From the Merely Obvious Department: Private hospitals could take some pressure off VA

123 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
The Obama administration's decision to allow more veterans to get care at private hospitals could take some pressure off backlogged Veterans Affairs facilities
Bold is mine.

Sounds like some of that "fettered capitalism" may be in order.

Private hospitals could take some pressure off VA - SFGate

Joe Mobley
  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
    Three years ago there were quite a few stories in the media about failures at the VA. The claim made (by whistleblowers) was that the order from D.C. to "cut waiting lists" had a side effect that was risk patients lives.

    The side effect was simple:

    To "cut waiting list time" as the President had ordered....some VA hospitals simply started treating/scheduling the simplest cases first. A case that required only one or two visits to cure or treat - or was a routine check of a condition would be quickly scheduled and done while cases that were long term and involved a longer course of treatment were put at the bottom of the list. You can treat a lot of stomach complaints, cuts and sprains in the time it takes to diagnose a cancer....and the numbers look a lot better.

    There was a flurry of stories for less than a month and then is quickly disappeared from the news. Whistleblowers were not protected - and are not offered protection now. Our govt has a record of punitive actions against whistleblowers in many agencies.

    Veterans Affairs whistleblowers face 'long slog' in fighting retaliation | WashingtonExaminer.com

    The total failure of our govt to put teams in place and call in the FBI to investigate the VA - is giving those hospitals time to destroy and alter evidence. Anyone think that's not deliberate?
    Signature
    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
    ***
    One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
    what it is instead of what you think it should be.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218095].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

      Three years ago there were quite a few stories in the media about failures at the VA. The claim made (by whistleblowers) was that the order from D.C. to "cut waiting lists" had a side effect that was risk patients lives.

      The side effect was simple:

      To "cut waiting list time" as the President had ordered....some VA hospitals simply started treating/scheduling the simplest cases first. A case that required only one or two visits to cure or treat - or was a routine check of a condition would be quickly scheduled and done while cases that were long term and involved a longer course of treatment were put at the bottom of the list. You can treat a lot of stomach complaints, cuts and sprains in the time it takes to diagnose a cancer....and the numbers look a lot better.

      There was a flurry of stories for less than a month and then is quickly disappeared from the news. Whistleblowers were not protected - and are not offered protection now. Our govt has a record of punitive actions against whistleblowers in many agencies.

      Veterans Affairs whistleblowers face 'long slog' in fighting retaliation | WashingtonExaminer.com

      The total failure of our govt to put teams in place and call in the FBI to investigate the VA - is giving those hospitals time to destroy and alter evidence. Anyone think that's not deliberate?
      It's Holder in the Justice dept. that won't investigate any of this. Of course he takes his orders from the top:rolleyes:
      Bottom line is this is what govt. run health care looks like.
      Some people get good treatment and a fast response time, most don't.
      My father was treated like a king at the VA. My brother and Uncle where treated so bad that they got health insurance through their work.
      Now the govt. runs all our health care. Ain't we lucky.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218135].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
        And wisdom speaks...


        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        Bottom line is this is what govt. run health care looks like.
        Joe Mobley
        Signature

        .

        Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218144].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        It's Holder in the Justice dept. that won't investigate any of this. Of course he takes his orders from the top:rolleyes:
        Bottom line is this is what govt. run health care looks like.
        Some people get good treatment and a fast response time, most don't.
        My father was treated like a king at the VA. My brother and Uncle where treated so bad that they got health insurance through their work.
        Now the govt. runs all our health care. Ain't we lucky.
        A couple of problems with this...

        The ACA doesn't "run" all of our health care. It only pays for (some of) it. Unlike the VA, the health care is provided and run by the private sector.

        Despite some major problems with the VA, it has higher approval rates than private health care. Are we supposed to pretend private health care is perfect and no one has died due to incompetence in private health care?
        Signature
        Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
        Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218156].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          A couple of problems with this...

          The ACA doesn't "run" all of our health care. It only pays for (some of) it. Unlike the VA, the health care is provided and run by the private sector.

          Despite some major problems with the VA, it has higher approval rates than private health care. Are we supposed to pretend private health care is perfect and no one has died due to incompetence in private health care?
          Who determined what insurance policies where acceptable or not? Was it the private sector that set up the regulations where people can't keep their doctor or plan, even though they where told they could?
          It is manipulated by the private sector under the guidance of the federal govt.
          What happens when the govt. decides it needs to cut funding like it did with the V.A.?
          What happens when the backlogs of patients starts like it did with the V.A.?
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9219259].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Kurt
            Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

            Who determined what insurance policies where acceptable or not? Was it the private sector that set up the regulations where people can't keep their doctor or plan, even though they where told they could?
            It is manipulated by the private sector under the guidance of the federal govt.
            What happens when the govt. decides it needs to cut funding like it did with the V.A.?
            What happens when the backlogs of patients starts like it did with the V.A.?
            Irrelevant, non sequitor. Nice try. Not to mention, you are also making a bunch of assumptions and stating them as fact.

            But, two can play this game...If you are truly concerned about cuts to the VA, better not vote libretarian.

            Who pays the drs?

            Who profits from the care?

            Why pretend that private medicine is "free market"?

            Do people get a choice what kind of medicine they need?

            Do ambulances get to barter for the highest possible price when you call one while having a heart attack?

            When I need to go to a private ER for a medical emergency, can I shop around to compare prices?

            Why ignore the fact that the VA has a higher approval rating than private medicine?
            Signature
            Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
            Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9219280].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
              Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

              Irrelevant, non sequitor. Nice try. Not to mention, you are also making a bunch of assumptions and stating them as fact.

              But, two can play this game...If you are truly concerned about cuts to the VA, better not vote libretarian.

              Who pays the drs?

              Who profits from the care?

              Why pretend that private medicine is "free market"?

              Do people get a choice what kind of medicine they need?

              Do ambulances get to barter for the highest possible price when you call one while having a heart attack?

              When I need to go to a private ER for a medical emergency, can I shop around to compare prices?

              Why ignore the fact that the VA has a higher approval rating than private medicine?
              Who says Libertarians don't want to take care of our veterans?
              Why is my reply irrelevant to you? Smacks to much of truth?
              Signature

              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
              Getting old ain't for sissy's
              As you are I was, as I am you will be
              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9219296].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                Here's the Libertarian take on veterans affairs Kurt.
                • Reforming the VA to make sure that it efficiently provides affordable care and benefits to our veterans.
                • Giving employers a tax credit for hiring veterans.
                • Narrowing the pay gap that exists between military and private sector pay scales.
                • Restoring health care coverage to retired service members and reducing their out-of-pocket costs.
                • Establishing a House Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs.
                • Fully investigating the causes of Gulf War illnesses and providing all necessary treatments to veterans suffering from those illnesses.
                • Immediately ending the requirement that disabled veterans give up their military retirement pay in order to receive VA disability benefits.
                So yeah don't vote Libertarian, the vets might actually get the help they deserve.
                Signature

                Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                Getting old ain't for sissy's
                As you are I was, as I am you will be
                You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9219339].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                  Another great story about the VA:rolleyes:
                  I can understand if they over pay someone that they would want that money back, but to take all of someones benefits except $6 dollars a month is just wrong.
                  VA cuts World War II D-Day veteran
                  Something similar happened to my father. The pnly difference was my mother being a bookkepper for a bank noticed the increase right away and called them on it. They continued to say there was nothing wrong so she put the difference into a separate bank account every month and wouldn't touch it.
                  When they finally figured out their mistake they wanted to take almost all of my fathers benefit check every month till it was payed off. Instead my mother read them the riot act and give them the money bank in one lump sum from that bank account (minus the interest it earned). She actually had to have a lawyer friend take them to court before they would take the lump sum payment.
                  Signature

                  Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                  Getting old ain't for sissy's
                  As you are I was, as I am you will be
                  You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9223564].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Joe Stewart
                    Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                    Another great story about the VA:rolleyes:
                    I can understand if they over pay someone that they would want that money back, but to take all of someones benefits except $6 dollars a month is just wrong.
                    VA cuts World War II D-Day veteran
                    Something similar happened to my father. The pnly difference was my mother being a bookkepper for a bank noticed the increase right away and called them on it. They continued to say there was nothing wrong so she put the difference into a separate bank account every month and wouldn't touch it.
                    When they finally figured out their mistake they wanted to take almost all of my fathers benefit check every month till it was payed off. Instead my mother read them the riot act and give them the money bank in one lump sum from that bank account (minus the interest it earned). She actually had to have a lawyer friend take them to court before they would take the lump sum payment.

                    This happened to my father-in-law too, only he didn't realize it was a mistake. He thought it was just a cost of living raise. Once they discovered the error they took his entire disability check AND $150.00 per month of his social security. He only lived another year or so anyway, but still.
                    Signature

                    My New "Share All" Blog Is Coming Soon! Online & Offline Marketing, More!

                    http://www.UnCENTSored.com

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224053].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                      Originally Posted by Joe Stewart View Post

                      This happened to my father-in-law too, only he didn't realize it was a mistake. He thought it was just a cost of living raise. Once they discovered the error they took his entire disability check AND $150.00 per month of his social security. He only lived another year or so anyway, but still.
                      Simple solution is you stop paying the increase and take back no more per month then what the increase was. If the recipient can show that amount would cause a hardship, you lower the return payment amount to one that doesn't and extend the time needed to pay it back.
                      Signature

                      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                      Getting old ain't for sissy's
                      As you are I was, as I am you will be
                      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224201].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        Bottom line is this is what govt. run health care looks like.
        In America perhaps. In Australia, private health sends most of its patients through the public system. They do that because the public system is more efficient, and cheaper.
        Signature
        Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
        So that blind people can hate them as well.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218239].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

          In America perhaps. In Australia, private health sends most of its patients through the public system. They do that because the public system is more efficient, and cheaper.
          If public were always more efficient and cheaper, how could private survive?

          In the US, it seems nearly all hospitals are wholly, or largely, PRIVATE! EVERY hospital in fort wayne, where I now live, is owned by the SAME PRIVATE group. When I was in california, EVERY hospital I went to was owned by KAISER Permanente PRIVATE.
          When I was in washington DC, I went to george washington university hospital. It was where Reagan went when he was shot. Apparently IT is private ALSO.

          HECK, some hospitals deal with the religious and even identify with religion. Several here identify with being lutheran. St Jude is Catholic. The way the US is going, those hospitals would have to change if they went public.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218543].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            If public were always more efficient and cheaper, how could private survive?
            Corporate welfare, and only performing "high value" work like cosmetic surgery and other non-critical work. Plus the fact that they only cover part of the cost of these procedures.

            Oh, and did I mention corporate welfare. The "private" sector is heavily subsidised by taxpayers.
            Signature
            Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
            So that blind people can hate them as well.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218673].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
              When you start two unfunded wars, don't properly plan for the consequences of those wars and then don't properly fund for all the new veterans of those wars you will have big problems. Part of the problem with these wars were that the "leaders" who started them completely misjudged how the wars would go. You may recall the "we will be greated as liberators", "Mission Accomplished", "It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and his army. Hard to imagine." etc...

              It was also not very wise to start two wars while at the same time give huge tax breaks to the rich. No other country has ever done such a thing. The wars themselves cost over a trillion dollars and cost us over 4000 lives, but the cost will be about another trillion dollars and continue for another 30 or 40 years because of all the injured and disabled vets who need care.

              Money doesn't solve all problems but when it comes to health care it helps. Don't block additional funding for veterans and then complain about bad care. Don't start wars, cut taxes that grow the debt and then want to cut the debt on the backs of the veterans from those wars. That seems pretty obvious also.
              Signature
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218725].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
          Banned
          Unfortunately, once again I am forced to bring up facts that will do nothing more than make me appear to be a contrarian. I can assure you from the bottom of my heart, that is not my intent. Additionally, I would ask that you set aside your preconceived impressions and or opinions about me personally and just read my words with an open mind - regardless of your political persuasion.

          I have been deeply immersed in the VA healthcare system for 45 years. I have been homeless twice from not getting psychiatric care when I needed it most. I have seen the best and worst of what the VA has to offer a seriously ill, disabled veteran. I can speak with a first hand knowledge of the intricacies and bureaucratic foibles of a system that simply has not been able to keep up with the crush of new veterans, mainly over the past decade. Many of these veterans would have expired on the battlefield in past conflicts, but the current medical staff that performs triage in our forward positions are so damn good at what they do that they are now actually capable of performing miracles and they somehow manage to keep mangled bodies alive until they can be rebuilt by other miracle workers who's job it is to take these men and women and transform their shattered bodies and begin to repair their obscenely devastated mental condition.

          Unfortunately, the survival of these men and women has created a new class of disabled veteran, one that the VA is working very hard to provide for and most, I repeat, most would say that they are getting exemplary care given their circumstances and the people that staff these hospitals at the caregiver to patient level are some of the hardest working and most dedicated individuals in the healthcare field. We are lucky to have them.

          That is not the problem at the VA, an agency that handles approximately 95 million patient interactions per year. The problems are systemic, rooted in a compensation system that breeds corruption and fraud and one that is exacerbated by a failed political system that proclaims a love for the troops but fails them - continuously, contemptuously, brazenly, incoherently and with no end to this cruel lunacy in sight.

          There was a time in the not too distant past when the ranks of the House and Senate were filled with - not just veterans, but war veterans, many of whom left pieces of themselves in the mountains of Italy or the shores of the Pacific Islands. No longer. At a time when our nation's veterans need strong advocates we are looking at a legislative body that has the lowest number of veterans in its ranks than at any time in the past 65 years. The newest veteran members of Congress obviously have not been around long enough to gain positions of power and influence as it pertains to veterans issues.

          I'll remind you that from the very first days of our most recent conflicts, we had parents purchasing body armor to send to their children that were in harms way. All the government provided was excuses.

          In February the Congress beat back a bill that would have provided for the construction and staffing of 22 new state-of-the-art VA facilities. When Republican lawmakers were questioned why they so vehemently opposed the passing of the bill Speaker Boehner said, "That's easy. Our nation simply cannot afford it." Yet, we can afford corporate welfare to the oil companies. We can afford tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans. We can afford farm subsidies to agribusiness including many members of the House and Senate. They make damn sure that they get theirs. We can afford foreign aid to countries that take our money with one hand and try to slit our throat with the other. We can give the military industrial complex billions in defense contracts to keep weapons programs alive that the top military leaders scream at the top of their lungs that they have absolutely no need of and use for. We can do all of that and then, to add insult to injury we create and encourage a compensation system in the agency that provide millions of dollars in bonuses in each and every facility for people simply doing their jobs to the best of their ability - an absolutely ludicrous and shameful proposition if I have ever heard one. The people that have falsified records to obtain these bonuses need to be fired, criminally charged, jailed and forced to publicly apologize to the American public that they are supposed to represent in providing first-class care to veterans.

          Additionally, politicians who continuously turn their backs on the troops need to be drummed out of office and shamed for the rest of their lives. Pardon my French, but they are lower than whale shit! They love to polish that American flag lapel pin and spend their days dialing for dollars while upwards of 22 veterans a day take their own lives and there are still tens of thousands of them sleeping in the streets from one end of the richest nation on the planet - to the other. I was one of them. Too sick to live anything that remotely resembled a normal life, yet even in my sickness, too proud to ask for assistance.

          At a personal level, I have been blessed to obtain incredibly competent and caring treatment for my PTSD and Agent Orange poisoning that at different times in my life have completely crippled me - both mentally and physically. It is a testament to the dedication of the VA caregivers that I have encountered that I am still alive. I honestly don't know how they have done it and not a single day of my life goes by that I don't take a few minutes to contemplate how fortunate I have been and to give thanks that even with my acerbic, demanding and not taking any bullshit from anyone stance, that I am treated as if I am their only and most valuable patient. It's mind-boggling what they put up with from me and they never complain.

          Truth be told, the only time that they ever failed me was when they sent me outside of the VA system to a local hospital for immediate, emergency treatment that was so incompetent that I almost died and it took me close to 6 months to recover from. That said, they did believe they were taking the proper action as they were afraid that I was in imminent danger of dieing. I have absolved them of any responsibility for what transpired except for not following up after putting me out of the VA system and into a facility that provided me with the absolute worst medical care that I have ever received in my entire life.

