12 Foot Giants - "Giant of Castelnau" - What Does This Mean?

Profile picture of the author SandraLarkin by
Giant of Castelnau - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recently I have been seeing discoveries of actual giants from our past. What I man is skeletel bones, that appear human, or humanlike that measure 12 -20 ft in height.



Like the link above.


Watch the presentation below if you have time. It looks like a ton of things were once again hidden from us peasants:




This seriously disqualifies evolution as we know as well.
#off topic

  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I know a couple of archaeologists who found a few 8' skeletons - and have heard of up to 9', but I've never seen or heard of anything larger. I'd be inclined to call 20 feet a hoax. It's normal to have different sized species - such as pygmies compared to geographic areas where standard size men are 6 foot. I still have trouble swallowing 20', though. There were also some photoshopped pics going around a year or two back that showed people 40 feet or so.

    Actually, any discovery like that will be suppressed. The Smithsonian received the 8' remains and that is the last anyone ever saw or heard of them. That happens more often than people understand. Cremo, though, isn't one of the most esteemed Archaeologists on the block.
  • Profile picture of the author chillee
    One of my friends is obsessed with this at the moment.
    As much as I wanna believe (and I'm quite open minded) its got to be a hoax.
    Why is it not on the actual news and just on the web?
  • Profile picture of the author SandraLarkin
    Originally Posted by chillee View Post

    One of my friends is obsessed with this at the moment.
    As much as I wanna believe (and I'm quite open minded) its got to be a hoax.
    Why is it not on the actual news and just on the web?
    The main reason is because the news is controlled by people who want a certain viewpoint for the mass public. Something like this does not fit into what "we" are allowed to know.


    There are TONS of actual archaeological proof for giants, as well as other remains athe general public would not understand. Just watch the lecture, it is from Stanford university presenting facts.


    Also, the Smithsonian point - the be all and end all of proof for some people, yet they HIDE massive findings that would shake science and belief systems to their very core. That is why they are hidden by the people who run them.
  • Profile picture of the author ronrule
    Annunaki, baby. They're coming. Look busy. :p
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I know the guy that led a recent exploration team into the Grand Canyon area. They found something. Shots were fired. He's refusing to talk about it.........at all..........to anyone.

    He told me once that most people would hurl if they knew how many very valuable artifacts (gold) are just melted down for the $$ because the scientific "authorities" refuse to validate them. For instance - his team dug 10 feet out in WY to unearth some pretty wickedly splendid stuff. He couldn't even get the "experts" to look at them. They told him it was impossible for them to be where he found them. Period. No further conversation.

    They've done the same thing in relation to stone artifacts found UNDER volcanic lava flow. Being under the flow predated them by tens of thousands of years from the written history gives for a time line, so the finders have been told that they are either 1. hoaxers 2. mistaken.

    When the current bunch of "authorities" are gone, the new ones will look at some of these things and do an expose that changes history into a new and improved knowledge base that will secure their authority, then things won't change for another few decades until the next wave of authorities is old enough to take over.
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
    Back many moons ago when I was in Elementary school, we had a special visitor that was
    10' tall. He stood on our stage and touched the school logo hanging above the stage. I now
    know that the logo is 14' 6" from the stage floor. I didn't measure the guys actual height. I'm just
    telling you what they told us and now that I know the logos height I tend to believe it.

    At the time they called him the tallest man in the world. True??? False??? I was just 6yrs old.

    Have a Great Day!
    Michael
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Originally Posted by Michael Mayo View Post

    Back many moons ago when I was in Elementary school, we had a special visitor that was
    10' tall. He stood on our stage and touched the school logo hanging above the stage. I now
    know that the logo is 14' 6" from the stage floor. I didn't measure the guys actual height. I'm just
    telling you what they told us and now that I know the logos height I tend to believe it.

    At the time they called him the tallest man in the world. True??? False??? I was just 6yrs old.

    Have a Great Day!
    Michael
    I think the tallest right now is around 8 feet give or take a few inches. Very well could have been true, though. Every breed has one or two that over-grow pretty hugely. My last Rottie wasn't much shorter than a Great Dane. I had a hamster that got about twice the size of any I'd ever seen before (or since), too. Look at how big some house cats get every now and then. And I think we've all seen pics of the world's largest dog (the real pics, not the photoshopped ones). So why should humans be any different?

    Um...........there's also the possibility that the guy was wearing a pair of stilts under his pants.:rolleyes:
  • Profile picture of the author travlinguy
    According to certain folklore, humanity is in its 5th evolution. The previous strain, if you will, was supposedly the civilization of Atlantis. Before that, Lemuria. Depending on who you listen to and how much of it you want to believe, one or more of these strains had giant sized people. Some believe the entire population at the time were giants.

    As the legends go, each different strain of humanity started out as fully evolved, though primitive humans. They were the people who remained after the rest of the culture screwed nature up so badly that mother earth shook the entire race off like a retriever shakes off water after a dip. A few folks survived but without enough scientists, engineers and other smarties, the culture reverted back to nuts, berries, farming and animal husbandry.

