Average monthly searches for niche?

by gedt
21 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hi,
What are lowest avg monthly google searches you will invest your time and would consider creating new niche website for making SEO money from it later?
Let's assume the keyword competition is low in the niche.

I Appreciate your honest answers. I know how the technology (WordPress, CSS etc.) a little SEO, but I am curious how the experienced niche marketers think, what are avg monthly google searches they consider worthy to invest time for creating niche site to get money later from it.

THANK YOU ALL!
#average #monthly #niche #searches
  • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
    It depends entirely on what I'm selling.

    If I make $1000 per sale, I'll take any level of search volume. If I make $0.25 per click or sale, I'm not going to waste time with something that gets searched 50 times a month.

    There is no standard correct answer. It all depends on how much you can make off of that search volume.
    Signature

    For SEO news, discussions, tactics, and more.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10371742].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author gedt
      Thank you for your answer MikeFriedman.
      You made good point, that it all depends on how much money there is in the specific niche. I was too focused on search volume vs competition + pay per click price, but now I will look what could be the price for the sales lead.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10371906].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dronehawk
    Depends with the value of the kw to you. If a kw has 10 searches and when a visitor to converts to a client you net $5k, I will definitely go for it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10372283].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DeKarperBoer
      What I'm wondering about the last days is, what is the importance of the "Monthly Searches".

      For instance, say a keyword has about 6,600 monthly searches for, which you discoverd in let's say Semrush.

      You discover that there ain't too much competition to rank the keyword. So then you decide to go for it...

      What kind of traffic can one expect on a blog with information about that subject? Is there a big difference in gaining #3, #2 of #1?

      Will almost all traffic come to the #1 spot?

      This is Adsense related in this case, but I also can imagine that with promoting products you might attract more traffice from those "Monthly Searches".

      Or is it even possible that your site might get terrible traffic after reaching out to the #1 spot in Google?

      Thanks,

      M@rc0
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10411751].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author DABK
        https://chitika.com/google-positioning-value is one study that looked at thousand of searches and figured out the answer to your question.

        Cliff Notes: 1 gets almost 3 times more than 2.


        Originally Posted by DeKarperBoer View Post

        What I'm wondering about the last days is, what is the importance of the "Monthly Searches".

        For instance, say a keyword has about 6,600 monthly searches for, which you discoverd in let's say Semrush.

        You discover that there ain't too much competition to rank the keyword. So then you decide to go for it...

        What kind of traffic can one expect on a blog with information about that subject? Is there a big difference in gaining #3, #2 of #1?

        Will almost all traffic come to the #1 spot?

        This is Adsense related in this case, but I also can imagine that with promoting products you might attract more traffice from those "Monthly Searches".

        Or is it even possible that your site might get terrible traffic after reaching out to the #1 spot in Google?

        Thanks,

        M@rc0
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10412011].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author DeKarperBoer
          Originally Posted by DABK View Post

          https://chitika.com/google-positioning-value is one study that looked at thousand of searches and figured out the answer to your question.

          Cliff Notes: 1 gets almost 3 times more than 2.
          Yes, I've read these kind of things somewhere, but thanks for posting...

          So, I guess it's very important to get a longtail keyword with big searches, and then also a lot of extra keywords with a lot of monthly searches to be succesful in for instance Adsense, not?

          Thanks,

          M@rc0
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10412071].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author DABK
            No, it's not. You don't get long tail keywords with lot of searches, by definition. Imagine a graph. On the left side it goes high (it's vertical, almost straight line. On the bottom, you have a line that's higher on the left and lower on the right.

            The graph measures traffic. Keywords with high traffic are close to the left... the ones with low are far on the right... the tail, on the long tail.

            What you need is a large number of low search, low competition keywords that are #1; 1 keyword with lots of searches and high competition, where you're on page 1 (3% of 1,000,000 i 30,000. 30k visitors converting at 10% is 3000 clicks. If you choose ads that pay $1.5 per click, that's the average income of the American worker.)

            Or a combination of those.

            But even if you're not #1 for keywords with low competition, you can make good money... It's just going to take more keywords.

            2000 keywords with 30 searches each is still 60,000 searches. If you're #3 for all of them, that's some 4000 visitors...