          All I know is that that firing General Shinseki will not change a damn thing for a single day and dumping extra hatred on President Obama won't either. The power to change this sorry state of affairs lies in only one place and that is, your hands. No one but you can fix this deeply flawed, decades old, ingrained institutional failure.

          Until you hold your elected representative accountable, nothing will ever change. Don't pick up the phone and call their office to politely voice your concern and displeasure. Do what I do. Pick up the phone, call their office and scream at the top of your lungs some profanity-laced words that accurately portray your loathing for this contemptuous behavior. It feels great! Call me crazy if you wish, but I can assure you that a few hundred calls in that vein will have a profound impact on the way that this problem will be dealt with in the future. People will always do what they know they can get away with and they need to be shaken out of their comfort zone.

          The GOP loves to call President Obama a wimp, but do you want to know who they think the true wimps are in this country. You! They think that you're the wimps because no matter what they do, from playing golf on your dime to legally trading on insider information, to making sure no matter how much money they entered Congress with they'll damn sure leave as millionaires and then become lobbyists - all the while sticking it up the ass of the American public - and worst of all fostering the slow decline of a once great nation while they stuff their pockets with money and they couldn't care less if a veteran or you, gets their next meal.

          You're not happy with the situation? Then get off of your dead, lard ass, raise a little hell and get to know what it feels like to effect change in the world. Get out of your state of perpetual somnambulism and take charge of the world around you or forever quit your friggin' bitchin' about how America is going to hell in a hand basket. And stop the crap about how President Obama spends every waking moment looking to fundamentally transform America's by secretly working to change our trajectory and place in the new world order. Give me a break. If you honestly believe that you need to be committed. You're insane.

          You folks have been begging for a scandal to prove your point. Now, forget your phony scandals and let's see you sink your teeth into a real scandal and do something to rectify it or is that too hard when compared to just sitting around blaming the administration for every single thing that's wrong with America.

          If you don't grab the problem by the balls and squeeze a little - then YOU ARE THE PROBLEM WITH AMERICA. You, you and only you.

          So, is your love of and concern for the troops rooted in sincere feeling or just more bloviating by a bunch of feckless weasels that in the end are no better than the politicians that you have put into office? I don't know. Only time will tell. Whatever happened to, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more." Oh - - right! That's only in the movies - and in my twisted mind. lol

          Yeah - I'm still trapped in the 60's in many ways, so I'll leave you with this bon mot - "Dig yourself."

          Hopefully most of you will have fully learned by now that I couldn't give a hairy rat's ass what you think, feel, say or do as it relates to me. I am completely oblivious to your existence. FDR said it best. "I welcome their hatred!" That, my friends is one of the ultimate joys of being profoundly disabled from PTSD for nearly half a century. Wow! Damn, I'm old, but I'm still kicking. Do you know why? Because I live on a steady diet of piss and vinegar. Yum-yum!!! May I have a second helping, please?

          I know that I'll be banned permanently because of my little tirade but I've always been a cost/benefit analysis kind of guy. If anything I've said motivates at least one of you to actually commit to making a concerted effort to try to initiate change in our little corner of the world, then I shall wear my banishment from the fold as a badge of honor.

          All I ask is that you remember that the clowns in DC truly do not care if you live or die. Your existence on the planet is an annoyance that they will tolerate until they can come up with a surreptitious plan to get rid of as many of you as possible in the shortest amount of time, after taking all of your money.

          Paranoid? Perhaps, but in my world paranoia is nothing more than being in possession of all the facts.

          Peace.

          Big Frank
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218758].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Don't forget! Private care can *****NOT***** help public! WHY? Because the current plan of public is to obliterate private. So if private tries to help, it not only quickens its demise BUT, after the demise, is no longer able to help. In short, it really accomplishes NOTHING in the long run.

    It is funny. In KINDERGARTEN you are told about how removal of something means it is removed! If you have 4 apples, and give 2 away, you only have 2. If you then give another 4 away, someone wil be looking for YOU to replace those 2 you had to take from elsewhere. If you do that enough, people will get UPSET. They may not even ever give you any more.

    NOW, if only more actually LEARNED that! HECK, even squirrels will get upset if you take their food, so THEY must understand it.

    OH, and I would be the LAST to say private is perfect. I have complained here a LOT about it! About not being able to test MYSELF for warfarin, getting DROPPED for no good reason, etc... I was EVEN ABANDONED in front of a hospital as an INVALID with NO FOOD, NO WATER, enough power in my cell phone for maybe one VERY short phone call, etc... In retrospect, maybe I should have used that to try to call 911, and literally make a federal case out of it. And YES, I mean LITERALLY. IMAGINE, I had to stop the few entering and ask them to ask the staff to help me. I couldn't walk, my stuff was unprotected, etc....

    STILL, it could be WORSE!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218158].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    If it were up to me, I'd have a new amendment that would require that any time the US sends troops into any war, military action or armed conflict that we must also pay for and build VA hospitals based on expected future casualties.

    We knew before Iraq 2 and Afghanstan there would be casualties like head injuries that would mean the people that got them would need medical care for the rest of their lives, and this would be very expensive.

    If we can't afford to pay for the medical care for those that fight for us, then we can't afford the war at all.

    The problem with the VA isn't that the gov can't run it well, it's that the gov didn't fund it well enough.
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9218798].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224205].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      Too bad you didn't listen to the rest of the statement - but then that wouldn't serve your political gods, would it? You have to find the right headline (from the left) to try to make a point but your point doesn't exist.

      Maybe others would like to read the rest of what Carson had to say:

      Myabe this is a message from God.....to show us what happens when you take layers and layers of bureaucracy and place them between patients and care providers.

      ...and if we can't get it right with a relatively small number of veterans - how are we going to do it with the entire population?

      You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure this out.

      We need seriousness here rather than just political speak

      how can I look better?
      how can my party look better?

      I'm saying this to both Democrats and Republicans - STOP and think about the people..
      You guys are SERVANTS
      You are not RULERS - first of all, get that out of your mind

      Ask yourself what can we do with the problems we have to solve in this nation, which are substantial and some of which threaten to destroy our nation like the fiscal irresponsibility.
      He ends by saying "these are problems that CAN be solved"

      OMG - a message of hope...we can't have that, can we?
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224248].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ThomM
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        Too bad you didn't listen to the rest of the statement - but then that wouldn't serve your political gods, would it? You have to find the right headline (from the left) to try to make a point but your point doesn't exist.

        Maybe others would like to read the rest of what Carson had to say:

        He ends by saying "these are problems that CAN be solved"

        OMG - a message of hope...we can't have that, can we?
        I know. Don't focus or even listen to his whole message, just half of one sentence.:rolleyes:
        Signature

        Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
        Getting old ain't for sissy's
        As you are I was, as I am you will be
        You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224271].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        He ends by saying "these are problems that CAN be solved"
        ALL problems can be solved once serious-minded people make a serious commitment to implement serious change. This stuff ain't rocket-science.

        First? Tell Congress to pony-up the loot that they said we "can't afford" to build the 22 new VA facilities that are long overdue and desperately needed.

        Next? Call Big Frank for a detailed list of how to fix the entire mess. I have a better solution than Ben Carson and God need not get involved. When I need His help, I'll ask for it. Don't hold your breath.

        Arrogant? That depends on whether or not you have the intellectual and emotional capacity to discern the nuance that sets the dividing line between arrogance and supreme self-confidence.

        Cheers. - Frank
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224314].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

          ALL problems can be solved once serious-minded people make a serious commitment to implement serious change. This stuff ain't rocket-science.

          First? Tell Congress to pony-up the loot that they said we "can't afford" to build the 22 new VA facilities that are long overdue and desperately needed.

          Next? Call Big Frank for a detailed list of how to fix the entire mess. I have a better solution than Ben Carson and God need not get involved. When I need His help, I'll ask for it. Don't hold your breath.

          Arrogant? That depends on whether or not you have the intellectual and emotional capacity to discern the nuance that sets the dividing line between arrogance and supreme self-confidence.

          Cheers. - Frank
          Just think if he said "it was great" instead you could of cut your rant in half.
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224326].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
            Banned
            Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

            Just think if he said "it was great" instead you could of cut your rant in half.
            1. That hardly qualifies as a rant. lol

            2. Brevity is NOT my forte. Are you new here?

            Cheers. - Frank

            P.S. I can go on, if you'd like!
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224343].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
              Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

              1. That hardly qualifies as a rant. lol

              2. Brevity is NOT my forte. Are you new here?

              Cheers. - Frank

              P.S. I can go on, if you'd like!
              Sounds good. It's a slow day over here
              Signature

              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
              Getting old ain't for sissy's
              As you are I was, as I am you will be
              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224352].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                Banned
                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                Sounds good. It's a slow day over here
                lol We'll normally I'd oblige you but I've been hard at it since 5 AM and still have a few hours to go before I settle in for the NY Rangers vs. Montreal Canadiens hockey game. That will be anointed by a giant rib-eye, smothered in sauteed onions and garlic and a couple of ice cold, Leinenkugel, 'Oktoberfest' brewskis. Does life get any better than that? I don't think so.

                Catch me early in the day, tomorrow. At the moment all the piss and vinegar that I use as fuel has been depleted. Don't worry, though. My tank gets filled to the tippy-top on just 6 hours of sleep. I'll be rarin' to go, bright and early in the AM.

                You have a wonderful evening.

                Cheers. - Frank
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224376].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                  Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                  lol We'll normally I'd oblige you but I've been hard at it since 5 AM and still have a few hours to go before I settle in for the NY Rangers vs. Montreal Canadiens hockey game. That will be anointed by a giant rib-eye, smothered in sauteed onions and garlic and a couple of ice cold, Leinenkugel, 'Oktoberfest' brewskis. Does life get any better than that? I don't think so.

                  Catch me early in the day, tomorrow. At the moment all the piss and vinegar that I use as fuel has been depleted. Don't worry, though. My tank gets filled to the tippy-top on just 6 hours of sleep. I'll be rarin' to go, bright and early in the AM.

                  You have a wonderful evening.

                  Cheers. - Frank
                  My asparagus has been coming up strong in my garden. So I've been doing the ribeye with sautéed asparagus, onion, peppers (frozen from my garden), and either clove garlic or garlic tops also from the garden.

                  You have a good evening yourself Frank.
                  Signature

                  Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                  Getting old ain't for sissy's
                  As you are I was, as I am you will be
                  You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224391].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                    Banned
                    Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                    My asparagus has been coming up strong in my garden.
                    Puhleeze. I only didn't mention the asparagus because I assumed you knew it was a given. lol



                    So I've been doing the ribeye with sautéed asparagus, onion, peppers (frozen from my garden), and either clove garlic or garlic tops also from the garden.
                    Did someone say "peppers?"



                    You have a good evening yourself Frank.
                    You can count on it.

                    Cheers. - Frank

                    P.S. I put garlic on my garlic!
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224424].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
                  Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                  You guys are SERVANTS
                  You are not RULERS - first of all, get that out of your mind

                  Seems a lot of them have their roles topsy-turvy in recent years, in both major parties.
                  Signature

                  Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224402].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        Too bad you didn't listen to the rest of the statement - but then that wouldn't serve your political gods, would it? You have to find the right headline (from the left) to try to make a point but your point doesn't exist.

        Maybe others would like to read the rest of what Carson had to say:

        He ends by saying "these are problems that CAN be solved"

        OMG - a message of hope...we can't have that, can we?

        How was I to know there was a bit of substance behind the headline?

        Normally it's not the case with those types.

        Talk about a one in a million shot...

        Anyways...

        I'd also love to hear Mr. Carson's position on whether or not we can afford to upgrade the VA system.

        It must be said...

        There's a certain group on the Hill that's responsible for preventing the VA from becoming the place it should be for all vets.

        I don't know whether you, Thom or seasoned agree with them on the Hill - ...


        ...they say that we just can't afford to upgrade the VA situation at this time.

        But, I'd love to know.

        Hint...

        It's the same crowd on the hill that's irresponsibly fighting the very notion of man-made climate change.


        BTW...

        I wonder what Mr. Carson's position is on man-made climate change. I'd love to know that also.
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9225657].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
          Banned
          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

          I wonder what Mr. Carson's position is on man-made climate change. I'd love to know that also.
          lol. I'm willing to bet my house that I know what his position is without ever having read of word of his on that particular subject. I'm just sayin' . . . . . :rolleyes:

          Cheers. - Frank
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9225681].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

          How was I to know there was a bit of substance behind the headline?

          Normally it's not the case with those types.

          Talk about a one in a million shot...

          Anyways...

          I'd also love to hear Mr. Carson's position on whether or not we can afford to upgrade the VA system.
          He would probably be dumbfounded! WHY "upgrade" mediocrity? Why throw money into what you know it won't help?

          It must be said...

          There's a certain group on the Hill that's responsible for preventing the VA from becoming the place it should be for all vets.

          I don't know whether you, Thom or seasoned agree with them on the Hill - ...


          ...they say that we just can't afford to upgrade the VA situation at this time.
          Well, REALIZE..... YOU ARE BEING PLAYED!!!!!! The other party had ABSOLUTE POWER, starting in 2007, and they KNEW ABOUT THIS, and THEY DIDN'T DO WHAT THEY CLAIM MUST NOW BE DONE! So that little fact should make it clear that they aren't telling the truth.

          PROOF that Obama KNEW about this in 2008, and PROMISED TO FIX IT!


          OK, you may doubt this due to the date, but it says OBAMA WAS TOLD!!!!!!!



          It's the same crowd on the hill that's irresponsibly fighting the very notion of man-made climate change.
          OK, let's say you were right. Give a VALID solution! Do you realize that as the US cuts back, china builds up steam? Do you realize that china does NOT care about the planet or treaties? THEY said the SAME!!!!!!

          I wonder what Mr. Carson's position is on man-made climate change. I'd love to know that also.
          OK, so the VA isn't CLOSE to being as important as your CC beliefs. Whatever happened to GW? AGAIN, give a REAL solution!

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9225991].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            He would probably be dumbfounded! WHY "upgrade" mediocrity? Why throw money into what you know it won't help?



            Well, REALIZE..... YOU ARE BEING PLAYED!!!!!! The other party had ABSOLUTE POWER, starting in 2007, and they KNEW ABOUT THIS, and THEY DIDN'T DO WHAT THEY CLAIM MUST NOW BE DONE! So that little fact should make it clear that they aren't telling the truth.

            PROOF that Obama KNEW about this in 2008, and PROMISED TO FIX IT!

            Barack Obama on Veterans - YouTube

            OK, you may doubt this due to the date, but it says OBAMA WAS TOLD!!!!!!!

            Incoming Obama administration was warned of VA waitlists in 2008 - YouTube




            OK, let's say you were right. Give a VALID solution! Do you realize that as the US cuts back, china builds up steam? Do you realize that china does NOT care about the planet or treaties? THEY said the SAME!!!!!!



            OK, so the VA isn't CLOSE to being as important as your CC beliefs. Whatever happened to GW? AGAIN, give a REAL solution!

            Steve
            You said...

            "Well, REALIZE..... YOU ARE BEING PLAYED!!!!!! The other party had ABSOLUTE POWER, starting in 2007, and they KNEW ABOUT THIS, and THEY DIDN'T DO WHAT THEY CLAIM MUST NOW BE DONE! So that little fact should make it clear that they aren't telling the truth.


            I say...

            I guess you don't know how the U.S. fed gov works.

            Beginning in 2007, there was a GOP president and a Dem congress.

            How does that add up to absolute power for either side?

            You said this...

            "WHY "upgrade" mediocrity? Why throw money into what you know it won't help?"

            So, your answer is no, we can't afford to upgrade the VA system right?

            The reason you're using is ...

            "WHY "upgrade" mediocrity? Why throw money into what you know it won't help?"

            But what about this?

            Additionally, Veterans strongly endorsed VA health care, with 91 percent offering positive assessments of inpatient care and 92 percent for outpatient care.

            When asked if they would use a VA medical center the next time they need inpatient care or outpatient care, Veterans overwhelmingly indicated they would (96 and 95 percent, respectively).

            You find that here...

