pot was passed in washington and calorado.

65 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
not that I condone it, but this will get interesting.
#calorado #passed #pot #washington
  • Profile picture of the author Cool Hand Luke
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302532].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author David Braybrooke
      Are you advocating marajuana? (Well, if we are going to be off topic ....)
      Signature
      "The scientific theory I like best is that the rings of Saturn are composed entirely of lost airline luggage." - Mark Russell
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302543].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Cool Hand Luke
        [DELETED]
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302548].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
          Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

          *marijuana

          This thread will likely either be deleted or moved to OT soon.
          and you don't have to go behind everyone correcting their post, so annoying.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302569].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Cool Hand Luke
            [DELETED]
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302730].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
              Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

              *Colorado

              What's this have to do with internet marketing btw?
              Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

              *marijuana

              This thread will likely either be deleted or moved to OT soon.
              Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

              Never start a sentence with the word "and". Also, deal with it.

              Apparently you like to pick on people. I usually don't point out the spelling and grammar mistakes of others, but because you seem to enjoy it, I'll make an exception for you. According to the dictionary:

              what's: contraction of what is or what has: What's the matter? What's been done?
              So which way did you mean that question you posed?
              1. What is this have to do with internet marketing btw?
              2. What has this have to do with internet marketing btw?
              Surely someone with your linguistic acumen doesn't think what's means what does, do you? :rolleyes:

              And by the way, starting a sentence with the word "and" has been acceptable for quite some time in informal writing. Many grammarians approve of it for formal writing as well.
              Signature

              Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302790].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Kurt
              Originally Posted by rondo View Post

              Wow. Does this mean anyone can buy and sell it?
              Originally Posted by Charles AK View Post

              recreational use, you can buy it. soon, probably be awhile before its available in stores.
              Here in Colorado, it will be regulated much like alcohol. People over 21 will be able to have up to an ounce and grow up to 6 plants, with 2 being "mature".

              Local counties can legislate it and even ban it.

              It's expected that it will be Jan. of 2014 before it will be sold in stores to all people. Colorado already has many medical MJ dispensaries. I'm guessing because of the way things are now, it will be the dispensaries already open that will sell it, as they have the growing process already in place.

              To put this in persepctive, Denver already has more MJ dispensaries than Starbucks. I believe they will just be able to sell to anyone over 21 and not have to require a special ID given with doctor approval.

              Also, it is still illegal on a Fed level, and it's exepcted there will be some legal fights as a result. While it is illegal federally, the trials would be local and it will be hard to get convictions with a jury made up of people from Colorado.

              PS. I believe we should change our name to Coolardo.
              Signature
              Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
              Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302794].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Cool Hand Luke
              [DELETED]
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302829].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author jimbo13
                Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

                [serious]It could be because using a conjunction to start a sentence is something most people learn is incorrect by the time they're out of the sixth grade. [serious]
                You are taught this in the US are you? Because it is incorrect.

                Dan
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7303605].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
                  I have only one thing to add to this thread

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ejvcd-JeVCQ

                  Darn video isn't parsing right.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7303706].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author HeySal
                  Originally Posted by jimbo13 View Post

                  You are taught this in the US are you? Because it is incorrect.

                  Dan
                  It USED to be incorrect. Language is not stagnant - it is fluid. What was correct at one time may longer be (example: ain't), and what was once forbidden, is now okay. Note - regular usage still prohibits "and" starting a sentence for normal usage. It is an emphatic usage only - works by going against taught rules enough to give the emphasis it is used for. It used to be a dash was used instead of a period to indicate such an emphatic run-on of thought. Now the "and" is just capitalized, yet still works at the beginning of a sentence to conjunct the two thoughts with emphasis on the predicated clauses.

                  BTW - WTF does this have to do with pot being legalized? I guess your education stopped with grammar and never covered thematic issues.
                  Signature

                  Sal
                  When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
                  Beyond the Path

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306512].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
                Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

                [serious]It could be because using a conjunction to start a sentence is something most people learn is incorrect by the time they're out of the sixth grade. [serious]

                LOL jk were on the internetz so itz all gud guies. Spelig dusent matr heer on thuh worrior forem. Yay Calorado wey too legelise marajuana!
                what I just read would drive an english teacher insane.

