Why Make Your Ads UN-Clickable?

15 replies
  • PPC/SEM
  • |
Online marketing community is full of articles and guides explaining how to make your headlines clickable so that you get more traffic. That’s great to have a clickable headline or an ad, but only if your traffic is FREE. Which it isn’t for most people like me lately as we pay for advertising (on a pay per click basis mostly, which means EVERY visitor costs us money).

That’s why, whenever I create a paid ad I want to make it as UN-clickable as possible! You often have to go against the obvious way of thinking if you want to succeed. Why do I act in such a weird way? The answer is very simple really: I want just high quality traffic, people who are most likely to buy something from my store! I don’t want too many “just lookers”. I don’t want to pay for their curiosity. My online store is not that big. I can’t afford to invest in a long-term perspective that maybe an occasional “just-looker” is a real buyer somewhen in the future.

So what I try is filter our everyone except people really looking to buy. To achieve that I do the following:

1. Use narrowly-targeted key-phrases. Never “LED lights” for example, but “27W LED work light”. I only want to see people looking for particular items I have in my store and I want them to see exactly that item!

2. Whenever applicable, show the exact price in the ad text or picture. This way people who look for a particular item can compare your offer with others WITHOUT the need to click your ad.

3. Include some information about delivery if you deliver orders or about your location if you don’t. Also, if you only deliver in a particular region or an area, only advertise in that area or a region.

4. As a general rule, don’t cheat, even slightly, to attract more people unless that costs you nothing. Do exactly the opposite: be as clear about pricing, product and every condition of your offer as you can. This will greatly improve your conversion rates (and will help your reputation, too).

Remember, for small online stores, particularly in early stages since inception it’s much more important to save money, get TARGETED and eventually HAPPY customers than receive tons of low-quality traffic (which “doesn’t work” as people later whine on forums and online marketing groups).

Mission “Save Click-Bucks for Little Entrepreneur-Girls n Guys” complete!
#ads #make #online advertising #online marketing #pay per click #unclickable
  • Profile picture of the author Bright Future
    You have some good points there. Just don't forget that not only conversion rates matters - the volume is important too.

    Let's say I've created a super tightly targeted campaign like you just described and I'm generating 1 conversion a day and my profit is 30$ per conversion on average. If I could get it up to 2 conversions a day even with just a 20$ profit per conversion on average, I would most likely do it because my daily profit would be bigger.

    Lower conversion rates + higher amounts traffic can sometimes lead to higher total profit. So, I would say you still need a balance between relevance and clickability/attractiveness.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10433921].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jmferret
      Originally Posted by Bright Future View Post

      You have some good points there. Just don't forget that not only conversion rates matters - the volume is important too.

      Let's say I've created a super tightly targeted campaign like you just described and I'm generating 1 conversion a day and my profit is 30$ per conversion on average. If I could get it up to 2 conversions a day even with just a 20$ profit per conversion on average, I would most likely do it because my daily profit would be bigger.

      Lower conversion rates + higher amounts traffic can sometimes lead to higher total profit. So, I would say you still need a balance between relevance and clickability/attractiveness.
      Right, if. Sales are distributed more or less randomly. And particularly in cases of newbie online entrepreneurs: how much can people who just started afford to lose to collect statistics?

      Hence my points. I fully agree with you that once you have stats that show benefit of "carpet bombing" via popular key-words that's good to go.

      But for smaller projects it's much safer to start with micro-niches, where clicks are cheap, much less competition exists and ROI is way higher.

      I was in and out of online marketing for years since 1998 and to compare: I used to use popular phrases, spent about $500-800 a day on PPC ads, getting ROI of around 60%. Product was digital (basically no other expenses), so I never complained.

      Now as I started online store in May 2015 that sells physical products I focused on much smaller niches (because I don't want to spend even a penny more than an absolute minimum on that project) spending about $100 a day or less on advertising, but ROI is a whopping 500-600% average now!

      Do I make less in $ terms? Definitely yes. What I do now is expand into other smaller niches rather than trying to compete in Ivy League key phrases for automotive lights (which would eat up almost any amount of money per day).
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10435121].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Bright Future
        Originally Posted by jmferret View Post

        And particularly in cases of newbie online entrepreneurs: how much can people who just started afford to lose to collect statistics?
        I agree, this is definitely the way to go if you're inexperienced and have a small budget.


