Underscores or hyphens

15 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I found this page -- Dashes vs. underscores

Darn, I have been using underscores! Should I change my pages? Then I read the comments below that five year old post. Are underscores okay, what is the word on this?
#hyphens #underscores
  • Profile picture of the author bigcat1967
    I would put dashes. I've always done that - and it seems to have helped.
    Signature

    <a href="https://changeyourbudget.com/save-money-on-your-water-bill/">How to Lower Your Water Bill</a>

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2213639].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      You have to understand why, the whole reasoning.
      The _ may look look like one term.

      But please notice the warning on dashes as well.

      Dashes are what I use all the time. I never run my words
      together, unless they are unique words that one would
      never run together. In other words, if you want to
      say "to pass" it is much better to put "to-pass" rather
      than "topass."

      So, the warning for underlines I believe is the same for
      not using dashes. If something can be construed as the
      wrong word, one word, or a mumble of words, better to
      use dashes to separate and define exactly what you want.

      Also Matt Cutts (and google) are VERY big on a visitor
      experience. What does a visitor think to_pass would
      mean? If a visitor has to guess, so will google. Worse,
      google may not guess.

      Thanks for sharing it!

      That's a pretty good Matt Cutts post and I can't imagine why
      people do not read Matt Cutts blog, and the google webmaster
      blog. Ahh...but then the WF in this section would be dull.

      I take that back. A lot of people don't believe Matt Cutts or
      google, regardless. There's no way they can be perfect, but
      I'll settle for 99% overall spot on info.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2213703].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Wi
        I'm using both...

        Both with success
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2213745].message }}
  • dashes are the best because of the way search engines read domains
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2216602].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Talar
      Originally Posted by webpromoterservice View Post

      dashes are the best because of the way search engines read domains
      Regardless of what Matt says or what we think Google wants ... why have a URL ... you want people to eventually click on it for some reason, no?

      Ever notice how an URL with an underscore character bends right in to the standard HTML underline for a URL? Why go through the expense of buying a URL, building something on it, intentionally making it hard for users to reach?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2219468].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CliveG
    Always take note what Matt says, but take into account that the article is nearly 5 years old now!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2216829].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Wi
      Originally Posted by CliveG View Post

      Always take note what Matt says, but take into account that the article is nearly 5 years old now!
      +1

      I think that google is reading both very well! Although I was making some searches when I read this thread, and I saw that most are using dashes, if not all!

      I think that I'm going to make test with this to see which ranks better, and I have some ideas on how to do this, because it's rather interesting.

      Maybe I should even test it x3 like:

      1. Keyword1_keyword_2_keyword3
      2. Keyword1-keyword-2_keyword3
      3. Keyword1keyword2_keyword3

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2216835].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author livemusic
      Originally Posted by CliveG View Post

      Always take note what Matt says, but take into account that the article is nearly 5 years old now!
      Note what I said in my OP...

      Darn, I have been using underscores! Should I change my pages? Then I read the comments below that five year old post. Are underscores okay, what is the word on this?

      Then people comment about this and that without reading the comments. My point is, whatever Matt said five years ago, does it still apply? The comments seems to indicate that it does NOT. And I was hoping for input from the Warrior community.

      Again, I am concerned about having used underscores... should I change them or not.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2216967].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chaim18
    Very long time back I read an article that says search engine considers - as space and _ are simply ignore i.e.:

    seo-services.html = seo services
    seo_services = seoservices

    But I am not pretty sure if same things goes true now, may search engine algorithms consider both as same now.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2218409].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rbyrd1157
    This is an interesting discussion. Being relatively new to this I would have never thought too much about this issue. I would have probably used dashes like I would when creating a squidoo lens. But I never really thought that Google might like one option over the other.

    Paul: You make an interesting point about how Goolge views the domain name. Again, something I have not put much thought into but I definitely will now because I don't want to be a "topass".

    - Rick
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2218416].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pube12
    Both are working for me... I kinda prefer dashes but no big difference.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2218833].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Hocking
      I use dashes but there is little difference in terms of SEO.

      Google can read your keywords smashed together, with hyphens or underscores.

      It is more about how it looks to you. In the url, the underscore seems to disappear which can make it more readible but can also make people think they are spaces if coping the link by hand.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2219093].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Domainate
    I would still use dashes instead of underscores because honestly, there's never been any report I've ever seen that says underscores are BETTER than dashes...they're either equal or worse, so may as well not take the risk that whether at Google or elsewhere they are treated worse than dashes.

    Underscores in general online seem to be more of a 10+ year ago major usage vs. current.
    Signature
    ===> COMING SOON: The Ultimate Guide to Finding the Perfect Domain. ***PM for details***
    Want to make a living with domains? Domain Boot Camp Online coming soon!
    Join the Doma.in Newsletter for special domain sales and free domain training!
    >> Have a list? Deliver more through our Listcast service or clean it to please your autoresponder with ELC.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2219390].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Gail Grannum
    I have chosen dashes on two of my sites because I believe it is preferable. Good luck with your decision.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2219435].message }}

Trending Topics