                I like forums, I am free to run around with my spelling and grammar errors as I choose.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306171].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
        Originally Posted by David Braybrooke View Post

        Are you advocating marajuana? (Well, if we are going to be off topic ....)
        I said I wasn't condoning it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302689].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author taskemann
      Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

      *Colorado

      What's this have to do with internet marketing btw?
      Maybe he's into the marijuana niche?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302556].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Hitch up the wagons, Jethro - we's movin' to Colorady.

      People all over the country are catching on to Jury Nullification. Feds won't get far.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302819].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Cool Hand Luke
        [DELETED]
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302833].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author HeySal
          Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

          It was posted in the main internet marketing forum and moved here. :rolleyes:
          Yeah - I saw that when I read the thread again. So ..........I changed my post instead of just making another one.
          Signature

          Sal
          When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
          Beyond the Path

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302852].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
          Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

          It was posted in the main internet marketing forum and moved here. :rolleyes:
          btw, i'm all for selling weed online.

          got my sales page ready, now I just need some testimonials.

          if they had weed on amazon I will be a millionaire by next week.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306189].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
    nothing always thought this was an lounge, if not mods can move it accordingly, sure there is a place to talk about politics here.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302553].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302632].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rondo
    Wow. Does this mean anyone can buy and sell it?
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302698].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
      Originally Posted by rondo View Post

      Wow. Does this mean anyone can buy and sell it?
      recreational use, you can buy it. soon, probably be awhile before its available in stores.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7302703].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

    Looks like they've managed to put marijuana production soundly into the hands of corporate America with the limitations on the rights of individuals to grow it and sell it.

    Oh well. At least they won't be taking away users' lives by throwing them in prison.
    Except it isn't corporate America producing and selling the MJ in Colorado, it's small business. If corporate America would take over, I'm sure the price would come down.

    There's also limitations on the commercial growers. While it's more than 6 plants, the limit isn't high enough to attract corporate growers Plus, if you grow more than 99 plants the penalty from the Feds greatly increases. The Feds can, and have, made local busts for those growing more than 99 plants.

    6 plants is more than enough for personal use. And I don't want unregulated MJ on the open market. First, who wants to smoke mites? Second, I agree with the taxes generated going to the education system here in Colorado. It's a much better option that the money going to drug rings.

    Also, it was the people of Colorado (and Washington) that voted in the law. If the laws had no or few restrictions, the laws wouldn't have passed. (See Oregon) For some of us, Democracy is a good thing.

    The good news is in Colorado, this was added to the State Constitution, so it will take a vote of the people to rescind the law and the politicians can't do it on their own.
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7304688].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

      Looks like serfs paying tribute to corporate America to me.

      Sorry.

      Looks like serfs paying tribute to the PEOPLE to me. That makes it alright.

      It's sad to see the last way a poor boy could amass some wealth without harming anyone put into the hands of bureacrats.

      Lots of businesses have been started with money made from dealing marijuana. I had hoped for decriminalization.

      Something's better than nothing, I guess.
      I would say it's more a case of your outlook on life than anything else and how everything is bad in your world.

      This is better than decriminalization. It's legalization. And yes it's better than nothing. As I posted above, this is just the start.

      BTW, there's a fine line between "news" and politics. Thanks for turning this thread political.
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7307173].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

        Anyone who doesn't happily acquiesce to your statist outlook is just a negative Nancy, right?

        The subject is intrinsically political. It concerns a political decision made at the state level. Of course, I have the option of agreeing with it or shutting up. How can it be otherwise?

        Once something is legal, it is subject to the whims of whatever geniuses our highly informed electorate chooses between staring open-mouthed at episodes of Honey Boo Boo Child and Dancing with the Stars.

        Heaven help us.
        You are the negative Nancy, based on a number of your posts. If you think I formed this opinion based on this single thread, you are mistaken, although this thread is a good example of why I have this opinion.

        And because the thread is "intrinsically political" doesn't mean you have to discuss the political points of the issue. And it especially doesn't give you the right to break the express rules of this forum.

