Google challenges U.S. gag order, citing First Amendment
Google challenges U.S. gag order, citing First Amendment - The Washington Post
|
Google asked the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court on Tuesday to ease long-standing gag orders over data requests the court makes, arguing that the company has a constitutional right to speak about information it is forced to give the government. The legal filing, which invokes the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech, is the latest move by the California-based tech giant to protect its reputation in the aftermath of news reports about far-reaching National Security Agency surveillance of Internet traffic. Revelations about the program, called PRISM, have opened fissures between U.S. officials and the involved companies, which have scrambled to reassure their users without violating strict rules against disclosing information that the government has classified as top-secret. A high-profile legal showdown might help Google's efforts to portray itself as aggressively resisting government surveillance, and a victory could bolster the company's campaign to portray government surveillance requests as targeted narrowly and affecting only a small number of users. Tuesday's unusual legal move comes after days of intense talks between federal officials and several of the technology companies, including Google, over what details can be released. It also comes as the companies increasingly show signs of wanting to outdo each other in demonstrating their commitment to protecting user privacy. In its petition, Google sought permission to publish information about the number of requests the surveillance court makes of the company and the number of user accounts that are affected. Google long has made regular reports with regard to other data demands from the U.S. government and other governments worldwide, but it has been forced to exclude requests from the surveillance court, which oversees an array of official monitoring efforts that target foreigners. Facebook, Microsoft and Yahoo in recent days have won federal government permission to include requests from the court as part of the overall number of data requests they receive from federal, state, and local officials. Google has rejected that approach as too imprecise to help users understand the scope of its cooperation with federal surveillance. "Google's users are concerned about the allegations. Google must respond to such claims with more than generalities," it said. |
Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path