            20000 keywords with 30 searches


            See, you start with the amount you want to make... Then figure out what traffic you need (based on your conversions... When I was doing adwords, I had 9.45 to 13. something). But it doesn't matter what conversions you have (from the point of view of figuring how much traffic you need only). Even if it's a measly 0.25%, the math works... You just need more traffic... Obviously, it's easier if you convert higher).

            Anyway, Let's say you want to make $10,000 a month. Your ads pay $1 per click. That means you need 10000 clicks. If your site converts at 1% you need 1,000000 visitors. If you're #1 for all keywords you need some keywords that, combined, have a bit over 3 million searches.

            If you want to make only $1000 a month, and the rest stays the same, you need keywords with only a bit over 300,000 searches a month.

            If you need $10k a month, but increase site conversions to 10%...

            If you need $10k a month, but increase site conversions to 10% and go for keywords with average click payout of $2...

            Once you've done your math, all you need to do is ramp up one or another thing.

            It's like clockwork, really. The only question that remains is: Are you willing to do the required work?

            Originally Posted by DeKarperBoer View Post

            Yes, I've read these kind of things somewhere, but thanks for posting...

            So, I guess it's very important to get a longtail keyword with big searches, and then also a lot of extra keywords with a lot of monthly searches to be succesful in for instance Adsense, not?

            Thanks,

            M@rc0
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10412194].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author DeKarperBoer
              So correct me if I'm wrong...

              I'm looking for long tail keywords with low monthly searches, but that lead to that one keyword with a lot of searches... I'm growing my bussiness with the longtail keywords, trying to get them all to be #1 but at least #3, because else I would need way too much keywords...

              BUT what also can be done, is instead of focussing on that one site is create more sites with more easy to rank keywords with over 5,000 monthly searches per month and rank those keywords and their longtail keywords to higher positions, preferably #1...

              Thing is that I then would have to create 20 sites to get to 100,000 monthly seaches. Get them ranked on #1 gives me 30,000 visitors per month... 1% conversion rate would be 300 clicks then, right?

              Are my thoughts travelling in the right direction?

              The required work is ranking those keywords I'm guessing? Posting new articles, etcetera...

              What do you mean with Adwords conversion 9.45 to 13.something?

              Thanks,

              M@rco
              Originally Posted by DABK View Post

              No, it's not. You don't get long tail keywords with lot of searches, by definition. Imagine a graph. On the left side it goes high (it's vertical, almost straight line. On the bottom, you have a line that's higher on the left and lower on the right.

              The graph measures traffic. Keywords with high traffic are close to the left... the ones with low are far on the right... the tail, on the long tail.

              What you need is a large number of low search, low competition keywords that are #1; 1 keyword with lots of searches and high competition, where you're on page 1 (3% of 1,000,000 i 30,000. 30k visitors converting at 10% is 3000 clicks. If you choose ads that pay $1.5 per click, that's the average income of the American worker.)

              Or a combination of those.

              But even if you're not #1 for keywords with low competition, you can make good money... It's just going to take more keywords.

              2000 keywords with 30 searches each is still 60,000 searches. If you're #3 for all of them, that's some 4000 visitors...

              20000 keywords with 30 searches


              See, you start with the amount you want to make... Then figure out what traffic you need (based on your conversions... When I was doing adwords, I had 9.45 to 13. something). But it doesn't matter what conversions you have (from the point of view of figuring how much traffic you need only). Even if it's a measly 0.25%, the math works... You just need more traffic... Obviously, it's easier if you convert higher).

              Anyway, Let's say you want to make $10,000 a month. Your ads pay $1 per click. That means you need 10000 clicks. If your site converts at 1% you need 1,000000 visitors. If you're #1 for all keywords you need some keywords that, combined, have a bit over 3 million searches.

              If you want to make only $1000 a month, and the rest stays the same, you need keywords with only a bit over 300,000 searches a month.

              If you need $10k a month, but increase site conversions to 10%...

              If you need $10k a month, but increase site conversions to 10% and go for keywords with average click payout of $2...

              Once you've done your math, all you need to do is ramp up one or another thing.

              It's like clockwork, really. The only question that remains is: Are you willing to do the required work?
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10412541].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author irawr
                Banned
                Originally Posted by DeKarperBoer View Post

                So correct me if I'm wrong...

                Thing is that I then would have to create 20 sites to get to 100,000 monthly seaches. Get them ranked on #1 gives me 30,000 visitors per month... 1% conversion rate would be 300 clicks then, right?

