2 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
2 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

Backlink Content Manual Vs Automated

by Azel
2 replies
  • SEO
    • |
I am not talking about creation of automated backlinks..

But I am referring to content that is used on those backlinks.

If the content is automated/spun etc.

For example a backlink might be on high P.R , high DA blog with anchor or what not but "The content" is clearly spun .

How bad is that?

Would you say that it is like using a toyota oil in a BMW.

Does it really truly matter.

Will someone ever look at it manually ?

Is it worth the time to spend time or money on the content so the content is better.

Apart from blog postings, What if the automated content is just used on stuff like diversity links such as social media, wikis , book marks and multiple blogs that are used for diversity

but the high P.R high DA links are done manually..

Please your thoughts on this..
#automated #backlink #content #manual
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    You're talking about backlink sources that are so weak it doesn't even matter for SEO (social, bookmark, etc...). Social isn't usually a followed link.

    The bigger question is why would anyone want to junk up their link profile on purpose.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10318848].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      The bigger question is why would anyone want to junk up their link profile on purpose.
      Bigger question for us, small question for them.

      I mean come on. It seems that 99% of the people who come here and
      post, and least HERE, are very much into junking up their link profiles.

      The Alfred E. Neuman Approach to SEO: What, me worry?

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10318867].message }}

Trending Topics