        If someone disagrees with your lunatic fringe ideals doesn't mean we watch Honey Boo, either.

        The people of Colorado voted. Deal with it.
        Signature
        Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
        Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7321475].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
    Haha. How do get that out of what Kurt wrote? In this case, the law was written by and voted on by the people.
    Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

    Yes, Kurt, the government knows better than we. How could it be otherwise?
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7304892].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

      Haha. How do get that out of what Kurt wrote? In this case, the law was written by and voted on by the people.
      Ken can't figure out it was the PEOPLE of Colorado, not the Gov. And being the terminal "glass half empty" person that he is, he also doesn't give credit that WA and CO now have more liberal MJ laws than any First World country on the Planet.

      You'd think Ken would be more concerned with every place OTHER than CO and WA.

      This is just the start. 40 years ago, only Nevada had legalized casino gambling. 30 years ago, Atlantic City had it too. Now, many states have it. I'm betting that legalized MJ will be similar.
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7304918].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
        Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

        This is just the start. 40 years ago, only Nevada had legalized casino gambling. 30 years ago, Atlantic City had it too. Now, many states have it. I'm betting that legalized MJ will be similar.
        I told my wife this morning we'll probably see MJ legalized in our lifetime. As soon as the other states see the taxes rolling into the state coffers, and the people rise up in favor of it, it's inevitable.
        Signature

        Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7305473].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
      I agree completely. That's why I am not one to usually jump on the government is bad bandwagon, since government is us.

      By the way, the state initiative process is where we actually are a democracy instead of a republic. Some great laws have been enacted through this form of government.

      Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

      The "people" and the government are one and the same.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7307147].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    In an earlier post I said I thought the dispensaries would sell to "everyone". After some research, I was wrong. The dispensaries and pot shops will be seperate. However, I have a feeling many dispensaries will convert to pot shops.

    Medical MJ will still allow people to have 2 ounces, instead of 1, and there's a tax that won't be applied to medical MJ. But, you have to pay for the doctor's appointment and approval annually.

    I left out you won't be able to smoke in public.

    I've seen critics complain about how this will create a market for "MJ tourism". Isn't this a good thing?

    Colorado is very diverse politically. Some areas are very conservative and others are very liberal, so MJ won't be available everywhere.

    There's one small mountain town called Nederland that is very pro MJ, even the sherrif and mayor. I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't benefit from MJ tourism. It specializes in "high altitude" MJ. It has a strange demographic, made up of bikers and hippies. Typically, these two don't blend all that well, but they do have one thing in common.
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7305307].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Durham
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      It has a strange demographic, made up of bikers and hippies. Typically, these two don't blend all that well, but they do have one thing in common.
      I think the reason for that demographic and stigma is because with it being illegal the only people who can access it are those who hang out in dark seedy corners... When that is no longer the case I will bet you see the demographics broaden tremendously and all kinds of people and social classes will be participating, like starbucks...You see every kind of diverse person doing star bucks. But if you could only get it on Indian reservations, then you would probably primarily only see Indians drinking it.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306490].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7305328].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author travlinguy
    I was looking at the actual proposition in WA. The state expects to collect a half billion in taxes within the first 18 months. Unauthorized growing becomes a major felony with massive fines. It was a felony before but now, since the state won't be getting their cut, it's really gonna hurt to get caught growing.

    People who want to become suppliers will pay $1000 per year for a permit, will be limited to growing a certain amount and will be required to pay high taxes on what they sell. Anyone having anything to do with growing and distributing legal weed will will be in a big state database and should expect the bud police to come a callin' fairly often. Better not have a single plant over the limit or get whacked hard with fines.

    I think Washington folks are going to be very surprised when they find out what was in the small print of what just passed there. Not that I'd know, but it looks like the price of an ounce is going to increase by a lot. Folks want pot to be legal? Be careful what you wish for.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7305389].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by travlinguy View Post

      I was looking at the actual proposition in WA. The state expects to collect a half billion in taxes within the first 18 months. Unauthorized growing becomes a major felony with massive fines. It was a felony before but now, since the state won't be getting their cut, it's really gonna hurt to get caught growing.

