SpamDexing 101

14 years ago

My experience has been your Page Rank has nothing to do with too much of anything. I have sites that rank on the first page of Google that are PR0 against stiff competition... and I have a couple PR4 sites that simply don't rank well at all. Also, keep in mind your PR will only change as Google updates their search engine - something I see happen every 3-4 months.

You can get de-indexed or sandboxed for spamming sites with too many links, posting too many spam-type blog comments, etc. It all boils down to too much link building too fast. Better to go low and wide. Also, GREAT content that is not scraped from the search engines or "compiled" in any way is a good thing. Adding adsense hurt a site. I've seen it. I have one site ranking #1 on google for a primary term. I added adsense and immediately fell to page three. Took it off... right back up to the #1 spot.

[ 1 ] Thanks
3 replies

Signature

Rob Fore, 6-Figure Affiliate Marketing
*** Free 5-Day Attraction Marketing Bootcamp *** Rob's Blog ***

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736498].message }}

Why9999

14 years ago

Originally Posted by 4freedom

My experience has been your Page Rank has nothing to do with too much of anything. I have sites that rank on the first page of Google that are PR0 against stiff competition... and I have a couple PR4 sites that simply don't rank well at all. Also, keep in mind your PR will only change as Google updates their search engine - something I see happen every 3-4 months.

You can get de-indexed or sandboxed for spamming sites with too many links, posting too many spam-type blog comments, etc. It all boils down to too much link building too fast. Better to go low and wide. Also, GREAT content that is not scraped from the search engines or "compiled" in any way is a good thing. Adding adsense hurt a site. I've seen it. I have one site ranking #1 on google for a primary term. I added adsense and immediately fell to page three. Took it off... right back up to the #1 spot.

Wow! Thx for the tip on the adsense. Isn't that ironic, though, that they penalize you for their own product? What is the reasoning behind this do you think? They're just trying to purify the race?

The Google forum boys always beat me up for adsense, so I guess now I see why...

Also, have you seen the same thing with affiliate links?? I've got about a quarter of my pages with Amazon affiliate links, usually just one link per page however.

Great comments - thx.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736516].message }}

Zeus66

14 years ago

Originally Posted by 4freedom

Adding adsense hurt a site. I've seen it. I have one site ranking #1 on google for a primary term. I added adsense and immediately fell to page three. Took it off... right back up to the #1 spot.

I've been making "Adsense sites" since literally the day they launched it back in 2003 and I've not ever seen this. Not one time. And I test everything. I'm OCD about testing. I cannot possibly see how the two are causally related. The drop after adding Adsense probably came from some other change or bad timing with respect to Google making internal ranking changes that were unrelated to your on-page changes.

There is absolutely nothing wrong at all whatsoever with making a site that is monetized purely by Adsense. Google doesn't care. IN fact, they care the other way. They want more Adsense publishers, not fewer. What they don't want is content on any type of site (Adsense or otherwise) that is scraped, duplicated, or otherwise crappy.

John

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736610].message }}

adamv 14 years ago

If "spamdexing" is real, somebody forgot to tell all of those viagra and cialis sites that keep ranking so highly.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
Signature

Get a professional voice over for your next audio or video project at an affordable price -- I will record 150 words of text for just $5.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736616].message }}

Troy_Phillips

14 years ago

Originally Posted by Zeus66

I've been making "Adsense sites" since literally the day they launched it back in 2003 and I've not ever seen this. Not one time. And I test everything. I'm OCD about testing. I cannot possibly see how the two are causally related. The drop after adding Adsense probably came from some other change or bad timing with respect to Google making internal ranking changes that were unrelated to your on-page changes.

There is absolutely nothing wrong at all whatsoever with making a site that is monetized purely by Adsense. Google doesn't care. IN fact, they care the other way. They want more Adsense publishers, not fewer. What they don't want is content on any type of site (Adsense or otherwise) that is scraped, duplicated, or otherwise crappy.

John

John , I really respect your opinion concerning adsense . Is there any way that only adding adsense to a site can make it rank better?

The reason ask is because I have had three different sites go to google one after adding adsense , with no other changes whatsoever .

The sites were already on google one but below fold before .

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1741055].message }}

Zeus66

14 years ago

Originally Posted by Troy_Phillips

John , I really respect your opinion concerning adsense . Is there any way that only adding adsense to a site can make it rank better?

The reason ask is because I have had three different sites go to google one after adding adsense , with no other changes whatsoever .

The sites were already on google one but below fold before .