            News Releases - Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs

            It looks like most vets disagree with your assessment of the VA.


            Of course there are the problems recently highlighted,...


            ... but if you start off on the wrong foot with faulty assumptions, you'll surely have the wrong policy prescriptions to fix the problems that plague the country - that's if you're interested in fixing anything - in the first place.

            The law would have cost just 21 Billion over a 10 year period and...

            ... the same crowd on the hill who didn't have any problems putting the wars on the national credit card and...

            ... even voted for a tax cut during time of war (first time in U.S. history) ...

            ... now want to act like the bill was asking for 2 trillion over a 10 year period.

            BTW...


            Aren't you an anti-man-made-climate-changer also?
            Signature

            "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226242].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
              Aren't you an anti-man-made-climate-changer also?
              So now anyone who disagrees with you is an anti-man-made-climate-changer? Better then calling them all racist I guess, lol.
              Signature

              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
              Getting old ain't for sissy's
              As you are I was, as I am you will be
              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226258].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                So now anyone who disagrees with you is an anti-man-made-climate-changer?

                Better then calling them all racist I guess, lol.

                Are you saying I throw the charge of racism around lightly?

                If so when?
                Signature

                "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226399].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                  Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                  Are you saying I throw the charge of racism around lightly?

                  If so when?
                  How about in that thread where you stated 99% of the other side are racist and then lowered it to 90%?
                  Now it's climate change which has nothing to do with the VA or health care in general.
                  Anything to distract from the real issues I guess.
                  Signature

                  Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                  Getting old ain't for sissy's
                  As you are I was, as I am you will be
                  You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226423].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                    Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                    How about in that thread where you stated 99% of the other side are racist and then lowered it to 90%?


                    Now it's climate change which has nothing to do with the VA or health care in general.


                    Anything to distract from the real issues I guess.
                    Once again your lack of comprehension is clouding the issues for you.

                    I said that 99% of the known racists in this society just happen to be on your side of the border which is much different than saying that 99% of the people on your side of the border are racist.

                    - Is it my fault that you along with a host of others in here like seasoned share the same economic philosophy as Rush Limbaugh - ...

                    ...a man so toxic even the NFL wants no part of him.

                    (I've already explained it to you in an earlier thread - so you know you do share the same economic philosophy as Rush.


                    I just want to make sure everyone readings our posts know who you and some others in here are aligned with economically and for some it also goes with the environment.

                    - And BTW... you oughta be careful what you say thank you to.

                    In one thread when we were talking about gay rights etc., some guy said that any business person should be able to discriminate against anyone for any reason.

                    That's all he said - and you thanked him for that.

                    Since you thanked him for his post, I had to ask you if you believed race was included in the list of reasons to discriminate against anyone.
                    Signature

                    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226531].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                      Once again your lack of comprehension is clouding the issues for you.

                      I said that 99% of the known racists in this society just happen to be on your side of the border which is much different than saying that 99% of the people on your side of the border are racist.

                      - Is it my fault that you along with a host of others in here like seasoned share the same economic philosophy as Rush Limbaugh - ...

                      ...a man so toxic even the NFL wants no part of him.

                      (I've already explained it to you in an earlier thread - so you know you do share the same economic philosophy as Rush.


                      I just want to make sure everyone readings our posts know who you and some others in here are aligned with economically and for some it also goes with the environment.

                      - And BTW... you oughta be careful what you say thank you to.

                      In one thread when we were talking about gay rights etc., some guy said that any business person should be able to discriminate against anyone for any reason.

                      That's all he said - and you thanked him for that.

                      Since you thanked him for his post, I had to ask you if you believed race was included in the list of reasons to discriminate against anyone.
                      My lack of comprehension?
                      How many times does a person have to explain to you that they ARE NOT a republican? My side of the border as you put it is independent/libertarian I've said many times that everyone should have equal rights, period. But yeah that puts me on the side of racists, lol.
                      The rest of your post just shows how little you understand about me or most other people here that you deem to be on the other side.
                      I have to be careful who I thank?
                      Are you really serious?
                      I've explained myself and gave some of the reasons for my thanks to you so many times I feel like a broken record.
                      But you think you have my (and others) all figured out so no matter what we say you either ignore or don't believe because it would make you wrong.
                      Signature

                      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                      Getting old ain't for sissy's
                      As you are I was, as I am you will be
                      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226590].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                        My lack of comprehension?


                        How many times does a person have to explain to you that they ARE NOT a republican?

                        My side of the border as you put it is independent/libertarian I've said many times that every should have equal rights, period.

                        But yeah that puts me on the side of racists, lol.


                        The rest of your post just shows how little you understand about me or most other people here that you deem to be on the other side.


                        I have to be careful who I thank?

                        Are you really serious?

                        I've explained myself and gave some of the reasons for my thanks to you so many times I feel like a broken record.

                        But you think you have my (and others) all figured out so no matter what we say you either ignore or don't believe because it would make you wrong.
                        And I guess you forgot how I explained to you on a number of points...

                        ... how you and Rush Limbaugh are on the same page as far as economic policy is concerned - no matter what you choose to call yourself and...

                        ... unfortunately that does put you on the same side - as far as economic policy goes, with a known racist - so toxic even the NFL wants no part of him.
                        Signature

                        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226654].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
                          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                          ... unfortunately that does put you on the same side - as far as economic policy goes, with a known racist - so toxic even the NFL wants no part of him.
                          Good lord, TL, even Slate disagreed with you about this one:

                          Rush was right about Donovan McNabb.
                          Signature

                          Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226699].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                            Originally Posted by Dan Riffle View Post

                            Good lord, TL, even Slate disagreed with you about this one:

                            Rush was right about Donovan McNabb.
                            Mcnabb went on to have a very good career playing 13 years whether the media, NFL or anyone else desired him to be successful.

                            I'm sure the Eagles wanted him to be successful since they invested in him like they would with any other QB.

                            Perhaps you can explain why the NFL rejected Rush Limbaugh being part of any group that wanted to purchase any NFL team.

                            Was the rejection revenge for the McNabb affair or was it for his long list of racial bomb throwing?
                            Signature

                            "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226753].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
                              Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                              Perhaps you can explain why the NFL rejected Rush Limbaugh being part of any group that wanted to purchase any NFL team.

                              Was the rejection revenge for the McNabb affair or was it for his long list of racial bomb throwing?
                              Perchance the NFL doesn't want such a polarizing figure as part of the ownership structure. Maybe Goodell doesn't like the way Limbaugh constantly confuses his salad fork with his entree fork.

                              Besides, why take a risk on a loose cannon when you have someone as vanilla as Jon Bon Jovi chomping at the bit?
                              Signature

                              Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226793].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                                Originally Posted by Dan Riffle View Post

                                Perchance the NFL doesn't want such a polarizing figure as part of the ownership structure. Maybe Goodell doesn't like the way Limbaugh constantly confuses his salad fork with his entree fork.

                                Besides, why take a risk on a loose cannon when you have someone as vanilla as Jon Bon Jovi chomping at the bit?
                                Sure Dan sure.
                                Signature

                                "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226826].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
                                  Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                                  Sure Dan sure.
                                  Hey, there's your "facts", my "facts", and the truth probably somewhere in the middle (but assuredly a tad closer to me ).
                                  Signature

                                  Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226886].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                          And I guess you forgot how I explained to you on a number of points...

                          ... how you and Rush Limbaugh are on the same page as far as economic policy is concerned - no matter what you choose to call yourself and...

                          ... unfortunately that does put you on the same side - as far as economic policy goes, with a known racist - so toxic even the NFL wants no part of him.
                          You really are pathetic.
                          I doubt very much my economic policy is the same as Limbaugh, of course I've never listened to him so I really don't know.
                          Your "side" continues to use unmanned drones to kill innocent women and children in Yemen and Chad, so I guess using your warped logic that you have no problem with being a baby killer. I guess it's worth killing a bunch of innocent people to further your cause right?
                          Signature

                          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                          Getting old ain't for sissy's
                          As you are I was, as I am you will be
                          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226756].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                            Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                            You really are pathetic.
                            I doubt very much my economic policy is the same as Limbaugh, of course I've never listened to him so I really don't know.


                            Your "side" continues to use unmanned drones to kill innocent women and children in Yemen and Chad, so I guess using your warped logic that you have no problem with being a baby killer. I guess it's worth killing a bunch of innocent people to further your cause right?

                            And you are becoming more and more Seasonesk by the day.

                            We've already been over how you share the same basic economic philosophy as Rush Limbaugh on at least two other occasions.

                            I can denounce the killing of innocents but you can't denounce Rush Limbaugh's national economic philosophy because it is your own.

                            Now for the last time, here's Rush, here's you, here's Rush, here's you...

                            1:- No raise in tax rates on the wealthy

                            2:- No min wage at all/or don't update it for inflation and/or productivity

                            3:- The national debt is out of control

                            4:- No ACA

                            5:- Abolish some federal gov departments such as education, EPA etc.

                            6:- No national standards set by the feds

                            7:- No going green as a nation

                            8:- No investment in national infrastructure: Roads, bridges etc.

                            9:- No new immigration law with a path to citizenship (it's an economic issue also)

                            10: - No wall street taxation tax.

                            11: - Loves to harp on the small time so-called freeloaders such a welfare recipients.


                            The above are some of Rush Limbaugh's economic related positions.

                            There's no need to explain why you agree with these positions. The important thing is that you do agree with these positions.

                            But if you disagree with any of Rush's positions - please let us know.


                            BTW...

                            The vast majority of anti-climate changers and people that make idiotic statements about women's rights such as rape and abortion deniers also subscribe to the above.

                            You're in fine intellectual company.


                            BTW, you never answered my question as to whether you're in favor of that 21 billion dollars (over 10 years) upgrade the VA bill the GOP killed in February.

                            Yes or no?
                            Signature

                            "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229368].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                              Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                              And you are becoming more and more Seasonesk by the day.

                              We've already been over how you share the same basic economic philosophy as Rush Limbaugh on at least two other occasions.

                              I can denounce the killing of innocents but you can't denounce Rush Limbaugh's national economic philosophy because it is your own.

                              Now for the last time, here's Rush, here's you, here's Rush, here's you...

                              1:- No raise in tax rates on the wealthy

                              2:- No min wage at all/or don't update it for inflation and/or productivity

                              3:- The national debt is out of control

                              4:- No ACA

                              5:- Abolish some federal gov departments such as education, EPA etc.

                              6:- No national standards set by the feds

                              7:- No going green as a nation

                              8:- No investment in national infrastructure: Roads, bridges etc.

                              9:- No new immigration law with a path to citizenship (it's an economic issue also)

                              10: - No wall street taxation tax.

                              11: - Loves to harp on the small time so-called freeloaders such a welfare recipients.


                              The above are some of Rush Limbaugh's economic related positions.

                              There's no need to explain why you agree with these positions. The important thing is that you do agree with these positions.

                              But if you disagree with any of Rush's positions - please let us know.


                              BTW...

                              The vast majority of anti-climate changers and people that make idiotic statements about women's rights such as rape and abortion deniers also subscribe to the above.

                              You're in fine intellectual company.


                              BTW, you never answered my question as to whether you're in favor of that 21 billion dollars (over 10 years) upgrade the VA bill the GOP killed in February.

                              Yes or no?
                              This is getting old TL.
                              I disagree with a few of those positions and agree with a few.
                              Here's where you and I disagree.
                              You think the liberal democrat way is the only way and anyone that disagrees is the enemy.
                              I think any policy should be fair to every American and not give an advantage or disadvantage to anyone. In other words I believe we are all equal and deserve equal rights and an economic plan that is fair to everyone and doesn't penalize anyone.

                              Just throwing money at a problem doesn't always solve the problem. I don't care how much money is in the budget for the VA over the next 10 years. What is important is that the veterans get all the help they deserve, regardless of the cost.
                              If it costs 21 billion or 41 billion, it doesn't matter.
                              What matters is if a veteran needs medical attention they get it, promptly. A veteran should get the absolute best medical care possible, regardless of the cost.
                              Signature

                              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                              Getting old ain't for sissy's
                              As you are I was, as I am you will be
                              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229411].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                Blacks ain't voting for him any more than we'd vote for Herman Cain.

                                Neither will the Hispanics or the Asians who voted for Obama like 75%.
                                Wow how arrogant can you get.
                                Now you speak for 3 different races?
                                Do you understand that talking like that is what keeps racism alive?
                                Try this.
                                Some Americans won't vote for him because......
                                Other Americans won't vote for him because......
                                There's no need to pull race into it.
                                Signature

                                Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229565].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                                  Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                  Wow how arrogant can you get.


                                  Now you speak for 3 different races?
                                  Do you understand that talking like that is what keeps racism alive?


                                  Try this.
                                  Some Americans won't vote for him because......
                                  Other Americans won't vote for him because......


                                  There's no need to pull race into it.
                                  Talk to Sal.

                                  She's the one talking about a gusher of multi-racial love for Mr. Carson.

                                  And...

                                  Sure lots of folks of all stripes will flock to his banner but when it comes to getting in that voting booth...

                                  I can say with a lot of confidence (based on recent voting patterns)...

                                  ... that black folks in America will not vote for Mr. Carson - more than about 10% - because of his policies.

                                  And based on recent voting patterns neither will Asians or Latinos - neither group more than 25% - because of his policies.

                                  BTW, I'm not speaking for anyone and there plenty of voter data available for anyone to make educated guesses.

                                  That's all Thom, but you can make it into anything you like. (and you seem to be working overtime at it)

                                  There's no way we're going to be able to prove this one way or the other cause Mr. Carson won't get on the ballot any more than Ron Paul - or his son, which I suspect got you a little peeved at my mention of the Dad's failure - since you were one of his most ardent supporters.
                                  Signature

                                  "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229657].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                    Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                                    Talk to Sal.

                                    She's the one talking about a gusher of multi-racial love for Mr. Carson.

                                    And...

                                    Sure lots of folks of all stripes will flock to his banner but when it comes to getting in that voting booth...

                                    I can say with a lot of confidence (based on recent voting patterns)...

                                    ... that black folks in America will not vote for Mr. Carson - more than about 10% - because of his policies.

                                    And based on recent voting patterns neither will Asians or Latinos - neither group more than 25% - because of his policies.

                                    BTW, I'm not speaking for anyone and there plenty of voter data available for anyone to make educated guesses.

                                    That's all Thom, but you can make it into anything you like. (and you seem to be working overtime at it)

                                    There's no way we're going to be able to prove this one way or the other cause Mr. Carson won't get on the ballot any more than Ron Paul - or his son, which I suspect got you a little peeved at my mention of the Dad's failure - since you were one of his most ardent supporters.
                                    Right, I'm the one who went back to get the list of Limbaugh crap:rolleyes:
                                    As usual you totally missed my point.
                                    I listen to Carson and I hear an intelligent man talking who has a good grasp on common sense and logic.
                                    I don't look at him as a black man because his skin color doesn't matter, I just see a man.
                                    You can't end racism by dividing people into groups because of their race. All that really does is keep racism alive.
                                    Blacks ain't voting for him any more than we'd vote for Herman Cain.

                                    Neither will the Hispanics or the Asians who voted for Obama like 75%.
                                    That statement divides people into groups based on their skin color and nothing more.
                                    That is how you keep racism alive.
                                    Signature

                                    Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                    Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                    As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                    You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229696].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                                      Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                      Right, I'm the one who went back to get the list of Limbaugh crap:rolleyes:

                                      As usual you totally missed my point.

                                      I listen to Carson and I hear an intelligent man talking who has a good grasp on common sense and logic.

                                      I don't look at him as a black man because his skin color doesn't matter, I just see a man.

                                      You can't end racism by dividing people into groups because of their race. All that really does is keep racism alive.

                                      That statement divides people into groups based on their skin color and nothing more.
                                      That is how you keep racism alive.

                                      I don't give a shit how you look at him. I didn't say anything about that kind of stuff.

                                      Voting patterns are voting patterns and there's nothing you can do about it. The data is readily available.

                                      That is the reality.

                                      White folks have voted for a republican near 60% in the most recent 5 or 6 potus elections - and that's a fact.

                                      Note: Before you try to charge me with racism for saying that, I am not saying anyone/group is racially motivated by their vote for any party or candidate.


