedy, but Big Oil isn't and only has our best interests in mind. The truth is, any of these scientists could get hired by Big Oil tomorrow and make twice as much money as they do as researchers.
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915265].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    of course doesn't Russia want the arctic sea to open up new trade routes? Big oil (i.e Bush family) can throw hundreds of millions at fake PR...and look how people love it.

    any..if anyone kepy an open mind and read this i am sure they would be convinced about it all. But they wont. Best to ignore the science and keep denying it.

    Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915299].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Mike, I have read your comments again..So what are you saying? It's natural? We are only controibuting alittle to it? Is that what you claim? Where are your sources to this claim. I'd like to read it.

    Here's mine:
    What does past climate change tell us about global warming?

    Share your please.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915312].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Mike, I have read your comments again..So what are you saying? It's natural? We are only controibuting alittle to it? Is that what you claim? Where are your sources to this claim. I'd like to read it.

      Here's mine:
      What does past climate change tell us about global warming?

      Share your please.
      Once again, putting words in my mouth.

      Like I said before - have a nice day
      Signature

      Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915554].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
    Banned
    As far as I know the Planet goes though natural cycles of being warmer than others (when you look at the big picture).

    And we could just be experiencing one of those cycles¾which would mean the warm weather is perfectly normal.
    Signature
    "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915414].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
    Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

    Wow....winter has been and gone and i have to say I am worried.

    You see unlike many who deny it, I base my decisions on the science.
    A decision to worry is based on science? :confused:

    Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

    It's definitely warming up at an alarming rate.

    ...I haven't heard anyone say "it's worrying"

    So..which side are you on? Worried? Liking it?
    Sounds like more emotion than science.

    Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

    PS: I can't beleive some of the temps I have seen Northern US states and Canada at this winter. Why has there been very little news about this event?

    Let's have a look beyond our own back yard.

    Google: winter weather in europe

    Some first page results,

    Eastern Europe scrambles to deal with brutal winter - CNN.com

    Europe freezes in cold winter weather | World news | The Guardian

    Extreme cold weather hits Europe - The Big Picture - Boston.com

    Heathrow cancels flights as snow blankets London - CNN

    Europe Continues to Suffer Severe Winter Weather | Europe | English

    Winter Weather Brings Deaths and Disrupts Travel in Europe ...

    Winter Travel to Europe - Low Season Highs from Europe for Visitors

    Why winter is mild in the U.S., frigid in Europe - CBS News

    Winter weather's deadly toll across Europe | News.com.au


    Joe Mobley
    Signature

    .

    Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915432].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    As far as I know the Planet goes though natural cycles of being warmer than others (when you look at the big picture).

    And we could just be experiencing one of those cycles¾which would mean the warm weather is perfectly normal.
    Oh and the ten+ billions tonnes of annual CO2 we create....just washes away in the rain? What's natural about cars, aircraft, churning through 3 million tones of fossil fuels in one year? The earth can cope with that no prob's? No effect?

    .....ever think about that?

    What many deniers simply overlook is this:

    CO2 in the atmosphere increase temp by trapping heat.

    We are creating billions of tonnes of it.

    Temp is increasing..

    And yet..according to them, there is no link....Expalon this to me. With references to back your claims. I would love to understand why not.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915441].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
      Banned
      Well that's something I do agree on. I think we should eliminate pollution.

      However I'm just not certain how much fossil fuels are actually responsible for the warm weather.
      Signature
      "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915459].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Oh and the ten+ billions tonnes of annual CO2 we create....just wahes away in the rain? What';s natural about cars, aircraft, churning thorugh 3 million tones of fossil fuels in one year? The earth can cope with that no prob's? No effect?

      .....ever think about that?
      The irony is the earth can cope with it with no problems, us not so much
      The long term effect would be, we would become extinct and the earth would gradual restore itself.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915588].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Oh and the ten+ billions tonnes of annual CO2 we create....just washes away in the rain? What's natural about cars, aircraft, churning through 3 million tones of fossil fuels in one year? The earth can cope with that no prob's? No effect?

      .....ever think about that?

      What many deniers simply overlook is this:

      CO2 in the atmosphere increase temp by trapping heat.

      We are creating billions of tonnes of it.

      Temp is increasing..

      And yet..according to them, there is no link....Expalon this to me. With references to back your claims. I would love to understand why not.
      I dropped this link in the other climate change thread. This article was just posted today and provides some discomfort to the CO2 argument.

