Indiana law allows people to legally shoot the police!

15 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Just when you think you've heard it all...

“If I pull over a car and I walk up to it and the guy shoots me, he’s going to say, ‘Well, he was trying to illegally enter my property,’” Sergeant Joseph Hubbard tells Bloomberg. “Somebody is going get away with killing a cop because of this law.”

“It’s just a recipe for disaster,” Indiana State Fraternal Order of Police President Tim Downs adds. “It just puts a bounty on our heads.”
Indiana legalizes shooting cops
  • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
    A typical sensationalist headline that in no way describes the actual facts.

    Personally, I'm glad the Indiana legislature did it. A state supreme court ruling that a citizen basically does not have the right to resist unlawful actions by police was the catalyst.

    If all law enforcement personnel were angels and never did wrong, I might feel differently. But we all know they're not.
    Signature

    The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

    Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6418729].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    As militant as our police have become, they need laws like this to slow them down again. The amount of people being brutalized and even killed for no good or just reason recently is just ridiculous. They aren't even careful anymore about which home they are raiding. When you have to fear that they will hurt you every time they come near you, it's time for laws to protect us from them.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6419124].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author All Night Cafe
      Dennis, are you saying what I think you saying.

      On our next vactation come to Indiana? For say
      traget pratice. Is that what you are suggesting us warriors do?

      lol

      Good one for a laugh today.

      Thanks
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6419140].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
        Originally Posted by All Night Cafe View Post

        Dennis, are you saying what I think you saying.

        On our next vactation come to Indiana? For say
        traget pratice. Is that what you are suggesting us warriors do?

        lol

        Good one for a laugh today.

        Thanks
        I didn't say anything other than, "Just when you think you've heard it all." Everything you wrote is from your own mind and has nothing to do with me.

        I heard the story on the news on the radio and posted the first link I found about it, and intentionally posted without comment to see where people would go with it. I find doing that interesting on several levels.

        - What direction with the thread initially take?
        - Who will be the first to go against the initial direction?
        - Who will think critically?

        ...and so forth. I'm easily amused.
        Signature

        Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6422672].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jennifer82
    This just reflect the real people's public servant, too bad it will never happen here. It lead the contrary in our country.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6419154].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BulletheadX
    The problem here is that even the gas company guy can legally enter your property without your consent or knowledge under certain conditions. Tax assessors, building inspectors, animal control, Child Protective Services... it's a long list.

    "... any public servant is now subject to be met with deadly force if they unlawfully enter private property without clear justification."

    I can think of all kinds of scenarios where the public servant would have "clear justification" and the homeowner would be completely ignorant of it. There's the rub.

    Reading between the lines it appears that this legislation is about giving a deserving person a legal 'out' instead of the sort of "strict liability" interpretation of that court, essentially saying "If you shoot a cop you're guilty" regardless of circumstances.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6419269].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
      Originally Posted by BulletheadX View Post

      The problem here is that even the gas company guy can legally enter your property without your consent or knowledge under certain conditions. Tax assessors, building inspectors, animal control, Child Protective Services... it's a long list.

      "... any public servant is now subject to be met with deadly force if they unlawfully enter private property without clear justification."

      I can think of all kinds of scenarios where the public servant would have "clear justification" and the homeowner would be completely ignorant of it. There's the rub.

      Reading between the lines it appears that this legislation is about giving a deserving person a legal 'out' instead of the sort of "strict liability" interpretation of that court, essentially saying "If you shoot a cop you're guilty" regardless of circumstances.
      I think you might want to do a little investigation - there are NOT 'all kinds of scenarios' where a public servant can forcibly and lawfully enter private property. There are very few, in fact. There are virtually NO circumstances where a private citizen (gas company employee, or the cable guy, etc.) can forcibly enter private property.

      None of your 'long list' qualifies, not even CPS in most states. CPS (in Idaho, I know this for a fact) can forcibly enter only when accompanied by law enforcement personnel and even then only when an emergency clearly exists and loss of life or bodily endangerment is imminent.

      The gas guy or the electric meter reader can't jump a fence, or break a lock just to read a meter. If there are covenants or laws that guarantee them access, they still have to jump through the proper legal hoops and be accompanied by law enforcement.

