How Can We Use Tools Like "Magic Submitter" & "Senuke" Safely With Google New Update

17 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I just started using the trial version of magic submitter which is similar
to senuke.

Whats some safe ways to use this software for a site that's two months old
& a wordpress blog to keep from getting sandboxed with Googles.

Like how many profiles can we safely create with a new domain name bookmarking,
submitting articles, posting to web 2.0 sites per profile etc.

Here's some of the modules that it has.

Profiles Maker, Bookmarking,Video Site,Photo Sites,Micro Blogs
Press Release,RSS Feeds,PDF Sharing,Article Directories.
#google #magic #magic submitter #safely #senuke #submitter #tools #update
  • Profile picture of the author jimbowman
    Use this software to build web 2.0 pages that link to your site. Build these slowly, and not many of them - a few a day, at most.

    However, you can build backlinks to the web 2.0 pages much faster, as they have a lot of "trust rank" (i.e. Google is not likely to be suspicious of these pages). You can build profile links, article links, etc. I like to blast them with article marketing robot, as this can send thousands of links to the web 2.0 properties, which then pass forward the link juice.

    Also, use long tail keywords in the articles and 2.0 properties, every page that you create has a chance of creating some additional traffic.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3650117].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author meakerseeker
      Also when building backlinks to the web 2.0 sites there's no chance
      of our main site going down.

      So when you said we can build profile links, article links, etc are you
      still talking about web 2.0 sites and going slow with building them or
      are you talking about sites like they like facebook blogger etc.


      Originally Posted by jimbowman View Post

      Use this software to build web 2.0 pages that link to your site. Build these slowly, and not many of them - a few a day, at most.

      However, you can build backlinks to the web 2.0 pages much faster, as they have a lot of "trust rank" (i.e. Google is not likely to be suspicious of these pages). You can build profile links, article links, etc. I like to blast them with article marketing robot, as this can send thousands of links to the web 2.0 properties, which then pass forward the link juice.

      Also, use long tail keywords in the articles and 2.0 properties, every page that you create has a chance of creating some additional traffic.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3650213].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jimbowman
    The profile links are from forums. The article links are from article directories.

    You should build the web 2.0 links slowly to your own site. But, you can boost these web 2.0 pages quickly, because they have trust rank.

    If you built 200 new links overnight to a brand new site, it could get sandboxed.

    If you build 200 links overnight to a web 2.0 site, it will almost certainly be ok, and will get a nice boost from the links. And it will pass more link juice.

    Not all links are the same. Links from popular pages count for more. By boosting the pages that link to your main site, you make them more valuable.

    Articles and profiles are great for this, because they can both be automated really easily.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3661592].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kysersoze
    I just canceled my subscription to MagicSubmitter, was happy with it for a while (ex SENUKE user) but going with SENuke X, the scheduling aspect of it makes it easier to automate the link building process. Easier to set up a campaign that builds a few links every day instead of blasting it all on one day.

    The biggest mistake most users of these type of software make is that they are not committed to the actual work it takes to do it properly. Blasting all the modules on the same day is a big no no in my opinion especially for small sites that get very little traffic. People are lazy and don't want to login every day to MagicSubmitter for example and do a few links daily, it's juts easier to blast them in one shot.

    I think SENuke has nipped that in the butt, gonna rejoin just looking for the best bonus.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3662145].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author xsalvador
      Originally Posted by Kysersoze View Post

      I just canceled my subscription to MagicSubmitter, was happy with it for a while (ex SENUKE user) but going with SENuke X, the scheduling aspect of it makes it easier to automate the link building process. Easier to set up a campaign that builds a few links every day instead of blasting it all on one day.

      The biggest mistake most users of these type of software make is that they are not committed to the actual work it takes to do it properly. Blasting all the modules on the same day is a big no no in my opinion especially for small sites that get very little traffic. People are lazy and don't want to login every day to MagicSubmitter for example and do a few links daily, it's juts easier to blast them in one shot.

      I think SENuke has nipped that in the butt, gonna rejoin just looking for the best bonus.
      I realize this thread is 5 months old, but you should check out MS again and compare it now to senuke x; for all the research I've done it seems MS would be second to none. I'm using the scheduler and it's really good; would be interested in your opinion if you went back to senuke x.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4765761].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author gregoryburrus
        Originally Posted by xsalvador View Post

        I realize this thread is 5 months old, but you should check out MS again and compare it now to senuke x; for all the research I've done it seems MS would be second to none. I'm using the scheduler and it's really good; would be interested in your opinion if you went back to senuke x.
        Yeah I would have to agree - I just tried the trial and I have to say I am major league impressed with the new features scheduling included and at half the price oif Sneukex. I still think the lack of really great documentation and it still has an old look but the functionality is truly awesome. It works as advertise from what I can see so far. After my trial month is up I will say more on my blog, especially if I decide to continue. Wish me luck.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4806424].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author xsalvador
          Originally Posted by gregoryburrus View Post