      People who want to become suppliers will pay $1000 per year for a permit, will be limited to growing a certain amount and will be required to pay high taxes on what they sell. Anyone having anything to do with growing and distributing legal weed will will be in a big state database and should expect the bud police to come a callin' fairly often. Better not have a single plant over the limit or get whacked hard with fines.

      I think Washington folks are going to be very surprised when they find out what was in the small print of what just passed there. Not that I'd know, but it looks like the price of an ounce is going to increase by a lot. Folks want pot to be legal? Be careful what you wish for.
      Not that I'd know either...

      Here in CO the price is down to $160 an oz in a few medical MJ places. You can get "shake", which is either trimmings or the bottom of the canisters that falls off the buds, for $100 an oz. Considering there's no seeds or stems (so I'm told), this isn't bad.

      These prices should hold, with a slight increase for the tax that isn't included on medical MMJ.

      The growers/dispensaries here are inspected regularly...Colorado expects $50 million in revenue the first year and over $100 million a year after that, with the first $40 million guaranteed to go to education. It looks like the difference between CO and WA's revenue would be the taxes.
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7305463].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    The people fought hard for this one. We deserve it. It's just plain right. As far as 6 plants == I don't think I could smoke 6 plants in the time it took to grow 6 more. I would have to have a lot of help. I'm really disappointed with Oregon though. On our local channels they've had ads running against it that sound right out of the 70's killer marijuana commercials. I couldn't believe what I was hearing - physically and mentally dangerously addictive? WTF? I guess we're in a time zone all of our own. You guys just went back an hour. We went back 5 decades.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7305552].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306529].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      Dennis,
      Surely someone with your linguistic acumen doesn't think what's means what does, do you?
      Not meaning to wombat you while you're properly wombatting a wombat, but... Yeah. In common usage, it is often meant in exactly that way. I am not aware of anything suggesting that usage is incorrect.

      Clever thread title, by the way...


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306610].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
        Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

        Dennis,Not meaning to wombat you while you're properly wombatting a wombat, but... Yeah. In common usage, it is often meant in exactly that way. I am not aware of anything suggesting that usage is incorrect.

        Clever thread title, by the way...


        Paul
        No problem, Paul. The OP wasn't making an allowance for common usage when he cited you should never start a sentence with "and," which is why I tossed the dictionary at him. If he thinks there should be no exceptions for others, then there should be no exceptions allowed in his own writing.
        Signature

        Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7307002].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author LarryC
        Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

        Dennis,Not meaning to wombat you while you're properly wombatting a wombat, but... Yeah. In common usage, it is often meant in exactly that way. I am not aware of anything suggesting that usage is incorrect.

        Clever thread title, by the way...


        Paul
        The way contractions are used is not always 100% correct by the formal rules of grammar.

        Consider the voice on America Online that said (maybe still does for all I know -is America Online still around?) "You've got mail." That translates into "You have got mail," which is not correct. "You've mail" -you have mail- should be correct, but that certainly doesn't sound right so it's never said.
        Signature
        Content Writing, Ghostwriting, eBooks, editing, research.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7307393].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
          Larry,
          That translates into "You have got mail," which is not correct.
          Ummm... Why not? What is incorrect about it?

          It's a bit clumsy and inelegant, but I don't see any actual error in that statement. Unless, of course, you ain't got no mail.


          Paul

          Added, as an aside: On the wombat front... I recently saw a sign on the drive-thru window at a Wendy's, talking about their new, BIG ketchup packets. Said they contain "three times as much ketchup than other packets."
          Signature
          .
          Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7307419].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    At least in Northern California the price of medical mj from a dispensary is the same, if not better than 'street price' at least for small amounts (its all I would know) - and minus all the risks = transaction etc.

    Note that here they set a real loose 'limit' - on the amount you can buy - just general like 'women - 1-2 ounces per month' - but then do not keep track of what you buy. I spend $20-50 every time I go shopping and now that I have tried all the edibles it will be more like $20 as a rule.

