Keyword in Quotes Question

3 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I'm kind of confused.

When I do a keyword search in Google with quotations
for a particular KW I got a return of aprox. 64,000.

However, when I go to the bottom of the page and click
until I get to the last page of the SERPs a new number of
results appears. Which is 42.

Everyone says to go off of what is in quotes: which was 64,000

Which number is more relevent. 64,000 or 42?
#keyword #question #quotes
  • Profile picture of the author paulgl
    The mighty G is not filled with uselessness. They would never
    give you all 64,000. I cannot fathom why people who do
    little exercises like this. Who is going to want to get to
    the last page? In fact, google always thinks that after
    the 6th page or so, it's a moot point.

    I have explained it before, I'll do it again.

    Go to a library. Ask for all books with references
    to dog breeds. Sure the building has thousands of books with dogs
    in them. A ton will mention something about dog care. Any book,
    that has the words dog care or "dog care" would theoretically
    come up in a search. Let's say 5,000. But in reality, the reference
    shelf on animals is what you would really want. And the librarian,
    (a stand in for google here) directs you to the 200 books in reference
    that are really on dog care. So, the librarian found 5,000 books
    with dog care, but only 200 are really on dog care. After listing
    those 200, the list would end. In fact, she might even limit
    it to the first 20, as beyond that, the books are iffy.

    So when you do a search for "dog care," it may show there are
    about 500,000 sites with dog care. (Notice the "about"?) But
    only 10,000 are really on dog care, and only 200 are really worth
    looking at. Google would make the decision that after 200, it
    becomes an exercise in futility.

    Paul
    Signature

    If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1500387].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author K. Rondo
      I understood everything you just said.

      I'm assuming then that the initial results, in quotes, that
      Google returns isn't as important as many people make
      it out to be.

      Im trying to learn.
      I've never created a site or done KW research (well once but never used them
      and don't know if I did it correctly.)

      But that's about to change

      Many people say to go after results in quotes of 10,000 or less.
      Some say less than that. Some say more but it will be harder to
      rank.

      But that advice seems too rigid.

      I was searching for more KWs and found one with 125,000 in qoutes
      and only 12 relevent results.

      It seems that it would be easy to rank for despite the high number of
      pages. The indexed pages were mostly articles and 2.0 sites. No authority
      sites.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1500543].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dee Scofield
    Originally Posted by K. Rondo View Post

    I'm assuming then that the initial results, in quotes, that Google returns isn't as important as many people make it out to be.
    Yes, and no. It's a good guideline to follow when you're just learning how to do keyword research. Gotta learn to walk before you can fly.

    Originally Posted by K. Rondo View Post

    Many people say to go after results in quotes of 10,000 or less. Some say less than that. Some say more but it will be harder to rank.

    But that advice seems to rigid.
    All of the above are true. But as you gain experience, you will get a better sense of which approach feels right for you. If you're just starting out, I would recommend going with a more conservative approach. Yes, it's a little rigid, but until you become more experienced it's a fairly reliable way to have some success at this.

    Originally Posted by K. Rondo View Post

    ...Maybe it's not profitable but it seems that it would be easy to rank for despite the high number of pages. The indexed pages were mostly articles and 2.0 sites. No authority sites. No adwords ad.s
    There can be several other factors involved, so maybe, maybe not. But the fact that there are no Adwords ads means that there probably isn't a significant amount of traffic for the keyword. It might be easy to rank for, but you don't want to put a lot of effort into optimizing your website for a keyword that won't bring you any real traffic.

    Originally Posted by K. Rondo View Post

    Obviously, the best way for me to learn is hands-on; instead of depending on
    everyone else for information.
    Read as much as you can, and then do as much as you can. But you should never be afraid to ask questions when you get stuck, because it can help shave a lot of time off of your learning curve. SEO isn't rocket science, but there are many details to learn and it can be fairly complex. Don't expect to learn it overnight. In fact, it's something you never really stop learning because of the dynamic nature of it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1500783].message }}

Trending Topics