3 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
3 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

Methinks It's Time to Pull the Plug on BBC

by thunderbird
2 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
    • |
I've had mixed feelings about government-sponsored news shows. Some of the news they've produced has been worthy. However, when something is part of government, crimes within its body can be covered up and get official protection, and that is scary.


And this pedophile-protector should be sent to prison, not given a cushy job, heading the New York Times:
NYT defends incoming chief amid BBC scandal - CBS Atlanta 46

The Jimmy Savile child abuse allegations were flagged up to the office of former BBC boss Mark Thompson at least twice
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

    And this pedophile-protector should be sent to prison, not given a cushy job
    Oooh, well, it's not quite clear yet exactly what he knew himself, rather than "his office" (which may include an enormous number of people?), what he could/should have done about it, and the extent to which he was personally culpable ... I think?

    At the very least, the story has a loooo-o-o-o-o-oooong way to go, anyway, even just in terms of fact-finding, let alone blame-attribution.

    Call me pedantic, but the BBC isn't exactly "government sponsored", by the way. Successive governments of all flavors have certainly felt it's been very far from that.

    Apologies if I seem argumentative ... I don't imagine our reactions to the substance of this story are out of alignment at all, I hasten to say!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7256122].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      Oooh, well, it's not quite clear yet exactly what he knew himself, rather than "his office" (which may include an enormous number of people?), what he could/should have done about it, and the extent to which he was personally culpable ... I think?

      At the very least, the story has a loooo-o-o-o-o-oooong way to go, anyway, even just in terms of fact-finding, let alone blame-attribution.

      Call me pedantic, but the BBC isn't exactly "government sponsored", by the way. Successive governments of all flavors have certainly felt it's been very far from that.

      Apologies if I seem argumentative ... I don't imagine our reactions to the substance of this story are out of alignment at all, I hasten to say!
      No need to apologize for being precise. Here's how Wikipedia's semi-anonymous (vs "semi-autonomous") contributors put it:

      "The BBC is a semi-autonomous public service broadcaster[6] that operates under a Royal Charter[7] and a Licence and Agreement from the Home Secretary.[8] Within the United Kingdom its work is funded principally by an annual television licence fee,[9] which is charged to all British households, companies and organisations using any type of equipment to record and/or receive live television broadcasts;[10] the level of the fee is set annually by the British Government and agreed by Parliament.[11]"
      Signature

      Project HERE.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7256225].message }}

Trending Topics