    Of course, none of this has been proved but I'd guess that if certain influential organizations are keeping things from the masses that this might be one of those things. I don't know, even if it's all made up it's cool to think about it. If we don't smarten up there there might be a 6th strain coming along soon.
  • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
    Steve Quayle - Genesis 6 GIANTS

    Steve Quayle - Genesis 6 GIANTS

    (I think the second has more realted links.)
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Originally Posted by bizgrower View Post

    Steve Quayle - Genesis 6 GIANTS

    Steve Quayle - Genesis 6 GIANTS

    (I think the second has more realted links.)

    Holy cow - found this article on one of your links. It's the same thing Steve Shaffer was telling me about, but more recent. I think his skeletons were in the 1990's - but the Smithsonian seems to have misplaced any record of ever having had them. Same thing - Red hair. I think he said something about Asian features - maybe Norse - some distinct features, though. The largest one of those three (two men and a female..the female had warrior gear on and with her) was 9 feet, though, not any 12 or 14. I only saw pictures, so have no way of knowing the exact measurements first hand. They were big, though.

    There are ruins of a quite large city down along the Mississippi - pyramid(s?) - settlement, etc -- yet little is being said about it. It's at least as advanced as the Aztecs and Mayans and dates to around 1,500 years ago (so they say anyhow). Rather than having that dig widely publicized as you'd expect, you have to really dig to find anything out about it. The info isn't completely knocked out of existence - but it's sure not being discussed - and neither is the cave in the grand canyon that they barricaded so nobody can get into it - and is rumored to have been full of some artifacts that just did NOT fit into our history of the US.
  • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
    Sal,
    If I remember correctly, the artifacts in the Grand Canyon cave are ancient Egyptian?

    I'd have to dig, but I remember Steve Quayle talking on the radio about many giants
    having six toes and recent military encounters with giants in Iraq.

    Dan
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Dan - Whether the ruins are Egyptian or not is speculation because nobody is allowed to see them. What I was told about the Grand Canyon - which wasn't much - it seems that it pre-dates Egypt. What I can repeat specifically is - "would cause a total re-write of human history".

    As far as toes, etc - the pics of the ones I was allowed to see had the normal 10 fingers and toes. As far as I'm concerned, though, I don't see why the fact that some races of humans were larger than others is in any way such a big deal. A lot of species have larger and smaller subgroups and nobody wigs over it. Well....not to this extent anyhow. I did about crap bricks the first time I saw a German Jack (huge rabbit).
  • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
    Sal,
    My Husky did not know what to make of the first English Mastiff (210 lbs at 18 months old) he saw. He literally just stopped and stared.

    I wonder if your Rottie was so large because he ate the first generation of
    dog food made for puppies, which turned out to be too loaded with vitamins
    and made puppies grow too fast. I came across an aeronautical engineer
    and dog breeder who actually published papers in veterinary research literature
    about this. His contention was from structural and joint standpoints that puppies need to grow slowly into their bodies for everything to develop properly and reduce the
    joint problems that large breeds have. It seems the puppy food is not as overloaded as it was originally.

    If giants are different DNA wise and not a mutation, I can see why historical and religous perspectives might be impacted.

    The post 911 report of our military contact with a giant was in Afghanistan, not Iraq.
    There was another report involving the Japanese in WWII - tossing jeeps around with impunity. So, there is military interest as well.

    Dan
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Dan - most of the animals I get overgrow. I feed a dog real meat, and plenty of raw organic meat - and exercise them to the hilt. Those two combos result in some really big animals -- even my hamsters got huge. But my dogs have never had joint problems, no matter how big they got. My last guy was pedigreed to the max and he was just an excellent specimen of his breed. His mom was 150 lbs and dad was a cool 200. He was also the biggest of his litter.

    I'm sure some strains of DNA or genes allow for bigger humans than others. Both my parents came from fairly large families. At 5'6", I'm the runt of the littler. My mom's family were Russians - those people that live forever and are rather tall and big boned. My uncle was only around 6' 3 or 4" - but he's one of those human muscle pyramids that could stoop under a small horse and pick it up. He died at 110 yrs- same as his sister. Both still mobile and lucid. This is the type of reason I really don't get the big deal over the fact there were or are some extremely large humans here and there. Of course - if a whole culture of people is large like that, there's bound to be legends.
  • Profile picture of the author arrowcom
    Most giants had two rows of teeth also.
  • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
    Sal,

    I agree.

    I should have known you feed your pets natural stuff that makes sense.
    I can't imagine a dog running through a field of corn and trying to eat
    the corn.

    Larger than average families of humans or dogs is no big deal.
    (Except, for example, to parents who go through five boxes of
    cereal a day, etc. to feed their five boys who all played college
    football and a couple went into the NFL.)

    Gene mutations which create 'giantism' is also no big deal.
    (Except, as cool as Giant Malamutes are, it's kind of sad that
    they've become a breed. Sadder if the military tried to Genetically
    Modify humans.)

    But, if we are talking about a different race, that would be
    something.

    Dan

Next Topics on Trending Feed