Troy, I've never seen Adsense drop a page's ranking, which is what I mentioned before. I don't know about raising its ranking, but I've not seen that happen and it makes sense that it would not be the cause for a rise or a drop. It's a piece of java script. It's not any kind of additional content, per se, in Google's estimation. I really think Google would take major precautions to guard against any kind of appearance of favoring pages with their own money-making script in the code. That would be fraught with all kinds of public relations nightmares for them, as well as probably some legal ramifications. I just can't imagine that Google gives a page with Adsense code on it any bearing whatsoever in the ranking algorithm.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1741139].message }}

Why9999

14 years ago

Originally Posted by 4freedom

My experience has been your Page Rank has nothing to do with too much of anything. I have sites that rank on the first page of Google that are PR0 against stiff competition... and I have a couple PR4 sites that simply don't rank well at all. Also, keep in mind your PR will only change as Google updates their search engine - something I see happen every 3-4 months.

You can get de-indexed or sandboxed for spamming sites with too many links, posting too many spam-type blog comments, etc. It all boils down to too much link building too fast. Better to go low and wide. Also, GREAT content that is not scraped from the search engines or "compiled" in any way is a good thing. Adding adsense hurt a site. I've seen it. I have one site ranking #1 on google for a primary term. I added adsense and immediately fell to page three. Took it off... right back up to the #1 spot.

Thx so much for this advice. I removed all adsense from my site and about three to four days later I started ranking on a variety of smaller searches. My traffic is up about 20-25% already. Furthermore, I should be able to leverage this by rewriting and reworking key pages to get better ranking.

Thx for the tip!

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1814307].message }}

Jared Alberghini

14 years ago

Originally Posted by Why9999

How can you fly under their radar?

- snip -

The reason I ask is that the Google forum guys were VERY hostile to me when I used to ask questions there.

Can you see why they might have treated you this way? :rolleyes:

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

P.S.

Join The Future: Telekinetic Marketing

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736521].message }}

Why9999

14 years ago

Originally Posted by Jared Alberghini

Can you see why they might have treated you this way? :rolleyes:

I understand what you're saying, but I work VERY hard on my site. My site has ten times more scientific studies than any other blog I have ever seen and I have many top level scientists actually following it and I'm not a content scraper in any way shape or form.

I just meant that if you have an IRS agent auditing you or a cop following you, nothing good is going to come out of it...

Or am I looking at it wrong?

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736536].message }}

Jared Alberghini 14 years ago

Originally Posted by Why9999

I just meant that if you have an IRS agent auditing you or a cop following you, nothing good is going to come out of it...

Or am I looking at it wrong?

If you have paid your taxes, and you are doing the speed limit,
why on earth would anything bad come out of it?

.jrd
- Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature

P.S.

Join The Future: Telekinetic Marketing
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736581].message }}
- Why9999 14 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Jared Alberghini
  
  If you have paid your taxes, and you are doing the speed limit,
  why on earth would anything bad come out of it?
  
  .jrd
  
  I know you're right deep in my heart, but I've been PR0 for so long that I have become bitter and cynical. All right - it's time to let that go...
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1737141].message }}

MissTerraK

14 years ago

Originally Posted by Why9999

I understand what you're saying, but I work VERY hard on my site. My site has ten times more scientific studies than any other blog I have ever seen and I have many top level scientists actually following it and I'm not a content scraper in any way shape or form.

I just meant that if you have an IRS agent auditing you or a cop following you, nothing good is going to come out of it...

Or am I looking at it wrong?

Well, in my opinion, stating that you want to fly under the radar, then stating nothing good comes of it if the "cops", a derogatory reference to police officers, are following you, leads me to believe that you are the type that will push the rules, laws, and morality to the limits.

My mental picture of you is speeding down the expressway with a radar detector on your dash, looking in the rear-view mirror, seeing a police car coming up behind you, and you desperately trying to pull the detector off and hide it under your seat.

Now, this may or may not be true, I have no way of knowing as I do not know you.

However, the best advice I can give you, is to be careful of the words you choose when asking questions or posting comments, because whether you like it or not you are sending out messages.

You've heard of first impressions, I presume...

MissTerraK

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736646].message }}

Why9999

14 years ago

Originally Posted by MissTerraK

Well, in my opinion, stating that you want to fly under the radar, then stating nothing good comes of it if the "cops", a derogatory reference to police officers, are following you, leads me to believe that you are the type that will push the rules, laws, and morality to the limits.

My mental picture of you is speeding down the expressway with a radar detector on your dash, looking in the rear-view mirror, seeing a police car coming up behind you, and you desperately trying to pull the detector off and hide it under your seat.

Now, this may or may not be true, I have no way of knowing as I do not know you.