      Global warming: Earth heated up in medieval times without human CO2 emissions | Mail Online

      Certainly, there are some man-made causes, but they may not be as significant as we think.
      Signature

      Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915821].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sloanjim
    Typical Joe, Heathrow had one day of snow in a warm winter and that's the story you use to debunk man made G.W....i am not surprised.. Ignore the pure science and keep finding those excuses.


    Dude it was 3" snow in one night (and that was it for the whole of winter ) LOL Oh Hold the press G.W has been disproven by that!

    Heathrow canceled about three out of 10 flights Sunday as several inches of snow fell on London overnight
    R.O.F.L.

    I think you fit into the "It's not actually warming" excuse.
    Signature

    15 Minute Forex Bar Trading System Free at
    http://www.fxscalpingmethod.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915468].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cashtree
    warm winter EPIC cold spring day today. Can't wait for another scientist to tell me there is no global warming.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916186].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
      Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

      Here's your problem TL.

      You really need to understand that for many of us here, there is no side of the isle. Myself, I've been voting and following politics for 40 years. I have never voted because of the party a candidate belonged to, NEVER.
      I don't follow or subscribe to any parties platform and never will.
      When will you understand that both parties carry equal blame for what is going on in this country.
      Same here, Thom. I've always thought party politics let individual politicians avoid responsibility to some degree, and encourage people to vote without actually knowing the issues. That's part of why we're in the mess we're in, because a big chunk of the voting public doesn't bother about the issues, they just show up on election day and vote their party. That's a recipe for trouble, IMO.

      Originally Posted by sloanjim View Post

      Here's your typical denier:

      YouTube - Broadcast Yourself
      That's odd, because I wouldn't call Newt "typical" about much of anything.
      Signature

      Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917065].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill View Post

        Same here, Thom. I've always thought party politics let individual politicians avoid responsibility to some degree, and encourage people to vote without actually knowing the issues. That's part of why we're in the mess we're in, because a big chunk of the voting public doesn't bother about the issues, they just show up on election day and vote their party. That's a recipe for trouble, IMO.



        That's odd, because I wouldn't call Newt "typical" about much of anything.


        And I remember you saying something to the effect of...



        I don't vote the party, I vote the man.


        Which is laughable... ( and I did laugh when I read it - thanks! )


        ... since anyone paying attention knows...


        ...the man is the party and the party is the man and exceptions are awfully hard to find.


        You may find a national pol breaking with his party on minor issues but not on a bunch of major issues.


        If he does, he's certainly not going anywhere within the party.


        That may even work on the local level but on the national level that sentiment is ludicrous.


        All The Best!!

        TL
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917265].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

          And I remember you saying something to the effect of...



          I don't vote the party, I vote the man.


          Which is laughable... ( and I did laugh when I read it - thanks! )


          ... since anyone paying attention knows...


          ...the man is the party and the party is the man and exceptions are awfully hard to find.


          You may find a national pol breaking with his party on minor issues but not on a bunch of major issues.


          If he does, he's certainly not going anywhere within the party.


          That may even work on the local level but on the national level that sentiment is ludicrous.


          All The Best!!

          TL
          Thanks for the ridicule. Coming from someone as biased as you seem to be that really means a lot to me. :rolleyes:

          It works reasonalby well on a local level, around here at least. Many are more than willing to break from party lines when they know it's an issue that carries a lot of weight with the voters.

          Have you considered that the only way to change things is to quit being a predictable drone and voice and vote for something beside the party?

          On a national level, it doesn't work as well, but at least there's a standard I follow. I have voted republican, democrat, and even a few odd parties based on the person rather than the party. Have you got anything better to go by, or do you just like to criticize others?

          That you find my attempts to vote for the best candidate so amusing says a lot more about you than it does me.

          Edited to add: By the way, voting for the person isn't confined to political issues. It also includes things like corruption and personal values. Since you apparently vote along party lines, maybe those kinds of things don't concern you.
          Signature

          Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917553].message }}
      • Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill View Post

        Same here, Thom. I've always thought party politics let individual politicians avoid responsibility to some degree, and encourage people to vote without actually knowing the issues. That's part of why we're in the mess we're in, because a big chunk of the voting public doesn't bother about the issues, they just show up on election day and vote their party. That's a recipe for trouble, IMO.

