Have you made your sites mobile friendly and...

Hostnameclub 9 years ago

Originally Posted by rahulmishra

As I understand mobile friendly update only effect on ranking when searched on mobile, Its not effect on desktop searches. Thanks

I think so. From my check on mobile search it took "mobile-friendly" only, but a rank is not changed.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041128].message }}
rosario1990 9 years ago

Originally Posted by rahulmishra

As I understand mobile friendly update only effect on ranking when searched on mobile, Its not effect on desktop searches. Thanks

In this case you're right dear. I think that so.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041182].message }}

AadhyaMehra

Banned 9 years ago

Originally Posted by aygabtu

have you seen a ranking difference whether you've done it or not?

If you haven't done anything for ranking a site, then also you can see some difference in ranking.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041579].message }}

Slade556

9 years ago

I didn't notice any big changes, and I don't think that was the point. The whole point was to "force" everyone to make their websites mobile friendly, since there are more and more people using mobile devices to browse the 'net.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Free Download: Confirm Your Ebook Guide

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041655].message }}

Dellco

9 years ago

So Google lied.

About "rewarding" mobile friendly sites. And they lied about penalizing non mobile friendly sites.

They should have just said - after X date, we will include mobile friendliness into our algorithm, but it will only have very, very, very minor effect....

See the problem here?

Google lied....

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041675].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by Dellco

So Google lied.

About "rewarding" mobile friendly sites. And they lied about penalizing non mobile friendly sites.

They should have just said - after X date, we will include mobile friendliness into our algorithm, but it will only have very, very, very minor effect....

No. You're the one who's confused here. The alarmist clickbait articles about "mobilegeddon" were mostly a bunch of BS. Their lack of merit is also something that was repeatedly discussed on this forum before this algorithm change even took place.

Google has never said that they're going to penalize someone, or even that they're going to reward some sites. They basically said the opposite of what you claim, and actually said what you claim they should've said minus any prediction of outcome.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041697].message }}

Dellco

9 years ago

Originally Posted by nettiapina

No. You're the one who's confused here. The alarmist clickbait articles about "mobilegeddon" were mostly a bunch of BS. Their lack of merit is also something that was repeatedly discussed on this forum before this algorithm change even took place.

Google has never said that they're going to penalize someone, or even that they're going to reward some sites. They basically said the opposite of what you claim, and actually said what you claim they should've said minus any prediction of outcome.

I am very sure I read that they said this update will be "significant". It was anything but.

No "rewarding", no "boosting" (words used in the descriptions for this update by Google themselves), and no "punishments" for non compliance. Nothing happened basically.

This was a FUD campaign by Google from start to finish.

And only this campaign goal was a resounding success....

Google herded the sheep really nice.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041813].message }}

batchos 9 years ago

Google Adsense removed their ads from my non-compliant (mobile friendly) sites.
- Thanks
Signature

*Be Veg, Make Peace!
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041915].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by Dellco

I am very sure I read that they said this update will be "significant". It was anything but.

It was more significant for most average users than Penguin or Panda. This one actually may have affected their search rankings to some extend.

You wanted drastic changes across the board, and still feel that you were promised this huge event? You just need common sense, and couple of reality checks. It's just one ranking factor for one of their searches.

Also, Google's algorithm changes tend to be an ongoing process. This is just the beginning of the mobile algo.

Originally Posted by Dellco

This was a FUD campaign by Google from start to finish.

No, it was not. It was FUD campaign by some churnalists who did it for profit and notoriety.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041942].message }}

Dellco

9 years ago

Originally Posted by nettiapina

It was more significant for most average users than Penguin or Panda. This one actually may have affected their search rankings to some extend.

You wanted drastic changes across the board, and still feel that you were promised this huge event? You just need common sense, and couple of reality checks. It's just one ranking factor for one of their searches.

Also, Google's algorithm changes tend to be an ongoing process. This is just the beginning of the mobile algo.

No, it was not. It was FUD campaign by some churnalists who did it for profit and notoriety.

You can deny until you are blue in the face, but it doesn't change the facts. And how can you say average users would see much more change than webmasters? If they are seeing change, then obviously the webmasters would detect changes. Aren't both the SAME?

