10 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Over a month ago we introduced an algorithmic improvement designed to help people
find more high-quality sites in search. Since then we've gotten a lot of positive responses about the change: searchers are finding better results, and many great publishers are getting more traffic.

Today we've rolled out this improvement globally to all English-language Google users, and we've also incorporated new user feedback signals to help people find better search results. In some high-confidence situations, we are beginning to incorporate data about the sites that users block into our algorithms. In addition, this change also goes deeper into the "long tail" of low-quality websites to return higher-quality results where the algorithm might not have been able to make an assessment before. The impact of these new signals is smaller in scope than the original change: about 2% of U.S. queries are affected by a reasonable amount, compared with almost 12% of U.S. queries for the original change.

Based on our testing, we've found the algorithm is very accurate at detecting site quality. If you believe your site is high-quality and has been impacted by this change, we encourage you to evaluate the different aspects of your site extensively. Google's quality guidelines provide helpful information about how to improve your site. As sites change, our algorithmic rankings will update to reflect that. In addition, you're welcome to post in our Webmaster Help Forums. While we aren't making any manual exceptions, we will consider this feedback as we continue to refine our algorithms.

We will continue testing and refining the change before expanding to additional languages, and we'll be sure to post an update when we have more to share.

Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: High-quality sites algorithm goes global, incorporates user feedback
#google #panda #update
  • Profile picture of the author calfred
    Thanks for the update Mike.

    Till today, I still get reminded of Aaron Wall's (from SEObook.com) advice about thinking of a website as a company and that the social factor always trumps the mechanical SEO counterpart.
    Signature

    Please do not use affiliate links in signatures

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3688793].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author gittar1122
    Long tail keywords also on target by Google this time. Most of poor quality content sites went down as a result of this update.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3688814].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nakmuay7
    the majority of sites that have been slammed by google have been very low value content farms which ahve little or no value.

    the changes have also helped sites owned by google rank better, i.e ehow so now most articles on ehow will outrank those on ezinearticles and other directories.
    Signature
    FREE Google Panda Exterminator ebook
    How to beat the New Google Algorithm, Get out of a Penalty and Build as many links to a new site as you like. 100% Free to all Warrior Forum Users! Dont buy any other WSO's till you have read this ebook today!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3697832].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HorseStall
    I agree. I liked the Panda update sites that have been "following the rules" seem to weather the update just fine.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3698487].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
    This update only effected folks trying to rank crumby content sites. We have had 350 page one rankings come in for Warriors since the update. So I guess our system is fine. But the panic caused by folks worrying about the update was actually quite humourous. There is so much disinformation rolling around on the web today most of which comes from the Big G themselves.
    Signature

    Free Training for SEO Providers in the United States - https://happyseoclients.com/happy-seo-clients-training/

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3698512].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JamesPenn
    My Google traffic went up 50% from the 10th to the 11th for one of my health niche blogs. And then jumped again by 25% yesterday (12th April).

    Perhaps this is why?

    James
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3698516].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rising_sun
    Banned
    Thanks MIKE for sharing this information. Really this is useful post. Google panda is like algorithm.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3699276].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Katejon
    I haven't got a crappy content site (it's e-commerce) and I've been hit. Today I deeply analysed these more recent sites above me for my keywords, and there are even some which are new and got no PR, no Moz rank and virtually no links, poor titles etc etc.

    This is strange to put it mildly.

    I do have some backlinks from syndicated content - which I wrote - but that was of course outside of my control.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3699609].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Gaston Wolf
    Thanks for the update, my rankings have been pretty consistent. Mostly because I have decent content on my websites.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3699650].message }}

Trending Topics