4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

Why this weird Indexation behavior By Google ?

by Zen Guru
3 replies
  • SEO
    • |
I am experiencing a weird indexation behavior by Google. I have created an auto-blog 3 days back of about 20 K pages each. About 80 % of the posts has YT videos. I have submitted sitemap too.On the first day [ last Sunday] about 300 of my posts are indexed and 1400 are being indexed yesterday. I was surprised when I look at the status of indexation this morning , because google showed only 105 pages has been indexed . I have never experienced such thing before.So ,I logged on to the webmaster tools and checked the indexation and it shows about 900 pages were still being indexed by it.

Why the sudden decrease of my indexed pages, from 1400 to just 105 in a single day as per SERP ? . Is this a normal google indexation behavior ?
#behavior #google #indexation #weird
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Odds are your pages are buried in Supplemental SERPs because you scraped established pages that have more authority than your pages with zero authority.

    Scraping Youtube page titles didn't help.

    I would be surprised If your whole domain/pages aren't deindexed within 3 months.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10130766].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Zen Guru
      Thanks yukon. But I am not using the exact same content that were being scrapped . I mash and spin to make them unique. Though I agree that poor content quality , But I was used to index the same type of sites and a lot of people still doing that.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10130779].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author nettiapina
        Originally Posted by Zen Guru View Post

        But I am not using the exact same content that were being scrapped . I mash and spin to make them unique. Though I agree that poor content quality , But I was used to index the same type of sites and a lot of people still doing that.
        Your definition of "unique" is pretty weird. Do you really think that Google compares verbatim copies of articles to each other? Your spun content is by definition very similar to the originals you ripped to make them, and therefore they're prime candidates to the supplemental index.

        So maybe Google is much better nowadays, and fresh and new spun crap hasn't got the small change that it had some time ago. So what? Past performance is not a promise of future performance.
        Signature
        Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
        Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

        What's your excuse?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10131415].message }}

Trending Topics