                Are my thoughts travelling in the right direction?
                I do niche sites and I have a lot of them. The numbers vary wildly from niche to niche. Conversion rates of 1% are amazing in some niches, trash in others. I personally put all calculations in terms of RPM (some guys prefer eCP, but whatever, it's up to you, honestly eCP makes more sense since it's inline with paid traffic calculations.) Once I get the site up, I get links to it, and start evaluating the niche. You really can't evaluate a niche if you're not in it, the advice "stick to your niche" is honestly terrible. Some sites average 2k RPM and from what I understand, that's still technically low compared to what's possible. The range is 100RPM and up, if I can't pull those numbers I usually pretty much abandon the site, I'll update it maybe 2-3 times a year.

                So yes, you are "traveling in the right direction." But what really determines my effort is (and what I suggest) #1 I don't want any sites to go stale for too long and #2 I focus most of my time on the sites producing the high RPMs. If one site is producing 150RPM, I'm not going to update it or work on CRO, if a 1000RPM site also needs attention.

                I do not use adsense anywhere (not much clickbank either) and always have email capture boxes on the sites. My sites are always 30+ pages of content (usually 50+) and not every page has affiliate links, actually I keep the ratio below 50%, (usually more like 25%.) So pages are funneling internally into landers or cross comparisons. I also don't really care too terribly much about #1 rankings, I just want to make sure I'm showing up in the top 4 on keywords with high commercial intent. Again, I only start to care about rankings when I know it's worth it.

                I also don't do any black/grey SEO anymore, although this may change in the future. I have purchased established sites from flippa and consider myself lucky as flippa is loaded with scammers. I have purchased expired domains at auction, basically only considering the name and have gotten lucky a few times and the sites had a handful of links.

                Protip: I've never seen this discussed anywhere. If I buy a domain that expired and a bunch of the links dropped or were removed. After I build the site, I will contact every single site that used to link to the domain, saying something like "Hey I know you used to link to <mydomain> and I got the site back up and running again and it's better then ever. If you could please put the old link back I would really appreciate it." I will also do this to correct 404s if possible, but I try my best to reproduce the internal structure as best as I can (or 301s.) If this technique catches on please refer to it as the irawr method

                I'm currently working on another 30 or so sites using affiliate programs I haven't really worked with before, or I felt they sucked. I'm sure 25 or so of those sites will suck and I'll end up really focusing on a handful, expecting 1k/month+ from each of the ones that work well. I will also pump any high RPM sites with paid advertising, which is the entire point of doing it this way. Also, if there's multiple affiliate programs for the same niche and I'm not creating a footprint from affiliate ids, I'll actually make another site on the same niche and just host it on a different isp.

                Edit: I also have zero sites on "how to make money online." My sites focus on problems and solutions or types of products. The problem there being, choosing which product.

                Edit2: My sites have a lot of long product descriptions, notice I did not say review. They are "feature overviews" and I don't make any claims that are not reasonable about the product/service. So I don't say "click here to buy these magic pills that will make you get rich quick." Also, I consider CPA marketing to be affiliate marketing to be 100% clear and I really like to work directly with companies on their own affiliate programs or through the Linkshare program. There's a pile of programs on LS and I think a lot of guys get scared away because there's not tons of information on the programs there. Sometimes I work with a company and I'm 1 of 4 affiliates actually promoting the program with SEO, so I basically roll my face over the keyboard and get on the first page. LS has some pretty insane programs like Udemy, which pays 50% on a sale. From experience, it's easier to get somebody to take a course, which has a lot of perceived value, rather then buying a clickbank ebook.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10412668].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author DeKarperBoer
                  OK, to see if I really have understand, and perhaps also for others struggling like me:

                  So I'm looking for the hot niche "travelling" and that's too big to gain rank in and probably sell something with that specific keyword I change my focus to the easier to rank "travelling in the right direction". Though it has only 50 monthly searches, chances are good I will sell to some visitors when ranking #1 for that keyword... Because they are targeted searchers for this particular keyword...

                  And because I want to gain a nice income, I start building more sites this way... Sites that don't convert will be sent to the trash can...


                  OW btw iRawr, I've sent you a PM...