    Along with the annual 'license' comes the right to grow - sooooo you will see more of that in the future where people will start growing their own - ('future' is now for a long time already) once you get it all set up I bet you can save some big money over time.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306637].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
      Originally Posted by Patrician View Post

      At least in Northern California the price of medical mj from a dispensary is the same, if not better than 'street price' at least for small amounts (its all I would know) - and minus all the risks = transaction etc.

      Note that here they set a real loose 'limit' - on the amount you can buy - just general like 'women - 1-2 ounces per month' - but then do not keep track of what you buy. I spend $20-50 every time I go shopping and now that I have tried all the edibles it will be more like $20 as a rule.

      Along with the annual 'license' comes the right to grow - sooooo you will see more of that in the future where people will starting growing their own - ('future' is now for a long time already) once you get it all set up I bet you can save some big money over time.
      I think it will take awhile before this affects dealing illegally or the work places, most work places will still require that everyone is clean.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7306716].message }}
  • Not Oregon? WTF?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7307401].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by MoneyMagnetMagnate View Post

      Not Oregon? WTF?
      I think I explained what happened in my previous post. If you'd heard the ads you would have sworn you were listening to 1969 "killer weed" propaganda.

      By the way, the state initiative process is where we actually are a democracy instead of a republic. Some great laws have been enacted through this form of government.
      Yes I particularly appreciate the ones that illegalize shooting moose on mainstreet (that was just such an irksome habit) and the one that illegalized carrying Ice Cream in your pocket. :rolleyes:
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7308140].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

      Yes, Kurt, the government knows better than we. How could it be otherwise?
      Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

      The "people" and the government are one and the same.

      More spin from Ken as he talks out of both sides of his mouth.

      In one breath, Ken talks about the government vs. "we". In the next breath, Ken says the people and the gov are the same. Sorry Ken, you can't have it both ways.

      Make up your mind, Ken.
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7321464].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Charles AK
    this thread got way off topic.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7307469].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bhmseoservices
    Times are obviously changing and shifting towards what the newer generation wants.

    Let's face it if Gay Marriage can be legalized so can POT. It's just the demographics of the 18-29 year olds now see things differently.

    Politically I can see how this could attract voters to come out and vote for the Senator responsible for giving these laws the light of day.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7309861].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author travlinguy
    Let us not forget:

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7310313].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by travlinguy View Post

      Let us not forget:

      Best comedy ever written about Cannabis.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7310527].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HKSEO Jonbones
    I have just finished booking my 'skiing trip' , and plan to see the Seattle Seahawks play...someone at home, soon
    Signature
    Letmeknowseo.comSEO News and tips From real SEO'ers!
    Linklicious- Get your links crawled, so they can count
    SEO Black Book By: R.L. Adams An Insider's Guide to the SEO Industry
    Glowing Reviews- Get your Online Business Reviews to STICK!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7310579].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    What I'm wondering is that if pot has become legal - will corporations still require drug testing for a job? There's a hell of a lot of profit in selling the testing kits or for clinics that do the testing. As far as I can see, it's insurance companies that force testing, not employers themselves. I'm sure there's money passing between them and insurance companies who require their corporate clients to test people. I've been disgusted with the way insurance companies are allowed to rip our rights up for decades now. I hope this move also starts to shatter their damned hold on our freedoms, too.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7311256].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Sharpay
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      What I'm wondering is that if pot has become legal - will corporations still require drug testing for a job? There's a hell of a lot of profit in selling the testing kits or for clinics that do the testing. As far as I can see, it's insurance companies that force testing, not employers themselves. I'm sure there's money passing between them and insurance companies who require their corporate clients to test people. I've been disgusted with the way insurance companies are allowed to rip our rights up for decades now. I hope this move also starts to shatter their damned hold on our freedoms, too.
      Yes, they'll still require drug testing, but I bet weed wont de-qualify anybody anymore. Too bad Oregon failed it :T I barely saw any sort of advertising on it at all in Eugene -- a lot of people told me they had no idea it was even on the ballot.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7311298].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by Sharpay View Post