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogsp...ly-search.html

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10042155].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by Dellco

You can deny until you are blue in the face, but it doesn't change the facts. And how can you say average users would see much more change than webmasters?

What facts?

That's not what I said. This is my sentence:
"This one actually may have affected their search rankings to some extend."

Where did you pull that "much more change"? Where did I put webmasters against users in the way you claim? If you read carefully I'm talking about "their rankings" so "users" in that sentence is more or less same than "webmasters". But missing that nuance would not have changed the message that much.

However, pulling stuff out of thin air completely changes the message.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10043785].message }}

Dellco

9 years ago

Originally Posted by nettiapina

What facts?

That's not what I said. This is my sentence:
"This one actually may have affected their search rankings to some extend."

Where did you pull that "much more change"? Where did I put webmasters against users in the way you claim? If you read carefully I'm talking about "their rankings" so "users" in that sentence is more or less same than "webmasters". But missing that nuance would not have changed the message that much.

However, pulling stuff out of thin air completely changes the message.

Fancy wordplay from you is all I get, but doesn't cut it. The "facts" is there was NO change of any significance at all. In fact the whole update resembled a very minor algo refresh; nothing more.

So you want to argue what is "significant" next?

Oh, and Google said Panda and Penguin would only affect a small percentage of their results, but I think the whole Internet landscape CHANGED from that day on. THAT my friend, is significant. Not this, which was probably only 5-10% of Panda/Penguin at most.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10043991].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by Dellco

Fancy wordplay from you is all I get, but doesn't cut it. The "facts" is there was NO change of any significance at all. In fact the whole update resembled a very minor algo refresh; nothing more.

From your point of view. How is this so hard to comprehend?

There have been some ranking changes, and even some that were fairly big. Drops have been reported although they're rare. Changes in the range of 10-20 position don't seem to be uncommon. The weird thing is that sites without mobile layouts are sometimes doing better in the mobile search, but there's a lot of other signals and factors in play.

It's not fancy wordplay, but your lousy reading comprehension and willingness to add stuff that wasn't in the original. See the two things you added to my simple sentences? You did the same to Google's announcements.

Also and again, the jury is still out on this change. Maybe you'll still get your beloved mobilegeddon.

Originally Posted by Dellco

Oh, and Google said Panda and Penguin would only affect a small percentage of their results, but I think the whole Internet landscape CHANGED from that day on. THAT my friend, is significant. Not this, which was probably only 5-10% of Panda/Penguin at most.

Well, yes. But only if you think that spam links and artificially generated BS was supposed to be a part of that landscape. There's quite a few of "internet marketers" who suffered because of the questionable methods they used, and unfortunately some honest business users got a bit of collateral for using bad consultants. We're in an IM bubble where this seems more commonplace than it would somewhere else.

Sorry, but throwing percentages around like that is very unimpressive. How did you came to that conclusion? What kind of data did you distill to get there? How do you account for the distinct effects that each update had? How do you know that the results are representative enough that you can use them as an argument?

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10044061].message }}

Dellco

9 years ago

Originally Posted by nettiapina

From your point of view. How is this so hard to comprehend?

There have been some ranking changes, and even some that were fairly big. Drops have been reported although they're rare. Changes in the range of 10-20 position don't seem to be uncommon. The weird thing is that sites without mobile layouts are sometimes doing better in the mobile search, but there's a lot of other signals and factors in play.

It's not fancy wordplay, but your lousy reading comprehension and willingness to add stuff that wasn't in the original. See the two things you added to my simple sentences? You did the same to Google's announcements.

Also and again, the jury is still out on this change. Maybe you'll still get the mobilegeddon.

Well, yes. But only if you think that spam links and artificially generated BS was supposed to be a part of that landscape. There's quite a few of "internet marketers" who suffered because of the questionable methods they used, and unfortunately some honest business users got a bit of collateral for using bad consultants. We're in an IM bubble where this seems more commonplace than it would somewhere else.

Sorry, but throwing percentages around like that is very unimpressive. How did you came to that conclusion? What kind of data did you distill to get there? How do you account for the distinct effects that each update had?

Hey, go to other sites that ARE talking about this update, and check the responses. People are either miffed or angry that nothing (much) happened. You will get stronger language from them. Had I known that it was going to be this way, I would not have busted my ass in trying to get all my sites ready by April 21.

