Can link building have a negative affect on your ranking?

4 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I posted this as a comment in another thread but it comes up so much I thought I'd start a discussion on it that we can refer people to in future.

This is just my take. I encourage everyone to add their own thoughts and experiences but please try to have some evidence to back it up where possible

---

On the subject of manipulative link building not being detrimental I think everyone is seeing it from too extreme a point of view when the "truth" (ok, my observations) sit somewhere in the middle.

First of all, let's deal with a big link building myth straight out of the gate. "Manipulative link building can't hurt my site because then I could just derank all my competitors"

GiftCertificates.com was pipped for the number 1 spot by FindGiftCards.com because the latter owned and operated 123counters.com, a free stat counter that handily provided a link back to FGC.com. This scam was outed by Stephan Spencer (founder and president of Netconcepts) and Google swiftly dealt with it to restore order.

Full details here -

Analyzing Competitors' Search Engine Optimization

That article was originally published in 2004 but it was reprinted almost word for word in the recent SEO book "The Art of SEO" because it's as relevant today as it's always been.

Google absolutely do not want you manipulating their search results and have to take action against stuff like this to send a message to everyone involved. "Don't do it"

So there, unequivocal evidence that manipulative tactics can and will get you busted down the rankings ... in some situations.

Matt Cutts' job is to weed out SE spam and manipulation, so of course he's going to tell you that the Google spider is the smartest thing on the planet and to give up before you try .... strangely that doesn't stop a lot of people doing really well with it.

So wait a minute Andy, what you're saying is that manipulative tactics work but they also don't work ... what gives?

My point is that, in highly competitive SERPs, that are widely monitored and receive a lot of attention, direct manipulation isn't going to work. But if you want to do some link blasts to get ranked for "blue widget product redball factory cat" then no, no one is going to care.

So where's the cut off line?

The line is somewhere between where it's profitable for you to do it and where it's profitable for Google to stop you. And that line moves in Google's favour everyday.

So work out what your goal is. If you want to rank this site now (and that's often very desirable) and you are doing so in the long tail, you're going to be alright for a fair while to come.

If you are doing long term corporate SEO then you better make sure the main efforts you put in are above board, Google endorsed tactics and save the spammy stuff for related sites that it won't hurt you if they get canned. A good example being setting up a number of long tail niche blogs to work alongside your client's main website. The main website remains untouchable with long term strategy involved. The niche blogs receive get ranked fast tactics to deliver results quickly and effectively.
#affect #building #link #negative #ranking
  • Profile picture of the author Ads
    very nice post, bookmarking this for later. I didn't realize google would fix a ranking, so what if they included a link back with their tool, I know of many free scripts that do just this and link to multiple other sites besides themselves. What if FGC was sponsoring 123counters or something along those lines. I guess this is a good heads up for folks not to be too tricky or sneaky.

    I think your writeup is decent and cannot wait to view other opinions. Long live long tail!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2031629].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author usearchme2
      Hi there

      I agree with some of your thinking here, and also I read your article you posted which made some good points.

      I agree with your statement below too and I have never met anyone who can for CERTAIN say their backlinks has hurt their site either. I do have a special interest in people who get banned and penalised as well as it always amazes me what tactics people will try lol.

      "First of all, let's deal with a big link building myth straight out of the gate. "Manipulative link building can't hurt my site because then I could just derank all my competitors""

      The above statement is such a strong statement there really is little argument about backlinks hurting your site after reading that.

      I think Google have changed their tactics when dealing with backlinks, and tend to de value some websites that have lots of spamming websites on it.

      For example I have some forums on one of my sites and when i set it up i didnt have any filtering onit, loads of viagra crappy sites started registering etc puttin their urls on profiles etc, eventually my whole site was pr zeroed and I plummeted down Search engines, I really didnt know any better then, until I was advised to clean the site up.

      So basically I was held responsible for the links that appeared on my website, I was very annoyed at first when this happened, but now thinking back it was my own fault for letting the viagra idiots register and put their link all over their profile. I cleaned my site up and it returned back into the search engines fine.

      When I first started in SEO over 5 years ago, I did some incredibly dodgy tactics and link building which I wouldnt dream of doing now, but I was never once penalised or banned like some people claim.


      So I fully expect the myths to keep circulating and people to contine the battle with Google to try to find good cheap ways to manipulate the search engines.

      Woc
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2031744].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
    Andy an informative post as usual and you are one of the good guys. two problems though

    Originally Posted by Andy Fletcher View Post

    I

    My point is that, in highly competitive SERPs, that are widely monitored and receive a lot of attention, direct manipulation isn't going to work. But if you want to do some link blasts to get ranked for "blue widget product redball factory cat" then no, no one is going to care.
    Don't agree. Because We know of a big name case where they were busted doesn't mean their isn't an algorithm in place to catch it on other levels as imperfect as they might be. I thnk Google will always care . Perhaps you meant that in another way.

    Second there is no good reason to do a link blast for a a longtail with low competition. It doesn't require it and its only putting you at risk. If we do good keyword research, followed by competitive analysis and a real check of real traffic its totally unnecessary to mass link it. The whole idea of that is to be able to rank for a term with relatively few backlinks.

    Thanks for your input. Always appreciated and always good stuff.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2031840].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Andy Fletcher
      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

      Andy an informative post as usual and you are one of the good guys. two problems though

      Don't agree. Because We know of a big name case where they were busted doesn't mean their isn't an algorithm in place to catch it on other levels as imperfect as they might be. I thnk Google will always care . Perhaps you meant that in another way.
      I obviously wasn't 100% clear as I was trying to say what you just said

      Google definitely have some level of automated spam detection, although it's not great at the moment. *And* it's backed by a manual review team which will definitely spot manipulative behaviour.

      Second there is no good reason to do a link blast for a a longtail with low competition. It doesn't require it and its only putting you at risk. If we do good keyword research, followed by competitive analysis and a real check of real traffic its totally unnecessary to mass link it. The whole idea of that is to be able to rank for a term with relatively few backlinks.

      Thanks for your input. Always appreciated and always good stuff.
      I really should be more careful what I say. Today alone I've made no less than three posts that make me appear to be a spammer

      You're right. There definitely is no reason to use a link blast and rather than saying that no one is going to care I should at least point out there really are better ways.

      Moral of the story. For long term success don't have a business model that can be summarised as, "I will be smarter than Google"!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2031873].message }}

Trending Topics