        Originally Posted by jmferret View Post

        Do I make less in $ terms? Definitely yes. What I do now is expand into other smaller niches rather than trying to compete in Ivy League key phrases for automotive lights (which would eat up almost any amount of money per day).
        It makes sense, however, there's no guarantee that the other smaller niches will also provide results just as great. If they do, that's fantastic. If they don't then maybe it's a good idea to slowly scale up what's already working. But your strategy is sound and a good advice.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10435444].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author jmferret
          Originally Posted by Bright Future View Post

          I agree, this is definitely the way to go if you're inexperienced and have a small budget.
          Yea, it was kind of a goal for myself - to create a cash flow with as little cash at risk as possible. Actually achieved close to nothing (just domain name, hosting and very little amount on advertising in the beginning).


          It makes sense, however, there's no guarantee that the other smaller niches will also provide results just as great. If they do, that's fantastic. If they don't then maybe it's a good idea to slowly scale up what's already working. But your strategy is sound and a good advice.
          True, you never know. Maybe I am biased, because it always worked well for me this way: I started with small niches in the past and up-scaled to broader terms using money already earned. You can't compare 1998 and 2015 directly however, back in 1998 online market was like a pond where there's more hungry fish than water.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10436516].message }}
  • The point of advertising is to invite people to come to your store, even a strictly online store. Of course, that means an outlay of money.

    The trick is to target your prospects correctly. In the old days, you would not put an ad in a sports magazine that is primarily geared to men (unless it's about women's sports) and advertise bras. You would just waste your money as it makes little sense. Same when doing it online.

    So the first part is using the proper keywords for your product or service. Almost every one I talk to say they use the proper keywords but that is often not the case and a discussion for another thread.

    The second part is having what I call clickable ads. You are saying to go against that which goes against getting the traffic you want. Most people want to get as much of it (but quality traffic) as possible.

    The way I see it, you are not making your ads very good so fewer people will click. You are missing out on sales and profits of those who did not click. There may be quality clicks you do get but you I know you'd get more quality traffic with quality ads. The two go together. You are sacrificing getting quality traffic and your profits are suffering for it.

    The other thing of course is that with a lesser quality ad, you get a lesser Quality Score, almost never a good thing. So your strategy has two strikes against you.

    The third strike with such ads is that you learn nothing about how to attract people to your site nor what they may be really looking for and buy your product. This is something that not only you can apply to your paid advertising but also non-paid traffic. It may even help in improving your pages' conversion rates.

    You seem to have the first part right with keywords. So right there, you are already qualifying prospects.

    On your second point, I never was a fan of putting the price in the ad. It may work for some things but generally, people don't buy based solely on price. So don't have text ads mentioning price, that's what PLAs are for. You still need to give the searcher a reason to click the ad and buy, even on PLAs.

    All the points you mention will help in making your ads unclickable. I see it all the time and I will rarely click these ads because they don't really talk to me, give me no reason to click and possibly buy from you.

    If the mission is to not spend money, the more obvious solution would be not to use paid advertising. But I think you would do much better by making ads clickable in the first place, improving the whole sales funnel, not saving click bucks.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10434791].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jmferret
      Originally Posted by LucidWebMarketing View Post

      The point of advertising is to invite people to come to your store, even a strictly online store. Of course, that means an outlay of money.

      The trick is to target your prospects correctly. In the old days, you would not put an ad in a sports magazine that is primarily geared to men (unless it's about women's sports) and advertise bras. You would just waste your money as it makes little sense. Same when doing it online.

      So the first part is using the proper keywords for your product or service. Almost every one I talk to say they use the proper keywords but that is often not the case and a discussion for another thread.

      The second part is having what I call clickable ads. You are saying to go against that which goes against getting the traffic you want. Most people want to get as much of it (but quality traffic) as possible.

      The way I see it, you are not making your ads very good so fewer people will click. You are missing out on sales and profits of those who did not click. There may be quality clicks you do get but you I know you'd get more quality traffic with quality ads. The two go together. You are sacrificing getting quality traffic and your profits are suffering for it.

      The other thing of course is that with a lesser quality ad, you get a lesser Quality Score, almost never a good thing. So your strategy has two strikes against you.

      The third strike with such ads is that you learn nothing about how to attract people to your site nor what they may be really looking for and buy your product. This is something that not only you can apply to your paid advertising but also non-paid traffic. It may even help in improving your pages' conversion rates.

      You seem to have the first part right with keywords. So right there, you are already qualifying prospects.

      On your second point, I never was a fan of putting the price in the ad. It may work for some things but generally, people don't buy based solely on price. So don't have text ads mentioning price, that's what PLAs are for. You still need to give the searcher a reason to click the ad and buy, even on PLAs.

