Maximum No. of backlinks on Web 2.0 property

7 years ago

Originally Posted by dgmufasa

Hi,

It is my understanding that after maximum number of backlinks on a Web 2.0 property, anything additional won't make a difference (as far as SEO is concerned).

Does this rule refer to backlinks at a DOMAIN/SITE level or backlinks at a PAGE level.

There is no such rule. Google would never inform marketers that that is the case. The strength of a link is determined by the strength of incoming link and the amount of links going out.

So how many links a web 2.0 page can give reasonable juice varies. Two might be weak as water

As it is a great deal of web 2.0 pages are weak anyway and people just blast second tier links to them. I don't know how long you guys are going to dream that Google won't start tweaking that strategy to make it more useless but I guess it will be years before you find somethng better

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917083].message }}

dgmufasa

7 years ago

Thanks for the response.

and the amount of links going out.

So - just to be sure

there is no limit on the number of links leaving a Web 2.0 property pointing to the money site. For example, if there are 20 links pointing to the money site, google won't see it as being fishy .... (BTW, I am using 20 as a ludicrous example - but - I think you get the idea

)

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917128].message }}

MikeFriedman

7 years ago

Originally Posted by dgmufasa

Thanks for the response.

So - just to be sure

there is no limit on the number of links leaving a Web 2.0 property pointing to the money site. For example, if there are 20 links pointing to the money site, google won't see it as being fishy .... (BTW, I am using 20 as a ludicrous example - but - I think you get the idea

)

Probably depends more on the nature of the links than any specific number. For example, a sidebar link on a site with 50 pages, if going to give 50 links. Is that suspicious or nefarious? In most cases, probably not.

On the other hand, if there are embedded, keyword-rich links in the content of each of those pages to the same site, that is probably going to look a lot more suspicious.

Either way though, links from a 2.0 property are pretty much worthless. Whether you have 20 or 1, you are not going to rank anything with those. I wouldn't bother.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917181].message }}

dgmufasa

7 years ago

Originally Posted by MikeFriedman

Either way though, links from a 2.0 property are pretty much worthless. Whether you have 20 or 1, you are not going to rank anything with those. I wouldn't bother.

I thought that Web 2.0 properties could help depending upon the ones you chose to use. I found the following online:

From: Top 100+ Free High PR Dofollow Web 2.0 Sites list 2015 - Power Tricks

Most of the webmasters and SEOs use web 2.0 sites to create Tier 2 backlinks. But some also create backlinks directly for their money making sites. As, anyone can create free web 2.0 sites without knowing any coding language, so it gets huge popularity. To get high quality backlinks from Web 2.0 sites, anyone must choose web 2.0 sites with high page rank, good domain and page authority.

Is what this guy saying right?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917366].message }}

Mike Anthony

7 years ago

Originally Posted by dgmufasa

I thought that Web 2.0 properties could help depending upon the ones you chose to use. I found the following online:

From: Top 100+ Free High PR Dofollow Web 2.0 Sites list 2015 - Power Tricks

Read well known SEO blogs not just anyone. That person is totally clueless. There no such thing as a high PR site. PR means PAGE rank. There are some sites with home and other pages with high PR but thats for THAT HOME PAGE. When you put your new page up on these services your page is PR ZERO. Your page is nowhere near these HIgh PR pages on these services so you get little from it

I don't know what it is about SEO why people can't figure things out. This high PR Web 2.0 thing has been out there for years and debunked for years and people still fall for it.

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10918202].message }}

yukon

Banned 7 years ago

Web 2.0 can be powerful links but it's nothing like folks around here play around with.

A web page is a web page, you can pump as much authority into the page/URL as anything else on the web.

The problem here (IM/SEO forums) is noobs assume web 2.0 is magic, it's not. Again, it's a webpage, you can have zero authority or all the authority possible. It all revolves around the backlink page exact URL backlink profile.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917192].message }}

helloinman

7 years ago

Yeh !! Maximum Number Of Links From Web 2.0 Website - No Issue !! All You Need To Make Sure Website Have High DA.

Here Are Some Of My Favorite Web 2.0 Website:

- Blogger
- WordPress
- Storify
- Live Journal
- Google Sites

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917379].message }}

KarenByerly

7 years ago

Originally Posted by helloinman

Yeh !! Maximum Number Of Links From Web 2.0 Website - No Issue !! All You Need To Make Sure Website Have High DA.

Here Are Some Of My Favorite Web 2.0 Website:

- Blogger
- WordPress
- Storify
- Live Journal
- Google Sites

What is Google Sites?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10924442].message }}

Ivan Duyduc

7 years ago

I often buy the expired web 2.0 because they have already high Pa metrics and It takes short time to get index url from 2.0 sites

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917430].message }}

customerblast

7 years ago

Web 2.0 really isn't going to do much anymore after Googles latest updates, however to answer your question yes rather then adding more to the same properties fresh ones are better.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Free Instagram PVA Accounts - PM me if you would like some free samples!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10917529].message }}

jefftaylor64 7 years ago

Google will take the first link it finds to any one given url. More links to the same url are ignored...
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10918122].message }}

MikeFriedman

7 years ago

Most of the webmasters and SEOs use web 2.0 sites to create Tier 2 backlinks. But some also create backlinks directly for their money making sites. As, anyone can create free web 2.0 sites without knowing any coding language, so it gets huge popularity. To get high quality backlinks from Web 2.0 sites, anyone must choose web 2.0 sites with high page rank, good domain and page authority.