        Yes, they'll still require drug testing, but I bet weed wont de-qualify anybody anymore. Too bad Oregon failed it :T I barely saw any sort of advertising on it at all in Eugene -- a lot of people told me they had no idea it was even on the ballot.
        Serious? Holy cow - I'm in Central OR and the ads were calling it severely physically and mentally addictive, poisonous, etc - save your children - it went on and on. I'm thinking that Oregonians need to get together and sue the people who ran the ads for false advertising. It was literally sickening. To think people might actually be so completely stupid they bought into it disgusts me so badly I can't even say. People that stupid have NO business going to a voting booth. Sick of having my rights determined by ignorance and apathy of the masses.
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7311383].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Patrician
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      What I'm wondering is that if pot has become legal - will corporations still require drug testing for a job? There's a hell of a lot of profit in selling the testing kits or for clinics that do the testing. As far as I can see, it's insurance companies that force testing, not employers themselves. I'm sure there's money passing between them and insurance companies who require their corporate clients to test people. I've been disgusted with the way insurance companies are allowed to rip our rights up for decades now. I hope this move also starts to shatter their damned hold on our freedoms, too.
      In the case of occupations that involve public safety - driving anything etc, volatile chemicals, etc. there are restrictions - AND this is Dept of Transportation and lots of other regulatory agencies involved.

      EVEN SOME PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ARE NOT ALLOWED* and they do not have to allow pot. It takes 10 days to get 1 joint out of your system - 30 days for more. Drug testing in these companies is not just when you apply but randomly - so you never know and it isn't worth it.

      (just happened to my friend who is a ferry boat captain for 30 years - he has taken for all of his life some drug for an anxiety disorder - he has never had an at-fault accident in 30 years.

      But the Coast Guard just changed their criteria - the man cannot work unless he stops his meds - he has the Union fighting it, but I dunno -

      So - hopefully pot will be treated like vitamins and herbs and etc with less restrictions than narcotics and other harmful pharma. etc. but you can bet your butt it will be more regulated as time goes on.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7311669].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author travlinguy
    There're definitely provisions for testing in WA. Yes, it stays in your system for a long time but they've got that covered. Apparently they've determined a level they consider to be impaired. I didn't spend a whole lot of time reading the details but from what I could gather employers have to accept people even if they are THC positive. The only way it would work against someone if if they were positive beyond the limit set by the state.

    Legalization is one thing. It appears to be a good thing. But legalization does not mean decriminalization. Not even close. Yep, they're making it available to people. But under their own VERY STRICT terms.

    There are more fines and penalties attached to it than ever before. Just think, you're driving along and get pulled over. Maybe you haven't smoked in more than 24-hours. But the cop who pulled you over says you look impaired. So you get arrested and brought in and after testing they find you're just over the legal limit. That means court, lawyers, fines, state mandated (and certified for a hefty fee) rehab programs, increased auto insurance premiums. This could turn into a gold mine for the states.

    It's highly likely that if this has happened before it became legal the cop wouldn't have thought (or wanted to bother) to test you for THC. But now that it's legal wanna bet that some wicked number like one in five people who fit a certain profile get stopped, arrested and tested? Why? Because most states are dead ass broke and this will be a boon to their very survival. Be careful what you wish for.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7311771].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by travlinguy View Post

      There're definitely provisions for testing in WA. Yes, it stays in your system for a long time but they've got that covered. Apparently they've determined a level they consider to be impaired. I didn't spend a whole lot of time reading the details but from what I could gather employers have to accept people even if they are THC positive. The only way it would work against someone if if they were positive beyond the limit set by the state.

      Legalization is one thing. It appears to be a good thing. But legalization does not mean decriminalization. Not even close. Yep, they're making it available to people. But under their own VERY STRICT terms.

      There are more fines and penalties attached to it than ever before. Just think, you're driving along and get pulled over. Maybe you haven't smoked in more than 24-hours. But the cop who pulled you over says you look impaired. So you get arrested and brought in and after testing they find you're just over the legal limit. That means court, lawyers, fines, state mandated (and certified for a hefty fee) rehab programs, increased auto insurance premiums. This could turn into a gold mine for the states.