        That's odd, because I wouldn't call Newt "typical" about much of anything.
        Gingrich campaign resorts to charging for photos with Newt

        1 hr ago
        ​The cash-strapped Newt Gingrich campaign has seized upon a new fundraising scheme: Supporters now have to pay $50 to take a photo with the GOP candidate. Photos with Newt were previously free. A spokesman tells the National Journal: "Some campaigns make you travel all the way to Wall Street to pay $2,500 for a photo with a candidate. We are trying out a new tactic and asking our supporters at rallies for a nominal donation. And guess what; it's working." The Gingrich campaign is $1.6 million in debt, election finance reports show, more than any of his three rivals for the GOP nomination.

        Gingrich campaign resorts to charging for photos with Newt - msnNOW
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917294].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    A better term for the phenomena is "climate change".


    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916301].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author garyv
      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

      A better term for the phenomena is "climate change".


      TL

      Of course it is - because then you're covered no matter what the weather does right?

      1977 - Beware of Global Ice-Age!

      No wait!!....


      1997 - Beware of Global Warming!


      Dangit!.......


      2007 - Beware of Climate Change!


      Really? The climate is going to change? You don't say! LOL
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917577].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by garyv View Post

        Of course it is - because then you're covered no matter what the weather does right?

        1977 - Beware of Global Ice-Age!

        No wait!!....


        1997 - Beware of Global Warming!


        Dangit!.......


        2007 - Beware of Climate Change!


        Really? The climate is going to change? You don't say! LOL

        Climate change is the best way the describe the happening because due to man's society we are exacerbating the situation and plus...

        ... there are idiots out here that say silly stuff like...


        We got 3X more snow than we usually get , what happened to Global Warming??


        All The Best!!

        TL


        Ps. Gary is an denier and believes man is not exacerbating the situation.

        If I'm wrong Gary, please correct me.
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917678].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author garyv
          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

          Ps. Gary is an denier and believes man is not exacerbating the situation.

          If I'm wrong Gary, please correct me.

          Obviously you didn't read the post I made right before your accusatory post. And you make it easy to see why there's rarely constructive consensus on this subject.

          I don't know of many people that don't believe that man is helping to exacerbate the situation. However - some of us are not naive enough to let the fear-mongers pick our pockets.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917794].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
            Originally Posted by garyv View Post

            Obviously you didn't read the post I made right before your accusatory post. And you make it easy to see why there's rarely constructive consensus on this subject.

            I don't know of many people that don't believe that man is helping to exacerbate the situation. However - some of us are not naive enough to let the fear-mongers pick our pockets.


            I guess you were writing your post while I was writing my post.

            I just wanted you to be clear on your position.

            TL
            Signature

            "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917831].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by garyv View Post

        Of course it is - because then you're covered no matter what the weather does right?

        1977 - Beware of Global Ice-Age!

        No wait!!....


        1997 - Beware of Global Warming!


        Dangit!.......


        2007 - Beware of Climate Change!


        Really? The climate is going to change? You don't say! LOL
        A very simplistic post.

        Let's actually examine the facts. In 1977 (45 years ago) researches found increasing carbons from man-made sources in our air.

        At the time, they theorized that these would block the sun, causing the earth to cool.

        However, as time went on, they found that the Earth's temps were rising, so they reformed their theory and what they found was that carbons don't block heat, but rather they trap the heat. This is called the "green house effect".

        But what people like Gary live to conveniently omit, is that even 45 years ago, the researchers were right about the carbons. And this part of the equation has NEVER changed.

        BTW Gary...The use of "climate change" is simply a term to try to get people like you to understand that "global warming" doesn't mean every day, every place will be warmer and that sometimes in some places record cold is part of global warming.

        But while you're trying to play word games, as if that proves anything, keep buying and burning oil. Keep sending money over seas. Keep having to pay the military to defend that oil and don't count the cost of life and limb into the price of a tank of gas. Keep denying that burning fossil fuels pollutes my air and causes many diseases and health problems or the effect oil spills have on oceans and the associated economies.

        BTW, did you notice in the last paragraph above I mentioned some serious problems associated with carbons? And I didn't even mention climate change a single time.
        Signature
        Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
        Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917921].message }}
  • Crisis? What Crisis?

    This Album was released in 1975
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916329].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
    And this is from 1977:


    Signature

    Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916447].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Let me answer you Thom...

    You said...

    Originally Posted by ThomM

    Here's your problem TL.

    You really need to understand that for many of us here, there is no side of the isle.

    Myself, I've been voting and following politics for 40 years.

