Backlink confusion
- SEO |
I am having some confusion about backlinks.
I have read someone say that you could get a blank web site to #1 in Giggle if you had enough backlinks. Well I am sure that was just an exageration but I am still confused.
I am going to use Angela as an example. Everyone knows she specializes in backlinks and all this info is public in her WSO ad. Besides, she is one of the best (most recommended) for backlinks so I doubt she'll care.
In her ad her on WF she says that she's #1 for her name Angela. I giggled it today and she is actually #2 right now.
Anyway I fired up SEOQuake the backlink numbers kind of surprised me.
SEOQ shows her site, #2 position, as being a PR 4 with 2,061 backlinks. Rank is 19546.
The first position has a PR 4 with only 176 links. The rank is 977781.
The 5th position is held by Wikipedia. It has a PR 6 with 4,013 backilnks. The rank is 6.
There is one PR 7 page with just over 37,000 backlinks on page one at #9.
Now I understand that some backilnks do not show even after giggle sees them. I also understand that there are different qualities of backlinks. But can Angela have that many more backlinks, or that much better, than Wikipedia?
Just by shear numbers shouldn't Wikipedia or the site that is currently at #9 be #1?
Thanks in advance for your opinions.
Steve
Portfolio and Samples
marketing online for offline businesses
http://www.Facebook.com/ColumbusLocalMarketing
www.TerryPower.com