                  Originally Posted by irawr View Post

                  I do niche sites and I have a lot of them. The numbers vary wildly from niche to niche. Conversion rates of 1% are amazing in some niches, trash in others. I personally put all calculations in terms of RPM (some guys prefer eCP, but whatever, it's up to you, honestly eCP makes more sense since it's inline with paid traffic calculations.) Once I get the site up, I get links to it, and start evaluating the niche. You really can't evaluate a niche if you're not in it, the advice "stick to your niche" is honestly terrible. Some sites average 2k RPM and from what I understand, that's still technically low compared to what's possible. The range is 100RPM and up, if I can't pull those numbers I usually pretty much abandon the site, I'll update it maybe 2-3 times a year.

                  So yes, you are "traveling in the right direction." But what really determines my effort is (and what I suggest) #1 I don't want any sites to go stale for too long and #2 I focus most of my time on the sites producing the high RPMs. If one site is producing 150RPM, I'm not going to update it or work on CRO, if a 1000RPM site also needs attention.

                  I do not use adsense anywhere (not much clickbank either) and always have email capture boxes on the sites. My sites are always 30+ pages of content (usually 50+) and not every page has affiliate links, actually I keep the ratio below 50%, (usually more like 25%.) So pages are funneling internally into landers or cross comparisons. I also don't really care too terribly much about #1 rankings, I just want to make sure I'm showing up in the top 4 on keywords with high commercial intent. Again, I only start to care about rankings when I know it's worth it.

                  I also don't do any black/grey SEO anymore, although this may change in the future. I have purchased established sites from flippa and consider myself lucky as flippa is loaded with scammers. I have purchased expired domains at auction, basically only considering the name and have gotten lucky a few times and the sites had a handful of links.

                  Protip: I've never seen this discussed anywhere. If I buy a domain that expired and a bunch of the links dropped or were removed. After I build the site, I will contact every single site that used to link to the domain, saying something like "Hey I know you used to link to <mydomain> and I got the site back up and running again and it's better then ever. If you could please put the old link back I would really appreciate it." I will also do this to correct 404s if possible, but I try my best to reproduce the internal structure as best as I can (or 301s.) If this technique catches on please refer to it as the irawr method

                  I'm currently working on another 30 or so sites using affiliate programs I haven't really worked with before, or I felt they sucked. I'm sure 25 or so of those sites will suck and I'll end up really focusing on a handful, expecting 1k/month+ from each of the ones that work well. I will also pump any high RPM sites with paid advertising, which is the entire point of doing it this way. Also, if there's multiple affiliate programs for the same niche and I'm not creating a footprint from affiliate ids, I'll actually make another site on the same niche and just host it on a different isp.

                  Edit: I also have zero sites on "how to make money online." My sites focus on problems and solutions or types of products. The problem there being, choosing which product.

                  Edit2: My sites have a lot of long product descriptions, notice I did not say review. They are "feature overviews" and I don't make any claims that are not reasonable about the product/service. So I don't say "click here to buy these magic pills that will make you get rich quick." Also, I consider CPA marketing to be affiliate marketing to be 100% clear and I really like to work directly with companies on their own affiliate programs or through the Linkshare program. There's a pile of programs on LS and I think a lot of guys get scared away because there's not tons of information on the programs there. Sometimes I work with a company and I'm 1 of 4 affiliates actually promoting the program with SEO, so I basically roll my face over the keyboard and get on the first page. LS has some pretty insane programs like Udemy, which pays 50% on a sale. From experience, it's easier to get somebody to take a course, which has a lot of perceived value, rather then buying a clickbank ebook.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10413093].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author DABK
                Do you have a site up already? Is it getting any traffic? Or, at least, is it ranking anywhere in Google? (Is analytics showing you ranking at any position for any keyword?)

                If you pick easy keywords, you ought to be on page 1 with just onpage.

                Keep in mind things like this:
                50 searches a month but you can be #1 just by using the keyword in the page title and url gets you 15 visitors a month forever

                1000 searches but you need to spend 2 months to get it to be #4... and you have to keep propping it

                Which one is better?

                The goal is to get visitors the cheapest way...

                Adsense conversion of 9.45 means that for every 100 visits, I had 9.45 clicks on ads. Adwords got on average $3 every time someone clicked on an Adsense ad on my page... Google gave me, on average,, $1.45 of that 3 dollars... The rules said it would give 60% (1.8) but in real life, I ended up with 1.45 (compared to what Google said was average in keyword planner).

                You're going in the right direction. Read again irawr's post.

                Originally Posted by DeKarperBoer View Post

                So correct me if I'm wrong...

