9 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
9 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

can i make a site by spinning content from other sites

by nest28
8 replies
  • SEO
    • |
i was just wonder if i were to take content from another site and spin it to 80% uniqueness would google catch this, reason i ask is because building a large site would take a lot of money as far as buying content so i thought hey what if i spin content from wikipedia, a large site could be build in a matter of couple weeks if such a thing is possible, although i must admit from a moral stand point i don't think i would do such a thing because i wouldn't want someone stealing my content, but just wondering is it possible.
#content #make #site #sites #spinning
  • Profile picture of the author webriches
    NO I WOULDNT DO THAT!

    I would use PLR article you can do what ever you want with them. I could give you a link but I'm new here. And free for now. I would just type in PLR Article And spin them in your own word works great.

    I sometimes use Word Flood. You can get it free. Its not as fast but, i can use my own words better than with some of the other ones out there, Also they have content you can use and change as-well. Hope this helps a little.

    To Your Success
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2979160].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nest28
      lol i figured this was a bad idea plus i would rather have original content on my sites anyway, but thanx for the heads up on the plr articles i will use/spin them for article marketing
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2979227].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Devid Farah
        Agreed, this is a very bad idea. Not only is it rude to the original writer (and sometimes illegal, depending on the copyrights on the work written), but it will not give you a good reputation, and thus eventually you won't make as much money.
        Go with your own unique material or at least pay for material.
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2979801].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author nest28
          Originally Posted by Devid farah View Post

          Agreed, this is a very bad idea. Not only is it rude to the original writer (and sometimes illegal, depending on the copyrights on the work written), but it will not give you a good reputation, and thus eventually you won't make as much money.
          Go with your own unique material or at least pay for material.

          yea i'm not a bad guy i was just trying to save money but i would never use such tactics against other webmasters, seems like it was blackhat thing to try sorry i ever brought up the subject.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2979830].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nest28
    bluefart lol...i don't remember typing that i meant blackhat
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2979861].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author va_mom
    try plr, there some free ones out there and you can also buy a pack of 20s or so for only a few dollars.
    Signature

    Need an SEO Virtual Assistant?

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2980263].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      What you propose to to do, is what a lot of us do.

      It's called doing a little research.

      Do you really think you need to reinvent the wheel, or have something
      earth shattering to say about, let's say, student loans? That hasn't
      been said before? In some way or another?

      You get some ideas, spin it, add your flavor.

      How many blogs do you think there are that just re-do google's official blogs?
      Okay, many add a link, but many don't. Many SEO gurus do nothing but spin
      others stuff.

      In fact, here's how silly I get. I take an article I've written from spun content,
      then spin it again for a blog post. And when I'm short on ideas, I'll spin it thrice.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2980330].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dburk
    Hi nest28,

    Wait... Before you listen to folks on this thread that may be giving you partially incorrect information, take a look at the Creative Commons License that Wikipedia uses:

    You are free:
    to Share--to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and
    to Remix--to adapt the work
    Under the following conditions:
    Attribution--You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work.)
    Share Alike--If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license.
    With the understanding that:
    Waiver--Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
    Other Rights--In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license:
    your fair dealing or fair use rights;
    the author's moral rights; and
    rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, such as publicity or privacy rights.
    Notice--For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do that is with a link to Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
    Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Signature

    * Get Results - Outsource Your PPC Management |
    *     Don Burk Advertising & Marketing - www.donburk.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2980485].message }}

Trending Topics