      All the points you mention will help in making your ads unclickable. I see it all the time and I will rarely click these ads because they don't really talk to me, give me no reason to click and possibly buy from you.

      If the mission is to not spend money, the more obvious solution would be not to use paid advertising. But I think you would do much better by making ads clickable in the first place, improving the whole sales funnel, not saving click bucks.
      Thanks for comment, Lucid.

      Basically yes, the idea behind the store is growth with as little investment as possible (Russian economics is not in the very best shape now ).

      At the same time, PPC makes sense because it's an instant flow of clients as opposed to organic traffic, which takes time to build up.

      You are right of course, one would want to have more clicks, but QUALITY clicks. My point is just that it's much better overall to play quality vs. quantity.

      Seen this often in the past (including my own experiments): if you start with some high-traffic expensive keywords you risk running out of your budget before getting any valid stats (nobody knows, there can be zero purchases for a week then a whole bunch in one day, I run an offline store as well and know what real-life sales are like ).

      Not yet sure about the price, maybe I am wrong about it, but the idea as I said in original post is that people can see and compare prices without me having to pay for that.

      So far result is pretty good, actually my CTR is around 20%. Is that bad?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10435126].message }}
  • Your argument is to have a bad campaign just so you don't spend too much money. We assume a page conversion rate of 5%. You may spend $100 using your strategy and get 100 visitors which is 5 sales. But doing it my way, I could get 200 or more visitors for the same $100 spend which is a minimum of 10 sales. More sales and less advertising cost per sale which results in more profits.

    Your landing pages are obviously doing the selling. You seem to have the keywords idea correct. You just need to improve your ads and get clicks on them. Trust me, you'll do much better instead of making them unclickable. You'll have more clicks, likely at lower cost and get more sales. Test different ads, with and without price and different hooks.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10437277].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jmferret
      Originally Posted by LucidWebMarketing View Post

      Your argument is to have a bad campaign just so you don't spend too much money. We assume a page conversion rate of 5%. You may spend $100 using your strategy and get 100 visitors which is 5 sales. But doing it my way, I could get 200 or more visitors for the same $100 spend which is a minimum of 10 sales. More sales and less advertising cost per sale which results in more profits.

      Your landing pages are obviously doing the selling. You seem to have the keywords idea correct. You just need to improve your ads and get clicks on them. Trust me, you'll do much better instead of making them unclickable. You'll have more clicks, likely at lower cost and get more sales. Test different ads, with and without price and different hooks.
      I currently have about 20% CTR and 10% conversion rate. If that's bad by any measure for selling physical products, then I don't know what's good.

      The problem rather lies exactly in the area of search terms: if they are too broad, your traffic is not targeted well and that causes waste of it regardless of how good your landing page is. I simply use ad text as an extra filter to target the traffic even more when the ad is already seen by potential visitor.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10437596].message }}
  • The CTR is irrelevant. I'm surprised you are getting 20% given that you are purposely making your ads unclickable. I believe it's because of laser-focusing the keywords, exactly what you should do. But you could get a 30% CTR or even more with better ads. That would be a 50% increase in sales, not bad either wouldn't you say?. So instead of making 10 sales per 100 clicks, you'd make 15. I'm also of the opinion that a good ad influences conversion rates. A 10% rate is great but a better ad could make it higher. So you would gain there too. You have the right idea with keywords, take it a notch higher with the ads.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10438489].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Bright Future
      Originally Posted by LucidWebMarketing View Post

      But you could get a 30% CTR or even more with better ads. That would be a 50% increase in sales, not bad either wouldn't you say?. So instead of making 10 sales per 100 clicks, you'd make 15.
      The problem with this is that if he created a more attractive ad, it would most likely boost the CTR but also quite likely decrease the conversion rate. That's how it often works out. Now, if the increase in CTR is really big and the decrease in conversion rate is small then I would go for it, however, your suggestion is that if he doubles the CTR then the amount of conversions will also double which may or may not happen.

      Originally Posted by LucidWebMarketing View Post

      I'm also of the opinion that a good ad influences conversion rates. A 10% rate is great but a better ad could make it higher.
      You're definitely right that a good ad influnces conversion rates it's just that an ad which is good for conversions is not always good for CTR and vice versa. It's perfect if you can find an ad which produces high CTR and conversion rate but it's not easy, so you need to find a balance between the two.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10438531].message }}
      • Originally Posted by Bright Future View Post

        The problem with this is that if he created a more attractive ad, it would most likely boost the CTR but also quite likely decrease the conversion rate.
        Don't know why you say that. I say the conversion remains the same but just as likely increases.

