Big Pharma is out of control

Its called profiling Terra.

Mike - sometimes I word things as if they are "done deals" because the chain of action actually leads up to it. In this case, all the precedents are set - read at least the basic summaries of CODEX (there's thousands of docs throughout participating countries (most of the world) so you won't get to them all in detail, LOL. Check out FDA actions (and remember they are funded by the very companies they are supposed to protect us from. Did you know aspartame is banned in many countries and was banned here twice? D Rumsfeld is the sole reason that it's allowed again. It's still nothing but poison. Period. There is not one plus. Yet it is approved. There are a few drugs that have been pulled a few times due to lawsuits but they are back - same as they were. Approval is bought. Even before a drug is tested approval can be purchased (with the stipulation that research has to prove safety within xx amount of time. Nice eh?).

Then if you look at the the way laws and actions actually rest on previous actions and documents instead of looking at them as isolated action, then you start seeing the patterns that aren't obvious from one document or action.

Consider how precedence is used in court - precedence is extremely dangerous is issues such as this one because a little linguistic tweaking can ram through completely outrageous power grabs.

Now note -- this action at this very moment only covers GENERIC drugs..........that is the "same" drug made by multiple entities after the original patent runs out on the drug. The drugs are cheaper because there is production competition and so people gravitate to the cheaper drug. The safety guarantees of those drugs was just trumped.

Now look at the patent holders. One company. For one thing, it is easier to pinpoint the fact that the drug is a problem when originally still in the ownership of one company so it's harder to rule against a lawsuit. But powerful pharmas want their money that they are losing when their patent expires. So the answer is to make generics a little scary so customers will spend the extra for the safety.

Now note -- the clause in the action that specifies "approved by the FDA". Well all pharmaceuticals are approved in this country or they aren't on the market. That's how the FDA makes their big bucks. SO we now have a very strong precedence for FDA power. (there are others, this is just this PARTICULAR incidence.

Now - big pharma, with all their crafty lawyers gets a lawsuit against an FDA approved drug that is still in their patent...................and suddenly, you have "FDA approval", with precedence, standing in the middle of that lawsuit. Who wins now isn't a matter of justice - it's chess. And I guarantee you lawyers that make the kind of money pharma pays them play one freaking mean game of chess.

Also consider that we are now in a society that is run on crony capitalism. So if I sound like it's a done deal.........it's because basically it is. The only thing that will stop them is to have a massive enough upheaval of protest that the FDA itself gets restructured. There's a LOT of other areas of take down we need to do before that happens.

The mask and gloves are also to protect the patient too as chemotherapy drugs practically kill a person's immune system so something my body fought against and prevented from fully manifesting, something I'm not even aware was trying to infect me, could indeed cause major problems for a chemo patient, like death due to the practically non-existent immune system of the patient.

But the rest, now you know.

Terra

Crying or even protesting against Pharmaceutical companies will never accomplish anything. You have to change the economics of it and that probably means paying some kind of tax (don't go gaga over the word).

This study came out close to two decades ago

Apoptosis induced by a human milk protein

Where breast milk was shown to induce apoptosis (self destruct signal). I followed the development for years but almost nothing happened for the obvious reason that the research had the potential to go nowhere in terms of being patentable. more here

Breast Milk Kills Cancer Cells & Shrinks Tumors | Collective-Evolution

Finally this year I saw something about it again that "maybe" there may be a treatment from it in a few years. If a bounty funded by tax dollars was available (and growing over the years) where companies could be eligible for hundreds if not Billions of dollars then we might see an economic system that will push development of these ideas

but if the only incentive and means of compensation is the ability to sell patented drugs - some things will never really be studied or developed

Well, today they are talking about how a bunch of idiots are saying they just found that retiring later can delay dementia. *****************DUH****************!

They found that out decades ago, and there HAS been a pattern. Reduction in stimulation soon leads to dementia. WHY? Because exercise limits it.

So WHY do the deaf not have that happen as often as hearing people may? Most deaf have COMPENSATED for it all their lives. And why does it not happen to the young? Science generally says the brain stops really growing around 35. Until then, you aren't so likely to get dementia.

Steve

Well the latest "researchers" didn't really say WHY, but I did. The work forces stimulation to hold it at bay. I'm certainly NOT on the side of corporations, because I think they are part of the CAUSE! They try to make sure we ALL get our daily dose of poison.

Steve