                I'm looking for long tail keywords with low monthly searches, but that lead to that one keyword with a lot of searches... I'm growing my bussiness with the longtail keywords, trying to get them all to be #1 but at least #3, because else I would need way too much keywords...

                BUT what also can be done, is instead of focussing on that one site is create more sites with more easy to rank keywords with over 5,000 monthly searches per month and rank those keywords and their longtail keywords to higher positions, preferably #1...

                Thing is that I then would have to create 20 sites to get to 100,000 monthly seaches. Get them ranked on #1 gives me 30,000 visitors per month... 1% conversion rate would be 300 clicks then, right?

                Are my thoughts travelling in the right direction?

                The required work is ranking those keywords I'm guessing? Posting new articles, etcetera...

                What do you mean with Adwords conversion 9.45 to 13.something?

                Thanks,

                M@rco
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10412816].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author DeKarperBoer
                  Originally Posted by DABK View Post

                  Do you have a site up already?
                  I have several sites ready now at the moment, only a few are running a few months longer. One I already forgot, but seems to rank slowly, without me doing anything at the moment...

                  Originally Posted by DABK View Post

                  Is it getting any traffic? Or, at least, is it ranking anywhere in Google? (Is analytics showing you ranking at any position for any keyword?)
                  The site I mentioned before is ranking in Google #4 and is getting some traffic.

                  I use Semrush to track my sites, and also SERPfox and CuteRank.

                  I can see ranking for other sites also already, though I've not been doing off-page SEO for them atm. But will start doing that shortly. One site has good potention, as there are several long-tail keywords with high search volumes that can be ranked, but also a ton of otherke LTK's with lesser search volume that also can be easily ranked.

                  Other sites are being build as we speak, or have off-page SEO just starting to go... I've got to wait what they'll do...

                  Originally Posted by DABK View Post

                  If you pick easy keywords, you ought to be on page 1 with just onpage.

                  Keep in mind things like this:
                  50 searches a month but you can be #1 just by using the keyword in the page title and url gets you 15 visitors a month forever

                  1000 searches but you need to spend 2 months to get it to be #4... and you have to keep propping it

                  Which one is better?
                  Yes, the option you mention is clearly better, so I'll start focussing on that from now on, thanks for your advice (and also iRawr)...

                  Originally Posted by DABK View Post

                  The goal is to get visitors the cheapest way...

                  Adsense conversion of 9.45 means that for every 100 visits, I had 9.45 clicks on ads. Adwords got on average $3 every time someone clicked on an Adsense ad on my page... Google gave me, on average,, $1.45 of that 3 dollars... The rules said it would give 60% (1.8) but in real life, I ended up with 1.45 (compared to what Google said was average in keyword planner).

                  You're going in the right direction. Read again irawr's post.
                  Well, hopefully I can gain a bit in the right direction. Option for starters was to gain $2/day with some of the sites that are in smaller niches and $5+/day with a few sites that are in bigger niches (for now only one is ready, but I've got some domains registered already)...

                  But I will take the advice from the both of you with and try it already with a site, I'm getting rebuild so I can also use for Amazon... The site that was ranking without me knowing it...

                  Thanks,

                  M@rc0

                  I'll try to keep things posted once it starts working...
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10413113].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author DABK
                    Don't trash sites that don't convert; use them, link from them to the sites that do convert.

                    The content you put up for adsense sites has to be different than the content you put up for sites that have amazon products on.

                    What converts for adsense doesn't convert for amazon.

                    For adsense, you want to get them in the mood to do research, the keywords you use are early in the buying cycle... Is it possible to lose weight in a healthy manner, for instance. For amazon.com, you'd use: elliptical machine comparison and Schwinn 420 review, type of keywords.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10413134].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author irawr
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by DABK View Post

                      Don't trash sites that don't convert; use them, link from them to the sites that do convert.
                      Yeah don't trash them, keep them maintained, a few things could happen here.

                      What usually happens is, it makes money anyways, but it's disappointing how slow it is. After awhile you might figure out something is wrong with the program/offer, so you switch to something else and test. Or if there happens to be a similar program, you test the program. Like for example, this sounds bizarre but, I found that the Walmart program was the best for one specific niche /shrug... I only use it for 1 niche. But I hope this sheds some light on what you need to do. There is a type of product that is sold at Walmart and there is at least a few different options for consumers to choose from.