                                      BTW...

                                      You need to stop trying to paint me as some type of racist just because your economic attitudes are in lockstep with a confirmed racist like Rush Limbaugh.
                                      Signature

                                      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229791].message }}
                                      • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                        Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                                        I don't give a shit how you look at him. I didn't say anything about that kind of stuff.

                                        Voting patterns are voting patterns and there's nothing you can do about it. The data is readily available.

                                        That is the reality.

                                        White folks have voted for a republican near 60% in the most recent 5 or 6 potus elections - and that's a fact.

                                        Note: Before you try to charge me with racism for saying that, I am not saying anyone/group is racially motivated by their vote for any party or candidate.


                                        BTW...

                                        You need to stop trying to paint me as some type of racist just because your economic attitudes are in lockstep with a confirmed racist like Rush Limbaugh.
                                        Tl I don't think you're really understanding me yet.
                                        From what I have heard Rush sounds like a real racist.
                                        What I'm talking about is a type of racism that most don't recognize as being racist.
                                        Why is saying 60% of white people vote republican important weather it's a fact or not?
                                        How is it not just another reason to hate white people if your of a different color and democrat? After all you don't know which whites vote that way.
                                        Same when you say black people and Hispanics won't vote for Carson. That's just another reason for republicans and others to hate those two groups. A person who thinks his candidate is the best choice for the country is not going to like anyone who doesn't agree with them. Look at some of your posts here on the forum. Look at how strongly you defend your president and party. Look at what you say about republicans and anyone who disagrees with you.
                                        You can not and will not end racism when you continue to divide people into groups based on their skin color or religion or even sexual preferences.
                                        You need to stop trying to paint me as some type of racist just because your economic attitudes are in lockstep with a confirmed racist like Rush Limbaugh.
                                        How is saying I'm in lockstep with a "confirmed racist like Rush Limbaugh" not implying that I am also a racist?
                                        As a side note, I've told you at least twice that I AGREED with A FEW of what you called his economic statements and DISAGREED with A FEW also. How is that being in lockstep with him. As I've also told you twice, I'VE NEVER LISTENED TO RUSH, EVER. I have no interest in listening to any puppet master on the radio, Internet, or TV.
                                        Signature

                                        Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                        Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                        As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                        You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229888].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                          Thom...

                                          You can stop deluding yourself because you do share the same basic economic attitudes as republicans and Rush Limbaugh whether you like it or not.
                                          If I do I came about them myself from my own research and not because they are what my party told me to believe.
                                          I tend to like it when what I believe is similar to either party.
                                          It shows me there may still be hope for that party.
                                          Signature

                                          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                          Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                          As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229893].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                                          Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                          Tl I don't think you're really understanding me yet.
                                          From what I have heard Rush sounds like a real racist.
                                          What I'm talking about is a type of racism that most don't recognize as being racist.
                                          Why is saying 60% of white people vote republican important weather it's a fact or not?
                                          How is it not just another reason to hate white people if your of a different color and democrat?
                                          After all you don't know which whites vote that way.
                                          Same when you say black people and Hispanics won't vote for Carson. That's just another reason for republicans and others to hate those two groups. A person who thinks his candidate is the best choice for the country is not going to like anyone who doesn't agree with them. Look at some of your posts here on the forum. Look at how strongly you defend your president and party. Look at what you say about republicans and anyone who disagrees with you.
                                          You can not and will not end racism when you continue to divide people into groups based on their skin color or religion or even sexual preferences.

                                          How is saying I'm in lockstep with a "confirmed racist like Rush Limbaugh" not implying that I am also a racist?
                                          As a side note, I've told you at least twice that I AGREED with A FEW of what you called his economic statements and DISAGREED with A FEW also. How is that being in lockstep with him. As I've also told you twice, I'VE NEVER LISTENED TO RUSH, EVER. I have no interest in listening to any puppet master on the radio, Internet, or TV.

                                          If I replace the word racist with the word "serious a-hole" will you get it then?

                                          I've said this in another thread...

                                          If he's an a-hole when it comes to the environment/climate change and he's also an a-hole when it comes to women and he's also an a-hole when it comes to social issues...


                                          ... I'd say there's a very good chance his economic philosophy will be just as a-holish and it really, really...

                                          ...should be lots of food for thought for anyone who somehow, someway just happens to have the same economic attitudes as him.

                                          Save the talk about dividing people etc.

                                          - I don't agree that simply discussing American voting patterns divides people and generates racism as you seem to do.

                                          You refuse to specify which of Rush's attitudes you disagree with because you and I both know you agree with the vast majority of them and you're trying to deflect by talking about how I shouldn't talk about race and voting patterns etc.

                                          I'm signing out of this back and forth with you on these particular topics (Carson & your economic philosophy) and in this particular thread.

                                          All The Best!!
                                          Signature

                                          "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230131].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                            Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                                            If I replace the word racist with the word "serious a-hole" will you get it then?

                                            I've said this in another thread...

                                            If he's an a-hole when it comes to the environment/climate change and he's also an a-hole when it comes to women and he's also an a-hole when it comes to social issues...


                                            ... I'd say there's a very good chance his economic philosophy will be just as a-holish and it really, really...

                                            ...should be lots of food for thought for anyone who somehow, someway just happens to have the same economic attitudes as him.

                                            Save the talk about dividing people etc.

                                            - I don't agree that simply discussing American voting patterns divides people and generates racism as you seem to do.

                                            You refuse to specify which of Rush's attitudes you disagree with because you and I both know you agree with the vast majority of them and you're trying to deflect by talking about how I shouldn't talk about race and voting patterns etc.

                                            I'm signing out of this back and forth with you on these particular topics (Carson & your economic philosophy) and in this particular thread.

                                            All The Best!!
                                            There's no use talking to you.
                                            You have your mind made up about what I am and I really don't give a rats ass.
                                            You can call Rush anything you want, I don't care. It doesn't anger me or upset me in any way.
                                            I'm not refusing to go over Rush's points again because I agree with him or not.
                                            I'm just tired of you trying to pigeon hole me because I may or may not agree with someone I've never listened to. If I do happen to agree with him on anything I doubt it's for the same reasons, which you seem to ignore or not comprehend.
                                            If you can't understand how dividing people into groups based on skin color does nothing to end racism and just promotes it, I feel really sorry for you. The key word there is dividing.
                                            Try watching this video. If this teacher can explain it to 3rd graders maybe she can make you understand also.
                                            A Class Divided - Watch Free Documentary Online
                                            Signature

                                            Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                            Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                            As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                            You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230219].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
                                    Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                                    Talk to Sal.

                                    She's the one talking about a gusher of multi-racial love for Mr. Carson.

                                    And...

                                    Sure lots of folks of all stripes will flock to his banner but when it comes to getting in that voting booth...

                                    I can say with a lot of confidence (based on recent voting patterns)...

                                    ... that black folks in America will not vote for Mr. Carson - more than about 10% - because of his policies.

                                    And based on recent voting patterns neither will Asians or Latinos - neither group more than 25% - because of his policies.

                                    BTW, I'm not speaking for anyone and there plenty of voter data available for anyone to make educated guesses.

                                    That's all Thom, but you can make it into anything you like. (and you seem to be working overtime at it)

                                    There's no way we're going to be able to prove this one way or the other cause Mr. Carson won't get on the ballot any more than Ron Paul - or his son, which I suspect got you a little peeved at my mention of the Dad's failure - since you were one of his most ardent supporters.
                                    Got news for ya sweetie. Your opinions (and they are NOT facts) aren't as widely supported as you want to believe they are. You talk as if almost the whole country thinks like you do and you are actually in the minority. But - that's the way communists have always been.

                                    As far as I'm concerned, I still strongly believe that you are a paid poster for your "party". I've never seen a good or logical argument or even a valid statistic from you. You just come into any thread that people are talking about anything you disagree with and start flinging poop like a monkey with an attitude.

                                    Dr. Carson may not choose to run. He is being petitioned to, but nobody can force him to run. Will he win? Probably not - not because he's not a favorite choice, but because he'll be blacked out by the media and the debates just like everyone else who isn't the Corporate choice of the main two parties.

                                    He does, however, hold enough respect that he's been called into committee to help fix the ACA so it might actually be worth at least something.

                                    I would vote for Carson in a heartbeat. I am not sure who Herman Cain is so I have not a clue what you are talking about. As far as Ron Paul. We'll never know because he was blacked out by media and kept from debates so he obviously posed a problem for the people in power. They let him talk up til the time they found he had a strong following. That's US politics in the 2000s. WE do not choose even if the majority of the drooling voters out there still think we do.
                                    Signature

                                    Sal
                                    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
                                    Beyond the Path

                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229776].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                                      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

                                      Got news for ya sweetie. Your opinions (and they are NOT facts) aren't as widely supported as you want to believe they are. You talk as if almost the whole country thinks like you do and you are actually in the minority. But - that's the way communists have always been.

                                      As far as I'm concerned, I still strongly believe that you are a paid poster for your "party". I've never seen a good or logical argument or even a valid statistic from you. You just come into any thread that people are talking about anything you disagree with and start flinging poop like a monkey with an attitude.

                                      Dr. Carson may not choose to run. He is being petitioned to, but nobody can force him to run. Will he win? Probably not - not because he's not a favorite choice, but because he'll be blacked out by the media and the debates just like everyone else who isn't the Corporate choice of the main two parties.

                                      He does, however, hold enough respect that he's been called into committee to help fix the ACA so it might actually be worth at least something.

                                      I would vote for Carson in a heartbeat. I am not sure who Herman Cain is so I have not a clue what you are talking about. As far as Ron Paul. We'll never know because he was blacked out by media and kept from debates so he obviously posed a problem for the people in power. They let him talk up til the time they found he had a strong following. That's US politics in the 2000s. WE do not choose even if the majority of the drooling voters out there still think we do.
                                      You said...

                                      "As far as I'm concerned, I still strongly believe that you are a paid poster for your "party".

                                      I've never seen a good or logical argument or even a valid statistic from you.

                                      You just come into any thread that people are talking about anything you disagree with and start flinging poop like a monkey with an attitude."

                                      I say...

                                      I got it.

                                      Resort to name calling when nothing else is working.

                                      I never called you a subversive even when you came in here talking that Republic of Missouri crap when in fact it sounds a lot like subversion.

                                      I guess Cliven Bundy is sort of a soulmate for you, since you both believe in that Republic of ? crap.

                                      If you don't believe in that Republic Of ? crap please let us know.
                                      Signature

                                      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229851].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                                      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

                                      As far as I'm concerned, I still strongly believe that you are a paid poster for your "party". I've never seen a good or logical argument or even a valid statistic from you. You just come into any thread that people are talking about anything you disagree with and start flinging poop like a monkey with an attitude.
                                      That WOULD explain a lot!

                                      I am not sure who Herman Cain is so I have not a clue what you are talking about.
                                      Ben Carson is liked because he seems to be VERY nice, smart, the personification of the american dream, has good relevant reasonable ideas and ideals, and is literally a brain surgeon with knowledge of health care and the insurance industry. That he happens to be african american is incidental.

                                      Herman Cain is liked because he has run businesses, seems to be VERY nice, smart, the personification of the american dream, has good relevant reasonable ideas and ideals, and has some nice ideas about how to increase "tax revenue" by replacing the IRS with a consumption tax. They SAID he started Godfathers pizza, but wikipedia says he was merely appointed CEO. That he happens to be african american is incidental.

                                      I have a friend that HATES Herman Cain, as a candidate, and NOW, I see what he was talking about. H.C. was chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch from 1989 to 1991.[13] He was deputy chairman, from 1992 to 1994, and chairman, from 1995 to 1996, of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.[13]

                                      As for Ben Carson, he has NO party affiliation. His books go back to 1990. I am tempted to read his 1996 book "think big" to see where he REALLY stands.

                                      BTW to others... Herman caine ran earlier, and other african americans ran far earlier on the same side. YKW will probably take credit, but it is unwarranted! HECK, you could even claim that the US earlier had a female president! 1919-1921 Edith Wilson! 28.5 president! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_Wilson

                                      Woodrow Wilson had a massive stroke, and was bed ridden, and Edith managed the oval office taking the more important matters to the her husband to discuss, etc... They were democrat BTW. Note to TL, don't do a find for "RAC", it will break your heart!

                                      Steve
                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230201].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                This is getting old TL.
                                I disagree with a few of those positions and agree with a few.
                                Here's where you and I disagree.

                                You think the liberal democrat way is the only way and anyone that disagrees is the enemy.

                                I think any policy should be fair to every American and not give an advantage or disadvantage to anyone. In other words I believe we are all equal and deserve equal rights and an economic plan that is fair to everyone and doesn't penalize anyone.

                                Just throwing money at a problem doesn't always solve the problem. I don't care how much money is in the budget for the VA over the next 10 years. What is important is that the veterans get all the help they deserve, regardless of the cost.

                                If it costs 21 billion or 41 billion, it doesn't matter.

                                What matters is if a veteran needs medical attention they get it, promptly. A veteran should get the absolute best medical care possible, regardless of the cost.
                                Good to know your position on the revamping of the VA bill.

                                It sure is getting old Thom.

                                You don't have to be the enemy to be flat out wrong - if you claim you're interested in a much better standard of living for the American people.



                                Back to you and Rush and Rush and you and your agreed upon attitudes/policies.


                                Which policies/attitudes do you disagree with? I'd really, really love to know.


                                I bet its not more than a couple (if that many) out of the 11 positions I listed.


                                Prove me wrong and remember you're on the record.


                                I'll list them again for you...


                                1:- No raise in tax rates on the wealthy

                                2:- No min wage at all/or don't update it for inflation and/or productivity

                                3:- The national debt is out of control

                                4:- No ACA

                                5:- Abolish some federal gov departments such as education, EPA etc.

                                6:- No national standards set by the feds

                                7:- No going green as a nation

                                8:- No investment in national infrastructure: Roads, bridges etc.

                                9:- No new immigration law with a path to citizenship (it's an economic issue also)

                                10: - No wall street taxation tax.

                                11: - Loves to harp on the small time so-called freeloaders such a welfare recipients.


                                Which attitudes to you disagree with?

                                I dare you to specify and I'll settle for just the numbers.


                                As I have also said to Kay, Seasoned and Steve, if the goal is to help create and sustain a society in which there is a large prosperous middle class in America - it's simply not going to happen with your set of economic attitudes which lead to policies.

                                Logistically it simply can not happen with your economic philosophy.


                                But on the other hand...

                                If the goal is to help create a society in which upward mobility is tough, living standards are low, retirements are scary, life is financially precarious etc. your economic philosophy will do quite nicely in achieving that goal.



                                Thom...

                                You can stop deluding yourself because you do share the same basic economic attitudes as republicans and Rush Limbaugh whether you like it or not.
                                Signature

                                "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229793].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                              Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                              1:- No raise in tax rates on the wealthy
                              How's about lowering the rate for ALL tax payers!?!?!?!?!? OH NO, you LOVE others to pay taxes, etc... And Let's hit those rich guys TRIPLE!

                              2:- No min wage at all/or don't update it for inflation and/or productivity
                              REAL productivity DROPPED! You CAN'T update it for inflation, because then you will update it FOREVER! GEE, that IS what is happening!

                              3:- The national debt is out of control
                              YEP, so let's cut SPENDING! YOU want to increase taxes. OK, what happens when the REAL tax rate hits 90%. It has ***********NEVER************ been NEAR 90% in the US. NEVER! When they said 90%, it was NOT INCOME*taxrate=tax! It was (INCOME-DEDUCTIONS)=AGI*taxrate=tax, and even THAT exceeds the REAL value, since they had other mitigating items. But I guarantee if it hits 90%, people WILL stop running businesses, and people will be told to go home. BYE BYE JOB!

                              4:- No ACA
                              WOW, you should have seen some of the recent stuff about the ACA. It is NOT good!

                              5:- Abolish some federal gov departments such as education, EPA etc.
                              How about we get rid of the armed jack booted THUGS at the EPA and the ridiculous rules, etc.... As for education? WHY do we have a FEDERAL department? We had schools that apparently did VERY well before all of the self serving garbage. NOW, they have "common core"!