However, the best advice I can give you, is to be careful of the words you choose when asking questions or posting comments, because whether you like it or not you are sending out messages.

You've heard of first impressions, I presume...

MissTerraK

Actually, I really don't want to push the rules. What I love to do is to write and write good content. Unfortunately, after writing and writing and writing and getting thank you letters from my readers and getting a PR6 Twitter site, etc., I have become very jaded and cynical toward Google. To be honest I feel that no matter how hard how I try, they penalize me and, for better or worse, it comes across sometimes in my posts.

I have spent 100's and 100's of hours producing great material, researching, reading studies, honing my writing skills, etc. and all Google has given me is three pages. That's right - almost all my Google traffic comes in on three pages.

My Twitter followers love many, many of my pages based on the retweets I get, but Google will have nothing to do with all of them but three.

Anyway, that's how I feel and I'm sorry if it comes across in my posts - I didn't even realize it actually. I kind of thought everybody thought the same way...

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1737161].message }}

MissTerraK

14 years ago

Originally Posted by Why9999

Actually, I really don't want to push the rules. What I love to do is to write and write good content. Unfortunately, after writing and writing and writing and getting thank you letters from my readers and getting a PR6 Twitter site, etc., I have become very jaded and cynical toward Google. To be honest I feel that no matter how hard how I try, they penalize me and, for better or worse, it comes across sometimes in my posts.

I have spent 100's and 100's of hours producing great material, researching, reading studies, honing my writing skills, etc. and all Google has given me is three pages. That's right - almost all my Google traffic comes in on three pages.

My Twitter followers love many, many of my pages based on the retweets I get, but Google will have nothing to do with all of them but three.

Anyway, that's how I feel and I'm sorry if it comes across in my posts - I didn't even realize it actually. I kind of thought everybody thought the same way...

Thank you for your honesty! I really appreciate it and am elated to discover that writing is what you really love to do!

As that is the thing I really love to do also...well, right up there with talking, having fun, and laughing...even at myself!

I know that things can become frustrating in this industry as well, and I can understand your pain, yes, I said pain, because I feel that your anger and frustration are coming from pain, the pain that's been caused by, shall we say, rejection of your love...writing.

Will you do a personal favor for me? I'm asking because I honestly can relate to your pain, and want to offer you the only help that I can in this situation.

Will you please take a big breath? Hold it, hold it, slowly exhale...now smile!

Don't you just feel a little better?

MissTerraK

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1740849].message }}

Daniel Brock 14 years ago

Originally Posted by MissTerraK

then stating nothing good comes of it if the "cops", a derogatory reference to police officers

That's their own fault for working with a hit TV show called COPS....
- [ 2 ] Thanks
Signature

Clickbank #1 Best Seller: The Deadbeat Super Affiliate.
Click here to learn how to make money online in your bath robe and gym socks!
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1741003].message }}

Dennis Gaskill

14 years ago

Google doesn't penalize sites for its incoming links because webmasters have no control over who links to them. That's a paraphrase from Google's Matt Cutts. If they suspect link spamming, they may not give a site full credit for the questionable links, but that's different from being penalized.

Too many people think they need gimmicks to trick the search engines into giving a site a better ranking than it deserves. The best way to get high rankings is to give the search engines what they want. I've proved this to myself and others over and over.

Thanks

Signature

Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1736645].message }}

Kurt

14 years ago

My guess is that Google and the other engines don't care too much about sites in their index. What they most likely care about is the actual SERPs for given keywords.

I base this on having built my own search engines over the years. I really don't care too much about what I have in my databases as much as I care about the actual search results.

And even then, I follow the 80/20 rule and spend my attention on the results produced by the top searches made by visitors. If I do this well, then 98% of my users get top qualtiy results, and that's really all I care about.

Not saying they do, but I see no reason why the major engines wouldn't work the same way...

Let me add, these comments only apply to having actual humans review results. Using algos to value links and content can be applied to all sites in the index.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1737345].message }}

Why9999 14 years ago

I heard that Matt Cutt was head of a spamdexing team and these guys oversee much of the net. Some other people have said that some large corporate sites that should be PR8 are PR5 because they got downgraded, etc., etc.

Sound right?
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1737796].message }}

Dennis Gaskill

14 years ago

Why9999 - pm me your web address so I can have a look at it for you.

Thanks

Signature

Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1737787].message }}

SpamDexing 101

Trending Topics

Google Ads, landing pages, and Clickbank links

Carry out better target audience research

YouTube gets shopping display tools and affiliate partnership updates

Membership area with multiple income streams

A Very Strange Internet Problem