How To Easily Dominate Google - Learn What Works By Looking At My Past Experiments

8 replies
  • SEO
  • |
The last months I have been conducting a lot of experiments about how to rank first page in Google. There's a lot of myths about it (such as looking for the competition in quotes) but I now have finally cracked the code.

In this post I will show you:
- The Magic Keyword Formula: how to check if you can easily rank for your keyword (even for millions of "competing pages")
- Where to build your web page
- How to do your backlinking / how to promote your sites
- My experiments (yes, actual sites) to show you the proof

1. How to check the keywords you can easily rank for - The Magic Keyword Formula

Yep, there's actually a formula for this (who would think that). And it's actually a very easy one.

Keyword To Target = Sum of PR for "keyword" less than 10

Let me explain: if you want to know if you can rank for a keyword, just put the keyword in quotes in Google and calculate the sum of the pagerank for all the sites on the first page. If the sum of the page rank is lower than 10 you're good. Easy isn't it? By the way, you can check the PR of the sites with firefox plugins such as "SEO for Firefox" or "SEO Quake" (just google it)

Just use this formula and you will be able to pick keywords which have good search volume that you wouldn't otherwise dare to attack

2. Where to build your web page?

Easy, just take a web 2.0 site. Hubpages, Scribd, Docstoc, Infobarrel. Whatever, choose a web 2.0 domain. Why? Those properties already have authority from the domain which makes them easier to rank.

Put your keyword in the title and sprinkle it in the article. That's all

3. How to do your backlinking / how to promote your sites

Do the following:
- social bookmarking
- linkwheel (actually, just a couple of web 2.0 properties that link to your main web page are enough). Don't sweat about leaving the linkwheel open or closed. Whatever :-)
- profile linking. Do some Angela or Paul stuff. I use Pete's Linkwheel software which automates this but you don't have to
- what you also could do is create an ezine article and point it with an anchored backlink to your main page (I did this in the beginning but now I found that I actually don't have to do this to rank)

Just do it once. That'll be fine. I also recommend to do one step at a time. Sometimes you could rank just with bookmarking alone. It really depends.

4. My experiments --- THE PROOF

It's quite a funny story actually (or frustrating depending on the perspective). I made lots of web properties the last couple of months and I followed some guy's method and I just couldn't figure out why some properties ranked and other's didn't while I used the same methods on them. I was determined to "crack the code" and discover the formula. I checked everything, and that's when I found out the method.

(remark: I'm messing up the links because I don't want to push the rankings by giving them backlinks from WF)

Proof 1: ***http://hubpages.com/hub/Weekly-Flower-Delivery***

Page 1 on Google, somewhere at the top
Sum of PR = 4

Proof 2: ***Best Roth IRA*** - Info Barrel
Page 1 on Google (bottom) or Page 2 (top), depending on the datacenter
Sum of PR = 6

--> Sum of PR is higher but still less than 10

Proof 3: ***Moissanite Engagement Rings*** - Info Barrel
Page 3
Sum of PR = 19

--> Sum of PR is more than 10

When the sum of the PR is more than 10 is getting more difficult to predict the rankings actually.

And besides that I got a truckload of properties that don't rank for their main keyword and as you can probably guess, the sum of PR is greater than 10 :-) Just check the other sites in the profile and you can check it for yourself.


In the meantime, I started testing my theory on some other keywords and properties (which I won't show for the moment) and they all seem to confirm the theory. Maybe just one side remark: I'm still testing keywords for which the PR formula are OK but where the sites are all very heavy sites with a lot of authority for the niche. Let me explain. Say you want to rank for a Playstation game title and the magic keyword formula tells you to go for it, you could nevertheless face some stiff competition because you'll be competing with niche sites like gamespot.com and so on. I still need to do some more testing on outranking a list of topic relevant authority sites which have like millions of backlinks.


I hope with this post, I could take a bit of mistery out of the keyword selection and provide you guidance on choosing keywords you can rank for.
#dominate #easily #experiments #google #learn #past #works
  • Profile picture of the author fortony
    Interesting read. Have you researched how well it works using your own domain vs. 2.0 sites?
    Signature

    Give your glass products the strength of 9H tempered glass with Dglass Coat. https://dglasscoat.com/

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1300206].message }}
  • Hi Cedric,

    First let me say I applaud your time & effort to try and 'systematize' your keyword ranking, and generosity sharing what you're doing.

    That said, here's what I see when I look at your examples:

    "Weekly Flower Delivery"
    Google, Position #2
    Wordtracker search volume, 0

    "Best Roth IRA" (btw, you typo'd your keyword phrase on the site 'Rorth')
    Google, Position #12
    Wordtracker daily search volume, exact-match 4, broad-match 9

    "Moissanite Engagement Rings"
    Google, Position #30
    Wordtracker daily search volume, exact-match 9


    I think your method and calculations are 'situational' and obviously needs a bit of work

    Unfortunately, I do not think it's a way to 'easily dominate Google'.

    Mark
    Signature
    = = = = COMPLETE, CUSTOM ADSENSE SITE = = = =
    VERY Limited WSO. 100% Guaranteed.

    MY Expertise, YOUR Profit.
    Read the thread.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1300221].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cedricl
      Originally Posted by internetmarketer99 View Post

      Hi Cedric,

      First let me say I applaud your time & effort to try and 'systematize' your keyword ranking, and generosity sharing what you're doing.

      That said, here's what I see when I look at your examples:

      "Weekly Flower Delivery"
      Google, Position #2
      Wordtracker search volume, 0

      "Best Roth IRA" (btw, you typo'd your keyword phrase on the site 'Rorth')
      Google, Position #12
      Wordtracker daily search volume, exact-match 4, broad-match 9

      "Moissanite Engagement Rings"
      Google, Position #30
      Wordtracker daily search volume, exact-match 9


      I think your method and calculations are 'situational' and obviously needs a bit of work

      Unfortunately, I do not think it's a way to 'easily dominate Google'.

      Mark
      Hi Mark,

      Let me first say that the title of the thread might lead to some confusion. It's rather about finding keywords to dominate Google than dominating Google itself (giving the impression that you'll get millions of visitors in one day or something).

      Anyway, I didn't look at wordtracker keyword volume actually (only used Google keyword tool exact match). Wasn't really the point of the idea. The theory is rather about finding keywords you could rank for regardless of all other criteria.

      Tell you what, let me take some keyword with higher search volumes in wordtracker and report back in a couple of days.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1300280].message }}
      • Originally Posted by cedricl View Post

        Hi Mark,

        Let me first say that the title of the thread might lead to some confusion. It's rather about finding keywords to dominate Google than dominating Google itself (giving the impression that you'll get millions of visitors in one day or something).

        Anyway, I didn't look at wordtracker keyword volume actually (only used Google keyword tool exact match). Wasn't really the point of the idea. The theory is rather about finding keywords you could rank for regardless of all other criteria.

        Tell you what, let me take some keyword with higher search volumes in wordtracker and report back in a couple of days.
        Very goodl Cedric, I'd certainly be interested in how that goes.

        My point re: search volume is that generally speaking, the higher the search volume, the tougher it can be to rank. Conversely, keywords with little or no search volume can often be ranked for relatively easily.

        Mark
        Signature
        = = = = COMPLETE, CUSTOM ADSENSE SITE = = = =
        VERY Limited WSO. 100% Guaranteed.

        MY Expertise, YOUR Profit.
        Read the thread.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1300847].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author camaro
    Nice experiment, gonna give it a try myself
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1300307].message }}

Trending Topics