                              6:- No national standards set by the feds
                              Well, the ones they are doing now ARE pretty DUMB!

                              7:- No going green as a nation
                              They have wasted MANY MANY BILLIONS of dollars! Literally THROWN DOWN TOILETS! They recently wrote standards that can only be met TWO ways!

                              1. NUCLEAR! HEY, even GERMANY is cutting back on this, after japans failures!
                              2. Natural Gas! HEY, liberals are trying to DESTROY this! OK, the US is a LEADER! This is used in homes, like mine, various buses, etc... But moving EVERYTHING to this will be NASTY! HIGH PRICES, POSSIBLE SHORTAGES, ETC....

                              8:- No investment in national infrastructure: Roads, bridges etc.
                              BULL! This is a section 8 thing, and nobody spoke against it. I AM against all the stupid ADVERTISEMENTS that say a road was created by a government project that had NOTHING to do with it!

                              9:- No new immigration law with a path to citizenship (it's an economic issue also)
                              Let's fix enforcement FIRST! There IS a path to citizenship. They simply don't like that the US is SUPPOSED to be a COUNTRY! COUNTRIES HAVE BORDERS!

                              10: - No wall street taxation tax.
                              WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?

                              11: - Loves to harp on the small time so-called freeloaders such a welfare recipients.
                              NOPE, YOU DO! YOU keep wanting to pay them more and more!


                              The above are some of Rush Limbaugh's economic related positions.

                              There's no need to explain why you agree with these positions. The important thing is that you do agree with these positions.

                              But if you disagree with any of Rush's positions - please let us know.
                              OK, so you figure there are two people on the planet that think for themselves. ONE is the guy informing YOU, and the other is RUSH. WOW!

                              Yeah, I only recently started(SPORADICALLY) listening to rush, after DECADES. I have to say that he has never changed MY opinion. And if you can't see where he and I differ, I guess you don't know him that well. There HAVE been a few points that I expressed HERE that were contrary to his.

                              The vast majority of anti-climate changers and people that make idiotic statements about women's rights such as rape and abortion deniers also subscribe to the above.

                              You're in fine intellectual company.
                              We HAVE been waiting on PROOF of the GLOBAL TREND nature, and how you plan to fix it.

                              WHO said ANYTHING about rape? I am AGAINST rape. With abortion, people DO start to cringe on late term, self serving, and regular abortions.

                              BTW, you never answered my question as to whether you're in favor of that 21 billion dollars (over 10 years) upgrade the VA bill the GOP killed in February.
                              Please first state HOW that is supposed to help the wait lists!

                              Steve
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230139].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                                Banned
                                Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                                It has ***********NEVER************ been NEAR 90% in the US. NEVER! When they said 90%, it was NOT INCOME*taxrate=tax! It was (INCOME-DEDUCTIONS)=AGI*taxrate=tax, and even THAT exceeds the REAL value, since they had other mitigating items. But I guarantee if it hits 90%, people WILL stop running businesses, and people will be told to go home. BYE BYE JOB!
                                Not looking to enter the fray - just want to correct a point.

                                Starting in 1939, the top rate was 75%. It rose to 91% during WWII all the way until 1964, when it decreased to 70%.

                                The 91% tax was for 200k or more.

                                Cheers. - Frank

                                P.S I have known this from previous battles, but the source is: Income tax in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230182].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                                  Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                                  Not looking to enter the fray - just want to correct a point.

                                  Starting in 1939, the top rate was 75%. It rose to 91% during WWII all the way until 1964, when it decreased to 70%.

                                  The 91% tax was for 200k or more.

                                  Cheers. - Frank

                                  P.S I have known this from previous battles, but the source is: Income tax in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
                                  On AGI, NOT INCOME!

                                  Since 1987(if not earlier), they have been bringing AGI closer to real income. HECK, they talk about having free, or low cost, insurance in the US. I had to pay almost $400 for a test today, and I probably won't be able to deduct a PENNY on my tax return. BTW YES I have insurance, but I haven't met my deductible, and it was like $800 to begin with.

                                  Steve
                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230249].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                                    Banned
                                    Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                                    On AGI, NOT INCOME!

                                    Since 1987(if not earlier), they have been bringing AGI closer to real income. HECK, they talk about having free, or low cost, insurance in the US. I had to pay almost $400 for a test today, and I probably won't be able to deduct a PENNY on my tax return. BTW YES I have insurance, but I haven't met my deductible, and it was like $800 to begin with.

                                    Steve
                                    You sound very angry.

                                    Cheers. - Frank
                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230265].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                      Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                                      You sound very angry.

                                      Cheers. - Frank
                                      Not Steve, he's just an excitable boy
                                      Signature

                                      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                      Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                      As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230277].message }}
                                      • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                                        Banned
                                        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                        Not Steve, he's just an excitable boy
                                        Warren Zevon. Now, that's music. Left us much too soon.

                                        Cheers. - Frank
                                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230300].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                                          Heard another interesting idea for VA changes today. The man said the VA has 700 lawyers on staff. He suggested firing 690 lawyers and hiring doctors instead.
                                          Signature
                                          Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                                          ***
                                          One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                                          what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230315].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
                                            Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                                            Heard another interesting idea for VA changes today. The man said the VA has 700 lawyers on staff. He suggested firing 690 lawyers and hiring doctors instead.
                                            But it's the gov't and that would be the smart thing to do...


                                            Probably a better ratio than docs to patients.

                                            ---------------------------------

                                            It does seem that with some revamping and training for vets'
                                            special situations and PTSD..., using a voucher system with
                                            other hospitals should become a very workable aid.
                                            Signature

                                            "If you think you're the smartest person in the room, then you're probably in the wrong room."

                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9230485].message }}
                                            • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                                              Shinseki just resigned a few minutes ago.

                                              I felt sorry for him because he's a good man. What he said was revealing. He TRUSTED those who gave him information and stats to be giving him TRUE information.

                                              He had that mindset because he was military and that's how the military runs. He said in the military he had to order attacks based on info given to him over the phone by subordinates. He learned to trust that information.

                                              PROBLEM - he's now dealing with govt - with an agency where 80% of the employees are union workers. Where bonuses are paid on numbers but the numbers are not tracked or questioned.

                                              So I feel for him but I also think he was really bad at the job.

                                              What we need is an ex military person with serious business organization skills!
                                              Signature
                                              Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                                              ***
                                              One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                                              what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232345].message }}
                                            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                              Watching the President and he just announced Shinseki handed in his resignation.
                                              I'm not sure if the timing here is all that good.
                                              First the problems with the VA aren't new and didn't just happen on his (and Obamas) watch.
                                              Second he should already know the job and I think is in the best position to fix the problems.
                                              On the other hand with members of congress from both sides of the aisle calling for him to resign he may not be able to enact the changes needed to fix the problems.
                                              All to often you see a scandal in a department and the head of the department resigns and then after a little time things go back to what they where.
                                              Hopefully the new VA head will focus on the veterans.
                                              Signature

                                              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                              Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                              As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232350].message }}
                                              • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                                                Time after time we have one scandal or waste or corruption in one agency or another...and sometimes (not alway) the top person is "retired" (with pay, of course) and sometimes there are few "key personnel" who get (paid) administrative leave and then return to work.

                                                This is one time there should be across the board firings of anyone in the VA at any level who participated in manipulating the numbers with the resulting damage to veterans.

                                                There are enough qualified people out of work in this country to fill those jobs - and it might finally send a message that govt workers are NOT immune to consequences when they don't do their jobs. To hell with the union!
                                                Signature
                                                Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                                                ***
                                                One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                                                what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232432].message }}
                                                • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                                  Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                                                  Time after time we have one scandal or waste or corruption in one agency or another...and sometimes (not alway) the top person is "retired" (with pay, of course) and sometimes there are few "key personnel" who get (paid) administrative leave and then return to work.

                                                  This is one time there should be across the board firings of anyone in the VA at any level who participated in manipulating the numbers with the resulting damage to veterans.

                                                  There are enough qualified people out of work in this country to fill those jobs - and it might finally send a message that govt workers are NOT immune to consequences when they don't do their jobs. To hell with the union!
                                                  One of the things they're talking about now on the news is the problem with firing people because of the unions.
                                                  One thing I thought was interesting with Obamas speech is when he said he knew about this problem when he was in the Senate.
                                                  A veteran friend told me last night that the problem has been around since Nixon was president. If true I think both parties have a lot of explaining to do.
                                                  Signature

                                                  Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                                  Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                                  As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                                  You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232476].message }}
                                                  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                                                    We've heard rumblings of problems in the VA but they have been denied over and over. The only reason we are learning this now is some good reporting - and a few whistleblowers.

                                                    From the VA official page:

                                                    In 2009, President Obama appointed Secretary Eric K. Shinseki to lead a massive transformation of the VA into a high-performing 21st century organization that can better serve Veterans. Under the leadership of Secretary Shinseki, the VA has adopted three guiding principles to govern the changes underway, namely being people-centric, results-driven, and forward-looking. These principles are reflected in the 16 major initiatives that serve as a platform from which transformation is being executed.
                                                    Sounds a lot better than it worked.

                                                    History - VA History - About VA
                                                    Signature
                                                    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                                                    ***
                                                    One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                                                    what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232627].message }}
                                      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                                        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                        Not Steve, he's just an excitable boy
                                        Are you trying to say something with that stupid song? I don't exactly appreciate that! ALSO, if I could have had any appreciation for that guys music, THAT has been shot ALSO!

                                        Steve
                                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232669].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                                          The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) is calling on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to end the culture of fear that has plagued the agency and negatively impacted veterans' care. As recent headlines suggest, some management officials have been 'gaming the system' to artificially inflate performance statistics in their medical centers. What is not so recent is the widespread cover-up culture that pervades the VA. Front-line employees have lived in fear of blowing the whistle due to an established history of retaliation. They do not feel safe to report mismanagement.

                                          "These headlines aren't revealing anything that the VA didn't already know," said AFGE National President J. David Cox Sr. "Our members have paid a heavy price for voicing concerns, submitting letters, raising issues in labor management meetings, and testifying before Congress on wait time issues and veterans' access to care. When they have sounded the alarm our members faced retaliation and intimidation. No one should have to choose between keeping their job and speaking out about threats to patient care. It is time for the VA to take swift action to end this culture of fear and cover-ups."
                                          VA Employees' Union Calls for End to "Culture of Fear" for Whistleblowers
                                          Signature
                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232695].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                                            Considering the nature of this, there should have been some online ticketing system with data only the PATIENT should be able to change, with feedback from the PATIENT, that only the patient should be able to change, with an IDENTIFIED medical code(ICD-9 type) that, once accepted by the patient, must have approval from him/her to be changed. If a given code(ICD-9 type) goes for a certain period without a proper response, it should be escalated up the chain!!!!!!! Other treatments can be scheduled automatically such that they ALSO get tracked even if no doctor schedules them.

                                            THIS way, the doctor HAS to open a code of the right type, or the patient will not approve it, and complain. Once they approve it, it is STUCK! The doctor has to have treatments approved. The only problem is if a patient fails to respond. In such a case, maybe the doctor can enter a notation, backed up by a death certificate, another hospitals paperwork, etc...

                                            It seems *****SO***** simple! All the technology for this has been opened to the world the moment the internet opened up.

                                            ICD-9 type codes are nationally recognized, perhaps even INTERnationally recogized.

                                            V67.2 FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION FOLLOWING CHEMOTHERAPY

                                            Above ICD9 translation courtesy of CMS.GOV! (AKA Center for medicare & medicaid services.)

                                            BTW there is opensource software that is CLOSE to this! There is COMMERCIAL software that is close to this! Seriously, this wouldn't take that much effort.

                                            Steve
                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232800].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                                          Are you trying to say something with that stupid song? I don't exactly appreciate that! ALSO, if I could have had any appreciation for that guys music, THAT has been shot ALSO!

                                          Steve
                                          No Steve it was just a joke based on the song title.
                                          Signature

                                          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                          Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                          As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232700].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                                            Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                            No Steve it was just a joke based on the song title.
                                            Did you listen to the last part?

                                            It seemed like such a silly song that I just went to check out the lyrics. YIKES! And THEN, not wanting to assume here, I skipped ahead on the video, and heard the same.

                                            Steve
                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232731].message }}
                                            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                              Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                                              Did you listen to the last part?

                                              It seemed like such a silly song that I just went to check out the lyrics. YIKES! And THEN, not wanting to assume here, I skipped ahead on the video, and heard the same.

                                              Steve
                                              I know the lyrics, it's been a favorite song of mine for years.
                                              If it's any consolation to you, if Frank said that to me I would of posted the same video and said "No, I'm just an excitable boy"
                                              Signature

                                              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                              Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                              As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232798].message }}
                                              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                                                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                                                I know the lyrics, it's been a favorite song of mine for years.
                                                If it's any consolation to you, if Frank said that to me I would of posted the same video and said "No, I'm just an excitable boy"
                                                Well, especially how some here view me, and elliot doing what HE did, it just has real bad connotations, not that I like the song at all, because I don't like that song. I don't ever listen to such things. The CLOSEST I have come to that is seeing a few horror films that have that kind of stuff in them.

                                                Steve
                                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232816].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author seasoned
              Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

              You said...

              "Well, REALIZE..... YOU ARE BEING PLAYED!!!!!! The other party had ABSOLUTE POWER, starting in 2007, and they KNEW ABOUT THIS, and THEY DIDN'T DO WHAT THEY CLAIM MUST NOW BE DONE! So that little fact should make it clear that they aren't telling the truth.


              I say...

              I guess you don't know how the U.S. fed gov works.

              Beginning in 2007, there was a GOP president and a Dem congress.
              OK, OK... In 2007 the president could have vetoed it. I guess he didn't, because I never heard of it. But what of 2009!?!?!?!?!?

              "WHY "upgrade" mediocrity? Why throw money into what you know it won't help?"

              So, your answer is no, we can't afford to upgrade the VA system right?
              NOPE! It was a snide way of saying money is being WASTED and the workers are causing problems, so money WON'T HELP! People have been on lists for over a YEAR! That is NOT a money problem! It is the EMPLOYEES!

              Additionally, Veterans strongly endorsed VA health care, with 91 percent offering positive assessments of inpatient care and 92 percent for outpatient care.

              When asked if they would use a VA medical center the next time they need inpatient care or outpatient care, Veterans overwhelmingly indicated they would (96 and 95 percent, respectively).
              Yes. Apparently, the VA has allowed that for a while, but NEVER told these waitlisted people. THEY were always led to believe that they would FINALLY soon get help.

              You find that here...

              News Releases - Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs

              It looks like most vets disagree with your assessment of the VA.
              PLEASE make up your mind! Is it running well, or not? MY assessment is that there are SOME types of problems that the VA CAN not and/or WILL not do and rather than say "We can't do it, please go to a covered hospital outside the VA.", they say "OK, please come back later!"!


              The law would have cost just 21 Billion over a 10 year period and...

              ... the same crowd on the hill who didn't have any problems putting the wars on the national credit card
              And WHICH crowd is THAT!?!?!?

              Aren't you an anti-man-made-climate-changer also?
              Not REALLY! I am a:

              1. YOUR DATA IS FLAWED! PROVE IT!
              2. Climate changes, GET USED TO IT.
              3. There isn't GLOBAL warming.(COLDER winters and hotter summers balance out!)
              4. Records aren't even semi regularly getting hit.
              5. You have NO EXTERNAL COOPERATION.
              6. CO2 TAX WON'T HELP.
              7. YOU give a VALID SOLUTION.
              8. HEY, we DO need oxygen, so why not reduce deforestation!?!?!?!?

              er!

              Steve
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226474].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      LIES!!!!!!

      MAN, you guys are starting EARLY with your disinformation campaign!

      LIE #1: Ben Carson is NOT associated with FOX. Like many other outlets, they simply had him on to speak!

      LIE #2: He did NOT say that it was a GIFT from god that veterans got hurt! He said it was a gift from god to point out the problems that CAUSED this! I HATE that 2-3 dozen people got killed, but it shows that maybe some should rethink what will affect 100s of MILLIONS! GEE, you claim to like to point out the greater good. THAT was what he was doing. Could he have phrased it better? SURE! MAYBE he had the STUPID idea that it would encourage the people to read the article or listen to the video.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224329].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    The problem is worse than gov controlling health care. According to what I read in the ACA when it was a 1,200 page bill -- the IRS controls the "health care".