      Tax men, building inspectors, etc., can not forcibly enter private property, but there can be dire consequences if you DON'T let them enter...you might find your business license yanked, for instance, or a permit to occupy revoked
      Signature

      The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

      Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6422478].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author BulletheadX
        Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

        I think you might want to do a little investigation
        I'm not going to spend a lot of time assembling chapter and verse- you can do that for yourself if you want to- but we spent quite a bit of time going over this very topic (and the many court cases associated with it) in law school. Based on those real-life cases and their rulings, I stand by my statement.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6424091].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author The 13th Warrior
          Originally Posted by David Maschke View Post


          Anyone with a gun better know when lethal force is justified. The excuse, " I was scared and shot the hell out of him" probably won't cut it.

          Um...., that's EXACTLY the law in Florida, though it is directed at citizens and not directed at Law Enforcement Officers...,... yet.


          Originally Posted by Jennifer82 View Post


          This just reflect the real people's public servant, too bad it will never happen here. It lead the contrary in our country.

          Not yet.

          The more the abuse and incompetence of government..., people can only take so much, even in a totalitarian government..., when the people get fed up, no force, militarily or otherwise , can stop revolution, it is an irresistable and inevitable force.

          ...."people can only take so much", is simply a mathematical/physics circumstance.., 5 pounds of crap can't fit into a 1 ounce bag without consequences, either the destruction of the bag, the regurgitation of said contents in the opposite direction, or damage to both bag and the one who is stuffing it.

          The only key for totalitarian/monetary power for longer enslavement and abuse is lie's and dis-unity.

          When the population is TRULY tired and can't take anymore, lie's and dis-unity quickly lose their stopping power, but the key is TRULY TIRED.


          The 13th Warrior
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6424178].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author David Maschke
    I don't know what the laws in that particular state, but usually there must be three conditions to use deadly force...

    1. Ability
    2. Opportunity
    3. Immediate and imminent threat

    Anyone with a gun better know when lethal force is justified. The excuse, " I was scared and shot the hell out of him" probably won't cut it.
    Signature

    I

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6419448].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author alivestock
    i think that the police is a certified robbers .thats all .cause they can do what they want and no body can ask them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6422896].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    I thought about starting this thread, but decided not to.

    I know a guy that GRANTED acted like a jerk, etc... I'm sure he was like that as a kid. Apparently he saw a cop once and somehow let the cop, who was a family friend, know that he knew where he lived, and the cop got on his case as if it were a THREAT! He was barely a teenager at the time. They were NEVER the same.

    Apparently some people have gotten doors knocked down, apparently even MULTIPLE TIMES, only to be told "sorry".

    I understand the policemens concerns! Investigations are harder/riskier. Accidents can happen so they end up dead. They may hesitate!

    But understand the concerns of honoring that! Burglaries/murders are easier/safer. Accidents DID happen so people ended up dead or injured! People hesitated!

    The court did NOT say it was OK to shoot cops! They said it was NOT ok to prosecute an innocent person for shooting a cop that was there illegitimately! There is a VERY big difference! And THAT is why the idea of cops even came up! If you so much as SCRATCHED a cop, you could be in serious trouble, EVEN if THEY broke the law!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6422960].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Basically all that this law is saying is that just because you are in uniform it does not give you the right to terrorize or abuse citizens. There are way too many thinking that as long as they are in uniform, they can do anything they want to to us and we have to just moo like a cow and accept the abuse.

    There is a rash of crime going on now that cops are shooting family dogs - not ATTACKING animals, but just dogs that happen to be around when the cop is. Does anyone think that we should just stand by and allow someone to shoot a loved family pet just because the guy wants to shoot it and has a uniform on? This is an act of indoctrination that precedes humans being shot at will instead of because they are dangerous. It's NOT a precedent we need to be going on in this country when the threat of martial law is becoming so strong.

    When I worked at the crisis center our statistics showed that there are a very high level of rapes committed by cops. We used to teach women not to EVER get into a cop car until the cop had called in to the station and told them they would be in the car -- and until there was an answer from the station that was AUDIBLE to the woman. That was back in 1979/80 - way before the police force had been militarized.

    Look at TSA. You give a few high school grads a badge and they take the right to commit vile acts of molestation and feel justified doing it just because they have the badge.

    The constitution guarantees us the right to secure our property. If anyone can steal from us, beat us, rape us, kill us, just because they wear a badge and feel like it -- that is a point that we have to finally admit we are slaves. I'm not ready to lay down and spread just because a pervert with a badge tells me to.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6423376].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Heysal,

    WELL SAID!!!!!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6423993].message }}

Trending Topics