        If the conversion rate remains the same (a good assumption if the landing page doesn't change and it's the conversion driver more than anything), then you are ahead. Even if what you say is true and conversions decrease, at what point does it that it negates the increase in CTR? It would take a lot. With current 20% CTR and 10% CV, it would have to go down to 9.5% if you get a 21% CTR to have a negative effect on profits. That's a 5% decrease which I highly doubt would happen.

        In my experience, higher conversion rates tend to have higher click rates. You won't get the same percentage increase (doubling the CTR won't double the conversions) but any increase in either figure will increase your profits.

        Better ads having better CTR usually help with conversions, not hinder. So you can get a double boost. There's no reason to expect the same page to convert less, provided proper targeting that also doesn't change.

        There's definitely a balance to find with optimal CTR and CV that will result in greater profits. The point is you'll never find it if you don't test.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10438954].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jmferret
      Originally Posted by LucidWebMarketing View Post

      The CTR is irrelevant. I'm surprised you are getting 20% given that you are purposely making your ads unclickable. I believe it's because of laser-focusing the keywords, exactly what you should do. But you could get a 30% CTR or even more with better ads. That would be a 50% increase in sales, not bad either wouldn't you say?. So instead of making 10 sales per 100 clicks, you'd make 15. I'm also of the opinion that a good ad influences conversion rates. A 10% rate is great but a better ad could make it higher. So you would gain there too. You have the right idea with keywords, take it a notch higher with the ads.
      Well, I probably should've been more accurate with definitions. The idea was of course not to make ads totally un-clickable, but un-clickable by people who are unlikely to buy.

      So far so good. Thanks for making me develop better definition of my goals!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10439854].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author solarwarrior
    The irony part of making your ads unattractive
    is that it defeats the very purpose of saving cost.

    A lower CTR will leads to higher Cost Per Click
    and a lower visibility rate regardless the platform
    you are in.

    Rather than trying to optimize your ads, you can
    try to find better keywords and set up a better lander;
    both of which will lead to higher conversion rate and
    provide higher profit margin for your campaign.

    At the end of the day, ditching everything aside,
    you want a higher ROI from your campaign.

    Focusing on the smaller goals like trying to
    make your ads unattractive is contradicting to
    your bigger goal for attaining a higher profit margin
    from your campaign.
    Signature

    Offers 1-1 Coaching for Bing/CPA/Clickbank.
    1,248 students have benefited so far!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10439332].message }}
  • While you would like 100% of your visitors to buy, that is unrealistic. The first step are keywords and using your example of “27W LED work light”, seems pretty clear right away what the searcher is looking for. Maybe a few negatives can be found but essentially, they are very likely looking to buy such a product.

    I've heard the argument before that putting the price in the ad eliminates those wanting to pay less. The problem is that the searcher should have a good idea of the price range. This range is usually very small so that should not be an issue. Besides, most purchases are not done based on price.

    Another problem is that you don't make your sales pitch to those who don't click the ad. One thing I know for sure, no click means no sale. You need to make your whole sales pitch on your page, not stop people from visiting in the first place.

    You have a very good one in my opinion based on your conversions. Of all those searching and buying the product, many are buying from you. Attract more of them with better ads. Don't be afraid to try and let us know.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10440585].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jmferret
      Originally Posted by LucidWebMarketing View Post

      While you would like 100% of your visitors to buy, that is unrealistic. The first step are keywords and using your example of "27W LED work light", seems pretty clear right away what the searcher is looking for. Maybe a few negatives can be found but essentially, they are very likely looking to buy such a product.

      I've heard the argument before that putting the price in the ad eliminates those wanting to pay less. The problem is that the searcher should have a good idea of the price range. This range is usually very small so that should not be an issue. Besides, most purchases are not done based on price.

      Another problem is that you don't make your sales pitch to those who don't click the ad. One thing I know for sure, no click means no sale. You need to make your whole sales pitch on your page, not stop people from visiting in the first place.

      You have a very good one in my opinion based on your conversions. Of all those searching and buying the product, many are buying from you. Attract more of them with better ads. Don't be afraid to try and let us know.
      Thanks for these tips, Lucid.

      I'll think how I can improve my ads using them and update in this thread.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10441461].message }}

Trending Topics