                      Example that's not my site: Top 10 Best Web Hosting Services of 2016 | Top Ten Reviews

                      Notice you can click on each host for a full "review." Note: Calling a product description a "review" is unethical and involves a legal balancing act. I do not do that. The trick would be just to use the word review on the page somewhere without calling the content a review. So "Here is great information for you to review." in the first paragraph. As long as you don't lie or make BS claims, you should be FTC complaint, you won't get a thin affiliate penalty, and everybody loves you.

                      Lying about your content and calling it a review is a great way to get a thin-affiliate penalty. You also risk getting banned from your affiliate and adwords/fb ads. If you did not personally test the product/service/offer, then it's not a review. It will be obvious to a manual reviewer that you are lying and you might get penalized. But I see people doing this all the time, it's nauseating. Also, false claims about the price, "it's the cheapest at company xyz.com" look, prices fluctuate all the time, don't do that. "Save money at xyz.com" will always work as long as their price is lower then the MSRP.

                      Also back to what DABK said, as a white hat, I link my sites to together here and there. Only if it makes logical sense, I generally don't worry about IPs or subnets, that stuff only applies if you're either a massive network or blackhat and you're trying to hide.

                      Lets say I have two sites, the first site is about blue widgets and the second site is about widget security. I will absolutely have a page on the blue widgets site about security and I will mention how important security is, that's why I created an entire site about it with a link. Neither of those sites will link to my site about training elephants, or zebra stripe counting, they're unrelated, it doesn't make sense.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10413564].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MikeCRO
          Originally Posted by DABK View Post

          https://chitika.com/google-positioning-value is one study that looked at thousand of searches and figured out the answer to your question.

          Cliff Notes: 1 gets almost 3 times more than 2.
          That's just 1 study. In my case, i get more traffic if i'm 11 than i'm 9 or 10.


          I'm searching for low competition affiliates with 1000-3000 searches, make micro blog and if in 2 months i'm not in top 5, i don't work on that site, use it just for back linking.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10414032].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author irawr
            Banned
            Originally Posted by MikeCRO View Post

            That's just 1 study. In my case, i get more traffic if i'm 11 than i'm 9 or 10.


            I'm searching for low competition affiliates with 1000-3000 searches, make micro blog and if in 2 months i'm not in top 5, i don't work on that site, use it just for back linking.
            To be clear, you understand that the search volume does not determine difficulty correct?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10414054].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author DABK
            Yes, it's just one study and deals in averages... You getting more if 11 than 10, supports their findings.

            Your method may be a good one, can't tell without more details...

            Or definitions.

            Originally Posted by MikeCRO View Post

            That's just 1 study. In my case, i get more traffic if i'm 11 than i'm 9 or 10.


            I'm searching for low competition affiliates with 1000-3000 searches, make micro blog and if in 2 months i'm not in top 5, i don't work on that site, use it just for back linking.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10414197].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DrForum
    Originally Posted by gedt View Post

    Hi,
    What are lowest avg monthly google searches you will invest your time and would consider creating new niche website for making SEO money from it later?
    Let's assume the keyword competition is low in the niche.

    I Appreciate your honest answers. I know how the technology (WordPress, CSS etc.) a little SEO, but I am curious how the experienced niche marketers think, what are avg monthly google searches they consider worthy to invest time for creating niche site to get money later from it.

    THANK YOU ALL!
    Any niche that has searches that are more than 100 a month is worth me investing my time in. It shows that the niche is active and when you devote your time in the above area, you will have a very big reward . The niche at times may be a lie to you and therefore you need to have the analysis well done. I try to find the niche that is consistent even if it is not that super active. I find the potential in a niche, I am fully in.
    Signature
    The Elite Ad-Network | Adsnik
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10413533].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author allanmagazine3
    Thanks for the post.It depends on your SEO.How much SEO work are you doing on your sites.If you want to improve Leads and back links then First try to submit on free social media sites rather than Facebook,G+,Twitter there are many good social sites where you can generate lead for business and improve back-links.

    Try this metropolis magazine japan in this site you will see a classified section submit your site in that to improve business and there are many sites you can search on google like scoop.it,you mob,live journal etc
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10414100].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author christina21maria
    Interesting topic. Now that we got a nice list of keywords that are not the best choices i would love to see a post with a strategy for finding keywords that do work.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10414237].message }}

Trending Topics