      It's highly likely that if this has happened before it became legal the cop wouldn't have thought (or wanted to bother) to test you for THC. But now that it's legal wanna bet that some wicked number like one in five people who fit a certain profile get stopped, arrested and tested? Why? Because most states are dead ass broke and this will be a boon to their very survival. Be careful what you wish for.
      They still wont. A THC urine test doesn't detect the amount of THC like an Alcohol test does. It only detects a presence which could have occurred at best within the last 14 days but usually only for up to three days. So a THC urine test doesn't prove a person is under the influence at the time of the test.
      A THC blood test would have to be preformed within 3 hours, but are rarely used except in auto accidents.
      A saliva test could also be preformed, both will show if the person has recently smoked, but neither will give a THC blood level.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7312773].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author travlinguy
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        They still wont. A THC urine test doesn't detect the amount of THC like an Alcohol test does. It only detects a presence which could have occurred at best within the last 14 days but usually only for up to three days. So a THC urine test doesn't prove a person is under the influence at the time of the test.
        A THC blood test would have to be preformed within 3 hours, but are rarely used except in auto accidents.
        A saliva test could also be preformed, both will show if the person has recently smoked, but neither will give a THC blood level.
        I'm not sure what your point is. Obviously if the cops are testing for THC impairment they're going to do either saliva or blood. And they should have no problem arresting (or detaining) someone and getting what they need within three hours.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7312784].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          Originally Posted by travlinguy View Post

          I'm not sure what your point is. Obviously if the cops are testing for THC impairment they're going to do either saliva or blood. And they should have no problem arresting (or detaining) someone and getting what they need within three hours.
          No point really. Just explaining how the different tests work.
          Because you can't detect levels of THC with any of the tests like you can with alcohol it will make intoxication harder to prove just from the tests.
          Besides cannabis users tend to be safer drivers. Marijuana Users Are Safer Drivers Than Non-Marijuana Users, New Study Shows
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7315005].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    There are going to be costs - and there are going to be restrictions and control - as there well should be -

    I carry my license documents in my car and my 'ID' in my purse. If they want to dick around with busting people to earn instant cash - whatever.

    If I abuse the trust/endanger anyone or cause trouble then I deserve whatever I get - just like drunk driving or a laundry list of things.

    Some people love the darkness and always want that to be predominant to any situation or conversation.

    I prefer not to worry about all the possible negative ramifications - we didn't leave the world so i guess it is still Open season.

    Can't rain on my parade - I couldn't be happier or feel more free -

    Nobody knows what tomorrow brings - and after worrying about this for decades and being part of the problem, I am thrilled that - maybe for just a little while - things are progressing and I am part of the solution...

    BE HERE NOW!
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7311832].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author travlinguy
      Originally Posted by Patrician View Post

      There are going to be costs - and there are going to be restrictions and control - as there well should be -

      I carry my license documents in my car and my 'ID' in my purse. If they want to dick around with busting people to earn instant cash - whatever.

      Some people love the darkness and always try to pee in every swimming pool -

      Can't rain on my parade - (pun unintended)
      Looks like you might be talking medicinal. That's way different than casual usage. There's no doubt they're going to try and milk this to the max with the casual use folks and if that means busting and fining people and sending them to rehab and all the rest, that's just how it's gonna be.

      Right now it's easy to get a doctor's letter for medicinal use in WA. Would cost you a couple hundred bucks. And you can also get to grow it without any permits. You're simply restricted to a certain number of plants. That's what made the state take notice. They saw a massive untapped profit center and decided to make a move. You can bet the other states will be watching and follow suit.

      EDIT: Maybe you're wondering how I know so much about all this. I've got a friend who was diagnosed with Huntington's disease many years ago. His doctor said pot would help. He's been growing it for more than 10 years. I'm not sure he'll still be allowed to do that. We'll see.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7311866].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I'm not much worried about it either way - I'm not someone who could be considered a frequent flier. My concern is putting the kabosh on drug cartels, for profit prison systems and their forced slave labor, and the expense of a phony war on drugs for profit. I'm also stoked for the day when we can grow hemp for nutritional seeds and natural fibers to replace toxic ones - and for paper to save our forestry, etc. I'm sure that whether legal or illegal, it will be milked for every dime that they can get from us on it.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7312365].message }}

Trending Topics