In fact, earnings generally went down AFTER conversion to mobile.

I have been a webmaster for close to a decade. I have seen all kinds of updates. I should have just ignored this "update", just like all those who have not made their sites mobile friendly. They are all still holding their places (very firmly). I also track a lot of SERPs and I know very little happened.

Typical Google. Mobile devices are easier to track, you see...

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10044094].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by Dellco

In fact, earnings generally went down AFTER conversion to mobile.

I have been a webmaster for close to a decade. I have seen all kinds of updates. I should have just ignored this "update", just like all those who have not made their sites mobile friendly. They are all still holding their places (very firmly). I also track a lot of SERPs and I know very little happened.

This is interesting. Especially the first sentence. Can I ask what kind of sites and niches/industries are you talking about? What kind of conversion are you talking about (on a general level)?

I'm guessing my profile is pretty similar. A bit more than a decade, and I'm a webmaster or web developer more than a marketer. I've previously had more sites in SERP trackers than I have now, but I've still got more than a dozen.

I understand the sentiment, and I'm sympathetic to the site owners who got scared by their SEO agency to fast track an unnecessary mobile change. Then again, that's something that they should've had already.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10044152].message }}

DABK 9 years ago

In my area, page 1 no longer has websites that are not mobile-friendly. Mobile-friendly means, though, is not the same a a great mobile-website experience (some of the sites that are still on page one have a script that shrinks everything, so everything fits on the screen but you can't read it).

On the other hand, there were only a couple of non-mobile-friendly sites on page 1, so hard to tell if mobile-ness was the reason they dropped out.

Note to everyone: Google said when it will roll out the change, it did not say how long it will take before full results are present.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10044182].message }}
Dellco 9 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10044238].message }}
- nettiapina 9 years ago
  
  [DELETED]
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10045021].message }}
  
  Dellco 9 years ago
  
  [DELETED]
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10045057].message }}
  
  nettiapina 9 years ago
  
  [DELETED]
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10045061].message }}

anynewsbd

9 years ago

Now to get advantage from Google must you have to make mobile friendly site

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

http://www.anynewsbd.com/

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10041948].message }}

Rodgers15 9 years ago

Originally Posted by anynewsbd

Now to get advantage from Google must you have to make mobile friendly site

At this point yes! google prefers mobile friendliness more especially on a mobile device. Just visit webmaster tools and look at your site stats under the mobile usability tab.
- Thanks
Signature
-==>Dirt Cheap Internet Marketing Tools That Really Deliver<==-

-==>Trade Secrets To Unlimited Traffic With Powerful Backlink Strategies<==-
.:: Get More Traffic, More Leads Absolutely Free Through Social Media::.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10042167].message }}

Jeff Willy

9 years ago

It seems that Google is acknowledging and loving websites and blogs that are mobile friendly. I strongly believe that once you enable that, not only you will gain organic traffic and clicks from Google search through desktop and laptop computers, but also on mobile devices as well. Just make sure that even if it's mobile friendly, you just need to give value to your audience by simply providing them useful high quality information. From there, you might be surprised that one day your rank will go higher.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10043804].message }}

mythoslife

9 years ago

Hello!
The company I work for has 8% mobile traffic due to our demographics. Although we are now moving to this direction.

But remember that Google will not lower your ranking simply because you don't have a mobile friendly website. Your current ranking will be kept on a desktop searches but if someone searches on the mobile device, then that is when your ranking will be affected.

Since in our case, that isn't a problem...yet.

Good luck.

-john

Originally Posted by aygabtu

have you seen a ranking difference whether you've done it or not?

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10044421].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

To anyone who might wonder: there's some small discrepancies in the posts in this thread because the thread got moderated. There was a non-productive shouting match in this space. Apologies for my half of it.

Thanks to the mods! A+ job.

Thanks

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10045095].message }}

Have you made your sites mobile friendly and...

Trending Topics

How do I effectively build and nurture an email list for affiliate marketing purposes?

Are billboards still effective in driving customers?

Are Solo ADs the Most Cost Effective Way to Promote your Product?

Been a while! Any of you Old Timers here?

How much does the rebranding affect CR ?