    The "health care", btw - is not controlled. All anyone is controlling is paying for a very bloated system that is run by people getting rich from it. It's not a system of controlling the cost of the actual procedures, devices, medications, etc. Those are still all for profit - high profit.

    What people don't understand about this system, conversely to some countries that have national health care, is that if the IRS feels that something is too expensive.......the cost takes precedence to the human. This is exactly why you see cancer patients getting kicked off their coverage for their meds. The success odds aren't high enough for them to "justify" the expense.

    This is how the VA has been operating for a long time. They've just been getting called on it in recent years because it's not been that long that the poisons of war have been causing long term disease. It used to be blown body parts, etc -- now it's chronic effects from radiation, biological poisoning, etc. A lot of times the guys in control in the money feel that prolonging someone's life a few years when they can't be cured isn't cost effective.

    People need to understand what fascism is. Just because we don't have concentration camps, doesn't mean we're not eyeball deep in fascism. Our whole medical system is corporate owned - we have a medical industrial complex, not medicine, not health care. There will be no push to make things better at the VA or in the public sector. There will be a push to find new methods of recording that will crunch the stats to make things look like they are getting better. Learn to save your own butt.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224368].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
      Banned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Learn to save your own butt.
      Because if you don't, there's no one out there that will save it for you. That's a fact. Fighting in Vietnam was much easier than fighting to stay alive after I got home. Vietnam was one year that went by amazingly quickly. The 45 years thereafter have been dreadfully slow and filled with more landmines that anyone would ever expect to encounter on life's path.

      There is something very wrong with this picture.

      Cheers. - Frank

      P.S. All that said, I thank the God that I don't believe in for the VA, every single day. I'd have died long ago without their care. I just want everyone to be able to get the same level of care that I've received. Everyone, every day, in every way.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224399].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
      Banned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      People need to understand what fascism is.
      Fascism is NOT the problem. Corporatism is what ails America and its most trusted institutions. The worshiping of the almighty dollar above all else. That is what people should be focused on and work mightily to eradicate. It's the only thing that will save America.

      Cheers. - Frank
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224406].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

        Fascism is NOT the problem. Corporatism is what ails America and its most trusted institutions. The worshiping of the almighty dollar above all else. That is what people should be focused on and work mightily to eradicate. It's the only thing that will save America.

        Cheers. - Frank
        Corporatism -- IS fascism. When gov and corps meld like they have in this country (called crony captialism), you get dollar worship, and you get some severe results. Fasism isn't just massacring people in concentration camps....that's just one result. The corporatism will eventually cause a lot of deaths because the general population won't be able to afford what they need to survive even if no overt effort to cull factions takes place.
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224495].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
          Banned
          Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

          Corporatism -- IS fascism. When gov and corps meld like they have in this country (called crony captialism), you get dollar worship, and you get some severe results. Fasism isn't just massacring people in concentration camps....that's just one result. The corporatism will eventually cause a lot of deaths because the general population won't be able to afford what they need to survive.
          Well, I won't argue over one word of what you have stated.

          If there is any argument at all to be had, it is rooted strictly in semantics.

          Cheers. - Frank
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9224522].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

          Corporatism -- IS fascism. When gov and corps meld like they have in this country (called crony captialism), you get dollar worship, and you get some severe results. Fasism isn't just massacring people in concentration camps....that's just one result. The corporatism will eventually cause a lot of deaths because the general population won't be able to afford what they need to survive even if no overt effort to cull factions takes place.
          I WISH I could call you a kook, but even MONSANTO ALONE, YIKES!!!!! Wheneven CHINA won't accept our stuff, it should give you a reason to pause.

          China’s Shut-Out of American Corn Won’t End Anytime Soon - Corporate Intelligence - WSJ

          From wikipedia:

          Fascist ideology consistently invokes the primacy of the state. Leaders such as Benito Mussolini in Italy and Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany embodied the state and claimed indisputable power. Fascism borrowed theories and terminology from socialism but replaced socialism's focus on class conflict with a focus on conflict between nations and races.[13] Fascists advocate a mixed economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky to secure national self-sufficiency and independence through protectionist and interventionist economic policies.[14]
          We ARE seeing similar things. I say similar because the idea of "focus", for example, is on BOTH! In germany, it was one against others. Here, it is all others against one. And I think wecan ALL agree there is a class war. Most saw THIS as fascism.

          The mixed economy is obviously happening.

          And the autarky HERE is certainly failing. I think failure is the goal. ICSM

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9225932].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
            Ben Carson seems to be prone to gaffes. That is what that "Gift from God" comment is really. Along with some of his other ones such as saying Obamacare is the worst thing to happen to America since slavery, comparing homsexuality to bestiality and pedefilia, saying white liberals are the worst racists, etc... he's a lot like Joe Biden already in this regard.

            It would be interesting to see him run for president. I hope he does. Can you imagine him trying to explain during Republican primary season his $700 billion a year health care plan that would give money to every citizen in this country from the time they are born until they die? That's 1000 times more socialistic than what Obamcare is. The fact that I kind of like that idea, although it has some major problems, should tell you it would not go over well among most conservatives.
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226110].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
              Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

              Ben Carson seems to be prone to gaffes. That is what that "Gift from God" comment is really. Along with some of his other ones such as saying Obamacare is the worst thing to happen to America since slavery, comparing homsexuality to bestiality and pedefilia, saying white liberals are the worst racists, etc... he's a lot like Joe Biden already in this regard.

              It would be interesting to see him run for president. I hope he does. Can you imagine him trying to explain during Republican primary season his $700 billion a year health care plan that would give money to every citizen in this country from the time they are born until they die? That's 1000 times more socialistic than what Obamcare is. The fact that I kind of like that idea, although it has some major problems, should tell you it would not go over well among most conservatives.
              Tim have you actually listened to anything Carson has said, or just the little sound bites that the liberal media takes out of context and claims he said.
              You guys are really to much.
              You elect a guy who blatantly lies. You elect a guy who claims to be for the people yet he has shown time and time again he's for his corporate sponsors, for example placing Monsantos people in key posts in the USDA FDA and EPA.
              Forcing a health insurance policy on us and calling it a healthcare policy.

              You do understand the govt. currently spends 1.3 trillion dollars a year on healthcare now right? Yet you think a system that would put heathcare between the patient and provider and only cost 700 billion a year is outrageous?
              That voucher money could also be passed on to anyone you say when you die or if a family member or friended needed some extra you could help them out by giving them dome of yours.
              How Should Healthcare Work? | RealBenCarson.com
              His way takes the bureaucracy and insurance companies out of the way so there is nothing between the person and doctor. Your guys way puts the insurance companies and bureaucracy right in the middle and costs a lot more.
              Signature

              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
              Getting old ain't for sissy's
              As you are I was, as I am you will be
              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226205].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                You do understand the govt. currently spends 1.3 trillion dollars a year on healthcare now right? Yet you think a system that would put heathcare between the patient and provider and only cost 700 billion a year is outrageous?
                I didn't say it was outrageous. Maybe you missed the part where I said I kind of liked it? The system he describes is similar to what Singapore does in some ways. Duplicating the Singapore system here would be very difficult though. You couldn't just get rid of medicare, medicaid, VA health care, etc.. and expect $2000 a year subsidized health saving accounts to replace it. That's a bit simplistic to say the least. However, I like the idea of starting subsidized health savings accounts for all Americans. Like I said, it's a very socialistic way of providing money for health care services. A different kind of socialism though. I think I'll call it direct socialism.
                Signature
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226313].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                  Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                  I didn't say it was outrageous. Maybe you missed the part where I said I kind of liked it? The system he describes is similar to what Singapore does in some ways. Duplicating the Singapore system here would be very difficult though. You couldn't just get rid of medicare, medicaid, VA health care, etc.. and expect $2000 a year subsidized health saving accounts to replace it. That's a bit simplistic to say the least. However, I like the idea of starting subsidized health savings accounts for all Americans. Like I said, it's a very socialistic way of providing money for health care services. A different kind of socialism though. I think I'll call it direct socialism.
                  I did actually
                  Socialism is what our healthcare is now. Govt. run and govt. controlled.
                  His plan puts the control back into the hands of the person and their doctor and uses more of a free market approach to the insurance side of it. You would be able to buy insurance from any company anywhere that met set standards.
                  Signature

                  Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                  Getting old ain't for sissy's
                  As you are I was, as I am you will be
                  You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226328].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Tim,

    You're right about the $700Billion/year plan. I didn't hear that before. I've got to check that out. As for the other stuff? He was simply telling the truth. He is retired, probably pretty rich, and wasn't campaigning.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226174].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Really Want To Help Some Veterans?

    Expand Medicaid.

    An estimated 40 percent of uninsured veterans have incomes that, under provisions of the ACA, could qualify them for Medicaid coverage.

    But...

    Whether or not veterans could qualify for Medicaid under the ACA depends on whether--and which--states opt to expand Medicaid.

    And...

    Provisions in the ACA would help extend coverage to uninsured veterans and their spouses.

    While the Medicaid expansion was not designed specifically to help veterans and their spouses, many among this group stand to benefit.

    Most of eligible veterans will have new coverage options...

    ...if they live in a state that expands Medicaid.


    http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm...s/rwjf405143_1

    Half a million vets could use the coverage but unfortunately they live in states with govs that have decided that ideology is more important than helping their own citizens - ...

    ...while also shortchanging their taxpayers and many hospitals in their state in the process.

    What a shame.
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9226239].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    TL - so.............

    Millions of people of all races are now petitioning Dr. Ben Carson to run for president. Not sure if you know who he is because he opposes just about everything your president is doing, but he's black - and he's popular.
    Let me add here that he is also one of, if not THE, top Neurosurgeons in the country. Intelligent - dignified - libertarian.

    What happens when a Black man like him gets elected and people of all races are absolutely thrilled to have him in office? Maybe you should join the majority of the country (not just whites, but blacks, hispanics, etc) in dropping off the ad hominem race card. You can't be taken seriously already now using that ridiculous and over-used ploy and it will be impossible to use it when you see the support Dr. Carson will get from all races. Might as well start planning for a better ad hominem ploy real fast, because that one is kinda passe already. If we can get him elected, you're gonna feel mighty stupid even trying to push that one.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9227790].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      TL - so.............

      Millions of people of all races are now petitioning Dr. Ben Carson to run for president. Not sure if you know who he is because he opposes just about everything your president is doing, but he's black - and he's popular.

      What happens when a Black man gets elected and people of all races are absolutely thrilled to have him in office?

      Maybe you should join the majority of the country (not just whites, but blacks, hispanics, etc) in dropping off the ad hominem race card.

      You can't be taken seriously already now using that ridiculous and over-used ploy and it will be impossible to use it when you see the support Dr. Carson will get from all races.

      Might as well start planning for a better ad hominem ploy real fast, because that one is kinda passe already. If we can get him elected, you're gonna feel mighty stupid even trying to push that one.
      You said...

      "What happens when a Black man gets elected and people of all races are absolutely thrilled to have him in office?"

      I say...

      I believe this is already going on even though there are many people who clearly hate the current POTUS.

      If the first POTUS got on some people's nerves what makes you think the same won't happen to Mr. Carson?


      I knew who Mr. Carson was before he decided to get a second career and IMHO, take the conservative movement for all its worth by pretending he's interested in politics - in order to sell books and increase his speakers demand and his speaker fees.

      If he's elected president I'll eat my hat.

      He may have a lot of fans from all groups but...

      Blacks ain't voting for him any more than we'd vote for Herman Cain.

      Neither will the Hispanics or the Asians who voted for Obama like 75%.

      Why?

      Because I have a feeling we're not going to like his set of policies and in order to get on the GOP ballot he's going to have to take positions and attitudes that will not be popular with the three groups mentioned above.

      If he ever got on the ballot I seriously doubt he'd get more than 10% of the black vote which is about normal for a non-Dem presidential candidate.


      Guess what?

      It's not about some cult around some individual, it's about the attitudes, policies and direction for the nation that person brings to the table.

      You ain't gonna get him elected anymore than libertarians got Ron Paul elected - its just another one of your fantasies - much like your Republic Of Missouri stuff.

      Yes everyone, Sal's into that type of stuff or at least she was. It's the same type of stuff Cliven Bundy is into.

      You said...

      Might as well start planning for a better ad hominem ploy real fast, because that one is kinda passe already. If we can get him elected, you're gonna feel mighty stupid even trying to push that one.


      I say...

      What's passe?

      Pointing out that some folks in here share the same basic economic philosophy...

      ...as the known racists in the society, the known a-holes when it comes to women's issues like rape and abortion and to top it all off - the anti-man-made-climate change idiots?

      That's quite a gang to be economically philosophically aligned with and IMHO it should be pointed out.
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229397].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley



    Joe Mobley
    Signature

    .

    Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9227802].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
    Well, it won't be long now...
    Signature

    Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9229837].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Poor guy.

    First he's fired or forced to resign by the previous admin because he publically differed with the admin (I'm not sure if it was official insubordination or not) and now this.
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9232828].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      From what I've read he announced his retirement in the previous administration a year before it took place - but true that he did not agree with Rumsfeld on troop numbers. Shinseki was probably right on that but his superiors made the call.

      I think it must be a shock to him to realize he could not trust the word of those working under his command at the VA. This has to weigh heavily on him but I don't think he could stay on at this point. Truth is - he was in the job almost six years and did not know what was happening at the hospitals under his oversight.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9233555].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        From what I've read he announced his retirement in the previous administration a year before it took place - but true that he did not agree with Rumsfeld on troop numbers. Shinseki was probably right on that but his superiors made the call.

        I think it must be a shock to him to realize he could not trust the word of those working under his command at the VA. This has to weigh heavily on him but I don't think he could stay on at this point. Truth is - he was in the job almost six years and did not know what was happening at the hospitals under his oversight.
        He probably got manure from above and below.
        Probably did need to do more unannounced visits, or he did and his
        findings were met with resistance from above or below his position.
        So, maybe incompetent, or in a no win situation. Or both.

        I always do feel a bit for leaders who have to take full responsibility
        for their underlings - especially in a large organization. And where
        stuff happens you would never sanction/tolerate if you knew. You
        can't know or control everything those under you do. Like the Navy's
        Tailhook scandal, or the Target credit card deal. But you're the leader
        and have to take the fall and full responsibility.

        I can't believe how the ground level people and systems failed
        to treat our vets well,
        Signature

        "If you think you're the smartest person in the room, then you're probably in the wrong room."

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9234081].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
          Banned
          While I greatly admire General Shinseki's service to our country, both in and out of uniform, it was his management style that exacerbated the festering problems at the VA, which ultimately led to his ouster.

          Personally, I believe that you need someone with the personality of Gen. George C. Patton to tackle the job. Imagine someone of that type showing up at the Phoenix VA and inquiring, "OK, which one of you horse's ass is the son of a bitch that's responsible for denying my troops their God given right to the health care that 'I' promised them after serving in 'MY' Army??? Yeah, OK - those other branches of the military, too - panty wearing little girls that they are?"

          Seriously. Why are all of our leaders such pansies??? Not a testosterone overloaded barbarian (that's a complimentary term) among them.

          Way too many 'participation trophies' over the past 20 years. ENOUGH!!!

          President Obama is cut from the same taffeta. Where the hell is 'angry black man' when you need one.

          Pathetic!

          Cheers. - Frank
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9234592].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
            Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

            While I greatly admire General Shinseki's service to our country, both in and out of uniform, it was his management style that exacerbated the festering problems at the VA, which ultimately led to his ouster.

            Personally, I believe that you need someone with the personality of Gen. George C. Patton to tackle the job. Imagine someone of that type showing up at the Phoenix VA and inquiring, "OK, which one of you horse's ass is the son of a bitch that's responsible for denying my troops their God given right to the health care that 'I' promised them after serving in 'MY' Army??? Yeah, OK - those other branches of the military, too - panty wearing little girls that they are?"

            Seriously. Why are all of our leaders such pansies??? Not a testosterone overloaded barbarian (that's a complimentary term) among them.