Originally Posted by dgmufasa

Is what this guy saying right?

Nope. That person is clueless. DA has nothing to do with it (DOMAIN Authority has nothing to do with your page) and the PR and PA of any Web 2.0 page you create is going to be 0 unless you get some good links pointing at it.

But if you can get good links, why waste your time pointing them at a page you don't control instead of just pointing them right to your site?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10918159].message }}

dgmufasa

7 years ago

Originally Posted by yukon

The problem here (IM/SEO forums) is noobs assume web 2.0 is magic, it's not. Again, it's a webpage, you can have zero authority or all the authority possible. It all revolves around the backlink page exact URL backlink profile.

What does this mean?

Originally Posted by MikeFriedman

Nope. That person is clueless. DA has nothing to do with it (DOMAIN Authority has nothing to do with your page) and the PR and PA of any Web 2.0 page you create is going to be 0 unless you get some good links pointing at it.

But if you can get good links, why waste your time pointing them at a page you don't control instead of just pointing them right to your site?

The guy seems to be focusing on creating links on 2.0 properties that point to the money site. My understanding was also that one uses the Web 2.0 properties in order to insulate the money site from any problems (where Google can issue penalties - i.e. de-indexing, etc.) It makes sense to me.

I started this affiliate site back in late September. And now, it's finally capturing organic traffic through targeted + long tail keywords.
...
- Order / create web 2.0's with tiered linking. GSA -> FCS networker -> Unique web 2.0 -> Affiliate money site (month 1-3)
- Order / create PBN's (month 4-6)

This is from the thread here: http://www.warriorforum.com/search-e...affiliate.html

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Read well known SEO blogs not just anyone. That person is totally clueless. There no such thing as a high PR site. PR means PAGE rank. There are some sites with home and other pages with high PR but thats for THAT HOME PAGE. When you put your new page up on these services your page is PR ZERO. Your page is nowhere near these HIgh PR pages on these services so you get little from it

So if there is nothing to gain with PR on a Web 2.0 site, I take it then that there is something to gain by using the Domain Authority of the site (hence the reason people seem to always create profiles on Web 2.0 sites)?

I heard that the goal was to create profiles on these types of Web 2.0 sites, put a link to the money site (index page) and then interact with the site (as in the case of a forum).

But, according to the info below (from We Analyzed 1 Million Google Search Results. Here ) this may not be the case(?)

You may have heard that getting backlinks from the same domain has diminishing returns. In other words, its better to get 10 links from 10 different sites than 10 links from the same domain.According to our analysis, this appears to be the case. We found that domain diversity has a substantial impact on rankings.

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

I don't know what it is about SEO why people can't figure things out. This high PR Web 2.0 thing has been out there for years and debunked for years and people still fall for it.

I was following the information from here. I was thinking about buying this software:

https://longtailpro.com/how-to-creat...-work-for-seo/

Yet, web 2.0 links still work when done right. Some forms should outright be considered mandatory, while others require a lot of effort to be seen as legitimate. In short, the web 2.0 linking game got a lot more strategic, with risk/reward dynamics affected by how much effort you are willing to put in.

It looks like this company is making some kind of a suggestion to use a backlink strategy using Web 2.0 properties.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10918786].message }}

Intuz

7 years ago

You can put any number of links. But your article or should blog should rank in SERP else the backlinks will be of no use.
Web 2.0 properties should have some valuable contents, topics, higher DA and mentions.
I wish you all the best for your work.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10918816].message }}

luciesmazanska

7 years ago

If you are asking whether many links from the same 2.0 platform count every one as a links from different sites. It doesn't.
BUT, you have to take into account that if those links are created in, for example, several wordpress sites with a lot of time
online and much presence in SERPs those will count as one every one.
On the other hand, if you are creating new 2.0 sites to get those new links: When creating several sites on the same platform will make those links less relevant.

Thanks

Signature

â˜…â˜…â˜…â˜…â˜…

TARGETED GOOGLE TRAFFIC - CHEAP!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10920399].message }}

starlox

7 years ago

I think it would be quite a huge flag if your building backlinks and suddenly it stops completely

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10924556].message }}

Maximum No. of backlinks on Web 2.0 property

Trending Topics

How did you turn it all around?

A healthy fascination for Hollywood...

Any thoughts on golf's latest phenom...Scottie Scheffler??

What's the Best IM-Related Skill to Learn Today That Can Help in the Future?

best high quality crypto traffic.