Why Index Page Go Back After Few Days??

Having unique content alone can't help you in better ranking. Alvinchua91 is right. Content needs further marketing, build some backlinks, have proper Off page strategies, use social signals.

That is the most ridiculous, ludicrous, insane, brain-dead, nonsensical reply
I've read today. But the day is young.

I refuse to give the real answer, as it would just get lost in the shuffle of these
seo wannabes who are clueless.

Paul

Wow. This is indeed quite a comment. You seldom see this kind of non sequitur even on WF.

Yes, Google dance seems to be a thing that sometimes happens. It's not "new algorithm". This has been going on for years. It's business as usual.

What does Google Analytics have to do with this? I'm sure Google pulls some data from there to rule the web and the world, but nothing indicates that they're using it to reward your site.

How can you say that a link should bounce back? If OP's new links are sinking like lead one would think that the conclusion is the opposite. Google already saw that they were not good, and they're gone.

Backlinks are a thing, too. However, they're not a thing that would affect a new article in this manner.

Did you read alvinchua91's comment? Google seems to give a "boost" to new articles, and they initially may enjoy a honeymoon in the SERPs. Perhaps it's meant to show "current topics" at the top of the searches. However, it's common for them to drop. You can play to get benefit from this effect, but it's not going to be the way those articles rank in the long run.

It's much more interesting how your articles fare after that first stint. Examine their position, and competing content both directly above them and in the top of the searches. Can you point out something that's different purely on the content level? Can you examine the backlinks profiles?

BTW, throwing "quality", "quantity" and especially "unique" around this way makes me fear for the worst. Are you absolutely certain that you've really got those? If by "unique" you mean "these words don't appear in this particular order" you're in for a rough ride. That doesn't make your articles competitive against articles on the same topic. That doesn't mean that they serve any user, or fit any purpose.

This thread has nothing to do with duplicate content. But hey, why read the thread...

Not that it's on topic either, but instead of these useless word lists: how about explaining HOW to make a blog post go viral? It's not as easy as spouting the word out like that.

The best recipe I've seen is this: make some kind of content that finds a small niche, and keep that up for extended period of time. Keep promoting it and hope that one of your pieces actually finds larger audience. It's hard, it's a lot of work, and the "virality" aspect is rather arbitrary. If you're only in for virality, you're probably gonna quit it eventually, so enthusiasm about the subject would be a good asset.

NO there in no duplicate and building backlinks..

want know how to make blog post viral ?

Why does he need to "wait some time"?

How can he "make latest post viral using social media"?

What does "indexed again and again" even mean? If it's indexed, it's bloody indexed already.

"... ranking will be improved but there is no guaranty of ranking...". You get bonus points for Yoda-speak., but zero for insight.