            Way too many 'participation trophies' over the past 20 years. ENOUGH!!!

            President Obama is cut from the same taffeta. Where the hell is 'angry black man' when you need one.

            Pathetic!

            Cheers. - Frank

            LOL!

            I've heard that the POTUS doesn't want to set a bad example by acting angry in public unless it is totally necessary.

            I also have a feeling that as soon as the admin determines who did what etc., - those heads will roll.

            But I also heard that people in that Phenix office gave out bonuses.


            BTW...


            Are there any American institutions remaining that have not been embroiled in some type of serious scandal?


            Recent additions to the club...

            - Secret Service

            - Rapes in the military

            - Rapes on college campuses
            Signature

            "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9234865].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
              Banned
              Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

              LOL!

              I've heard that the POTUS doesn't want to set a bad example by acting angry in public unless it is totally necessary.
              A total wimpfest. He should have given them hell when they started the "You didn't build that," crap. They'll soon be doing the same thing with Hillary's, "What difference does it make," totally disregarding what she was actually referring to. The difference is, as soon as they pull that crap on her she'll stick it up their rosy, red, you know what. They have no shame at all in the level of dishonesty they will sink to.
              I also have a feeling that as soon as the admin determines who did what etc., - those heads will roll.
              It'll be tough. The civil service laws are very strong. They need to be placed on administrative leave and then criminally charged, then blindfolded and then you'll need to the leave the rest up to you imagination, lest I get banned and the thread gets locked. I hate when that happens.
              But I also heard that people in that Phoenix office gave out bonuses.
              That's not quite accurate. Individuals in the Phoenix office and others collected bonuses, but they were handed out via the DC VA.

              BTW...

              Are there any American institutions remaining that have not been embroiled in some type of serious scandal?
              Short answer - no!

              Recent additions to the club...

              - Secret Service
              That's been going on for decades. It's just that the old-timers had more common sense than to get caught.

              - Rapes in the military
              A national disgrace that no one seems to care about, especially the politicians. They shamefully block most attempts to deal with the issue and anything that does get approved is ineffectual at best.

              - Rapes on college campuses
              Another problem that has been around forever but only brought more to the forefront by rapist taking pictures with the 'not-so-smartphones' and sharing them with their friends.

              Very simple solution - castration!

              Cheers. - Frank
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235075].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author RobinInTexas
                Now that Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki has fallen on his sword, the agency can finally give our growing population of ill and aging vets the care they deserve, right? Not according to the many frazzled VA employees who have sent Gawker their stories. Here's one.


                Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki Resigns
                At a press conference this morning, President Obama announced that he has accepted the resignation...
                Read more
                We've heard from many VA workers and are reading all of their accounts--of malfeasance, of incompetence, of inertia caused by politicization and budget cuts--and we'll share more in the coming weeks. Here's one we received immediately after Shinseki tendered his resignation to President Obama this morning, which describes an underfunded, undermanned spoils system at VA: "You f***ing had two f***ing wars and demand that we take care of our veterans, but somehow you can seem to come up with equitable funding that you do for some f***ing fighter jet."

                This employee has worked at VA since 2007. Despite holding a graduate degree, the author was "was immediately sat down and ordered to make copies, and make notebooks. For the larger part of not quite a year and a half, I was assigned menial tasks while most of the work was contracted out to 'program support contractors.'"

                My issues with the VA are as follows:

                1. Thanks to Congressional pressure to not grow the government, we rely heavily on contractors to administer services. The rationale being that you keep government from growing and keep costs down (HR and pension costs down), you contract services. However, the American population is still growing as does the need for services. In addition, it is not uncommon to have the same resource in excess of 5 to 10 years (especially if a subject matter expert). We have no way to hire them full time because we cannot offer competitive wages. If you really want to cut down on waste fraud and abuse, private contractors hired should be the first to go. Upon my second year the the VA, 1 single program support contract resource was 250K, whereas a GS12 employee with benefits was valued at 125K. I don't know about you, but it seems as if government employees are still cheaper. That said:

                2. The hookups for a good govt job need to stop. I was hired through an internship program that no longer exists. But, there are many people who hook their family members up that are unqualified and lazy. That is a job that could be going to a new, hungry college grad who is eager to learn and help.

                3. My job started in Washington, DC and I am now in the field. I am appalled by the discrepancy of working conditions between the ivory tower elite of inside the beltway and in the Field VISN's. The campus I currently work in is a shithole. There are condemned buildings, a lack of appropriate IT equipment, textbook, stereotypical, lazy employees, and a lot of egos in management that are not necessarily good directors.

                IMO -

                1. We need more people. PERIOD. We connot keep up, people are quitting and retiring right and left and we are not backfilling. The Center for Investigative Reporting has been tracking the VA and our problems for a long time.

                That said, VA needs to evaluate all field directors and employees and examine qualifications and see if people know how to do the job they are assigned to do. I guarantee they do not. We also need to f***ing clean house and get the useless employees out.

                2. Congress need change their appropriations so that money goes to sustainment and not just contract dollars. VA needs more money to keep the lights on and maintain what is already in place. Stop with the f***ing budget cuts. You f***ing had two f***ing wars and demand that we take care of our veterans, but somehow you can seem to come up with equitable funding that you do for some f***ing fighter jet. You love haviung a f***ing new VA hospital in your district, but you don't want to fund personnel. You are f***ing pricks.

                3. VA executive leadership needs to be honest with true state of affairs at the Cabinet level. Part of the problemn is that a lot programs just flat out lie un their performance measures rather than admitting that there are problems. And we see how well that turned out.

                I just got this in my inbox.

                I will continue to work here in the VA and I, like many of my colleagues, are sad to see the Secretary go. He was a good guy, unlike much of the Bush people who were lighting this f***er on fire. Yes, we have waste. Yes, we have problems. Firing the one guy who was working to solve it isn't going to help things. Ultimately, the problems we have are broad and systemic. The f***ing taxpayers demand that the Federal government not spend money or less money, and that affects the quality of care for many. In the end motherf***ing taxpayers get what they f***ing pay for.
                http://gawker.com/shinseki-wasnt-the...-fu-1583876768
                Signature

                Robin



                ...Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just set there.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235219].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                A total wimpfest. He should have given them hell when they started the "You didn't build that," crap.

                They'll soon be doing the same thing with Hillary's, "What difference does it make," totally disregarding what she was actually referring to.

                The difference is, as soon as they pull that crap on her she'll stick it up their rosy, red, you know what.

                They have no shame at all in the level of dishonesty they will sink to.

                It'll be tough. The civil service laws are very strong.

                They need to be placed on administrative leave and then criminally charged, then blindfolded and then you'll need to the leave the rest up to you imagination, lest I get banned and the thread gets locked. I hate when that happens.


                That's not quite accurate. Individuals in the Phoenix office and others collected bonuses, but they were handed out via the DC VA.

                BTW...

                Short answer - no!

                That's been going on for decades. It's just that the old-timers had more common sense than to get caught.

                A national disgrace that no one seems to care about, especially the politicians. They shamefully block most attempts to deal with the issue and anything that does get approved is ineffectual at best.

                Another problem that has been around forever but only brought more to the forefront by rapist taking pictures with the 'not-so-smartphones' and sharing them with their friends.

                Very simple solution - castration!

                Cheers. - Frank
                I hear you Frank.

                But now those mentioned scandals are clearly public.

                And...

                But despite all the Koch horses and all the Fox & Friends they couldn't stop him from being elected again.

                I agree, Hillarys attack ads will be a lot more explicit in counteracting the kaleidoscope of lies that will spew forth if she runs.

                I think its just a difference in management & personality styles.

                Take the writing of the ACA for example.

                #44 gave the house and senate a bunch of principles he wanted in the law but he let congress write the law verses writing the law and trying to shove it down the congresses' mouth like Hill & Bill did in the 1990s.

                The goal was to get it done and it was.

                You said...

                "They have no shame at all in the level of dishonesty they will sink to."

                I say...

                No freaking kidding. They have to lie & appeal to the worst instincts in people in order to cover up their dismal economic record and who they're really working for and also trick decent people into voting for them and against their own economic interests.

                Think about it Frank.

                Those folks are in danger of not having the POTUS for 16 straight years and they'll do anything to try to prevent that from happening because 16 years could easily turn into 24 years.

                IMHO, more than anything else they do not want the tax code to go back to what it was before the 1980s.

                They lost the POTUS from 1932 until 1952 and the only reason they got it back was because IKE decided to run as a republican.

                And what did they do as soon as they finally got control of either house of congress in the 1950s?

                They launched that totally unnecessary & ugly Mccarthyism BS.

                All The Best!!

                TL
                Signature

                "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235257].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                  Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                  They lost the POTUS from 1932 until 1952 and the only reason they got it back was because IKE decided to run as a republican.
                  I'm sure you mentioned this before. TWO presidents is a STREAK to you?

                  FDR and Harry S Truman!

                  FDR doesn't count! He started after the market about hit bottom, a number of measures were presented to make sure it didn't happen again. I'm sure people liked that. Things started to look good BUT, after the INTERNATIONAL depression, OTHERS were hurting! Interestingly, one cause of all of this, INCLUDING WWII, was Woodrow Wilson! WW ALSO had a WW! WWI!!!!!!!! WW ALSO made sure we would have a depression! HE is the one that signed the Federal Reserve Act! OUCH, that must HURT! BTW he did it with FULL CONTROL! PRESIDENT, HOUSE, AND SENATE!!!!!! DOUBLE OUCH!!!!!!! OK, nothing to brag about! You can't even blame edith, since SHE didn't come into the picture until 1919.

                  Anyway, WWII started, and most felt it is "not good to change horses in midstream"! At the end of WWII, FDR was out.

                  Harry S truman fit a popular pattern. One that that Johnson did, George Bush did and Al Gore tried to do. The current vice president runs as a president in the next term.

                  So you could almost say it was ONE president. And THAT is a STREAK to you!? WOW!

                  Steve
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235450].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                A total wimpfest. He should have given them hell when they started the "You didn't build that," crap.
                Actually, OBAMA did that!

                They'll soon be doing the same thing with Hillary's, "What difference does it make," totally disregarding what she was actually referring to. The difference is, as soon as they pull that crap on her she'll stick it up their rosy, red, you know what.
                What's dishonest? An ambassador was assigned and kept for WHO KNOWS WHY! Requests for more security were DENIED! Support was DENIED! And all she can say is "What difference NOW does it make?"!

                BTW Embassy property IS considered to be that countries soil! So, according to international law, when they attacked that embassy, they attacked the US!!!!!

                Had a normal citizen done all that to another citizen:

                1. Put them in harms way, KNOWINGLY.
                2. Denied adding to security.
                3. Told existing security there to stay down.

                They would probably be on charges of accessory to murder!

                And how do you think they would be received in court if they said "Prosecuting ME won't bring them back!" That IS effectively what hillary said when she said "What difference NOW does it make?"!

                MAN, she even said they waited for the FBI. The FBI shouldn't have been involved. They should have gotten the extra security or, better yet, been moved out.

                After listening to the full video, hillary ALMOST sounds like she has a point except that investigations go like that, and frankly that IS odd! At like the 11th hour, LITERALLY, someone suggested that this video be presented as an answer.

                It was a ridiculous video. Apparently, according to what I now think is some kind of cover story, a film was made called "master george". It was very disconnected, etc.... It was then POORLY dubbed in ways that muslims could find it offensive, and supposedly renamed something like "the innocence of muslims". An actress, and IIRC a couple others, were likely PAID to implicate a US resident that was supposedly, IIRC, a jewish convert to egyptian coptic christianity. Innocence of Muslims - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This sounds MADE TO ORDER, LITERALLY!

                That video could have been created and kept in wait for JUST this event. I wouldn't put it past them. They have the PERFECT scapegoat!

                Of course, there is the 9/11 date, and that debate. INTERESTING! Frankly, the embassy should have been closed down, ESPECIALLY because of 9/11 and the requests. Failing that, Hillary owes the US a valid answer. That is NOT because her husband was president, or she might run in 2016. It is because SHE WAS THE ONE RESPONSIBLE because she was secretary of state!

                Steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235382].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                  Banned
                  Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                  Actually, OBAMA did that!

                  What's dishonest? An ambassador was assigned and kept for WHO KNOWS WHY! Requests for more security were DENIED! Support was DENIED! And all she can say is "What difference NOW does it make?"!

                  Steve
                  Here's an honesty test for you.

                  1. When President Obama said, "You didn't build that," was he referring to someone's business or the nation's infrastructure which allows individuals to effectively build a business?

                  2. When Hillary said, "What difference does it make," was she referring to the fact that four individuals lost their lives or whether or not the attack was the result of a spontaneous reaction to the video or a premeditated attack by an organized entity?

                  Be careful. Your answer will let everyone know just how honest you truly are.

                  Answer away.

                  Cheers. - Frank

                  P.S. The whole world is watching!
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235627].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                    Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                    Here's an honesty test for you.

                    1. When President Obama said, "You didn't build that," was he referring to someone's business or the nation's infrastructure which allows individuals to effectively build a business?
                    Neither did he for that matter.
                    I think a better reply would be "we built this infrastructure together". To my knowledge the federal govt. doesn't have that many road crews, inspectors yes but actual workers no. Their "work" is mostly done by private contractors who are the actual Americans who are building that.
                    Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                    2. When Hillary said, "What difference does it make," was she referring to the fact that four individuals lost their lives or whether or not the attack was the result of a response to the video or a premeditated attack by an organized entity?

                    Be careful. Your answer will let everyone know just how honest you truly are.

                    Answer away.

                    Cheers. - Frank
                    I've always had a big problem with that one also.
                    Wasn't her full statement something like "What difference does it matter what caused this, the fact is it happened"?
                    Both sides use that same trick though.
                    Signature

                    Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                    Getting old ain't for sissy's
                    As you are I was, as I am you will be
                    You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235638].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                      Both sides use that same trick though.
                      Puhleeze! The GOP has elevated the tactic to an art form.

                      They subscribe to the theory that if you tell a lie long enough and loud enough that it becomes the truth. Of course it actually does in the minds of the uninformed. That's the scary part of the proposition.

                      Cheers. - Frank
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235648].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                      To my knowledge the federal govt. doesn't have that many road crews, inspectors yes but actual workers no. Their "work" is mostly done by private contractors who are the actual Americans who are building that.
                      Oh, c'mon. If you don't have the ability to precisely understand what someone is trying to communicate then you're going to be adrift in a sea of political confusion.

                      This wasn't something entered into the oft-cited teleprompter which they claim that he depends on. It was a throwaway line at a rally. Not like he said it at the State of the Union.

                      I only have a GED education level. Why is it I understand perfectly what he was metaphorically saying and all those who would come here and boast of their intellectual prowess and academic achievements can't tell sh*t from shinola? Please explain that point to me. That baffles me. lol

                      It's simply rank dishonesty and people need to be called-out on it lest they believe that they can get away with it, forever. No more!

                      Cheers. - Frank
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235660].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                        Banned
                        One more thing as it relates to the VA. Supposedly there are many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of unemployed veterans.

                        Why not train them in hospital administration and basic caregiver procedures and fill the ranks of the VETERANS Administration with freakin' VETERANS? Isn't this what is meant by the term, 'no-brainer???'

                        Cheers. - Frank
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235672].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                          Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                          Puhleeze! The GOP has elevated the tactic to an art form.

                          They subscribe to the theory that if you tell a lie long enough and loud enough that it becomes the truth. Of course it actually does in the minds of the uninformed. That's the scary part of the proposition.

                          Cheers. - Frank
                          Right. both sides use it ALL the time. You can see an example here in this thread from the left.
                          Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                          Oh, c'mon. If you don't have the ability to precisely understand what someone is trying to communicate then you're going to be adrift in a sea of political confusion.

                          This wasn't something entered into the oft-cited teleprompter which they claim that he depends on. It was a throwaway line at a rally. Not like he said it at the State of the Union.

                          I only have a GED education level. Why is it I understand perfectly what he was metaphorically saying and all those who would come here and boast of their intellectual prowess and academic achievements can't tell sh*t from shinola? Please explain that point to me. That baffles me. lol

                          It's simply rank dishonesty and people need to be called-out on it lest they believe that they can get away with it, forever. No more!