    I have never voted because of the party a candidate belonged to, NEVER.

    I don't follow or subscribe to any parties platform and never will.



    When will you understand that both parties carry equal blame for what is going on in this country.


    I say...

    Your independent streak is laudable - that's great, but if you plan on participating in the national elections you and all your independent friends will have to make a choice - one way or the other.


    Who's the problem???


    I disagree with your take on the present situation.

    Why??

    Because one group clearly inherited this mess ( just like they did in 1932 )...


    ...and is trying to clean it up and one group has been playing the obstructionist card from day 1.

    BTW...

    Many pols show at least 60% of independents agree that one group has been playing the obstructionist card and it's slowing down the country's recovery.

    Even 30-40% of registered republicans have agreed.


    In the 50's until 1980 the parties were mostly on the same page and the differences were small.



    That's not the case anymore.


    They are diametrically opposed to each other on most issues, especially what type of society America should be and the role of the fed gov.


    For example...

    Most people who seriously distrust the fed gov will lean to the right and most people who think the fed gov can be a great tool for national prosperity lean to the left.


    Fantasy Island...

    Pretending there are no major differences between the two makes no sense whatsoever and lots of so-called independents are guilty of that.


    If you can get over the hump of pretending that there are no major differences between the two parties...

    ...then you can start to compare the completely different set of attitudes that lead to policies that lead to outcomes for the citizenry and make informed choices.

    All The Best!!


    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917556].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
      Can someone direct me to the post where someone said that there were no differences between the parties? I can't seem to find it. :confused:

      Terra
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917589].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by MissTerraK View Post

        Can someone direct me to the post where someone said that there were no differences between the parties? I can't seem to find it. :confused:

        Terra

        No one actually said it but Thom said this...


        When will you understand that both parties carry equal blame for what is going on in this country.

        All The Best!!

        TL
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917626].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

          No one actually said it but Thom said this...


          When will you understand that both parties carry equal blame for what is going on in this country.

          All The Best!!

          TL
          Oh! Thanks!

          Well, we can hardly argue that statement considering that we have had both republicans and democrats in office in recent history and are continuing to decline. Well, IMHO anyway.

          Terra
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917699].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Snappinn
    this winter in my country (Iceland) we had more snow that we have had for last 10 years, but the last 10 years we had almost no snow, the winters had become warmer and the summers have also become warmer except last summer it was pretty cold.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917624].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author garyv
    Of course there are going to be some effects on our climate caused by man, but you're just blind if you don't see the huge money and politics behind making this a hysteria. Just ask the G.E.s and Solyndras of this Country how much they've profited from the Al Gores of politics. There's huge money in fear mongering - on both sides of the aisle.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917646].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by garyv View Post

      Of course there are going to be some effects on our climate caused by man, but you're just blind if you don't see the huge money and politics behind making this a hysteria. Just ask the G.E.s and Solyndras of this Country how much they've profited from the Al Gores of politics. There's huge money in fear mongering - on both sides of the aisle.

      Some effects?????????????????????


      We're blanking up the planet at an alarming rate.



      Guess what Gary?


      - Somebody made money when we built the canals.

      - Somebody made money when we built the transcontinental railroad.

      - Somebody made money when we built hover dam.

      - Somebody made money when we built the TVA.

      - Somebody made money when we built our national highway system.

      - Somebody made money when we entered and conducted the space race.


      Colleges made money when the fed gov via the GI Bill helped turn this nation from a nation where only 6% of the adults had a college degree to a place where 20% of the population had one in less than 20 years.


      And somebody is going to make money if we ever transition to a more green economy and all that entails.


      Big money is going to be made by someone/companies on almost any pivotal issue.


      The question is by whom and will the proposed and implemented solutions really improve the quality of life of the population.


      All The Best!!

      TL
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917821].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by garyv View Post

      Of course there are going to be some effects on our climate caused by man, but you're just blind if you don't see the huge money and politics behind making this a hysteria. Just ask the G.E.s and Solyndras of this Country how much they've profited from the Al Gores of politics. There's huge money in fear mongering - on both sides of the aisle.
      And just ask Exxon and BP how much they've profited from the deniers.
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917841].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tina Golden
    Did the rule against political discussion get revoked?
    Signature
    Discover how to have fabulous, engaging content with
    Fast & Easy Content Creation
    ***Especially if you don't have enough time, money, or just plain HATE writing***
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917742].message }}

Trending Topics