Tesla coming out with new, more-affordable electric car

by Star69
9 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Tesla rolls out new sedan

LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- While automakers lay off staff and shut down plants in response to the economic downturn, one automaker announced Thursday that it will open a manufacturing plant in the United States, potentially creating hundreds of jobs in the area eventually chosen.
Tesla unveils its Model S sedan, with a base price of $57,400. The manufacturing plant will be in California.



Tesla Motors, maker of a high-end electric sports car, says it will build an all-electric sedan in Southern California.


Thursday's announcement was made in Hawthorne, California, where Tesla unveiled the Model S sedan at a base price of $49,900, after a federal tax credit of $7,500.


That's less than half the price of its first model, the Roadster.


Started in 2003 and bankrolled by PayPal millionaire Elon Musk, Tesla has attracted investments from the Silicon Valley elite, among them Google founder Larry Page.


It is widely believed that the Model S sedan will be built near the Space Exploration Technologies Corporation facility in Hawthorne. That aerospace company, more commonly known as SpaceX, was founded by Musk in 2002.
SpaceX recently won a NASA contract to deliver cargo to the international space station when the space shuttle program is retired next year. That contract, worth $1.6 billion, was won over such industry mainstays as Boeing and Lockheed.


The promise of a high-performance, all-electric vehicle became a reality with the startup's first model, the Tesla Roadster, a car with the look, speed and price tag -- a steep $109,000 and up -- that rivals other high-end, high-performance vehicles. Recently though, the economic downturn has forced Tesla to delay production of their would-be flagship Model S until 2011. They've also had to lay off more than 80 workers, which is about 25 percent of the company's staff.

Nonetheless, Tesla predicts it will manufacture 20,000 Model S vehicles a year. That would make it more of a mass-market vehicle than the Roadster; only 1,200 of which are produced yearly.

The company faces many challenges, the foremost of which is convincing consumers to pay almost $50,000 for an all-electric sedan when they could pay thousands less for another brand of upmarket sedan or a gas-electric hybrid.

Tesla rolls out new sedan - CNN.com



Hmmm, I wonder how far it can go on a single charge and how long a full recharge takes.
  • Profile picture of the author Flat Out
    It has somethig of a Maserati look about it... but 1.8 tonnes... jeez!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[645615].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
    Screw that.

    I got an AWFUL itch for one of these...

    Signature
    Professional Googler
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[645690].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Teresa Coppes
    Unless a car runs on air there's no way that I'd pay that much for it. Although, it does look pretty cool.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[645839].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    It is one sharp little thing - I think I'll stick to the 4WDs though - that puppy looks like you could high end it on a speed bump.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[646332].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Star69
    Yeah, Sal, give me a '72 Toyota Land Cruiser any time. That's the closest thing to a billy goat ever made.

    I suppose, though, that to achieve the best fuel mileage a person would have to be just about laying down, so there is less wind resistance in motion. Wind resistance is what burns up a lot of the fuel.

    I like the looks of it but it would be useless to me. I'm still addicted to fossil fuel.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[647400].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    How badly effected to wind resistance is electric?

    Maybe they should put little mini-turbines on the car so it can regenerate the electric as you drive - want more power...go faster. LOL.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[647443].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Star69
    Sal, I was referring to the amount of air the vehicle itself pushes as it moves. It takes more energy (no matter of electric, fossil fuel, etc.) to move against a head wind than it does in calm air. Just as a sports car would 'push' less air than a flat-front RV, it would also require less energy to move the same distance.

    Mini turbines. Good idea. Now if we could just invent a true perpetual motion, we'd have it licked! (Long as you turn off the power before licking, of course...)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[647577].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      Alternative fuel - including electric hybrids will never fully catch on in the near future. The technology is still just way too expensive for the popular market, compared to the cost per mile of gasoline engines. And now there is an even cheaper source of gasoline recently discovered that could wipe out the green alternative fuel industry altogether.
      Bad News: Scientists Make Cheap Gas From Coal
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[648299].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Wright
        These vehicles already use the energy produced by deceleration and
        braking or going downhill to recharge the battery pack.

        As the batteries are rechargeable and very hi-tech .... they cost a
        small fortune to replace ..... as do the drive motors and electronics.
        Not a great secondhand purchase ?????? Also, the quoted range between
        recharges drops dramatically the faster you go.

        Hybrids like Prius and Lexus really do not work from the economic
        viewpoint.

        Now that very economic lean burn engines and design is becoming
        fairly commonplace with 50>60 mpg and low emissions, it would be
        interesting to see what the clean LPG conversions of these vehicles
        could achieve apart from negligible emissions.

        There is at least one company developing a vehicle powered
        by a big tank of compressed air.

        In one Scandinavian/Eu country, the trams were powered by a
        huge flywheel which was spun up at the depot and then used to
        power the trams .....quite conveniently again regenerating
        energy back into the flywheel on deceleration.

        There is also development continuing of steam, hydrogen and
        fuelcell powered vehicles as well as a plethora of biofuel options
        andin the right environments solar power.

        Essentially, as many people live and work in urban/city areas,
        there is little need for vehicles which go faster than say 60mph
        or have a range between refills/recharges of more than ~100miles.
        Commercial vehicles are another ballgame altogether.

        From the pollution, congestion and parking views, smaller and
        cleaner cars make compelling sense in the urban context.

        Jusst remembered reading that Tesla will need about $500 million
        to achieve its plans
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[649070].message }}

Trending Topics