                          Cheers. - Frank
                          Exactly. I thought putting that ugly smiley face after my first sentence would indicate I thought it was funny. He's a politician, politicians say those types of things all the time.
                          Maybe I should of added another ugly smiley face after my second comment, even though true it was also meant in jest.(Those ne smilies really are ugly though, I hate using them)
                          Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                          One more thing as it relates to the VA. Supposedly there are many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of unemployed veterans.

                          Why not train them in hospital administration and basic caregiver procedures and fill the ranks of the VETERANS Administration with freakin' VETERANS? Isn't this what is meant by the term, 'no-brainer???'

                          Cheers. - Frank
                          I agree.
                          Signature

                          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                          Getting old ain't for sissy's
                          As you are I was, as I am you will be
                          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235706].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                            Banned
                            Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                            Right. both sides use it ALL the time. You can see an example here in this thread from the left.
                            Do you mean my post. lol I'm so far left I've made a U-turn. But, that said, I am NOT a liberal. I'm a progressive. Same crap, just sounds more eruditer - or something along those lines. (I'm a bit lacking in the edumacation department and actually never gradgatated.)
                            Exactly. I thought putting that ugly smiley face after my first sentence would indicate I thought it was funny. He's a politician, politicians say those types of things all the time.
                            You're still making it sound as if it was what he meant to say. It wasn't.
                            Maybe I should of added another ugly smiley face after my second comment, even though true it was also meant in jest.(Those new smilies really are ugly though, I hate using them)
                            Oh, my. Those things are atrocious. I just noticed them. So much for my observational powers. lol Don't you just hate 'improvements?' I don't recall a cry for the emoties (my word - you can use it) to be changed. Change for the sake of change. (Thanks for nothing, new owners! lol If you've got that much time to kill I have a long list of improvements I'd be happy to share with you.)
                            I agree.
                            Of course, you do. You're brilliant. (Please picture the old style smiley face. I'm boycotting the new ones. They suck!)

                            Cheers. - Frank
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235770].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                              Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                              Do you mean my post. lol I'm so far left I've made a U-turn. But, that said, I am NOT a liberal. I'm a progressive. Same crap, just sounds more eruditer - or something along those lines. (I'm a bit lacking in the edumacation department and actually never gradgatated.)
                              Not yours, someone else's.
                              Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                              You're still making it sound as if it was what he meant to say. It wasn't.
                              Frank I'm to old to think any politician means what they say.
                              Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                              Oh, my. Those things are atrocious. I just noticed them. So much for my observational powers. lol Don't you just hate 'improvements?' I don't recall a cry for the emoties (my word - you can use it) to be changed. Change for the sake of change. (Thanks for nothing, new owners! lol If you've got that much time to kill I have a long list of improvements I'd be happy to share with you.)
                              They look like something a 4 year old drew, with their feet.
                              Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                              Of course, you do. You're brilliant. (Please picture the old style smiley face. I'm boycotting the new ones. They suck!)

                              Cheers. - Frank
                              Don't be calling me names now. (Insert green old style smiley face)
                              Signature

                              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                              Getting old ain't for sissy's
                              As you are I was, as I am you will be
                              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235815].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                    Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                    Here's an honesty test for you.

                    1. When President Obama said, "You didn't build that," was he referring to someone's business or the nation's infrastructure which allows individuals to effectively build a business?
                    I WISH I could say YES! At one point, he almost CLAIMED to be. But NOPE! He brought unions into play, etc... Could intel have gotten where it was without ANY post 1913 government help? YEP! Could Microsoft? YEP! Could they have gotten there without unions? YEP! Even IBM would likely have happened without the government. They WERE kind of heading in that direction. Who knows. MAYBE, if the government didn't get involved, IBM would have created a reasonable character set and not have EBCDIC!

                    Heck, even NETWORKS were created independently.

                    HECK, where I live a LOT of the roads were NOT created by the state or even the city. A LOT of roads, even subways, were built by PRIVATE companies or people. HECK, I tried to look for the WHOLE speech, rather than the small part below, but with all the garbage out there, I was lucky to get this. I heard it when it was shown on the news.


                    Figure it this way. If he said things the way YOU claim he did, then why do you figure he said it? I showed a video here earlier that was neat with one girl explaining to another how complex an ipad is. ALAS, I keep forgetting the exact title or something, so I will show you its ancestor. It shows how complex a PENCIL is:


                    So YEAH, I appreciate all the work that came before me, and how much easier my job is. The fifth computer language I learned was 6502 machine. NOT that fun. But YEAH, someone had to use it to create the first 6502 assembler which made the first compiler that could run on the 6502. And before I programmed the computer I saw the schematic. My first computer schematic was the FIRST schematic I ever saw that showed a circuit and merely noted that so many others were hooked up the same way.

                    BTW though I learned my 2nd and 3rd computer languages through school, I learned the first 1 self taught through books my father used, that IBM gave him. I learned my 4th, 5th, and 6th computer languages totally self taught. I went to a public college with an inept teacher. The last thing AND FIRST THING she "taught" the class was how to change a line in an editor. We didn't even get to compile that COBOL program. I went to see her, and she gave me a pascal book. SO, I learned pascal, by myself!

                    What I heard in Obamas talk was that we are indebted to unions and government and owe all to that. HECK, I was getting paid to do things for people even when I was 6! I don't even know if I knew about taxes back then. I wish I had HALF the motivation I did then.

                    2. When Hillary said, "What difference does it make," was she referring to the fact that four individuals lost their lives or whether or not the attack was the result of a spontaneous reaction to the video or a premeditated attack by an organized entity?

                    Be careful. Your answer will let everyone know just how honest you truly are.
                    Didn't I already answer that? It WAS in response to a LOT of questions pressing about that stupid video.

                    Still, as I said earlier, people deserve an answer ANYWAY.

                    She hasn't given ANY answers.

                    Steve
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235782].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                      I WISH I could say YES!
                      You could if you chose to. lol You're just trapped in ideological quicksand.
                      What I heard in Obamas talk was that we are indebted to unions and government and owe all to that.
                      Of course that's what you heard. It's what you wanted to hear.

                      Everything else you posted on the subject was nothing more than an incredibly feeble attempt to bolster your deeply entrenched beliefs. Period

                      Now - moving on.

                      Didn't I already answer that? It WAS in response to a LOT of questions pressing about that stupid video.

                      Still, as I said earlier, people deserve an answer ANYWAY.

                      She hasn't given ANY answers.
                      Translation: she hasn't given the answer that will assuage your misplaced rage.

                      Cheers. - Frank
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235803].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                        Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                        Everything else you posted on the subject was nothing more than an incredibly feeble attempt to bolster your deeply entrenched beliefs. Period
                        OK, FORGIVE ME! I don't know this new language coming down the pike. WHAT does period mean TODAY?


                        And WOW, how time flies. 1-2 months before I find out if I lose MY insurance and if I can even TRY to do a last minute search for something that isn't TOO much worse.

                        Steve
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9235863].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                          Banned
                          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                          OK, FORGIVE ME! I don't know this new language coming down the pike. WHAT does period mean TODAY?
                          "Mission accomplished." - Dubya. "We'll be greeted as liberators." - Dick (five deferments) Cheney. We can play that game for weeks on end. What's your point? Of course the difference is Bush and Cheney knew they were lying.
                          And WOW, how time flies. 1-2 months before I find out if I lose MY insurance and if I can even TRY to do a last minute search for something that isn't TOO much worse.
                          How's that optimistic spirit working for you in life? Of course, unlike many millions who have found surprisingly affordable plans, with great coverage, there's not a snowball's chance in hell that you could be among them. I mean however would you be able to show your face? Rest assured that we know you will go find the absolute worst plan available and then return to bitch, bitch, bitch about it. There's nothing more boring than being totally predictable.

                          Soon your health insurance woes will be eliminated forever. It's called single-payer. The saddest part of your incessant exercise in futility is in fighting a battle with reality grounded in necessity? You're simply failing to accept the inevitable. It's coming under Hillary's watch and you'll be better off for it.

                          Think of that while you're drifting off to sleep, tonight. Pleasant dreams, Bunky. lol

                          "Oh, the humanity."

                          Cheers. - Frank
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9236002].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                            Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                            How's that optimistic spirit working for you in life? Of course, unlike many millions who have found surprisingly affordable plans, with great coverage, there's not a snowball's chance in hell that you could be among them. I mean however would you be able to show your face? Rest assured that we know you will go find the absolute worst plan available and then return to bitch, bitch, bitch about it. There's nothing more boring than being totally predictable.
                            WELL,I only want a FEW things!

                            A deductible at least CLOSE to my current one. ********VERY******* few appear to be close!
                            A premium that isn't much higher than my current payments. I haven't found one!
                            A copay not far off from my current. Ihaven't found one.
                            Coverage like mine. THIS gets complicated, since the exchanges don't bother to mention this.
                            A network like mine. MOST have FAR WORSE! Others tend to just be worse.

                            I can't keep researching things. I might actually end up very close to where YKW is sleeping in the coming weeks. I wonder. If I run into problems, and call 911 asking them to have him drive me a few dozen miles because I don't feel like spending $1000+ extra due to bad insurance, do you think it would get on the news? I mean the women calling 911 for cops to take care of fast food orders make the news.

                            Realize that I am one that is NOT going to get a subsidy. And WHERE do you think the subsidies come from?
                            All people that I have heard that had good luck either haven't used it yet, had simple things, or got a subsidy. Some poor, young, disabled, automatically get placed in medicare, which is a different plan entirely. though fewer are accepting them.

                            Soon your health insurance woes will be eliminated forever. It's called single-payer. The saddest part of your incessant exercise in futility is in fighting a battle with reality grounded in necessity? You're simply failing to accept the inevitable.
                            It didn't happen before, so it wasn't inevitable. AH YEAH! SINGLE PAYER! What my mother had and I saw some problems there. And WHAT is this thread about again? Isn't single payer what those veterans had, and what you have? I HAD what I needed.

                            It's coming under Hillary's watch and you'll be better off for it.
                            Yeah right!

                            Steve
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9236162].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author BigFrank
                              Banned
                              Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                              WELL,I only want a FEW things!

                              A deductible at least CLOSE to my current one. ********VERY******* few appear to be close!
                              A premium that isn't much higher than my current payments. I haven't found one!
                              A copay not far off from my current. I haven't found one.
                              Coverage like mine. THIS gets complicated, since the exchanges don't bother to mention this.
                              A network like mine. MOST have FAR WORSE! Others tend to just be worse.

                              I can't keep researching things. I might actually end up very close to where YKW is sleeping in the coming weeks. I wonder. If I run into problems, and call 911 asking them to have him drive me a few dozen miles because I don't feel like spending $1000+ extra due to bad insurance, do you think it would get on the news? I mean the women calling 911 for cops to take care of fast food orders make the news.

                              Realize that I am one that is NOT going to get a subsidy. And WHERE do you think the subsidies come from?
                              All people that I have heard that had good luck either haven't used it yet, had simple things, or got a subsidy. Some poor, young, disabled, automatically get placed in medicare, which is a different plan entirely. though fewer are accepting them.
                              Don't you ever get tired of the gloom and doom? Seriously!
                              It didn't happen before, so it wasn't inevitable. AH YEAH! SINGLE PAYER! What my mother had and I saw some problems there. And WHAT is this thread about again? Isn't single payer what those veterans had, and what you have?
                              Absolutely - and I get the best health care that I could ever hope for. On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd give it a 9.5 and that's over 45 years in 4 different states. Any health care that I have received in the private sector I would give a 5.9 - at best. My last experience I'd rate at a 1.0. The *******s almost killed me and they couldn't have cared less.

                              To be completely transparent and honest, I don't go to the VA for my coronary care. I go to Deborah Heart Hospital because it's only an hour away, not much farther than the VA hospital and on a scale of 1 to 10, I'd give them a 9. Id give them a 10 if it were not for the fact that the actual surgeon who has implanted 3 pacemaker/defibrillators in me has a total God complex and is one step above a subhuman POS, bedside manner wise.
                              I HAD what I needed.
                              Many people believe that until they actually needed to use what they had and then found out it was a crap policy. Not a pleasant surprise.
                              Yeah right!
                              Generally, but not always.

                              Cheers. - Frank
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9237254].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                                Originally Posted by BigFrank View Post

                                Don't you ever get tired of the gloom and doom? Seriously!
                                YEAH, I DO! I wish it would stop! As for Obama not knowing, ******I***** knew it! I told people here what would happen before it even passed. HOW? I READ the stupid bill.

                                Obama was told about it as early as 2010. People knew about it. And many SAID it! Obama didn't say this stuff until people PUBLICLY TOLD HIM that he was wrong. And then he said NOPE, YOU CAN KEEP IT PERIOD!

                                Absolutely - and I get the best health care that I could ever hope for. On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd give it a 9.5 and that's over 45 years in 4 different states. Any health care that I have received in the private sector I would give a 5.9 - at best. My last experience I'd rate at a 1.0. The *******s almost killed me and they couldn't have cared less.
                                Well, the care in the US isn't even trained well. I went to one hospital and, after taking my pulse, the nurse came back to take it AGAIN! WHY!?!?!?!? I ASKED! She said she did NOT hear my valve, and was shocked when her superior asked if she had heard it.

                                To be completely transparent and honest, I don't go to the VA for my coronary care. I go to Deborah Heart Hospital because it's only an hour away, not much farther than the VA hospital and on a scale of 1 to 10, I'd give them a 9. Id give them a 10 if it were not for the fact that the actual surgeon who has implanted 3 pacemaker/defibrillators in me has a total God complex and is one step above a subhuman POS, bedside manner wise.
                                OK, you lucked out and got a good doctor. BTW VERY VERY VERY VERY few can EVER do that unless they happen to be in the same spot or VERY VERY VERY rich. I'm NEITHER!

                                Many people believe that until they actually needed to use what they had and then found out it was a crap policy. Not a pleasant surprise.
                                FUNNY how when I say that of SO many that have NEVER used it, you claim I am wrong in expressing that view! Yet when I have used MINE so much in SO many places, you claim NOW that I am wrong. PLEASE make up your mind! Your last statement just said I was RIGHT about MY insurance, and you were WRONG about the obama care people like me would get.

                                You said EARLIER *******MILLIONS******* have gotten it! BZZZZT!

                                1: ZERO got it before 1/1/2014. Don't talk about the 10/2013 registration date because that was a farse anyway, but was for policies effective 1/1/2014!
                                2: MOST of those went to other NON private insurance plans. Of course THEY have been compromised and ARE getting worse.
                                3. MANY of the remainders are dups!
                                4. MANY of the remainders haven't paid!
                                5. Nearly NONE of those have used the insurance for anything substantial.
                                6. BTW MOST are in ONE STATE!
                                7. OH, I shouldn't forget the last piece! About as many HAD insurance before it was canceled and many complained that the new policies cost too much.

                                I, on the other hand, have used my insurance for drugs, ophthalmologist, leg hematomas(You would have to see them to believe them. Have YOU ever seen a bruise that was over 2 feet?), MRIs, and major open heart surgery that I am told by others usually 90% die before even getting to the OR, let alone have it successfully done. And these have been in no less than FIVE states. BTW with the surgery, I was told I could MAYBE live 5 days without it. That was ten years ago.

                                Steve
                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9237355].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    But last term, he said he was "MAD AS HELL"!
    NOW, he is saying he is "MADDER than hell"!

    So he is trying to say he is MAD! is "ACTING" really that hard? I think he is a GREAT actor! And he has probably been on TV more than any other president, short of reagan who was a professional actor! And his WIFE? SHE has been all over as well.

    Yeah, they wasted a billion US dollars on a piece of JUNK, that is STILL no good, and can't spare an extra $0 to fix this problem!?!?!?!? SERIOUSLY, they should have people ON THE PAYROLL NOW that could do this! NO MONEY NEEDED! As for advertising it? Have a secretary update the phone messages! Have the printer add a new message to the next batch of inserts! OK, if they outsource this, the last item there COULD cost maybe an extra $200 for plate setup!

    But NO!!!!!!!!!!! To listen to THEM, you would think they pay people per project, etc...

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9234932].message }}

Trending Topics