More pressure from G00gle to weed out low quality sites

8 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I just saw the news today about g00gle making some huge changes in its algorithm to focus on quality content to rank sites in srps.

read more here:
Google Tweaks Search To Punish 'Low-Quality' Sites : NPR
#g00gle #low #low quality #pressure #quality #sites #weed
  • Profile picture of the author lukyjoe
    I'm not worried, I'm glad its happening.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3432721].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hdcayse
    Michelle MacPhearson made a post on her blog on this subject. She cited an interview that Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land had with Bing and the Big G. There were a lot of interesting points, but the main one was that one indicator of what is good web content is whether or not people are sharing it with social media like Twitter and Facebook Pages.

    Also, the more influential you are, determined in part by the number of people that follow you on Twitter, the more weight your Tweets have.

    The blog post is at Massive SEO & Social Media Changes Ahead! on Michelle MacPhearson

    I think the original interview is at searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3432791].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by hdcayse View Post

      Michelle MacPhearson made a post on her blog on this subject. She cited an interview that Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land had with Bing and the Big G. There were a lot of interesting points, but the main one was that one indicator of what is good web content is whether or not people are sharing it with social media like Twitter and Facebook Pages.

      Also, the more influential you are, determined in part by the number of people that follow you on Twitter, the more weight your Tweets have.

      The blog post is at Massive SEO & Social Media Changes Ahead! on Michelle MacPhearson

      I think the original interview is at searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389

      Ol', Danny should be be standing in line at Glamour Shots about now, need to look pretty for that seo hall of shame photo op. :rolleyes:

      Amazing what you can acomplish with a fake WSJ article.

      http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...gle-story.html
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3432858].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author drd1812
      IMHO, social networks may be a part of the formula, but definitely not the dominant one.

      would hate to see serps like "breast cancer" or "heart disease shunt treatment" go to some page just because asswipe managed to make a fan page on twitter...

      I think (and I stress it!!!), concept is ridiculous. IMHO social crapworks may be conceived a part of a weight in serp ranking in case when major other relative or same keywords sites also have social crap bookmarked, bot-twitted and alike... just would not be fair.

      heck, mebbe I'm just too old fashioned and there is no thing like moral dilemma in IM...
      or mebbe its just my time to go flip burgers and I'm again too old for this.
      Signature
      https://se.marketing - Performance Driven Approach To Google Ads Campaign Management That Increases Conversions & Sales!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3432888].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
    Forget about the search engines and how they MAY or MAY NOT view or calculate social media. Why on EARTH would you not include social networks in part of your marketing plan anyway? That is just stupid in my opinion. Every concept, topic, or niche, can gain exposure through social outlets.

    This update, made me happy. It made me happy reading it, and it made me happy to see that ALL sites I run and manage, had a nice little jump in the SERPS. Some, jumped over 80-90 spots.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3432899].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    SEO is still all about keywords, nothing changes...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3432944].message }}

Trending Topics