          Yeah I would have to agree - I just tried the trial and I have to say I am major league impressed with the new features scheduling included and at half the price oif Sneukex. I still think the lack of really great documentation and it still has an old look but the functionality is truly awesome. It works as advertise from what I can see so far. After my trial month is up I will say more on my blog, especially if I decide to continue. Wish me luck.
          That's awesome man, I have a feeling you will stay with it for quite some time; I just passed the trial! The documentation is actually incredibly thorough, they have an ebook and hours(I do mean hours) of video going through just about everything. I'm still getting the hang of it, but the Designer function alone is worth the monthly price; let me know what you think or look for me on the MS forum(I have the same name).
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4828779].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by Kysersoze View Post

      I just canceled my subscription to MagicSubmitter, was happy with it for a while (ex SENUKE user) but going with SENuke X, the scheduling aspect of it makes it easier to automate the link building process. Easier to set up a campaign that builds a few links every day instead of blasting it all on one day.
      I will never understand why people make a big deal out of a scheduler. Windows has one built in and there are automation tools that are one off payments for less than a hundred dollars that can automate almost any process. Even before MS updated I would never switch back to a product costing nearly a hundred dollars per month more for that reason. I'd just buy a simple to use macro tool.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4808614].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Oneal Degrassi
    Hmmm - it just doesn't feel right to me. I know that you could do it all manually and it would be considered completely white hat...but it just doesn't feel right. Like Google is waiting in the wings to slap anyone who suddenly has a bunch of links from the sites SENX utilizes. Don't think they're not first in line to snatch up a license either. Just sayin'
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3662375].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author retsek
    You guys need to get a grip of yourselves.

    1. Google is not going ban or sandbox a site if it gets 200 links over night. If that were true, I'd xrummer blast all my competitors and waltz my way to no.1 everytime.

    2. When you are building links, especially forum profile links, very few of them get indexed or crawled. If left after a few months, you'll find no more than 10% indexed from a 200 profile blast.

    It is safe to build 200 or more in a one day, and then slowly ping them or use a service like lickicious to schedule when they are feed to the GoogleBot.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3662552].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author URbanWorld
      Originally Posted by retsek View Post

      You guys need to get a grip of yourselves.

      1. Google is not going ban or sandbox a site if it gets 200 links over night. If that were true, I'd xrummer blast all my competitors and waltz my way to no.1 everytime.

      2. When you are building links, especially forum profile links, very few of them get indexed or crawled. If left after a few months, you'll find no more than 10% indexed from a 200 profile blast.

      It is safe to build 200 or more in a one day, and then slowly ping them or use a service like lickicious to schedule when they are feed to the GoogleBot.
      I completely agree with what retsek says above. With that said even though 200 links overnight won't hurt you, I doubt they will help much unless they are established page ranked sites and do follow links. If Google sees you have 200 higher page ranking sites linking back to your site you are bound to obtain a higher ranking.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3662650].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author celente
      Originally Posted by retsek View Post

      You guys need to get a grip of yourselves.



      2. When you are building links, especially forum profile links, very few of them get indexed or crawled. If left after a few months, you'll find no more than 10% indexed from a 200 profile blast.
      I had a 1000 blaster job done and half of them did get indexed...so just be careful. Just saying
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3662783].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author URbanWorld
        Originally Posted by celente View Post

        I had a 1000 blaster job done and half of them did get indexed...so just be careful. Just saying
        True, I guess it depends on the quality of profiles. I had a blast done for one of my sites. The profiles it was sent to seemed to be mostly from China and ultimately many didn't get indexed or help my site in the slightest bit.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3662982].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author meakerseeker
        I'll blast the article & web 2.0 profiles & build links slowly to
        my main url from relevant high page rank sites.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3663019].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author anwar001
    My suggestion is this - write really high quality articles which teach at least something useful to the readers and not waste their time. It would be better if you can write about specific and narrow topics as your articles would be much more focused then. Think of tutorial type of articles. Link directly to your main sites from these articles.

    Submit these articles to top article sites, web 2.0 sites, turn them into pdf's and submit to pdf sharing sites. Social bookmark these articles. Submit the same article to top blog networks. If your articles are really good quality then you don't need to worry too much about building lots of links directly to your main sites.
    Signature
    Get Hundreds of Super Targeted Traffic in Any Niche from Facebook - 3 Step Organic FB Marketing

    25 Guidelines For Massive Affiliate Success - Whether you are a beginner or an expert, read these principles and refer back to them many times
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3931678].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author trentonlaura
    I like Magic Submitter but I think that when it updated this last time it erased my preference to use Proxies. Long story short I was building lots of links using my IP address and I got a call from my Internet Provider saying that they noticed a lot of forum posting and such being done from my IP address.

    Does anyone else have experience with this/is this likely related to the fact that when I checked MS I saw that it was NOT using proxies as I initially set it up to do (as obvious a question as that probably is)?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5379634].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Schofield5
    Hey,

    I am new so please be patient with me. I am using Backlink Indexer to help juice my articles (no videos yet) is there any reason I should be considering Magic Submitter at this point?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5468198].message }}

Trending Topics